By Chandra Jayaratne –

Chandra Jayaratne
This open letter submission is made taking account of the sustainable long-term interests of the government led by you, Sri Lanka and its people.
The budget speech 2026 recently delivered by you highlighted with much emphasis the critical need for visionary thought leadership driven timely change management; leading optimization of investments, sustainable growth of at least seven percent per annum and the assurance of corruption and waste eliminated equitable good governance; optimizing factor productivity and enhancing greater value addition to benefit all citizens in all parts of the country in the long term.
It appears, however, that little or no emphasis, nor even a reference, was made to the most obvious sector of the economy to be focused on in strategically and effectively implementing with leadership commitment, to secure in the longer-term the greatest opportunities for sustainable growth, investments and significant economic and social value creation.
Therefore, it is recommended that You, the Cabinet and your advisors strategically address urgently, the challenges in optimizing the sustainable exploitation of undersea untapped resources in a manner compliant with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (which Convention sets out the legal framework within which all activities in the oceans and seas must be carried out).
Sri Lanka can inter alia exploit all valuable sea resources within its territorial jurisdictional rights, including those secured under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which paves the way for the rights of nations to exploit under-sea resources, of course varying by maritime zones.

Screenshot
In summary, as a coastal nation, Sri Lanka has exclusive control over resources in its internal waters, territorial sea, EEZ, and continental shelf. Beyond these limits, the International Seabed Authority regulates resource exploitation.
In addition to the exploitation of the coastal belt and territorial sea for under seas resources, (such as minerals, sand, gravel, oil, and gas found on the ocean floor, including polymetallic nodules, seafloor massive sulfides, and cobalt-rich crusts, which contain valuable metals like copper, nickel, cobalt, gold, and rare earth elements), Sri Lanka’s share once our rights under UNCLOS are duly settled in respect of the Bay of Bengal undersea resources, as well as the cobalt-rich resources on the seabed, specifically in an area of the Afanasy Nikitin Seamount falling within Sri Lanka’s recent extension of its continental shelf beyond the standard 200 nautical miles of its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), would expand its jurisdictional rights over the seabed and subsoil resources,. This is possible post competing claims made by other countries, including India, Myanmar, and African country are duly resolved.
It would be essential that the best available Sri Lankan resources team with integrity, expertise and commitment be mobilized by the government (irrespective of where they reside) and to be duly engaged to develop a strategic plan covering abovementioned value creation opportunities.
This team must address inter alia in its strategic plan the following:
1. Clearly identify what are the exploitable resources within Sri Lanka’s current endowed extents of the seas, as well as all other options as available under UNCLOS and any others not exploited to date (eg. Mannar Basin and other strategic areas of the North, East and South).
2. Clearly identify what remains to be done to secure optimum rights for Sri Lanka under UNCLOS and other treaties, together with an action plan and associated time plan, to ensure optimum rights are acquired by Sri Lanka on a timely basis
3. A thorough competitor analysis and timely gather intelligence and information on the strategic steps the competitors are pursuing and identify any consequential risks as well as risk mitigation strategies
4. Develop strategic plans with associated time plans and identified resources requirements to exploit sustainably Sri Lanka’s entitlements, conscious of the consequential international/geopolitical challenges, other sensitivities and risks also being identified along with mapped mitigation actions
5. Clearly agree a strategic risk mitigated approach to be adopted in seeking, selecting and negotiating with international partners in exploiting the resources and the best options for marketing post optimum value addition and including partner remuneration /sharing of resources/profits/cash flows outcomes
6. Identify the best option organizational and operational structures for envisioning, project implementation and management, management information systems, resource management, decision making, oversight and leadership
In the backdrop of giving attention to the above, it is essentially important that all new and presently approved and future to be approved Strategic Development Projects, Colombo Port City Economic Commission Projects and all Board of Investment Projects engaged in strategically important economic activities and those above set limits for investments and grant of concessions be subjected to the following legal and regulatory reforms:
1. All such projects and their management are bound under contractually agreed good governance codes of conduct and ethics (say like that applying to listed Companies) with associated non-discriminatory practices, anti-monopoly practices, sustainability, and consumer protection guidelines
2. All such projects and their management be placed under scrutiny and be subject to strict reporting requirements of the Financial Reporting Act with oversight by the Financial Intelligence Unit; thus assuring compliance with Anti-Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing Regulations, Financial Action Task Force rules and beneficial ownership regulations
3. Accounts, Operations and Financial Statements of all such projects are required to be subjected annually to a compulsory Transfer Pricing Audit and local Economic Value Addition Certification and further required to submit agreed management information to the approving authority
4. Projects engaged in development, marketing and servicing tradable goods and services which optimize local value addition become a priority requirement for grant of tax and other concessions
5. Introduce effective regulatory mechanisms for early identification of any emerging operational sensitivities of these projects, any emerging challenges of geo-political and international relations and any risks of unacceptable communications by third parties damaging investments and investees
6. Remove forthwith all monopoly licensing and exploitation rights granted by previous regimes governing the exploitation of maritime and undersea resources
I stand ready to clarify and expand on any of the submissions and recommendations set forth above.
