15 August, 2022


Call To Defuse Bombs In Parliament Or Precipitate Explosion Outside Parliament

By P. Soma Palan – 

P. Soma Palan

I refer to the article captioned “Secularism and Its Discontents” by, Mr. Malinda Seneviratne (MS), in Colombo Telegraph of 2nd November. I state my point of view regarding the views expressed

therein. Mr. MS has compared, metaphorically, the two issues in the Constitutional project as two bombs(a) Expunging the Clause relating to Buddhism and (b) Devolution of Power.

Clause Foremost Place for Buddhism-its inclusion or exclusion

Mr. MS states that “the Tamil National Alliance M.P. Mr. Sumanthiran has stated the stand of his Party, and by and large, the group of anti-Sinhala, anti Buddhist NGO lobby”. To say those who express the principle of equity and justice are anti-Sinhala and anti- Buddhist, is an erroneous idea. Indirectly, Mr. MS is saying, even Mr. Sumanthiran ‘s statement  reaffirming the stand of the TNA, is also anti-Sinhala and anti-Buddhist.

Mr. MS cites Articles (9) (10) and (14(1) (c). Article (9) relates to ‘foremost place for Buddhism”, and’ to protect and foster Buddhism’. Articles (10) & 14(1) (c) guaranteeing the rights of other religions.The Articles (10) & 14 (1)(c) are negated by Article (9) is admitted by Mr. MS, when he says “taken together Article (9)  stands in effect negated”. If so, what is the use of the guarantees provided in (10) & 14(a) (c). If the latter Articles are contradicted by the former, it is of no value.  If one knows there is inequity and injustice, why embody them in the Constitution?

Secular State

The concept of a Secular State is a complete divorce between State and Religion in the Constitution. A Constitution has no gender, race or religion. It is an abstract, Impersonal document- the Fundamental Law of the Country. Mr. MS states that “if Secular is the way to go, there cannot be half-way measures. You can’t take away the only privilege that Buddhism has, while being silent on the privileges enjoyed by other religious communities.” Mr. MS enumerates a list of religious Holidays enjoyed by other religions, which he claims violates the Secular concept. As if Buddhists don’t have religious Holidays. The Buddhists have more religious Holidays than other religions. They have every month a Holidays and extra holiday for Wesak. Other religions only have few holidays. Sundays is a statutory week-end holiday for all, irrespective of religion. Moreover, holidays are not embodied in the Constitution of the Country. Holidays are governed by separate enactment of the Law, the Holidays Act. Further, other privileges or concessions are governed by other Enactments as the Labour Statute, Shop & Office Employees Act etc.  Mr. MS confused by associating Holidays granted by other Laws, as non-secular privileges. These laws/ concessions given to different religious faiths do not take away the Secular character of the Constitution. Mr, MS  states “these are other special laws that are certainly at ‘odds’ with the secular vision”. These do not violate the secular vision as he believes, because these do not emerge from the Constitution. This miss-apprehension is due to a misconception of a Secular State. The State has no religion, hence the Constitution of the State does not recognize any one religion.

The State is apart and beyond religion. Mr. MS cites the Personal Laws of the Northern Tamils, the Thesavalamai, and the Kandyan Law of the Kandyans and Muslim Law of the Muslims, as incompatible with the Secular concept of the Constitution. The Constitution has nothing to do with these Personal Laws of a particular community based on customary practices.These  have no Constitutional sanction, and does not erode the secularism of the Constitution. These are similar to other Laws of the Country, like the Criminal, Civil and the Common Law .These do not spring from the Constitution. Due to the failure to discriminate the difference between Constitution and the other Laws of the country, Mr. MS comes to the ludicrous conclusion stating that “ if equality is the objective, then all these should be erased off the Constitution, along with Articles (9) (10) and (14(1) c- relating to Buddhism. That is, if we need to separate State and Religion. What is being proposed is to remove Buddhism and allow other religions to entrench their already privileged position in the Constitution.”Mr.MS will discover the fallacy of his argument, whilst citing the specific Articles relating to Buddhism, he does not cite the specific Articles in the Constitution relating to the privileged position entrenched in the Constitution to other religions, which need to be erased off. This is simply because no such Articles exist in the Constitution. What is entrenched in the Constitution is an omnibus Article 14(1) C guaranteeing the freedom for all religions to profess, practice and manifest their respective religions. This is inclusive, all embracing and equal fundamental right available to all citizens of the country. This has to be retained. It is the essence of a Secular State. No particular religion has a place in the Constitution.

Mr. MS laments about the abrogation of the Kandyan Convention of 1815 by the British, relating to Buddhism. This is a Convention between the King of the Kandyan Kingdom, a residual of the three kingdoms that existed in 1505, and the British. It is restrictive and not to the whole country. Mr. MS states that “as things stand, religion-wise, this state is chock-full of religion and it’s mostly non-Buddhist”. This is an untruth. On the contrary, it is chock-full of Buddhist, with the pre-eminent place for Buddhism, making the State a de-facto Theocracy. The State and Buddhism have become synonymous. Since Buddhism has entered the Constitution, it has also entered the Sinhala Government. The Government had got Buddhisized and Buddhism ( Sangha) has got politicized. The Government governs the Country on all fronts, from a Buddhist mind-set, and the concern of the Buddha Sasana is to control politics than follow the Buddha Dhamma, as evidenced by the ultimatum issued by the Two Mahanayake Theros, to stop the Constitution making process immediately.

