By Vipula Wanigasekera –

Dr. Vipula Wanigasekera
Governments, by nature, communicate success. It is part of political survival. The current NPP-led administration is no exception. Since assuming power, there has been a visible and energetic effort to showcase achievements—statistics highlighted, narratives amplified, and messaging carefully curated across platforms. But somewhere between projection and reality, an important question arises: what truly constitutes progress?
The controversy surrounding the Speaker’s academic credentials briefly dominated public discourse. Yet, in the larger scheme of governance, this was a sideshow. The matter was resolved quickly, and rightly so. The real concern lies elsewhere—within the deeper structural and operational performance of the State.
Take, for instance, the ongoing debates around coal supply. Energy security is not a peripheral issue; it is central to economic stability. The fact that such matters are surfacing—and are under scrutiny—is not necessarily a negative. It reflects a system being questioned. But it also signals that foundational challenges remain unresolved.
On the economic front, export performance appears encouraging, at least on paper. Numbers suggest resilience. Yet, statistics can only tell part of the story. They rarely capture the lived experience of businesses grappling with inefficiencies, delays, and systemic bottlenecks.
Which brings me to a more grounded measure of governance: public service delivery.
There is much talk of transformation, of digitisation, of ‘frog leaps’ in efficiency. But what does that mean in practice?. I renewed my driving license in September last year. To date, I am still carrying a temporary piece of paper, with the assurance that it remains valid for two years. This is not an isolated inconvenience; it is emblematic of a system that struggles to translate policy intent into citizen experience.
If institutions are indeed leaping forward, the public should feel it—consistently, tangibly, and without having to navigate uncertainty.
Another dimension worth reflecting on is the growing system of narrative reinforcement. I happen to be part of several WhatsApp groups that strongly support the current government. The level of effort invested in projecting a positive image is remarkable. But one must ask: to what end?
Perception management has its place. However, it cannot substitute for performance. In fact, excessive emphasis on messaging risks creating a disconnect between what is said and what is experienced.
Leadership, too, warrants examination. It is commendable that the President is willing to address Parliament on critical issues. Accountability at the highest level is important. But should every major concern require direct intervention from the top?. A well-functioning system is one where institutions carry their responsibilities effectively, without over-reliance on central authority.
This leads to what may be the most relevant question for any government claiming progress: where is the investment?
Not agreements signed, not memoranda of understanding, not announcements. But actual, physical investments—projects that have moved beyond paperwork into construction, into operation, into job creation. Factories being built, hotels rising, services expanding. These are the markers of economic confidence.
If such investments are flowing in, they will speak for themselves. If not, then the narrative of progress becomes harder to sustain.
There is also a temptation, in the absence of visible industrial or service-sector expansion, to pivot towards claims of agricultural self-sufficiency or incremental improvements in traditional sectors. While these are important, they cannot alone carry the weight of a modern economy aspiring for growth and global integration.
Ultimately, governance is not about crafting the most compelling story. It is about delivering outcomes that citizens can see, feel, and trust.
The NPP government has an opportunity—perhaps even a mandate—to reset expectations and redefine performance. But this will require moving beyond optics, beyond reactive explanations, and towards measurable, verifiable progress.
Because in the end, it is not the narrative that endures. It is the reality.
*Writer is former Diplomat and DG of Tourism Board and currently a Lecturer, Youtuber, Author, Advisor ZeroPlastic Movement, Meditation & Reiki Therapist
leelagemalli / April 14, 2026
Thanks for the article Vipula.
.
The article raises important concerns that many people have been silently observing. For years, bold rhetoric and strong criticism were directed at those in power, with promises that change would be swift and meaningful once authority shifted.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MExZRT9iYho
However, now that those same voices are in governance, there is a noticeable gap between what was promised and what is being delivered. Statements that once inspired hope have, in many cases, fallen silent, leaving citizens questioning whether those earlier criticisms were genuine or merely political strategy.
There is also growing frustration about public safety and law enforcement. Urban areas continue to face issues such as vandalism, drug activity, and petty crime, which are not unique to one country but visible in many major cities around the world. While these challenges are complex and long-standing, people expected stronger responses, clearer policies, and more decisive action from the current leadership. Instead, incidents such as the rapid deterioration of newly introduced public spaces highlight a lack of preparedness and enforcement, raising doubts about governance and accountability.
What is increasingly compelled to be seen, however, is not equal enforcement of the law but a troubling double standard. There appears to be one set of rules applied to those aligned with the ruling side and another for the opposition.
/
vipula / April 17, 2026
Valid points leela
/
old codger / April 14, 2026
“There is also a temptation, in the absence of visible industrial or service-sector expansion, to pivot towards claims of agricultural self-sufficiency or incremental improvements in traditional sectors.”
