6 December, 2019

Blog

2019 Presidential Election Outcome: Different Scenarios & Possibilities

By Siri Gamage

Dr. Siri Gamage

There are various opinion pieces in the media about the possible outcome of forthcoming Presidential election in Sri Lanka. Some utilise results from the previous Local Government elections held a few years back; Others analyse campaign strategies, timing etc. of the two main candidates. Some recognise the impact of other candidates such as Anura Kumara Dissanayake and Mahesh Senanayake. The potential effect of numerically minority votes in the Northern and Eastern provinces are also mentioned. However, in a country where there are no systematically conducted opinion surveys by independent polling agencies, analysis of anecdotal factors cannot be avoided. In this context, there are several key factors that need to be elaborated to help in our thinking on this subject so close to the election day- in particular the voter behaviour.

Party Members and Loyalists

Voters closely aligned or identified with major parties and minor parties tend to stick to their guns no matter what the campaigns and policy announcement of alternative candidates are. This comprises the hard core voters who have been socialised into following a certain colour, symbol, party or leader. Party affiliation is ascertained by party membership, active involvement in political campaigns at the local level, and official positions held in party organisations. To some extent families and friends of such party loyalists also align toward supporting one party candidate or another for the same reason. Some calculations indicate that the UNP, SLFP, Podu Jana Peramuna (PJP), JVP and even the TNA and Muslim Congress have such a voter base some amounting to millions. Yet the stark reality is that no candidate can win a Presidential election merely on the basis of support from party loyalists, their families and friends. Therefore, support from a large number of voters who do not belong to a given party are essential for victory. The strategy adopted to achieve this goal by parties seem to be to form coalitions in particular with smaller parties and civic organisation such as those led by professionals, artists etc. Through these the parties aim to reach a wider voter base and garner support.

Voters who are not affiliated with Parties

We can assume the majority of voters belong to this category. In the urban and rural areas, many people do not wish to be involved in active politics. Their aim is to lead a life of harmony and peace without engaging in divisive politics that lead to conflicts. While they recognise that those involved closely with party politics gain avenues of access to politicians who hold power (or the government bureaucrats many of whom are political appointees) and in return can secure material benefits, recognition, positions of power etc. these voters also recognise that such benefits have a short life. When the opposite party gains power they know that party loyalists are persecuted. Therefore, they want to maintain a distance from those party affiliates aware of long term security of family, work, businesses, etc. 

This category comprises of various types of voters. Independent minded voters who read newspapers and listen to TV and radio discussions, debates etc. are one type. They tend to base their opinions on not what the parties, candidates, party loyalists and their spokes people say or promise.  Personal experience (positive –negative), unfulfilled promises, failures of governments can loom large in the minds of such voters. Many of them have already seen the ups and downs of mainstream party politics as well as coalition politics. Many have seen various infrastructure projects such as roads, air ports, ports as well as signs of expanding neoliberal economic model, e.g. high-rise apartments, shopping centres, supermarkets. By the same token they have seen the poor state of public transport, rail, hospitals, roads and many other issues affecting their quality of life and cost of living. Included in this type are those who belong in lower socio economic and middle class-not necessarily English educated. Their sources of information can purely be mono ethnic. However, some educated persons especially those who have gone through university education and professionals as well as those who have experienced overseas work experience can also be included here. 

To what extent the personal experience, evaluation based on range of information sources and party promises, predicament of the country, nation, ethnic community, religion or the future prospects of the children will impact on their voting decision is unknown. Lack of credible political science research on this topic is a hindrance to make any informed judgement.

Floating Voters

Part of this type of voter category can be labelled as floating voters. They tend to vote differently at each election based on their assessment. One question being mentioned in media commentary is about how many of those who voted for Yahapalana government in 2015 will change their mind this time and which candidate they will support? Perceived or real abuses of power and privilege as well as excesses can also be a dominant factor in the decisions of such voters. While the fading memory of the Rajapaksa era abuses and excesses can be favourable to PJP candidate, failure of the present two-headed government to provide security to churches before the April terrorist attacks can be a negative for the NDF-UNP candidate.

The volume of votes to be gained by a given candidate from such floating voters is thus mediated by ‘Emotional’ factors as against ‘Rational’ factors that involves comparison, analysis and evaluation. Self-interest plays an important role along with the national interest. It is possible to assume that even the illiterate individual in the rural areas engage in some level of comparison, analysis and evaluation but theirs is different from such exercises undertaken by more educated persons.

