19 September, 2020

Blog

20th Amendment Rekindles Need To Share Power 

By Jehan Perera

Jehan Perera

The draft 20th Amendment to the constitution is a tribute to the faith placed in President Gotabaya Rajapaksa by the members of the government and the general population. This proposed change in the supreme law of the country will provide him with virtually unfettered powers and dominance over parliament and all other institutions of state. The transfer of power away from parliament and to the president is reflective of the trust and confidence placed in the President Rajapaksa by the framers of the proposed law and by the cabinet of ministers that approved it unanimously.

The widespread hope is that President Rajapaksa will be different from all leaders who came before and will genuinely put the country’s interests before anything else. The track record they see is of the leader who performed the seemingly impossible task of eliminating the LTTE, once known as the most deadly terrorist organization in the world, and keeping the Covid virus at bay, despite it rampaging through much richer and more developed countries.

As the president has come to the highest office in the land from outside of politics, he is untainted by the compromises that politics usually entails. The failure of leaders of the past to solve the people’s problems and take the country to the path of self-sustaining development has made President Rajapaksa the focus of people’s hopes. On the other hand, many political commentators, even those who have been supportive of the president and the government, are cautioning against the empowerment of a single institution of governance at the expense of all others.

The day after the draft amendment was presented to the general public I participated in a meeting of a divisional level inter-religious committee in Beruwela, a little south of Colombo which has previously been the site of significant inter-religious strife. Those I spoke to were generally of the view that most people were unperturbed by, and indeed positive towards, the proposed law as they believed that the president should be given as much power as needed to solve the country’s problems and make it a developed one. The fact that the issue of the 20th Amendment did not spontaneously come to the table to be discussed may reflect ignorance, lack of interest or a judicious decision to steer clear of trouble.

Cautionary Voices

In terms of the amendment, the President can remove the Prime Minister, a member of the cabinet or any other minister and has authority to dissolve Parliament after completion of sittings for a period of one year. The 20th Amendment also empowers the President to make appointments to top positions of the state having obtained observations of the Parliamentary Council, which comprises members from Parliament.

The President will accordingly be empowered to appoint the Chief Justice and judges of the Supreme Court, the President and the judges of the Court of Appeal, the Attorney General, the Auditor General and also to make appointments to the Election Commission, the Public Service Commission, Judicial Service Commission, the National Police Commission, the Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka, the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption, the Finance Commission and the Delimitation Commission.

The evolution of democracy worldwide over the past few centuries has led to concepts of separation of powers where the executive (presidency), legislature (parliament) and judiciary (courts) are made independent of each other, though the degree of such independence will vary from country to country. The 20th Amendment is by and large a return to the 18th Amendment of 2010 which made the Parliament subservient to the Presidency. The abuse of power and corruption that occurred during the pre-2015 period, and their negative consequences, contributed to the change of government at that time. The entire basis of the 19th Amendment was to ensure that the Rule of Law prevailed over the rule of men and that misuse and abuse of power should be prevented through a system of checks and balances in which the independence of institutions such as the judiciary was safeguarded to the maximum.

A justification for the transfer of power to the Presidency stems from the inability of the previous government to govern effectively under the 19th Amendment to the constitution which was passed in 2015 in order to reduce the power of the presidency and to strengthen other institutions of governance. In a sense the 20th Amendment is a reaction to the failure of the 19th Amendment which had sought to reverse the centralizing effects of the 18th Amendment. However, the main negative outcome of the 19th Amendment was the inability of the former President and Prime Minister, and other government leaders, who came from two opposing political parties to work together. This led to a paralysis in the government which prevented it from governing in a problem solving manner. The current government does not suffer from the same constraint as it enjoy a 2/3 majority in Parliament and the President and Prime Minister are from the same family.

Pluralism Required

The need for the sharing of power is particularly strong in plural societies where there are different interest and identity groups which need to be represented in decision making. If the rulers and decision makers are from one community, members of other communities will tend to feel alienated. There are incipient signs of this happening. The representation of ethnic and religious minorities in the government, among the ministers and ministry secretaries is very low. The 20th Amendment which gives the president the power to make appointments to virtually the entire top rung of the state apparatus is likely to lead to a narrow band being selected.

Sri Lanka is a country that experienced three decades of internal war in which the chief protagonists came from different ethnicities and religions. This protracted war lay waste to parts of the country, stunted its developmental potential and caused immense human suffering. It was preceded by three decades of political conflict between the leaders of the different communities which continues to this day. Following the end of the war the country has become increasingly susceptible to inter-religious conflict. The marginalization of the minorities from decision making positions within the state is likely to fuel further discontent.

The absence of violence and appearance of peacefulness in Sri Lanka today must not beguile anyone to think that these problems are over for all time. If sections of the people feel that they are not being included in decision making, and that decisions being made exclude them, there can grow an alienation of heart and mind that cannot be stopped by more security measures and more intelligence gathering alone. The importance of parliament in the context of Sri Lanka’s plural society is the fact that its 225 members are meant to represent the interests and loyalties of all of the voters who cast their votes and select those who will best represent them. The prime minister who is part and parcel of parliament is more likely to be responsive this diversity than the president, who in a former president’s infamous words is “free from the whims and fancies of parliament.”