If the end result of “agricultural self-sufficiency ” is that consumers have to pay multiples of the regional market price for staples such as rice, onions, potatoes, pulses, etc, what is the point? Do the rest of us have to suffer to support farmers who keep complaining anyway?
A simple Google check brings startling results:
.Fresh ginger prices in Sri Lanka generally range from LKR 1,500 to over LKR 3,500 per kilogram,
As of April 2026, ginger prices in Tamil Nadu (including Chennai) are roughly ₹50–₹105 per kg
Big onion prices in Sri Lanka generally range between LKR 200 and LKR 300 per kg in retail
Onion prices in Tamil Nadu (near Chennai) vary by market, between ₹23.50 and ₹30.00 per kg.
SUGAR Bulk (White) in Colombo Regular price Rs 212.00.
Sugar Price in Chennai: ₹ 32/Kilogram | 12 Apr 2026
There are many more examples, but my point is that this is a major component in our COL. Why do we stubbornly insist on subsidising inefficient agricultural practices when the end result is that our exports become uncompetitive because the workers demand higher salaries. Even garment factories are moving out for that reason. The government begs for foreign investment, but which investor wants to invest in overpaid labour?
/
vipula / April 17, 2026
Good Analysis OC
/
Naman / April 14, 2026
“ what truly constitutes progress?”
That’s a very good QUESTION to ask.
If there was a change FOR BETTER in people’s behaviour attitudes work ethics after the NPP government come to power, one can call it a progress.
The “SYSTEM” in SL had become so rotten it’s very difficult to get better within couple of years. AKD should be given more time as well as correct advice from SL professionals.
Ministers if they can NOT perform well needs to be pushed out
/
vipula / April 17, 2026
Thanks Naman. Agree
/
leelagemalli / April 17, 2026
Naman,
.
Corruption tends to be more pervasive in many developing countries than in wealthier ones, often rooted in structural weaknesses, economic pressures, and uneven enforcement of the rule of law. When economies are struggling, institutions may lack the capacity or independence to ensure accountability across all levels of society. In such contexts, resorting to whataboutism—deflecting criticism by pointing to others’ failures—only deepens the problem, as it avoids responsibility and prevents meaningful progress. Societies shaped by misinformation, emotional narratives, and politically motivated claims often find it even harder to build a culture of transparency and accountability.
/
leelagemalli / April 17, 2026
cont.
In Sri Lanka, concerns have been raised about the conduct and rhetoric of the current administration under President Anura Kumara Dissanayake (AKD). Critics point out that sweeping accusations against political opponents—such as broadly labeling them as “thieves”—were made without sufficient evidence, seemingly for political advantage. Now, similar scrutiny has turned toward the government itself, particularly in light of the controversial coal procurement issue highlighted in the Auditor General’s report. The findings suggest that there were significant procedural or governance failures, even if some of the corruption may be systemic within the institutions involved.
–
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAJ3j94a7Dc
–
Despite these developments, the government continues to publicly deny wrongdoing, which has contributed to growing public frustration and uncertainty. Many citizens feel misled by official statements that appear inconsistent with emerging evidence, leading to anxiety and declining trust in leadership. At the same time, efforts to promote even minor achievements as major successes risk further eroding credibility. Rebuilding public confidence will require greater transparency, accountability, and a commitment to honest communication—steps that cannot be easily substituted with rhetoric or short-term political messaging.
/
leelagemalli / April 17, 2026
Dear Rational Thinkers,
While we are trying to see tangible progress made by this government, which now self-proclaims that “we are not corrupted” but there are processes that have emerged to prove the opposite, I am perplexed as to why on earth some commenters, including CT writers and commenters, are also supporting their blatant lies.
–
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_X_3oUEAIqE
–
I was astonished to see the following video, which is about Minister Lalkantha’s wide daylight money frauds. Jayasumanya, an independent political activist, has been stating the truth, as far as I can tell, since before he was elected minister, and what he says in public today is exceedingly controversial. Rajjapakshe’s fraud management reveals DAIZY grandma’s manik malla story, and Lalkaantha’s are similar looking back.
/
nimal fernando / April 17, 2026
Vip,
–
You’re a better Caribbean Conga dancer ……… than an impartial observer/writer! :)))
/
Ajith / April 18, 2026
“The NPP government has an opportunity—perhaps even a mandate—to reset expectations and redefine performance.”
It is true that NPP had an opportunity or its used the opportunity given by “Aragalaya” to come to power. It looks like that NPP used the opportunity rather than it had an opportunity. They are surrendered to Buddhist extremism.
/