The Political Economy Of Sinhala Chauvinism

Filed under: Colombo Telegraph,MORE OPINION |

13 Responses to The Political Economy Of Sinhala Chauvinism

  1. Thanks for this Ajith. Please translate and publish in Sinhala for the Sinhalay Modaya..
    We so need political economic analysis.. since the current generation of economists in Lanka, except for a handful, are sorry practitioners of the dismal science, sold on neoliberal analysis without conscience..
    As the economic crisis and debt worsens the Rajapassa brothers are looking for SCAPEGOATS and the Muslims are the new scapegoat, now that the Tamils have been smashed and neutralized. The name of the game of the Sinhala politicians, following their colonial masters is, DIVIDE AND RULE.. distract the people by playing identity politics from the twin crisis of governance and Rajapassa brother’s corruption and looting of the national wealth via MILITARY BUSINESS..

    Kalpana - February 22, 2013
    1:42 pm
    Reply

  2. Jack of all trade of politics by essay,is needless to say your essay has large number selections and range of subjects covered,indeed not be in ordered to guide for democratic Revolution under the leadership of PROLETARIAT.
    “They all call themselves Marxist,but their conception of Marxism is impossible pedantic. They have completely FAILED to understand what is DECISIVE IN MARXISM,namely ,its revolutionary dialectics” by Lenin says.
    To grasp Marxism one needs to adopt its methods not by book-learning,even by heart is ever-never enough.
    The material basis for this is the the complexity of class relations in Sri lanka in state-monopoly capitalism and the distinctly crisis-ridden character of its present-day development you were unable to realize.

    Mahiepala Pathirana - February 22, 2013
    3:15 pm
    Reply

  3. Thanks Ajit for this excellent analysis, except that it has been written in a tone of historical fatalism. It will be interesting if you could in the same breath of analysis, as a historical materialist, say “what it is to be done” to avert the impending catastrophe that may befall this country yet again.

    cyberviews - February 22, 2013
    4:46 pm
    Reply

  4. Wonderful piece by a Sinhala Marxist which does not do the normal JVP type racist marxism or the parlimentary variety like Dew and Nanayakara which i would call Marxism with an L for Licking or Lap dog marxism of the MR regime.

    What a breath of fresh air to get this!

    Sinha Bahau - February 22, 2013
    5:30 pm
    Reply

  5. Dear Cyberviews,
    You have correctly raised the question “What is to be Done”. We must beware of quick fixes, cosmetic reforms, and short cuts. We should neither fall behind or overstep the struggle of the masses. The masses must liberate themselves through their own experience and struggle by engaging in conscious, organised revolutionary practice to transform the world and themselves. This is the revolutionary essence of Marxism- and Maoism. We can only serve their struggle for freedom.

    We have suffered from two abortive armed insurrections in the South commanded by the elite vanguard , and from a liberation struggle in the North that also had no need or place for the creative initiative and revolutionary activity of the masses. All three ended up in total disaster, and generations of revolutionaries have had to pay the price. We have to develop a scientific theory, strategy and program taking account of past and on-going experience and new developments in the world, based on a concrete analysis. On this basis, we have to raise our level of organised revolutionary practice to a higher professional level corresponding to the need of the situation.

    I have stated what should not be done, and that is to try to reform the State and the system, since the rot has set in at the foundations. I have said that the way forward is to build towards constructing a new form of people’s democratic State, and discussed its political content and character.

    We are in the process of building a Left Unity Center consisting of radical-democratic and revolutionary forces that share the need to strengthen, support and try to unify the various mass resistance struggles and to raise this struggle against the Regime to go beyond the prevailing status quo, and set the foundations of building a whole new form of State. As Mao said,” The path is tortuous: The future is bright”. The time will come, if we work towards it.

    Thanks to Cyberspace, Kalpana and Sinha Bahu who have appreciated the post. It is truly encouraging. Thanks also to colombo telegraph for being there.

