23 October, 2017

A People-Centered Approach To Building “50,000 Brick & Mortar Houses” For War-Affected Communities

By Chandra Jayaratne

Chandra Jayaratne

We welcome the announcement made by the Government to build 50,000 “brick and mortar houses” for war-affected communities. Masonry houses are the time-tested model, technically sound and most suitable for living, cultural and climatic conditions of the North and East. Thus, we are also pleased that the government has recognised and respected the preference of the people for masonry houses.

At the time the proposal for pre-fabricated steel housing was being considered, our group, a collective of independent professionals and social activists, presented a viable alternate proposal for building 65 000 masonry houses. We stressed the importance of ensuring that the housing project is people-centered in every aspect, seeking community participation, maximising local economic benefits and financing options which will enable such a process.

The revised housing policy of Sri Lanka and the government’s Vision 2025 also recognize the need for such an approach.

We highlight the following aspects which are important to ensuring a people-centered approach for the successful delivery of houses:

* Involving home owners: when compared to a contractor-driven approach a people-centered approach with involvement from community organisations and a network of technical support organisations in the construction of the houses has shown to better ensure quality, economical and successful completion of housing projects.

* Benefits to local economy and sustainability: implementation of the project (e.g. sourcing of materials, labour, construction services etc.) must create employment locally and boost the construction industry and economy in the North and East. With traditional incomes in agriculture and fisheries dwindling, housing projects in the region must ensure that incomes from construction reach those families. Requirements to bid need to be such that enable contracting companies from the region to be given opportunities and be considered, instead of only large national or international companies.

* Community participation and mobilisation: The project should not be seeking to merely deliver the houses, but consider the people as key participants and owners in the project. Thus, having meaningful consultation with beneficiaries and to gain vital support from them in implementation is necessary. In a post-war context strengthening the community by investing in social mobilisation and encouraging participation will also be crucial in terms of furthering social cohesion and reconciliation. The RfP provides very little space for community ownership and community participation in monitoring the construction, and seems instead to strongly favour a contractor driven approach.

* Environmentally appropriate options: Masonry houses are not just built of burnt clay bricks (Gadol/Chengkallu), but also of cement blocks, compressed stabilised earth blocks, etc. The most cost effective and environmentally friendly option for the area needs to be considered, e.g. Burnt clay bricks are not the most cost effective in the North, accounting for a small percentage only.

* Financing the project: Domestic financing options rather than foreign loans will be less burdensome for the national economy. Our proposal suggested raising local resources for the housing project through issuing of rupee bonds via a consortium of local banks as a viable option. The financing method chosen must be conducive towards carrying out the most people-centered building of houses.

We hope and look forward to the above aspects being given serious consideration in the implementation of the project to build “50 000 brick and mortar houses” for the North and East; as other programmes such as the upcoming housing programme in the hill country, are seeking to do. Two years have passed since the first EOI for a housing programme in the North and East was issued and the need to invest in the community is that more pressing.

Recognising the hardships and long delays faced by war-affected communities, we urge the Government to implement the project in a manner that is attentive to peoples’ wellbeing, contributes to strengthening the community and as an initiative towards reconciliation.

Thank you.

Issued by Chandra Jayaratne, on behalf of a group of professionals with expertise in engineering, architecture, spatial planning, community development, housing, financing, economics, development planning, law, community organisation, and project management.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 2
    3

    Sri lankan forces, particularly Army is engaged in developing that area. the best option is build brick and mud as the cement and hire local people to build those including those unemployed LTTE caders. Some Tamils are under priviledged in that area. ————– why some of these houses should not be built in the south. there are many families whose children died because of the insurrection. Why those parents, wives, children do nost deserve a house. Only problem is politicians involve and spoil everything and that should be exposed, if they want to spoil it. —————-why you are talking it. Isit the Sri lankan Treasury spending money ?

  • 1
    0

    I welcome the decision by the government as well as the above statement.

    Having lived in Jaffna for almost twenty years, and seen the constructral style how the houses were built, I support the above initiative.

  • 2
    3

    Of course being married to aTamil it is natural that his heart bleeds for the Tamils ,NOT for the thousands of Sinhalese killed,,raped,and maimed by the Tamil terrorists.

    • 3
      0

      Go to kindergarden and start to leanr counting.

    • 2
      0

      Yes Percy Percy Percy.
      Organize a pogrom of the 1983 type – the 1958, 1977 versions are mild and the 2014 Aluthgama pogrom is chicken feed! This will teach a lesson to Ken’s bleeding heart. Cheers.

  • 2
    0

    Thanks Chandra Jayaratne for blocking the pre-fabricated houses based on engineering consideration. We the lay-person silent majority only smelt corruption.
    Please use your social conscience to block off (or reduce) the corruption bane in the “brick & mortar” build.

    • 0
      3

      Moda K. Pillai: See for whom he is writing. It looks he is for FEE-FOR -SERVICE. BETTER GIVES IT TO ARMY. THEY WILL DO IT while providing employment to unemployed LTTE caders.

  • 0
    1

    I say Pillai, you chaps always want to talk about 1983 program. We all agree that it was a barbaric event and should’ve condemned. We all should equally condemn what Prabakaran did in wiping out thousands of innocent Sinhalese villagers in the border areas, and course in the City areas as well. You guys do not like that reference. This fellow Jayaratne is bleeding his heart out for the Tamils as he is married to one. Should he not think of the tragedy of his own people ???

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 300 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically shut off on articles after 10 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.