The pluralism that is part and parcel of Sri Lankan society needs to be reflected and protected by its institutions. The best protection against one-dimensional thinking are institutions that have plurality within them, such as parliament, provincial councils and local government authorities. These institutions can become the avenues for voicing and advocating for a collective vision. They need to be empowered and not diminished as will be the case if the 20th Amendment comes into force. What Sri Lanka needs is a plurality of empowered institutions. The cohesion must come from a policy that is inclusive. Central oversight by an honest and strict leadership can ensure that their delivery is efficient. These do not require the 20th Amendment.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 3
    3

    I believe 20A will fail in the parliament. We have not seen any number analysis from Prof. Kumar on this.

    My guess is UNP/SBJ, JVP, TNA + other Tamils National Parties +10 SPFA (Slap Party+SLFP) will oppose the 20A. Earlier I thought 30-40 SPFA would oppose. But, now I don’t see much split yet in SPFA, so there is about 10 votes may go against or stay absent. Old King claiming that small parties will vote for him. We need to wait and see. At this time it looks like it will be a balance. Unless 10-20 SBJ line crossing, 2/3 victory is very hard.

    • 0
      2

      just add one more time for when you have been wrong imbecile

  • 2
    14

    Power is already shared with Tamils (Douglas Devananda, Thondaman). So there is no need to re-invent the wheel.

    Power sharing – yes
    Decentralization – yes
    Devolution – no
    Federal – no

    Sinhala only Elam and Tamil Elam – yes
    Tamil Elam and multiethnic SL – no

  • 6
    0

    The reason for 20A according to GLPeries.

    “The President would not have time to serve the people effectively, as long as the 19A prevails, since the President has to make appearances in courts”

    I am sure the Sri Lanka Sinhala voters will buy in to this.

    more here:

    http://www.dailymirror.lk/print/front_page/Immunity-of-President-from-suit-is-to-serve-the-people-better-SLPP/238-195389

    • 7
      0

      President has to make appearances in courts – this is only if he has allegedly been committing errors that need court’s jurisdiction. How often is that.
      And for that he needs unfettered power ?
      Was GLP lecturing Grade V in Law College.

      • 5
        0

        Ferryman”….How often is that……”
        well GL Pierires is not thinking longterm
        He is thinking short term and about the current incubent ?

        All these measures are to consolidate the Rajapakses for the next few years.
        They will then think about the further few years.

        • 4
          0

          GL has never been farsighted. The professor’s nearsightedness too centres around individuals who will place him on a high pedestal. It is said that educated people should adorn the parliament. In his case, he is not an elected MP, but a faithful servant to the President and his family members, to put on paper their wishes and cook up a (CON) institution. Those citizens who clamour for educated individuals should think ten times over before they support someone like GL.

      • 5
        0

        Sorry Ferryman,
        GLP’s lectures are for 3rd grade buggers, the Lankawe parliamentarians. .

  • 1
    9

    Jehan Perera has to keep on talking ‘Devolution’, ‘Power Sharing’ because that is what his pay masters want. But that is not what people want. The President was elected to do what the people want, not what foreign hands or Malabar Vellala elite politicians or Muslim extremists or NGOs want.

  • 6
    0

    The following sentence caught my attention:
    The president should be given as much power as needed to solve the country’s problems.
    Immediately what passed thru my mind is the following:
    What is that ‘power’ that the President is NOT having, at present.
    ___________________________
    A president with a good heart and a sane mind does not require any more power to do what is ‘good’ for the country.
    No president, past or present, has had the heart or the mind to do what is ‘right’ by the country; 20A is not going to deliver that goodwill.

  • 1
    3

    [edited out]

    Thee people have spoken They dont want the 19a .Stop trying to asking to spend more money on another vote which the Govt will win . No amount of delay will help . People need a strong functioning president who is not bound by these idiots in parliment

    • 1
      1

      a14455,
      You believe that those who are in parliament are idiots. If so, what do you think of those who have spoken!

  • 3
    0

    While this critical analysis is useful, what is the purpose of writing such pieces to the groups in the society who already understand the danger of the 20th A.

    We must seek to inform the ignorant masses about how such amendments will negatively affect their lives.

    • 0
      0

      Informing the ignorant masses, good luck with that, one says to it! These ignorant masses not knowing the first thing about democracy, were given the sword, in the form of franchise to vote and vote they indeed did by voting in all unsavoury characters to the house to kill just that bit of democracy we had at the altar! The ground work for its sad demise began way back in May 1972!

  • 2
    0

    G.L.peiris is a political pimpiya.when he was with Chandirika he prepared a devolution document granting much more power to north-east than 13th amendment together with Neelan Thiruchelvam .later he went to THAILAND and took part in a conference with LTTE and Anton Balasingham and Tamilselvan where he agreed for internal temporary administrative unit for north-east.now he has become a educated fool and taking against tamils and 13th amendment and have become HIS MASTERS VOICE in every thing for a minister post power and position-what a shame.if he has any self respect(every body knows he has nothing left in him) he must leave the political field.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.