21 June, 2026

Blog

Birth Centenary Of Comrade Prins Gunasekera & The Relaunch Of “A Lost Generation: Sri Lanka In Crisis: The Untold Story”

By Lionel Bopage

Dr. Lionel Bopage

Dear Comrades and Friends,

I would like to extend my gratitude to Comrade Prins Gunasekera‘s daughter, Mrs. Geshni Gunasekera, for inviting me to deliver a message on this special occasion of the birth centenary of the late Comrade Prins Gunasekera and the re-publication of his valuable work.

Born in Kataluwa, Galle District, Comrade Prins was first elected as the Member of Parliament for Habaraduwa electorate in March 1960 and re-elected under the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) ticket in 1970. However, due to conflicts with the leaders of the ruling coalition government over the Criminal Justice Commission Act and the trials to be conducted under it, he became an independent.

Prins Gunasekara

Looking at Comrade Prins’s ideological evolution, starting from the old left politics of the 1950s, he changed in the 1970s to a position of being sympathetic towards the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP). He continually stood up for human rights and democracy. He was a key figure in the political landscape as well as in the legal history of Sri Lanka.

From 1971 onwards, Comrade Prins was deeply involved in civil rights movements. Collaborating with other human rights activists such as Comrade Bala Tampoe and Lord Avebury representing Amnesty International, he investigated the state repression that had been launched across Sri Lanka. In 1972, during the Main Trial of the Criminal Justice Commission, the government charged 41 individuals with conspiring to overthrow the Queen’s state. Comrade Prins and other legal teams challenged the legitimacy of the commission and protested. As a result, they were barred from appearing before the commission. This act of moral courage underscores his commitment to justice.

He continuously advocated for the right of the JVP to engage in democratic politics. His ancestral home in Kataluwa had been allowed to be used for our political activities. His home in Rosmead Place was the headquarters of the 1982 presidential election campaign. Comrade Prins also filed a petition against the infamous “Lamp-Pot” referendum, which destroyed the entire democratic process and extended the term of Parliament by six years.

His work alongside a new generation of human rights lawyers highlighted the issue of state violence and repression. I would like to mention at this moment, Comrade Prins’s younger sister’s son Kanchana Abeypala, as well as comrades like Charitha Lanka Pura and Wijeyadasa Liyanarachchi. They advocated for the interests of those who were at the receiving end of state violence in the eighties. The regime’s terror campaign worsened. By 1989, more than 15 lawyers had been assassinated. On this occasion, I consider it our duty to remember and pay our respects to them.

In the late 1980s, the intimidation from state forces made Comrade Prins and his family to leave Sri Lanka. Despite being in exile, he continued to work for the protection of human rights.

“A Lost Generation: Sri Lanka in Crisis: The Untold Story”, he authored, is a chronicle about the dark era in Sri Lanka. It provides a searing account what happened from 1977 to 1990. He has named the presidents of that time as serial killers, who were driven by an unbridled greed for total power. This book provides much insight into the political trajectory of Sri Lanka, which was marked by the fraudulent 1982 referendum, the brutalities of 1988-89, and the state repression of that time.

The 1983 Black July massacre, orchestrated by the United National Party, marked a critical and decisive turning point in the island’s history. The state sanctioned violence against Tamils was used as a pretext to proscribe the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP), the Nava Sama Samaja Party (NSSP), and the Communist Party of Sri Lanka. After this pogrom, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) became extremely strengthened.

The state while suppressing the JVP, and unleashing terror across the country, continued to maintain the ban imposed against it. It was those actions of the state that ultimately led to armed violence in the South. In parallel, the Tamil community was also terrorized. This further strengthened the violent movement in the North and East. Comrade Prins’s book sheds light on the state-sponsored death squads used in the South for this suppression, like PRRA, Black Cats, Yellow Cats, and others, which operated with impunity under indemnity laws.

We know that Comrade Rohana went underground as soon as the pogrom began. Politically, I did not agree with his decision. Because it would have allowed the government to make the people believe the state’s version of events that the JVP was behind the Black July Pogrom.

Comrade Prins would have realized that the desired political objectives could not be achieved by remaining underground. Fearing that the image created by the government would become valid, he would have tried to persuade Comrade Rohana to bring the party to the open, above ground. Accordingly, in the mid-eighties, Comrade Prins had met Comrade Rohana in Bulathsinhala and discussed the matter a whole night.

