Colombo Telegraph

30 Years On, Can We Claim To Have Come Very Far From Black July At All?

By M. A. Sumanthiran –

M A Sumanthiran

For  30 years, July 23, 1983 has been remembered in Sri Lanka as ‘Black July’. This date marks the tragedy of thousands of Tamil people beinge attacked by rioting  mobs. Hundreds of Tamils were killed and thousands of homes and businesses were destroyed. Many of those  who survived fled the country, fearing they would never be able to see their homes again. The repercussions of these brutal actions are still felt by the Tamil people both in Sri Lanka and abroad. The ’83 pogrom is widely seen as a trigger to Sri Lanka’s civil war.

The importance of remembering this watershed atrocity  cannot be underestimated. It is only by remembering  such tragedy that  we hope to ensure that such horrors never again take place.

Unfortunately  we as Sri Lankans have not journeyed very far from ‘Black July’. Instead of dealing with, and eradicating the root causes of the conflict, we seem to be intent on exacerbating them. Today, more than 4 years after the end of a bloody war, reconciliation amongst Sri Lanka’s peoples is still very far away.  Sadly, 30 years later, not much has changed.

Black July was widely recognized as a genocidal act unleashed against the Tamil people; as Sri Lanka’s Holocaust. This was recognized as Genocide not merely because a large number of Tamil people were killed and injured, but also because assets and property owned by Tamils – Tamil homes and businesses – were attacked and demolished. 30 years later we are still seeing such genocidal acts being committed against the Tamil people. It is internationally recognized that the term Genocide includes acts that force a community of people to leave the land  traditionally occupied by them for several generations. This is taking place in our country today, with the mass land grabs by the government and the military in the North and East.

The horrendous killings of Tamils in July ’83, is largely believed to have been carried out with the support of the government of that day. In fact President J.R. Jayawardene’s first speech on the event made on 27 July 1983, offered little sympathy to what the Tamil people had faced.

Today, four years after the end of the civil war, the incumbent President has declared that Sri Lanka has ‘no minorities’. The reality however, is vastly different. The government turns a blind eye to the repeated attacks against various minority groups. Today, that includes not only the Tamil people, but the Muslim people as well. One of the recent incidents was an attack carried out against a Muslim owned business. Video footage taken during this attack clearly showed a Buddhist monk vandalizing the building in question while policemen look on, doing nothing. Other religious minorities also continue to come under attack, with threatening and violent acts being committed against  mosques and churches.. Following the events of Black July, despite rioting mobs openly attacking Tamil civilians for several days, no perpetrators were apprehended or held accountable. Today too, few, if any, of the individuals responsible for attacks against members of minority groups are ever apprehended. Hate speeches against minority groups are made, processions threatening minority groups are openly conducted, and the government does nothing.

The  government  turns a blind eye to violence in  other quarters as well. Scores of journalists have been attacked, seriously injured, killed or have  disappeared, but the perpetrators of these attacks are almost never apprehended and brought to justice. The crime rate in the country has risen dramatically over the past months and years. The riots in July 1983 were symptomatic of a complete breakdown in the Rule of Law. It is indeed disheartening to see that breakdown today as well.

The ‘83 pogrom is seen as a determined effort by a portion of the majority community, backed by the government of the day, to teach the Tamil people who had been for a long time calling for meaningful power sharing, a lesson. Until 1983, these calls had been for the most part, non violent. After 1983,  violence by Tamil youth increased significantly. It is this that led to the 26 year long conflict in our country. To date, the Sri Lankan state has been unable to address the Tamil question in a meaningful way. The only concession to power sharing in Sri Lanka’s Constitution is the 13th Amendment. Even this has to date not been fully implemented despite the government’s repeated promises to its people and to members of the international community that it will do so. In fact, the government now proposes to do away with it altogether! Instead of making a realistic effort to arriving at a meaningful power sharing arrangement through genuine, constructive political dialogue, the government now proposes to take away even the limited concession to power sharing in the Constitution. The Tamil National Alliance has repeatedly stated that the solution to the ethnic conflict is not a  military one,  but  a political one. However, 30 years on, the Sri Lankan government seems more unwilling than ever to either engage in any meaningful, genuine process to this end.

In 2004,  President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunge acknowledged the role played by the government and made a public apology for the atrocities of ’83. Despite being seen by many as 21 years too late,  the gesture, in my opinion, was tremendously significant. For Sri Lanka and its peoples to move past ’83, this acknowledgment, and with it the accountability for the atrocities committed, was absolutely necessary. Today, 4 years after the war, despite assurances given to the international community and its own peoples, the government of Sri Lanka has yet to put in place any credible process for accountability for what occurred during the war. The tragedy of ‘83 should have taught us that in order for us to move past the tragedy of the civil war as a country, there must be accountability for atrocities committed on both sides.

30 years on, the environment and circumstances that made Black July possible have not changed in any significant way. A war has ended, but we have failed to address, far less eradicate, the root causes of the conflict behind it. If anything, we have exacerbated them. 30 years on, can we claim to have come very far from Black July at all?

*The author, M. A. Sumanthiran (B.Sc, LL.M) is a Member of Parliament through the Tamil National Alliance (TNA), a senior practicing lawyer, prominent Constitutional and Public Law expert and civil rights advocate

 

Back to Home page