    Surendra

    Surendra Ajit Rupasinghe - February 22, 2013
    7:44 pm
    Reply

  6. Mr Ajith Rupasinghe Your hypothesis “Comprador Capitalist state…Neo-colonial political order” of political terms, is half truth of National Capitalism order of Sri lanka.
    Sri lanka (Ceylon) capitalism came into being that existence of womb of Colonial Order of British Empire.Since over 150 years of tyrannical colonial rule by British had been plunder of national wealth and ruthless exploit people all races by colonial masters.
    Is obviously white rulers have been train and safeguard political elites class for replace after exit of end colonial rule in 1948 04th February.
    They have been train class of elites not only Sinhalese, but Tamils as well as Muslims another minority communities in our society replace to carry colonial system with in their ABSENCE .
    Their political class and party of Comprador bourgeoisie is represent by United National Party or U N P. The Colonial order forward by
    U N P since day of Independence; that order shifted into new form of that Neo-colonial political order by U N P and its political class.
    The nature and character and its comprador bourgeoisie class basis of
    U N P are social roots remain unchange, urban and rural population our society even after 65 years past of Independance. They represent backwardness,underdeveloped and simple commodity production VAST rural terrority of huge population in poverty and poor living social conditions majority of population of Sri lanka.
    That how U N P become PUBLIC ENEMY PEOPLE OF SRI LANKA ,which opposed ongoing national path of capitalist development and its growth. U N P national politics agenda still opposed National Soverignity, Territorial Intergrety,Independence and foundation CERTAIN electoral politics in Sri Lanka.
    System had been enrich and ensure growth Comprador Bourgeoisie class and Camprador Capitalist state since 1948 encourage by U N P.Our young generation ‘s understanding of economy theory of neo-colonialest state and the governing assumptions of capitalist economy practice will be as radically different from ours the national capitalist theorist’ ideas are the FAIR SYSTEM DEMOCRATIC ORDER of philosophy that governed by late Neo-colonial political order.

    Piyadasa Yalagala - February 23, 2013
    2:06 am
    Reply

  7. Dear Ajit

    Thanks for taking the time to pen a response to my comment. I am in agreement with the approach you have suggested and I like the idea of the Left Unity Centre. I am sorry that I have to communicate with you under a pseudonym, but I would like to learn more about the Center in the future.

    cyberviews - February 23, 2013
    2:58 pm
    Reply

  8. The writer is obviously a Marxist who sees everything through one lens. The issues is much more complicated. Global islamic expansion with all its tentacles such as sharia, halal, hijab, al qaeda, jihad is set to conquer the island of Lanka by no later than 2050, perhaps as early as 2025. Every such tragedy is preceded by Marxist denials, a happened in Serbia, Indonesia, etc.

    Someone should address the issues raised by the Buddhists, and make the country more equitable, less islamic and friendly with smiling people, not full of women covering themselves in black terrorist looking outfits. The bodu sena will be seen a justified as long as blatant islamic “conquer” of the island does not stop.

    Jay Chambers - February 23, 2013
    3:30 pm
    Reply

    • For God’s sake, isn’t there a limit to your idiocy? If you wish to comment on the topic, you are most welcome.If you have nothing to say, just keep away. This forum is strictly for intelligent comment

      Nabil - February 26, 2013
      7:52 am
      Reply

  9. Dear Mr. Chambers,

    This is neither an analysis nor an empirically informed theoretical refutation. Unfortunately, in rings to the tune of the war-mongering jingoists in the US and Israel- and in Lanka. Are you representing a MOSSAD agency or consultancy? We must not reduce or distort the issue as a religious or civilizational contention and provide nourishment to extremism, fanaticism and fascism- in whatever form and from whatever source. We should strive to unite the people to rise above their conditions of oppression, to overthrow and uproot all structures and institutions that generate the social relations of domination, exploitation, violent division and WAR! This the way to serve the people, whatever their race, nationality, language, religion or caste may be. So, I ask you not to be blinded by hatred and prejudice, but to rethink your assumptions and premises.

    Surendra

    cyberviews,

    Thanks for taking up the article seriously. There is so much to be done to catch up. I will keep you informed about developments in building the Left Unity Center. We will get connected.

    Wish you strength,

    Surendra

    surendra ajit rupasinghe - February 23, 2013
    6:27 pm
    Reply

  10. Sri lanka state and democracy run by -Urban centered Wealthier -Bourgeoisie, who are really in RULE and POWER of society, politics, economy and democracy.
    Their set of persons belongs to ruling class parties of their own RULE by Government of public adimitration and management, as well as security forces, Members of Parlimeant, Presidency , Judiciary and Democracy since 1948.
    Even after 1956 social changes of power occur in country ,indeed that Sri Lanka Freedom party have been to power of state, there were NO any fundamental change from mode of management of STATE previously used by United National Party in power.
    There were certain social-political-economy changes has taken place during the SLFP rule time to time,but never address main social and economic issues by house of Babadarake family under the SLFP leadership. By and large SLFP has taken path of reform that Parlimentay center politics ,but being to power, that which SLFP-politics abonaded vested interest of People of Sri Lanka.
    Needless to say Sri Lanka Freedom Party is repestantive of National and Petty Bourgeoisie classes of our society;well, SLFP come into driving seat of state power and members of Parliment in chamber,they promptly exit form relationship with majority of people,and are working hand in hand with Urban Wealthier Class.
    Since 2004 Under Mahinda Rajpakase of SLFP has pratice previous policies by C B Kumaratunge of SLFP.
    In fact after end of 30 years WAR, credit goes to SLFP under the leadership of MR, upheld safeguard Sovergenity, Terroitral Intergreity and Indepenedence of Sri Lanka,made most progressive act in our modern political history.
    This is dual nature of SLFP and so-called Left Political parties enter into ruling vicious cycle of political power and practice since 1956 start working for FEW RICH.
    So-called people-oriented policies keep beside,start working according
    vested interested local and foreign powers.