Subsequent events show that Comrade Rohana did not accept Comrade Prins’s reasoning. Comrade Rohana had informed Comrade Prins that the party leadership had already decided on an alternative plan of action. Comrade Prins’s disappointment at that time is understandable. However, his efforts reflect his desire for a peaceful resolution of the situation that prevailed.

Comrade Prins’s work extended from legal representation to challenging the state’s abuses of power. For example, he represented the JVP in the case against the fraudulent referendum, and exposed the corruption and violence carried out during that referendum.

Comrade Prins had a blend of progressive left ideals and Sinhala nationalism. Nevertheless, his fearless commitment to justice earned him widespread respect.

The centenary of his birth, and the relaunch of “A Lost Generation: Sri Lanka in Crisis: The Untold Story,” has given us an opportunity to reflect on an era when young Sri Lankans were sacrificed to protect the political and economic interests of a privileged few. Instead of the state-sponsored or state-sanctioned narratives about the 1987-89 uprising, Comrade Prins’s work offers a critical account of those brutal realities.

As we mark his birth centenary, his legacy should be honoured by committing ourselves to a world that safeguards human rights and democracy. His life reminds us again and again, of the importance of remaining courageous and safeguarding humanity.

The wealth of political and legal experience Comrade Prins Gunasekera possessed would have been of immense use for the current government, which is attempting to create a more democratic and accountable state.

Finally, I would like to really appreciate Mrs. Geshni Gunasekera’s efforts in organizing this occasion of commemorating the birth centenary of Comrade Prins and relaunching of his work.

Thank you very much.

—————————

I would like to insert here the following paragraph which I had to omit in keeping to the time limit:

If I digress a bit here. If the JVP had listened to people like Comrade Prins rather than to other voices, and decided to enter open politics earlier, it would have been possible to save the tens of thousands of lives, including those of the leaders. The massive loss of life and destruction, and the terror that ensued, could have been prevented. Under those historical circumstances, the JVP could have achieved a competitive political advantage by exposing the fraudulent and violent role played by the UNP regime led by Mr J R Jayewardene. Nonetheless, all of that has now become a tragic history. Yet, there are many valuable lessons that could be and should be self-critically learned from this.

Latest comments

  • 6
    2

    Lionel, with all due respect to your efforts to honour an interesting politician of the last century posthumously, I have got a couple of questions.
    Please note that I call spade a spade – nothing else.

    I don’t honestly understand these paradoxes. I am not here to debate socialist and capitalist ideologies. But I do not see any sense in these sentences.
    “He continually stood up for human rights and democracy”
    Prince G being an ultra-leftist, how did he view democracy and human rights?? In Marxist way or orthodox western way?
    Human rights or democracy like in Russia, China, North Korea, Cuba or in the UK, USA, Canada, Australia……??
    “…other human rights activists such as Comrade Bala Tampoe and Lord Avebury representing Amnesty International, he investigated the state repression that had been launched across Sri Lanka….”
    Few questions.
    1. As far as I know, Bala Tampoe was a trade unionist. Not a human rights activist. He might have had elements of human rights in his movement, but he was not a human rights activist. Contd….

  • 6
    2

    2. Lord Avebury was knighted by the British Empire, and he did not refuse the knighthood. I do not have to stress that the Crown is a conservative body that do not condone communism. How genuine was he about the rights of an ultra-leftist, Marxist group which wanted to topple a (western) democratically elected government in SL, wearing a feather in his colonial cap?
    3. Prince G finally could successfully escape the SL state genocide of the 80s and settled down well and peacefully in the conservative, capitalist Britain and still continued his radical political movement until his demise. How did those poles apart two phenomena synchronized??
    In a nutshell, how did Prince G expect his ultra left ideologies achievable in a technically capitalist country like Sri Lanka while living in another capitalist territory UK??
    How did he compare that task compared to achieving the same type of ‘freedom’ in comparison to the governments closer to his heart such as Cuba, North Korea, Russia or China?
    But he opted to live comfortably in capitalist UK and keep fighting for his socialist ideologists. Just like what Karl Marx did! And the capitalist UK government gave all what he needed – visa, citizenship, immunity, social security, freedom, protection……. How funny? how paradoxical?
    I rest my case.

