15 December, 2017

Blog

Facing (Apparent?) Failure

 By Charles Sarvan

Prof. Charles Sarvan

Prof. Charles Sarvan

“As for me and some other Sri Lankans, both within and outside the Island, we have failed, again and again.

The above observation was made by a friend, a Sinhalese Buddhist, whom I’ve met only through the written word. She is one who has fearlessly stood up for abstractions such as justice, equality and decency. (For “decency”, see Sarvan in The Sunday Leader of 08.08.2010 on Avishai Margalit’s The Decent Society). She and others like her, be they Burgher (Pieter Kenueman comes to my mind), Tamil, Sinhalese or Muslim, have stood up for such ideals because the absence of these abstractions has a real, physical, impact both on individual human beings and on society in general. In their absence, ideals do not remain ideals but translate to a (negative), and very real, reality.

Viewing Sri Lanka immediately prior to, and ever since independence in 1948, one feels compelled to agree with my friend’s sad conclusion of failure. (If there’s a note of self-reproach in her message, it is undeserved.) The typical attributes of racism, such as hegemony and exclusion; cruelty and violence have triumphed and now hold sway.  Justice (John Rawls states in his classic work, A Theory of Justice, that it is the notion of “fairness” that leads to principles of justice) and equality which make for a country beautiful in far more important terms than natural, geographic, features have been defeated The emotive and mass-mobilising forces of vertical division – ‘race’, language and religion – have proved much stronger and more lethal than the vision of a common humanity.  Flowers, though beautiful, happiness-making and life-enhancing lose against weeds. “How with this rage shall beauty hold a plea / Whose action is no stronger than a flower?” (Shakespeare’s Sonnet 65)

Personal and private failure is easier to come to terms with than the failure of what one has, in the impersonal and public interest, pursued; devoted thought, expended time and energy; taken risk. Personal failure affects only the individual and her or his family. The failure of a good cause one has espoused is harder to bear because that lack of success affects others, the wider society and the country at large. Throughout the decades, Sri Lankan men and women with a sense of justice and fair-play; gifted with intellect and eloquence (some of them come to mind but because I can’t name them all, I will refrain from citing any), bright stars on the public stage, sank into that final darkness knowing they had failed to make the slightest difference. Indeed that, despite their efforts, things had only worsened.

Some, seeing inevitable defeat, jettisoned ideals and joined with the forces of injustice and unkindness: “If you can’t defeat them, join them!” They saw where personal profit and advantage lay, and took that seductive route. It is easy and profitable to cling to victory chariots as they career along, but brave and honourable to fight an ethical rearguard action. Some turncoats perhaps deceived themselves, easing their conscience with the thought they could do more good by going with the torrent than by futilely opposing it. The Bible relates that cruel Roman Saul – “Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?” (Acts 22:7) – changed suddenly and became pious Paul.  (Paul was likely beheaded by the Romans, under Emperor Nero, sometime around May or June of 68 CE.) However, in the public sphere it’s more a case of admirable and good-intentioned Pauls becoming self-seeking and virulent Sauls, proudly flaunting what they should be ashamed of. Corruption means a debasement, a loss of original moral lustre. Robert Frost in his poem, ‘Nothing Gold Can Stay’, suggests that a falling-off with time is in the nature of life and this world.  Not even gold remains bright and beautiful:

Nature’s first green is gold,

Her hardest hue to hold.

Her early leaf’s a flower;

But only so an hour.

Then leaf subsides to leaf.

So Eden sank to grief,

So dawn goes down to day.

Nothing gold can stay.

Centuries earlier, the so-called ‘father of English literature’ (Chaucer) in describing a priest wrote somewhat on the following lines: He behaved  as he preached, and so set the perfect example. He lived by the motto, “If gold were to rust, what would iron do?”  To Chaucer’s priests and monks we could add politicians and public figures: if religious and political leaders “rust”, then the folk will also deteriorate. (Lilies – symbols of purity –  when they fester, smell far worse than weeds. Shakespeare: Sonnet 94). The betrayal of ideals by once-admired figures is felt personally by those who had believed in and followed them, as in Robert Browning’s attack in ‘The Lost Leader’ on William Wordsworth:

Just for a handful of silver he left us […]
We that had loved him so, followed him, honoured him […]
Made him our pattern to live and to die!

But to return to my friend and her observation, the Buddha emphasised the temporary nature of all things while Ecclesiastes 1:2 exclaims “all is vanity”, that is, meaningless. It may be argued that that being the reality, neither victory nor defeat is permanent. I would suggest two answers to this. The Native Americans and the Australian Aborigines have not, and never will, regain their ancestral lands. Their defeat is permanent. What happened, has happened: paradoxically, history is fluid and final.

The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ,

Moves on: nor all your Piety nor Wit

Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line,

Nor all your Tears wash out a Word of it. (Omar Khayyam)

Secondly, one may repeat and re-live but one cannot ever “un-live” History. Experience cannot be erased post facto; lives cannot be resurrected. Posthumous atonement is a fiction reserved for Fiction: see, for example, Ian McEwan’s novel, ‘Atonement’.