Mallaiyuran / November 14, 2025
The author exhibits a style reminiscent of Tisaranee Gunasekara, marked by grandiosity and a tendency toward disconnected rhetoric. Despite his verbose approach, the points he raises lack direct relevance to the current (2026) budget discussions.
I
There are instances when certain laws and acts require amendments for a proposed budget to be fully implemented. Without these adjustments, the budget risks remaining theoretical, much like previous examples such as Junius Richard’s and the so-called Evil Emperor’s PC election, which, according to critics, aimed to undermine Tamil rights. However, the author does not address these necessary legal modifications. Instead, he appears more interested in inviting AKD onto his own election platform through the performative gesture of writing an open letter.
“I stand ready to clarify and expand on any of the submissions and recommendations set forth above.”
It seems the author misunderstands the budgetary process. AKD cannot simply heed the author’s advice and make unilateral changes; the budget must be debated and approved by Parliament. The fundamental nature of the budget is to balance expenses and income. If the author had substantive suggestions, he could have communicated them privately to the president, relevant ministers, or the offices responsible for drafting the budget. Instead, his public letter comes across as an attempt to showcase himself to the public, firing criticisms in all directions without offering meaningful or actionable recommendations.
/
Mallaiyuran / November 14, 2025
The author’s recommendation to “remove forthwith all monopoly……… contracts” demonstrates a lack of understanding of the complexities tied to international agreements and their repercussions. For instance, during the 2015 election, the so-called Evil Emperor campaigned on the promise of cancelling the controversial Colombo Pong Cing deal with China. However, after assuming power, he was unable to follow through. Instead, China leveraged its position to force the government into selling the Hangbangtota port and five surrounding villages in perpetuity. The nation remains burdened by over $125 billion in loans and interest, with repayment obligations looming by 2028.
Such ill-considered advice, as put forth by the author, risks placing the entire country at the mercy of foreign powers, particularly China. This pattern is further highlighted by the Gothapayal’s inability to return the $8 million “poop ship” due to a legally established letter of credit, after which China blacklisted the People’s Bank and drove the nation toward bankruptcy. The author appears oblivious to the binding nature of international contracts and the consequences that arise from breaching them. Is this uninformed perspective derived from Dr. Jaisankar’s Indo-Ceylon Defense Fact stance, or perhaps the Mannar windmill project from India? It’s worth recalling that it was the so-called Rowdy King—mentor to both the author and his father—who surrendered Bay of Bengal fishing rights to China, leading to the European Union banning fish imports from Langkang.
/
Mallaiyuran / November 14, 2025
If the author genuinely intends to propose amendments to the 2026 Budget, his recommendations must address specifics, such as the targeted area, the magnitude of the change, and its potential impact. Instead, his approach mirrors past tactics, including leveraging the Supreme Court to protect the Royal family from human rights violations by intentionally damaging the country’s economy. Ultimately, the author seems less interested in constructive criticism and more intent on ensnaring the NPP in a rhetorical trap under the guise of budgetary critique.
/
Naman / November 14, 2025
The Author of this article rightly brings in a topic of discussion on how our country can benefit from the resources under the sea surrounding us. But we are at present discussing how the Budget presented by AKD is going to affect our country.
Our attention needs to be directed towards the uplifting the lives of those living with low incomes/ unemployment/ struggles of the travelling to work and back/educating the children/ protecting the kids and young adults from drug addiction etc.
We need to promote social activities that promote the “CLEAN SL” projects on weekends and public holidays.
Keeping the country roads parks and beaches litter free is a way to get our country a beautiful one.
Budget should also help those who were affected by the prolonged civil war. This is not the time to organise National Protests by those politicians who brought economic downturn.
The money that is being spent on organising the 21/11/25 protest is also THE STOLEN MONEY!
Protest should be natural and a paid up /bribed picnic for their stooges!
/
Ajith / November 14, 2025
“Budget 2026, Investments & Growth Optimisation”
President has a vision about the country, economy, people. He has only limited choices because he has limited opportunities but so far he has no vision about how to keep the country under same stability to continue for longer. For example according to his original vision or thoughts he has changed a lot. Will he remain original vision is now a big question?
/