    • 4
      0

      Jit

      Your point 3

      Do you think Comrade Prins Gunasekera should have sought asylum in North Korea?
      I also wonder as to why Honorable Somawansa Amarasinghe too didn’t seek asylum in North Korea.

      • 4
        2

        NV, those are the points I have always been wondering about too! Every ‘socialist’ who rebel against ‘capitalism’ in their home countries happily end up in capitalist English speaking countries using gate passes from western embassies!! How hypocritical!! No one bothers to land in almighty socialist lands China or Russia or even smaller sprats like Cuba or NK.

    • 2
      3

      ” Lord Avebury was knighted by the British Empire, and he did not refuse the knighthood. “
      That is interesting.
      Where did you pick up this bit of gossip?
      BTW There was one Sir John Lubbock, Lord Avebury. But he died 111 years ago.
      *
      Also it is nice to know that there was social security in the time of Marx. (He missed the most basic of social security by 25 years.)
      Same source?
      *
      Do you belong to the same club as one Lester whom we find hereabouts?

      • 5
        3

        Should I even bother to respond to your rubbish?? Get out of the mud pool and try to address my main points at least to show that you are not as hypocritical as your comrades!

        • 1
          0

          Please do not bother.
          We do not need any more falsehoods in your pathetic defence.
          *
          “Get out of the mud pool”
          Enjoy slinging mud from where you live.

  • 0
    1

    Hallo Jit
    I like to rub some salt to the wound.
    If
    “Mrs. Geshni Gunasekera, for inviting me to deliver a message on this special occasion of the birth centenary of the late Comrade Prins Gunasekera and the re-publication of his valuable work”
    she has chosen the wrong person.
    A tribute to Pris Gunasekara and valuable work Pris Gunasekara is said and done in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDTKaZpo494
    (I have no respect to Lionel)
    I like to I call spade a spade – nothing else and Hypocrite a Hypocrite.
    (I have little respect to Lionel and his attempt is an insult to Pris Gunasekara)
    He attempts to write tributes to all, who have pass through his life how short it may be. Lionel has missed or he is not aware that Prins’s great contribution as MP for Habaraduwa from May 1965 -70 (after defeating the incumbent SLFP Minister-MP, DS Gunasekara,) contesting as an Independent candidate (with undisclosed SLFP blessing).
    The rest of the inaccuracies of this article can be detected from the 11 episodes of the above link.
    These 11 Episodes portrays the real life and contributions of Pris G. There too the story about Sir Oliver- Sir John has incorrect timing or incorrect references to portfolios they held at that particular occasion/ time

    • 3
      1

      Sisira, the crux of my argument was not about the ideologies of socialism or the extent of work by PG in his own field of interest. I do not understand why ultra socialists finally land in ultra capitalist English societies when they face life threats in their own countries! Isn’t it a paradox that these socialists finally seek shelter, and get shelter too, in the system they ripped out when politically active in their own homelands??

      • 0
        2

        If we are to do any justice to PG, we shall not get carried away with rubbish Lionel tries to cloak on PG. Take some time and pain to listen to the link I said in my earlier comment : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDTKaZpo494

        • 0
          0

          Prins was in the MEP, previously VLSSP.
          He was disappointed with Philip’s decision not to form an alliance or at least a no-contest pact with the SLFP, the way the CP & LSSP did in 1965 July.
          The MEP was reduced to just one seat from its earlier 10 in March.
          He contested against both UNP ans SLFP candidates in 1965 and won. He was in the opposition while his former leader Philip was in the UNP-led government as minister.
          He joined the SLFP in 1970, but split in the wake of the insurrection. He was all along a critic of Mrs B.
          Now it may be worth taking a second look at the flippant comments about his politics.
          *
          Lionel himself has a sense of gratitude as Prins was one of the few MPs who showed sympathy for his comrades in the fallen JVP and later became supportive of the JVP for which he was persecuted by the UNP government.
          Overall, Lionel is not exaggerating anything about Prins, but does not seem to know much of his pre-1970 career.
          Even Wikipedia is wrong to say that “in 1956 he was one of the founding members of the Mahajana Eksath Peramuna (People’s United Front)”. The MEP of 1956 was not Philip’s creation it was the name of an SLFP-led alliance.

