23 June, 2025

Blog

Can Business & Spirituality Coexist? A Buddhist Critique Of Modern Capitalism

By Vipula Wanigasekera

Dr. Vipula Wanigasekera

In a world where billionaires are idolized and featured on magazine covers, one is compelled to ask: can business and spirituality genuinely coexist? A provocative claim made by a speaker once stated, “To make one billionaire, another thousand must go hungry.” While this may be an oversimplification, it reflects the disturbing reality of global wealth inequality. If such imbalance persists, should we continue glorifying business achievers without questioning the moral cost? More importantly, are spiritual leaders fulfilling their duty in guiding society toward ethical balance?

In capitalist economies, business success is often measured solely by profit, market dominance, and personal wealth accumulation. But these measures frequently overlook the deeper societal impact of such success. The latest report by Oxfam (2024) shows that the richest 1% continue to accumulate nearly two-thirds of all new wealth globally, while billions face growing insecurity and poverty. This isn’t just a statistical anomaly—it’s a moral crisis.

Glorifying the ultra-wealthy, therefore, becomes problematic when their success is built upon exploitative labour practices, environmental degradation, and systemic inequality. The question isn’t whether business itself is wrong—but whether the values driving it align with human and ecological well-being.

Buddhism offers a deeply reflective framework to evaluate wealth and livelihood. The Buddha did not condemn wealth outright but placed great emphasis on how it is earned, used, and shared. The Sigalovada Sutta (Digha Nikaya 31) outlines a code of ethics for laypersons, promoting honest livelihood, generosity (dāna), and responsibility toward employees and society. Wealth, according to this teaching, must serve communal well-being—not merely personal indulgence (Bhikkhu Bodhi, 2005).

Central to this ethical compass are the Brahmavihāras: mettā (loving-kindness), karuṇā (compassion), muditā (empathetic joy), and upekkhā (equanimity). These are not just contemplative ideals—they can shape leadership, corporate culture, and economic systems when applied sincerely. Buddhist economics, as explained by Payutto (1994), suggests a “middle way” where production and consumption are guided by moderation, mindfulness, and compassion, rather than greed (lobha) and competition.

Moreover, the concept of Right Livelihood, one of the steps on the Noble Eightfold Path, insists that earning a living must not cause harm to others. Industries that exploit humans, animals, or the environment would be considered unethical in this context (Rahula, 1974).

If such powerful ethical tools are available, why do spiritual leaders often remain silent about the moral failings of economic systems? Many spiritual institutions have become passive or complicit in the face of corporate excess. Temples, churches, and spiritual centres sometimes mirror corporate structures themselves—invested more in fundraising and visibility than in confronting injustice.

There are exceptions. The Dalai Lama (1999) has long emphasized “compassionate economics,” and Thich Nhat Hanh (2012) warned against the seductive nature of wealth and power, calling instead for mindful consumption. Yet these voices remain in the minority.

It is time for spiritual leaders to reclaim their moral authority—not through ritual alone, but through active engagement with economic and social realities. Their silence, in the face of growing inequality, questions their commitment to their own teachings.

Business and spirituality are not mutually exclusive—but the former must be redefined through the latter. Business leaders should be held accountable not just for profit, but for ethical consequences. Buddhist values offer tools to humanize economics: through mettā in leadership, karuṇā in policy, muditā in celebrating shared success, and upekkhā in cultivating inner balance amid external pressures.

Spirituality, to be authentic, must step beyond meditation halls into boardrooms, parliaments, and marketplaces. Otherwise, we risk glorifying a world that thrives materially while starving morally.

*The writer is a former Diplomat, Head of Tourism & Convention Bureau, Currently an Academic at ECU, Author, Youtuber, Meditation and Reiki healer vwanigasekera@gmail.com

Latest comments

  • 1
    2

    Buddhism has said nothing about ending feudal exploitation of the peasantry although it attracted marginalised people.
    It cared for the poor and the weak, but never told them the way out.
    It was mainly concerned with rights and wrongs and salvation at a personal level.
    If modern day Buddhism is anti-capitalist, I wonder why there is not a single Buddhist socialist state.
    Members of the Buddhist clergy have been revolutionaries, but equally there have been big money bags among the clergy.

    • 0
      1

      Thank you for your comments

      • 1
        0

        Why has a Sanghanayaka in Padeniya been demoted by the Malwatta Chapter for holding some sort of a TV program at his temple, while they do nothing about criminals like Gnanasara?

  • 0
    5

    Dr. Vipula, It is not possible for a now SL Buddhist who follows Siddhartha Gauthama who was a Hindu, cremated as a Hindu and ashes thrown into the river, to have any spirituality, as the Buddha did not believe that Creator God exists. His was total salvation by self, 4 fold and 8 fold. So where is this nirvana into which one can vanish, with own karma and family bloodline karma from several generations. Hindus also believed in many gods who manifested to the people. Can business and spirituality co exist is your question. Business involves cheating which is not spirituality.

    • 0
      0

      Possible David. Thank you

    • 3
      1

      DTG, spectacular ignorance. Who told you that Nibbana was a place? Who said you can vanish into it? Who said there was ‘bloodline karma’ whatever that is? You should study a subject carefully before commenting on it.

      • 1
        0

        Hello Paul,
        DTG is a firm believer in “bloodline karma” as per Exodus 34:7 and Deuteronomy 5:9 which states that God is”a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me”.
        DTG studies the Bible Assiduously, however he is unable to critique it as he believes it is all the word of God and therefore Unassailable.
        Best regrads

      • 0
        1

        Paul, Bloodline karma is what our ancestors have been doing down the line ending in us too repeating the same and multiplying our own karma which takes people to demonic hell and nowhere else like the intended Paradise of heaven of Creator God. Whether place or state, people say “May you attain Nibbana” Who can verify where Siddhartha Gauthama, the Hindu now has gone to.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.