    D.Nimal - February 24, 2013
    1:10 am
    Reply

  11. The corner stone of Democratic Revolution could come under leadership of working class and Its party.
    Task and reform of democratic Revolution fail since 1956,Under the leadership National Bourgeoisie class of its DUAL nature of political character and action.Mao said ” is needed in dealing with national bourgeoisie. While it is opposed to the WORKING CLASS,it is also opposed to imperialism.Our main task is to fight Imperialism,and Feudalism and that the LIBERATION of the people..”
    Our society PRESENT urgent task NOT for socialism , needless to say society urgently demand by social forces to be overthrown unfinished, incomplete and under-develop OF WEAK Bourgeoisie Democracy of island.
    At this stage ongoing capitalism that undermine national political-economy order and oppressed 90% majority people of Island.
    The central role play by Neo-colonial and Neo-Liberal capitalism having connected to US headed Hegemony system.
    Their-system ( Imperial of Hegemony) that which modern-day successors are represented of Imperialism of USA,by IMF-International Monetary Fund,WD-World Bank-, and WTO- World Trade Organization an operations power of Global Neo-colonial economy.The hegemony of Neo-colonial political-economy order with liberal face which that rally exploit and oppressed nation regardless of CLASSES, RACE, CREED,COLOR, GENDER, SEXUAL orientation in masses of PEOPLE OF SRI LANKA.
    The triumph of Globalization of Capital since 1990 , that International Capital of Hedges Funds rule by US EU Japan and UK,which that sovereignty nations no longer be regulated own economy and Financial capital within national state. Capital’s response to such struggles was to decentralized production,raise the mobility of capital and relative of mobility of workers;but the corollary of this was that nation state could no longer regulate the flows that now exceeded it.
    Due such Neo-colonial process since 1977 under UNP-JRJ rule of Sri lanka, that capitalism relative decline and lost the economic, and political sovereignty power of nation state.
    By UNP regime of Start up war, ethnic conflicts ,as well as,riots against Tamil community in 1977,79.1981,and 1983,and suppressed and demobilized workers state corporation and ,privatized of state corporation under Neo-colonial order,political sovereignty power of nation had been suddenly disappeared.
    The democratic revolution is of a different nature-OLD bourgeoisie path that is an open and transparent collaboration leading classes of workers,farmers,peasant , plantation workers ,petty bourgeoisie,elite youth and students are friendly social forces of democratic task has to undertake by working class party. And between civil society and which represents the interest of all public of majority Sri lankan in overseas just friendly forces of new system come into being. The handful Neo-colonial forces will be isolated and Democratic movement by join critical role.

    Piyadasa Yalagala - February 26, 2013
    12:56 am
    Reply

  12. The categorisation of the economy into 3 sectors is that in which Sri Lanka is not alone. A (1) crippling unproductive and resource-gobbling State Sector (2) a crime-crony-narco-Mafiosi sector and a (3) poor nephew of a private sector are found in the ASEAN region (notably Indonesia, Phillipines, Thailand) and even in India. But what is significant in Sri Lanka is there is at least one individual – poorly educated – who is a leading player in all three not excluding a leading role in the banking sector. To add spice to the whole saga, he is also the king-pin of what goes as the Stock Market here. The Common Denominator in all of these is filthy lucre. He has every one in his deep pockets. There is yet another individual who too has his tentacles on all three areas – but he has a bit more education and has a longer innings at the top (from the mid-1970s till now)

    The other weakness that works against the country’s march to economic
    health, even at a limited pace, is a totally crippled Opposition that has not merely watched the collapse of many limbs of governance – including the Legislature – but in many instances collutionist with the truant regime as well – all allegedly due to personal gain of the its own weak and divided leadership. As opposed to this was the Opposition in the 1960s-1970s – devoid of corruption/bribery, urbane, highly educated whose contributions in the House and outside served as a useful check on the regime’s possible excesses.

    The cunning regime knows playing the numbers game will ensure its continued survival. And so it resorts to the majoritarian game – also playing Godfather to the chauvinistic cabal – while simultaneously paying lip service to justice to the minorities. For this trapeze act the regime has to lose some credibility – both within and outside. But from its own narrow calculations the risk is worthwhile and ensures its own hold on the apparatus of power. This is proven by the deceit in pledges to the outside world to bring in a more just governance that is never kept. It also includes a vast array of transparent meetings with concerned minority leaders and frightened religious groups – giving them empty pledges in the old Leninist strategy “promises are like biscuits. They are made to be broken”

    But trickery and perfidy cannot hold a collapsing economy that has a poor base – permanently. The cracks are already showing. Soon they will grow to levels which was best described by Gen. Charles de Gaulle “an individual alone cannot control all events at the same time”

    Senguttuvan

    Senguttuvan - February 26, 2013
    2:21 am
    Reply

Leave a Reply

Please read our Comments Policy. Comment approval may take up to 24 hours.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>