Young Voters

Again, making predictions about this category of voters especially newly enrolled ones could be a difficult task. One segment of this type will be party loyalists, and the rest independent minded who will want to make a decision based on a range of factors including their own personal and family circumstances. Employment prospects, assistance in education, security, concerns on environment and corruption in governance can loom large in the decision-making process by the youth. To some extent, factors such as ethnicity, religion, regional development can also be influential factors. Some youths are impressionable by the aura of modern development projects and new media landscape also. However, with the new media and exposure to multitude of messages they may also be literate about hidden dimensions of party politics, privileges enjoyed by the ruling class, and weaknesses or failures in governance at different levels. International experience of some youths can eye openers to the many ills in society.

Rights of the Majority & Insecurities

It is no secret that for some years anti-Muslim sentiment among the Sinhala Buddhist(SB) majority has been a growing phenomenon. This functioned as a political undercurrent in previous elections also. However, after the April 2019 terrorist attacks by Muslim terrorists, it seems that the SB sentiment has galvanised further. This was reflected in the recent Pradesheeya Sabha election held belatedly in the South. Added to this are the feelings among SB community that we need a strong leader to navigate the country through the multiple crises. Crises not limited to the debt crises. There are other concerning developments such as the spread of drugs, deterioration of discipline, increasing trend toward crimes, lack of trust among communities, family breakdowns, agreements with foreign governments that may compromise the sovereignty of the country and more. The insecurities generated in the minds of SB majority, or at least a significant component of it, can favour one candidate over another in the elections. If this feeling of insecurity and anxiety turns into votes in the Southern electorate, the candidate from the Podujana Peramuna can secure a landslide victory easily surpassing the 50% mark. However, what is unknown is how the profile of NDF candidate will ameliorate such a victory? Given the grassroots nature of his politics and the appeal that he has as a relatively young person can work in his favour in the Southern electorate. This is in contrast to a situation where Ranil Wickremesinghe came forward as a candidate.

Confused Electorate

Unlike previous elections at this time the electorate is somewhat confused about the contestants, especially from the two main camps because the two camps cannot be understood in black-white terms. This is especially so after four and half years of a two-headed national government where the two main parties joined hands –rather unsuccessfully- in governance.  Confusions arising in the public mind from a two headed yahapalanaya government pulling in two directions and its multiple failures impacting on the security and well-being of the people.  Due to the cross overs of MPs and even ministers in the recent past, the voter cannot be sure of one’s colour or the party. The Mahinda Rajapaksa government that came into being unconstitutionally in October, 2019 lasting for 52 days is still in the minds of voters. 

Added to this are the plethora of party/candidate symbols in circulation. Political arguments about who is better to govern dominate the campaign in this last week before the election but there is a growing sense in the community that they all are the same. The key question is whether voter frustration with the existing mainstream coalitions will turn them into a third alternative and if so to what extent? At this time, we can only speculate and speculation is not that helpful.

What helps the voter in such a confused state is the clear messaging over a period of time by relevant parties and leaders about their political platform, what they will do if they come to power and how their promises can benefit the voters?  Generally, voters do not focus their mind to the elections until late in the campaign. When they do so, the mood of the electorate can swing one way or another.

Third alternative/s

NPP movement led by Anura Kumara has executed a disciplined campaign with clear messaging and policies. Many believe they can attract a larger voter base this time compared to the previous elections. How large this will be the question? Some believe that the JVP in particular has a designated voter base and it will not be able to move this up significantly.  However, the idea that ‘we do not need all 225 MPs who failed us’ has gained ground. The contributions made by other alternative candidates including Mahesh Senanayake have been a factor in moving public opinion away from the major parties or coalitions. 

Emergence of third candidates has diluted the neat categorisation of mainstream parties into two camps because those dissatisfied with both can now turn to a third alternative at least in theory. If we assume that the NPP movement led by Anura Kumara will attract more votes this time, we can predict that this can bite into the voter base of the two main candidates.  In such event they will not be able to reach the 50% mark as expected.

Role of Minority Votes and Pluralistic/Majoritarian Hypothesis

One logic is that if the NDF candidate can muster a large volume of voters from Tamil and Muslim areas/provinces as well as Christian votes, it is a mater then of securing nearly half of the Sinhala Buddhist votes to secure victory. Alternatively, in the other camp knowing this possibility, what they stipulate is an overwhelming majority vote from the Sinhala Buddhist areas/provinces plus some votes from Tamil, Muslim and Christian voters their candidate can secure victory. This one camp relies on a pluralistic assumption whereas the other camp relies on a majoritarian hypothesis. These two possibilities are in hypothetical stage and can only be tested in the forthcoming election. It is true to say that in the 2015 Presidential election, the former proved to be the realistic one. Conditions in the electorate are different this time.

Election Result: Possible Scenarios

Here we can only stipulate possible scenarios rather than any prediction.