Devolution of Power

Mr. MS  states that “first lines were the work of British Cartographers and are not drawn from any substantiable historic narrative”. He is not specific here. What is left unsaid is that the Provincial lines drawn by the British of the North Eastern Province only is false, and not in accord with historic narrative, while all of other Provinces  are in accord with the historic narrative. The objection is only in respect of the North Eastern province. Others are acceptable. Firstly, the British are not that stupid to draw lines in the air, without any rationale and ground reality relating to demography of the region, racial composition, Culture, and place names etc, which unmistakably had all the characteristics of a distinct homogeneity as to constitute a region. Mr. MS and others of same leanings, fault British cartographers with contempt only with Provincial line of North East, not with lines of other Provinces. Strangely, those who oppose the Provincial lines of the British, are amorously fanatical about the “ Unitary” State, which is a creation of the British, despite the fact that the country was ruled for an aggregate period of about 800 years by South Indian Kings, from Polonaruwa and Anuradhapura, from the time of King Devanambiya tissa. The descendant Tamils continued to inhabit the Northern and Eastern region, whilst the Sinhala kingdoms drifted to the South, in stages, due to the threat of invasion from South India.

The stage of Tamil of grievances has now passed, although discrimination persists. Now, it is self-determination, that is the right to rule themselves in the region they are a majority. The fact of a sizable percentage of Tamils living in the capital city is irrelevant to the issue. It is thrown in to deflect the issue. They have valid reasons for living in the capital city, like job opportunities, the neglected state of North/East in the economic development of the country, education, wartime insecurity etc. Mr. MS says Provincial Councils are white elephants. Who made it so? The Government, by not devolving full powers to them. If this had been done, North East would have been a self-thriving Unit, along with others.

Coming back to the subject, Mr. MS compares the twin issues, Foremost place for Buddhism and Devolution of Power, as Bombs. He says “they need to be defused, otherwise, it can precipitate much suffering outside”. What he means is that if the Government goes against these two issues, the so-called ‘bombs’ will explode outside Parliament, in violence. Is it a call or a prediction?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 0

    What Karl Marx said ”Religion is the opium of the people” still holds good 135 years after his death.This single saying should be our religion.Millions have died in the name of religion and are dying today in the middle east and Myanmar to name a few places. As it is for the people to decide on what religion they should follow do we need to codify it in the constitution. Credit should go to the late JVP leader Rohana Wijeweera where he said thatState does not need a religion and should allow freedom of worship of all religions.

  • 0

    Malinda Seniviratne’s writings always aim at a certain group. His claim that Christians have 54 holidays per year is bordering on the absurd! This includes 52 Sundays! We did try the Poya-day and pre-Poyaday holidays but abandoned it. MS tries to exploit people’s short memory.
    Whose attention is MS trying to attract?

  • 0

    Buddhism and Devolution are just stink bombs to foul up the atmosphere and confuse and cofound issues used by weasel hacks like MS.
    He knows primitive patriotic racial jingoism can be invoked whenever required for the hoi polloi to accept hunger,ignorance, destitution even if there is mass discontent.
    That is what he is doing. He is an expert at that.

  • 0

    Although it may not suit Palan’ argument there is no doubt that Sunday is a Christian holiday introduced by the British to enable the converts from Buddhism to attend church.Saturday of course is non religious. The majority of people in Sri Lanka are Buddhists and the foremost place of Buddhism recognised from the time of the Kandyan convention in 1815 and on wards. Non Buddhists like Palan will probably want the recognition given to Buddhism withdrawn but that is an idle dream. It also has the effect of Buddhists closing ranks and becoming more proactive in safeguarding their religion. There is a new Buddhist reawakening in the country due to the anti Buddhist policies of YAHAPALANAYAS. So Palan and his ilk better be careful before rousing anti Buddhist sentiment.

    • 0

      Malinda S’s position and politics is no dissimilar to the degenerate
      politics of that crank – Donald Trump. The latter, to win over the other
      16 Presidential candidates, chose the path to shock the American electorate – an evil Bannon plan that eventually worked. The Wall,
      China Currency-manipulator, USA 1st, anti-immigration policy were all calculated cheat. As Michael Bloomberg said of Trump then “I know a Con man when I see one” Malinda is another conman. He is sufficiently educated and comes from the right stock not to confuse
      decent politics with the crass, narrow opportunistic Sinhala Buddhist variety. His father is a respected Leftist intellectual. Yet he (MS)
      messes with Sinhala extremists and bogus nationalists to get “somewhere” in journalism, in which he is no more than a novice. That is the path that bought dirt like Weerawansa, Ranawake,
      Gammanpilla and the like quick rewards.


      • 0

        Backlash should get on to a crash course in English composition. Can’t make out anything from his intended diatribe! Or is he and I orbiting in different planets?

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.