          • 1
            0

            SJ
            “Now it may be worth taking a second look at the flippant comments about his politics.”
            You are correct in distinguishing between MEP of 1956 (symbol HAND) and MEP (symbol Wheel) of 1960 Match election onwards.
            In 1956 MEP, the joint secretaries were Prins G and AP Jayasooriya.
            Prins was a Journalist – Sub Editor, in Lankadeepa prior to that,from 1949 to 55. Lankadeepa was a progressive paper published by Times Group under the guidance od DB Danapala.
            In 1959 June Philip Left SWRD govt with Nimal Kaunathilaka, Piyasena Thennakoon, MS Themis, Laxman and DA Rajapaksa, to the opposition.
            Most of them as well as Pris contested 1960 Match election under newly formed MEP lead by Philip G. 10 of them won. (Most of them joined SLFP in July 1960)
            Pris along with other liberal MEP carder joined hands with SLFP LSSP (CP) coalition in May 1964. All this is history which has to be read with the rest.

      • 0
        2

        Jit, you are expressing what these idiotic brains do to good humans when the devil traps them to make equals of unbelievers, who are forced to escape to capitalist countries like UK. Immaterial whether it’s Prins Gunasekara or Karl Marx or any other who not only deny God but make it their life’s ambition to prove that they are correct. When they die, their stooges build monuments. So sad about the final destination of these struggling unbelievers, not accepting eternal salvation.

        • 2
          0

          David, in my world there are no gods. But respect your right to believe in one or more. So I refrain commenting further.

      • 0
        0

        Jit,

        I think you and many others often conflate political systems ( autocracy, totalitarianism, fascism vs. democracy) with economic systems ( capitalism vs. socialism.) It is fair to argue that countries should strive for fairly consistent and principled legal frameworks and freedoms as in Western societies even while criticizing their economic systems. If someone advocates a fairer system than what passes for global capitalism today while opposing any form of autocracy and totalitarianism, that should be applauded.

        Would you criticize Noam Chomsky, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, et. al., for being citizens of a capitalist country because they offer cogent criticism of their country’s economic system?

        • 2
          1

          Agnos, We cannot separate economics from politics, as economic systems are closely bonded, just like bark to a tree. Whichever the way it can be argued to separate politics from economics, the result will be absolute hypocrisy.
          In the point you made about Bernie Sanders et al., you yourself have proved my fundamental point! If Sanders were doing whatever he has been doing in China or Russia, he would either be in an ‘education camp,’ ‘rehabilitation camp,’ or in a dark cell for life, or the worse, buried six feet under. Why he can still live fearlessly in the USA with his more-than-centre-left policies is because of the freedom of expression in capitalist societies. There is no absolute freedom of expression anywhere, yet it is way more liberal than in the far-left blocs. Just like the way Comrade Deng Xiaoping was pushed to work in a tractor factory during the Cultural Revolution for just being a reformist leader.
          I am not a blind follower of capitalism nor socialism so I don’t hesitate to commend “…If someone advocates a fairer system than what passes for global capitalism today while opposing any form of autocracy and totalitarianism, that should be applauded….” as something worthwhile to accept.

          • 1
            2

            Jit,

            Genocide of native Americans, slavery, colonial plunder, etc., were all part of the West’s past before they arrived at the current system, which still has many problems; after all, if Trump is elected as the standard bearer, it shows the West has serious problems underneath a veneer of normality. So I think South Asia should strive to find a better way, absorbing the aspects where the West does well, discarding other things that involve a lot of hypocrisy, and not imitating the West. Unfortunately, India is already imitating the West in many spheres, so can Lanka do better?

            • 0
              1

              “…..Genocide of native Americans, slavery, colonial plunder, etc., were all part of the West’s past before they arrived at the current system..”