Scenario 1

Landslide victory for Gotabaya Rajapaksa is a possibility due to the insecurities and anxieties in the mind of SB voters plus the failures of Yahapalanaya government and unfulfilled promises etc. This is a scenario where he can command more than 50% first preference votes.  However, the emergence of support for Sajith Premadasa in the final two weeks of the campaign and questions being raised about Gotabaya’s citizenship, potential for democratic deficit if he wins as well as the questioning of his nationalistic credentials can be mitigating factors. His brother Mahinda was a grassroots politician. Whether the electorate will perceive Gotabaya in the same way is a critical question. Generally, he is perceived as a technocratic leader behind whom there is an army of technocrats, engineers, bureaucrats, former security personnel rather than a populist leader. His appeal is more to the Sinhala Buddhist middle class, or more preciously its nationalistic elements rather than grassroots peasant, farming, clerical elements. It is here that the role of PJP is playing a role to garner support from Pradesheeya level voters.

Alternatively, irrespective of the failures of Yahapalanaya government, given the Sinhala Buddhist credentials of Sajith Premadasa and his grassroots nature of politics, there is a possibility that he can muster a majority of votes from SB areas/provinces. The presence of Sarath Fonseka, former commander of the army, is a plus factor in presenting an image of a future government where security can be assured. If this scenario becomes true, then he can secure an easy win with the minority votes in his favour –provided that the history is repeated as in 2015. 

Scenario 2

Neither Mr. Rajapaksa or Mr. Premadasa being able to muster the 50% first preference votes and therefore having to rely on 2nd and 3rd preferences. Outcome of such a scenario is very difficult to predict and prolong the announcement of results. If we assume that a small number of people who vote for one or other party will mark their 2nd and 3rd preferences to another candidate, the one who commands a majority among these voters will be able to cross the 50% mark.  It is possible to assume that those voting 1st preferences to NPP, will mark their second preference to Sajith rather than Gotabaya. By the same logic those from the North and East who vote NDF will vote for NPP or another independent candidate rather than vote for Gotabaya.  If the magic of 2nd and 3rd preferences come into play, the role of floating voters will still be a determining factor. Role of young voters will be crucial here.

Either way, this will be an interesting election result that will either bring back Rajapaksa team including its elders to power OR an emerging relatively young leader who does not belong to the party establishment as such and surrounded by a team of equally young MPs and junior ministers of the current government. If the latter outcome comes true, President Sirisena will go to political oblivion. On the other hand, if Rajapaksa victory comes true, Sirisena will reap the results of his manoeuvrings undertaken during his official term by way of re-entry to the parliament as a nominated MP or in some other capacity. Electorate will look for internal political and economic reforms in order to minimise waste and corruption and face he key challenges facing the country. Whether the winning candidate will continue with the neoliberal, pro globalisation, import-oriented economy or as promised by both mainstream candidates build a national economy giving priority to agricultural development and local manufacturing will be a critical issue. Mahesh Senanayake, Anura Kumara Dissanayake and other alternative candidates –once defeated -will continue to build their organisations and political platforms eying for the parliamentary elections that will follow. Sri Lanka’s non-aligned stand will be further tested with the competing interests of regional and world powers. So will the independence and sovereignty of the country.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 17
    3

    If one’s memory is a bit hazy and blurred as to what happened during 2010 to 2014, one has to go back only one year to recall what happened during the 52 day saga, to get a glimpse into the future in the unlikely event of NGR being elected to the highest Office in Sri Lanka.

    Voters, please take this seriously. Please use your franchise wisely, judiciously, aptly and appropriately. Please help defeat despotism, cronyism, racism, extremism and authoritarianism in all its forms and maintain our much cherished Democratic values!

    Unfortunately we are asked again to take action where the current Government has failed us miserably in prosecuting the alleged criminals and fraudsters thereby giving them oxygen and breathing space. They (MS / RW) are a miserable lot!

    • 11
      2

      Gamini,
      You have given us a friendly Reminder of the danger that lies ahead

      I sincerely hope that the voters will act to your persistent mantra “Please use your franchise wisely, judiciously,aptly and appropriately” to defeat despotism, corruption, cronyism.racism and all the evils that come with an authoritarian govt.

      Yes we had a taste of what was to come during the October coup and do not need a repitition of it ever again by a group of shameless, power hungry and corrupt individuals. Intent on self preservation.

      The President and PM by their callousness and ineptness are the villains who facilitated the re-entry of this ruthless group and did a great dis-service to the nation. A traitorous act no doubt.

      Anybody with an iota of intelligence should heed your advice and Save Sri Lanka being denied of its Democratic Freedom .

    • 1
      0

      There are many voters rally round the powerful and the wicked! Why?

    • 1
      0

      This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn’t abide by our Comment policy.