I am sorry not to be of any real comfort to my friend – I use “comfort” in the earlier sense of “strengthen”. But while some individuals see opportunity, those like her see no option. The thought of abandonment or alteration, not even of compromise, simply does not occur to the likes of her. I am reminded of Emma Goldman. Honoured and feted by the Soviet Union, she did not hesitate to criticise its dictatorship. As Vivian Gornick comments (‘Emma Goldman: Revolution as a Way of Life‘, Yale University Press, 2011), had she remained in Russia, the once-honoured guest  would have ended up in a Soviet labour camp. Polonius in Hamlet urged, “to your own self be true”. In the case of individuals like my friend it means being in a very small and losing minority. At the end of what I wrote about Paul Caspersz (Public Writings on Sri Lanka, Volume 2), I quote words from Wyatt, though the poet uses them in a very different context: For good is the life ending faithfully. In my friend’s instance, faithfulness is to certain ethical principles in political and public life.

The Bible advises that the help we render others should be unobtrusive (Matthew 6:3). In quite in another context, Doris Lessing wrote that it is insufficient to render private and personal help within an unjust state of affairs: the aim must be to change that unjust system. (No doubt, Lessing is here echoing Marx.) However, my friend sent me a story about a twelve-year old white girl who, in 1961, during the intense violence and hostility that met the ‘civil rights movement’, particularly in the American South, defied the baying mob and publicly gave a glass of water to a black woman. (Reference: http://www.upworthy.com/she-grew-up-overhearing-her-racist-dad-after-hearing-her-story-i-dont-think-she-was-listening?c=upw1.)

Failure or not, that individual and open challenge by the little girl; my friend in Sri Lanka, and examples from other places and times are example and encouragement. They save us from misanthropy, such as Swift expresses in Part 1V of his Gulliver’s Travels, ‘A Voyage to the Country of the Houyhnhnms’.  To act in the face of seemingly certain failure may be seen by some as folly; by others as being all the more admirable. Hans Fallada wrote a novel based on the true case of a working-class couple in Berlin who, all by themselves, decided to oppose Nazism. What they did was to write postcards of accusation and warning, and leave them surreptitiously in public places where they would be picked up. They knew the cards would have no effect whatsoever: most, in terror, either threw them away or took them straight to the police. The couple knew that eventually they would be caught, tortured and executed. Yet they persisted. The novel is on sale in English under the title, Alone In Berlin but a more literal translation of the original would be something like, ‘Everyone dies alone’ (for or by her / his beliefs).

Several years ago, my second son expressed the regret that he had not studied medicine and become a doctor. When I asked why, he replied: “Then, at the end of the day, I can forgive my mistakes.” I ‘read’ this as: Inevitably, to a greater or lesser degree, we will do what we ought not to do, and leave undone some of the things we ought to have done (‘Book of Common Prayer’). But, as a medical doctor, he would also have done much good and so, at the end of his life, he could be somewhat content. So I tell my friend facing failure that she can, and should be, content for, in the words of St Ignatius of Loyola, she is one of those who have given and not counted the cost; fought and not heeded the wounds; laboured and not asked for any reward other than knowing she stood on the side of justice, equality and inclusion. In short, she campaigns for a better, more free and happy, life for all Sri Lankans.

A question difficult to answer but one which compels attention is, “How much worse would things have been without the efforts of the minority with decency and courage?” I end with the words of one Sri Lanka’s most perceptive and sensitive writers: “If there are gods… let them … give us strength every day, because we need it every day …There is no let-up, ever.” (Romesh Gunesekera, Reef.)

“A luta continua!”  And the struggle must be continued, for the alternative will be the continuation, and worsening, of injustice and tragedy.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 2
    3

    Prof. Charles Sarvan

    “As for me and some other Sri Lankans, both within and outside the Island, we have failed, again and again.”

    Why? Sinhala “Buddhist” Racism and Chauvinism that has nothing to do with Buddhas Teachings-Dhamma.

    Al-Maʿarri “The inhabitants of the earth are of two sorts: those with brains, but no religion, and those with religion, but no brains.”[16]

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Ma%CA%BFarri

    Re Buddhism —

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsgcP65dDOg

    Buddhism The Great Evil — Part 1

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNOfTGSADdY

    Buddhism The Great Evil — Part 2

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clcs2PSze0I

  • 1
    2

    Charles Sarvan keeps qouting the wrong poet.Here is the one that he should be contemplating:

    “The old order changeth yielding place to new And God fulfills himself in many ways Lest one good custom should corrupt the world. Tennyson

  • 4
    1

    Many thanks Charles Sarvan. We need to keep fighting the good fight with ideas rather than guns and bombs.. and we will WIN if we are pragmatic…
    Right now the project to rescue Sinhala Modayas from themselves devolves to the minority of good people 0f all ethnic and religious bents..
    We must get our long dead civil society and academics to promote Chandrika Bandaranaiyake as the only viable joint opposition candidate as the most realistic if tainted figure to being back some decency into the corrupt and filthy political culture of the Lanka. All the other politicians are far worse than she is!
    CBK must run a positive campaign for:
    1) RECONCILIATION, MULTICULTURLISM and UNITY IN DIVERSITY
    2) Clean up political culture, reduce the cabinet of clowns, cut back the military and politicians perks.