              Agnos, it is very cool to bash colonization, isn’t it? I do not want to comment on faraway Americans because we have enough material to discuss right at our own doorstep. What did we have before colonization? Were we saints? I am sure you know many stories about sons murdering their fathers to grab total control of the kingdom and its wealth. What about the Dathusena-Kashyapa saga? Even fables like the Sinhabahu story depict murdering the father to take control of the reign. There was no law other than the king’s law, which was absolutely a kangaroo court system. There was no ‘hearing the other side,’ and so-called ‘defendants’ were not given a chance and were hanged or had their heads severed! And what about the carcinogenic caste system that was clearly a very good example of slavery, where people other than the king’s henchmen were barred from doing any kind of ‘elite’ jobs? If that system continued, you and I would still be doing the same jobs that our parents did! Fortunately, the Dutch and the British colonized us and gave us a fair legal system and free education and a liberal political system enabling us to be who we are today.

            • 1
              0

              … and they have finally arrived at arming mass murderers and forming alliances with Islamist fanatics.

        • 1
          1

          “principled legal frameworks and freedoms as in Western societies”
          I think that we should ask Julian Paul Assange for his views on the subject.

          • 2
            2

            Assange is an odd case that doesn’t invalidate the broad idea of democratic freedoms and legal frameworks in the West.

            The destructive influence of money in US politics and Universities that pay lip service to free speech while being subservient to pro-Israeli donors and taking harsh disciplinary action against pro-Palestinian students, etc., are more problematic. Recently, an MIT PhD student, Prahlad Iyengar, was suspended after he wrote an essay ‘On Pacifism,’ arguing that pro-Palestinian protests might need to be bolder, perhaps even violent.

            No system is perfect but it is self-evident that totalitarian systems are far worse.

            • 1
              1

              Asange is not the odd case but the most publicised case.
              Remember the McCarthy years?

              • 1
                1

                “Remember the McCarthy years?”

                Remember the Wanni years under Hon. Velu? The reason economic systems fail is not because of the particular ideology, it has to do with misallocation of resources. If you give a homeless man on the street $1 million USD, he will likely be bankrupt within 5 years. There are many studies that reach this conclusion. To be fair, Velu was resourceful. His mistake was chasing after a full house, rather than folding & exiting according to India’s rules.

      • 0
        0

        Hello Jit,
        It might be worth your while reading Engels on “The Condition of the Working Class in England” This was around the time that he met Marx (1840s). Europe was awash with Revolutions around 1848.
        My Ancestors on my Father’s side were descended from a Village Blacksmith (John) near Perth who moved to Aberdeen in the 1830s and worked in the Shipyards. In my Research I found that John, his son Andrew and his Grandson Alexander died of Phthisis (TB) at quite early ages. Many other relations also died of TB some in Dundee and Edinburgh. They mostly lived in the crowded Tenements of the Cities near the Docks. On my Mother’s side they were all from the Countryside going back to the mid-1500s. Not a single one died of TB.
        The conditions for the Working Class were only improved when they formed Trade Unions and fought for their rights.
        Now what exactly is an “Ultra Socialist” and an “Ultra Capitalist”?
        Best regards

        • 0
          2

          ” Now what exactly is an “Ultra Socialist” and an “Ultra Capitalist”?…”

          You know what it is LS!
          Ultra socialist = ultra leftist, one who crosses and go beyond the centre left line to the extreme left.
          Ultra Capitalist = extreme right wing activist who crosses and go beyond the centre right line to the extreme

          • 0
            0

            Hello Jit,
            I still don’t understand.
            When I was at University during the Upper Cyde Shipbuider’s Strike, the Leader of the workers was Jimmy Reid, a member of the Communist Party (CPGB). When I asked Reid, at a Public Meeting, how the Chairman of the UCS managed to have a small Bridge built in his Garden by striking workers, he replied by haranguing me and said “You are so far over to the Left, that according to Einstein you are over on the Right”. There are many Capitalists that would protest at your description.
            And by the way who decides what the Centre is?
            Best regards

            • 0
              0

              Hello Jit,
              PS I really should have asked you what particular policies define an Ultra Left or Ultra Right position.
              Best regards

            • 1
              1

              Dear LS, I appreciate your curiosity and the questions but I have a feeling the way you expect me to answer them all will definitely go on until the cows come home….and probably afterward. Unfortunately I don’t have that kind of luxury. As a very intelligent man in CT, you can start researching at something called Google where you will find a plethora of definitions. Here’s a very good starting point………..https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/ultra-leftist. Thank you and have a restful night! 😊

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.