      For more detail see our Comment policy https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/comments-policy-2

  • 1
    1

    AKD is presenting a better scenario for the public. SLBC is advertising free for candidates. IT looks Mangala and NGOs are succeeding and SLBC is not advertising for AKD.

  • 6
    2

    Gota has proven himself to be the same as Sajith and the 225+1. Look at the morons who surround him. Sadly the best chance this country had via a complete overhaul/system change with Nagananda was lost.
    All these politicians are Indian bootlicking scum. They have not offered a single concrete policy to pull the nation from this economic mess, nor to abolish the Indian installed rubbish like Provincial Councils or to establish/re-establish ONE LAW across the country and reintroduce DS’ and LKY’s ethnic integration policy and settle all ethnicities in the North (and islandwide).
    This election is a Hobson’s Choice with no candidate offering any real change that could turn us into a first world nation. They are all a bunch of rogues, inept morons and buffoons who lick the boots of India. Our only hope is that some honest bunch come around to offer a national referendum to completely abolish this entire corrupt system which serves India and NOT the people of Sri Lanka/Ceylon.
    If Gota was honest, he wouldn’t stand on stages with the same idiots who ruined the MR government. And if he was confident of a landslide, why the hell would he be doing “deals” with every party under the sun? All 225+1 and their parasites in Provincial Councils (the bane of the nation) and all Indian bootlickers need to be thrown away and never brought back.

  • 2
    8

    Under either Scenario, All I want from Santa for this Xmas are.
    the net assets of at least the following UNP Ministers . because it will be hard to list all …

    Galleon Ravi,
    Malik Samare
    Kabir Hashim
    Kiriella,
    Sujeeva Senasighe
    Ajith Perera,
    Dentist Rajitha,
    Arjuna Ranatunga,
    Uncle John,
    Dr Ranil
    Rauf Hakeem,
    Bathudeen and Bro.
    Haleem
    Thalatha.
    And last but not least, the UNP Presidential Candidate young Premadasa-

    And it must be not the assets directly in their names, , which I doubt there will be much although they got up to 34 Mil each from just the Car Permit but also the wages and the other perks including that special allowance of LKR 100,00 a month after Dr Ranil converted Kotte in to his UNP CA.

    But the List should include all the assets of their extended families, including In Laws..

    The asset Register must have the Balance as at 30 December 2014 and the Balance as at December 2018.

    I know it is too late and also it has no relevance in this Election although I learned Young Premadasa has two Pent Houses on the 11th Floor at the Royal Park.

    But this List will certainly help that independent, Siri Gamage’s Floating Vote bank to decide which of them deserve that tick in the Box. next time.

    • 0
      0

      KAS,
      The two Buddhist monks who are contesting the Presidency, are the very first candidates who (theoretically) have no assets.
      Hardly any news available about their ‘manifestos’ or, comments about their proposed version of government.

  • 1
    0

    My understanding of the process, is: if neither candidate reaches the 50% + 1 (of ALL valid votes cast) in the first count, then 2nd & 3rd preferences (if any) of all other candidates (except the 1st two – the rest of the candidates are thus eliminated from the race) will be assigned to the first two candidates. The one who comes on top in that exercise will be the winner. As the total valid vote count is then confined to those votes of the first two candidates, then the % will necessarily be over 50% for the winner.

    It is likely, this will end up as the scenario this time as there are 35 candidates in the race and there are 2-3 candidates (other than SP & NGR) who are expected to poll well. Hence the importance of indicating 2nd & 3rd preferences by those voters who decide to give the 1st preference to a candidate other than SP or NGR, if you wish your vote to be counted in determining the ultimate
    winner.

  • 2
    0

    Citizens, you know very well that all politicians are liars who promise the Earth and deliver nothing. However you do have one thing that they need and do not have – your vote. This is all you have, you have nothing else. If they take this away from you, you will have nothing at all and will be totally powerless in their clutches. So my advice is, vote for the candidate who is most likely to let you keep your power to vote. Onna keeuva.

  • 0
    0

    Already there are news of Army roadblocks in the north.
    And, news of shots fired at buses transporting Muslim voters.
    And, allegations by MR of GR getting more than 80% of votes.

  • 0
    0

    this is he election to appoint another criminal for next five years. no matter what , look the UNP list how many Criminals with sagith??? if he decided to remove all corrupted people what happen to Ragitha?and 97% UNP ‘MPS????????????????????????????ININCLUDING HIM?

  • 0
    0

    The Rajapaksha clant has a history of forgery, counterfeit and thuggery during elections. In 2010 they used forgery and in 2015 they tried to deploy thuggery but they failed.
    So the subject requires proper investigation to affirm a democratic victory for Rakshapaksha…..

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 300 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically shut off on articles after 10 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.