    • 0
      0

      Dammit! I thought the Dodo was dead. Thankfully, he is alive and making some very SENSIBLE proposals

      Point 1 YES YES YES

      Point 2 GOOD GOOD GOOD

      how about a point 3 – KEEP THE CABINET down to say 20 COMPETENT people who will take INDIVIDUAL And COLLECTIVE responsibilty for their actions.

      Let the dogs loose, Banda.

  • 5
    0

    Ever since his trip to the US, Ranil Wickramasinghe has being trying to project himself as joint opposition candidate even though he cannot even unify his own party! What a pathetic clown this Ranil is!

    Ranil is getting ready to be the spoiler and joker in the joint opposition to unseat the corrupt and criminal military dictator of Sri Lanka – Mahinda Rajapaksa and his criminal brothers and cronies..

    We must put an end to Ranil Wickramasinghe, the UNP dicatators, delusions of grandeur NOW!

  • 3
    9

    If Rajapaksa gives LTTE proxy TNA Leader, Land Titles and Police powers to run the North, without getting the consent of the inhabitant population in the rest of the Country ,these failures of justice, equality and decency will become successes overnight.

    Never thought that it so simple

    Wonder whether that will get Ms Pillai and the Diaspora off the back of the non Tamil inhabitant population….

    Or would she still demand that the soldiers who killed the LTTE killers be handed over to her Investigating Committee?.

    • 2
      1

      .
      In the end, MaRa is going to give Police and Land powers to North and East.
      The delay is only to win elections, not to protect the Sinhalese.

      :-)

      • 1
        0

        Not a problem,

        If the UNP, JVP, Fonseks, ex CJ ex CBK , all put their hands up..

        Another 6 years of Rajapaksa will take us in to the real Mid Income League .

        And our rural poor will be a bit more better off too. And they even may tick the box in favour of the Rainbow Riders.

  • 3
    0

    Very true Saravan, Time to face up to our peasant state.

  • 2
    0

    I’m Amarasiri and i can be as stupid as one can ever get

  • 2
    0

    The bigger question is: Considering what is happening in Iraq, Israel
    and Palestine, especially to the children, is whether these can be ever reversed and whether there exists a Jewish, Islamic, Christian or a Hindu God or more importantly whether they only help to be a centre of focus, given that Buddhism is not a religion and Buddhists are atheists. Bensen

  • 1
    0

    I see sadness in this article. Written by a true intellectual unlike the trite written by so called intellectuals who can only quote
    a fellow called Gramsci

  • 0
    1

    Truth is, once we realize there is a mass of SB’s out there severely disadvantaged against the minorities, can we then see them as human as ourselves, quoting poetry and seeing the world in all its emotions as we do. We can support them in their bid to move Sri Lanka into the post-modern era of less capitalism and more social-dwelling that the Buddha preached.

    Even as the masses embarrassingly scream out the Mahavamsa rethoric (that propels the neo-fascist right), can the Gosl move into the paddy-field and give them the correct wages for an honest days work. It is up to Gosl to form the ethical balance to integrate town and village; minority and majority. Then, and only then, can the final tears of Kuveni be erased, and SB’s will find in in themselves, redundant to go back to 2,500 year-old records to substantiate their existence.

  • 0
    0

    Racial, religious differences and discrimination is the root cause of all the evil things happening today. If every one try and follow this old ancient successful concept, there will always be real peace and harmony in any nation:

    No religion ever preached enmity amongst faiths. It is the narrow-mindedness in individuals that gives room for conflicts and differences. Truly speaking, there can be no scope for any such disputes. For example, the word ‘Islam’ means surrender and peace – signifying surrender to God, and a peaceful life with fellow beings. Two words in Quran are important – Salaat and Zakaat; Salaat means adoring God with steadfast devotion, Zakaat means charity to the needy and destitute, and helping fellow beings. Ancient Hindus lived with the motto, “May all the beings in all the worlds be happy” (Lokah Samastha Sukhino Bhavanthu) and “Help Ever, Hurt Never” (Paropakarayah punyaya, papaya para peedanam). Treating such aphorisms as their life breath, people of all religions lived with amity and harmony in the past. They considered truth, peace, love and forbearance as their very life breath.

  • 0
    0

    Sorry about not mentioning the origin of the above quote, under the heading ” Thought for the day” forwarded by a well wisher..

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 300 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically shut off on articles after 10 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.