30 October, 2020

Blog

Grama Rajya

By Charitha Ratwatte –

Charitha Ratwatte

The Secretary to the President in a recent Twitter session stated that ‘Devolution must be to the village. Power must be devolved to the lowest possible level, the village – the Grama Rajya’.

Given the fundamental factors of Sri Lanka, population, geographical size, literacy and numeracy, health, infrastructure and access, it is eminently feasible to provide more capacity and power to the local, village and community level. From time immemorial this has been the mantra of historians and development commentators and analysts.

Historically, until the British colonialists administratively and judicially unified the island, the national trait had been one of remoteness. The villagers led their own cycle of life, at their own pace. One can draw an analogy with the line in that famous West End play, ‘Fiddler on the Roof,’ where in the old Russian Empire, in a Jewish community, who were being discriminated against and harassed by the Czar in Moscow and his Slav officials, one Jewish villager asks the Rabbi for a prayer for the Tsar. The Rabbi responds: ‘May God protect and keep the Tsar, far away from us!’

Isolated existence

The village in old Lanka lived such an isolated life, far away from the palace and its intrigues, other than those rare instances in which the King or his representative or the colonial government intervened, to mobilise the citizen militia to wage war or collect taxes, etc. Robert Knox among others has commented on this feature.

Indeed, even during Colonial times, the local administrators were empowered to an extent unimaginable today. The official and personal diaries and other writings of legends like Leonard Woolf, AGA Hambantota, and Dyke GA of the Northern Province and Freeman GA of the North Central Province reflect this. Their autonomy extended to an extent unimaginable in today’s context of telephones, fax and e-mail! Not to mention rampant politicisation.

An analogy may be drawn from India’s British Raj, where one colonial District Commissioner, in a remote part of India’s North East Meghalaya District , once declared that a circular issued by the Colonial Government’s Viceroy in Calcutta was ‘utter and complete nonsense’ and placed on record in his official diary, which would end up, at some future date in with the Colonial Government in Calcutta, that ‘as long as I am the District Commissioner, this nonsensical circular will not apply in my District!’

May be the District Commissioner was sure that communication and infrastructure in his remote area of the North East Meghalaya was so difficult and inaccessible that the papers would reach the Governor only after the DC’s retirement!

The Diaries of Ceylon’s colonial administrators are replete with examples of the absolute discretion which the Government Agent and the Assistant Government Agent had in carrying out their administrative duties, subject to law. Things changed with road access improving, the railway and the telegraph.

Rise of centralisation

The final nail in the coffin of regional empowerment was when the Supreme Court, declared that the Kandyan Law was a personal law and not a regional law, applying to those domiciled in the Kandyan Provinces. A British planter had divorced his wife, under the Kandyan Law, which allows no fault divorce, on establishing incompatibility, but on appeal, the Court held that non-Kandyans, although residing and domiciled in the Kandyan Provinces, could not be subject to the Kandyan Law, since it was a personal law applying only to Kandyan people.

The Colebrooke/Cameron reforms which administratively consolidated the whole island, abolishing the special status of the former Kandyan Kingdom, which was the death knell of regional autonomy and the rise of centralisation and the Colombo centric development ethos which has been the bane of the country , leading to an unequal distribution of investment. It has been consistently a case of the Western Province sucking in all the resources, like a vacuum cleaner, leading to the neglect and deprivation of other areas.
As long as the port of Galle was the main import export hub for the island, the dominance of Colombo was not so complete. But when the Colombo break water and harbour was developed, the Galle harbour went into disuse and the decline of the south started. Whether the investments being made in the recent past, the Hambantota Harbour, Mattala Airport, the Southern Highway etc., will be able to arrest this decline remains to be seen.

The same applied to Trincomalee, whose heyday was when the British Far East Fleet was based there, when into decline after the British empire ceased to exist, but was resurrected to some extent after the civil war necessitated the expansion of the naval and defence establishments and today’s tourist and leisure revival.

Development disparity

One researcher did an interesting analysis by superimposing on a blank map of Sri Lanka all the large development schemes. Historically the Raja Rata was the Granary of the East, subsequently, after the dismantling of the hydraulic civilisation, which required intensive maintenance, and the ravages of malaria, the drift to the south west took place. That was the push factor. Spices were the pull factor, traders for west Asia visiting our western coast for trade in spices.

After Western colonial domination the initial investment in the plantations in the Central Hills took place with the destruction of the natural forests. The rise of the south around the Galle Harbour, the irrigation restoration of the North Central Province and the colonisation schemes, the Gal Oya Valley scheme, the Integrated Rural Development Projects, the Greater Colombo Economic Commission, the Accelerated Mahaweli Project, Gam Udawa , the 200 garment factories, Janasaviya, Samurdhi, Divi Neguma, etc.
A large stretch of the land mass from Puttalam in the north west to Dambulla in the north centre, Polonnaruwa in the north east up to Monaragala and Hambantota saw an absence of planned investments in all schemes, other than those few of national reach. Even for those projects disparities in implementation capacity in the peripheral areas took its toll, creating disparities in the quality of the services provided. The south west quarter of the island drew most of the money.

The fact that the pioneering micro finance institution, the Co-operative Rural Banks, whose assets were used for setting up the People’s Bank, which has now been transformed into a run-of-the-mill commercial bank, forgetting its grass root beginning, is a case in point. Rural savings are collected and transferred to head office in Colombo to finance letters of credit to pay for imports! This is the story of all financial service providers – mobilise funds in the rural areas and invest in Colombo! Has anyone done an analysis of the amount mobilised, say in Monaragala, and the proportion of that invested in Monaragala itself? If done, it will be a revelation of the development disparity, which is our curse.

CCC submissions

The Ceylon Chamber of Commerce in August 2006, making its submissions to the Government’s Sub Committee on Constitutional Reforms, anticipated the Secretary’s proposal made on the Twitter interaction… In paragraph 22 of the Ceylon Chamber’s proposals, prepared by a Sub Committee on Constitutional Reforms chaired by senior business leader Charitha P. de Silva, under the caption ‘The Reserved List and the Provincial List, the Chamber stated: ‘The lists contained in the 13th Amendment have been revisited in the draft 2000 constitution. We recommend the adoption of these lists as stated in the draft 2000 constitution. Two significant changes in the draft 2000 constitution have been the omission of the Concurrent List and the item “national policy on all subjects and functions,” which appeared in the Reserved List. It would have been observed that the provisions in the present constitution (the Concurrent List and National Policy) enable the Centre to undermine devolution. Under the provisions of the draft 2000 Constitution all residuary subjects go to the Centre. We recommend that the residuary subjects go to the Local List (go to the Pradeshiya Sabhas).’

The Chamber further recommended: ‘Recognition of Pradeshiya Sabhas as the Basic Unit of Government: We recommend that the Pradeshiya Sabhas be recognised as the basic unit of Government, in consonance with the principle of subsidiarity. We also recommend the entrenchment of the legislative and executive powers of the Pradeshiya Sabha in the Constitution, as has been done by Article 156 of the South African Constitution entrenching the legislative and executive powers of Municipalities and the 73rd Amendment to the Indian Constitution (articles 243A to 243L) entrenching the Panchayat system.’

The Chamber recommended that the powers of the Pradeshiya Sabhas be set out in the Constitution itself. The Finance Commission should have the responsibility to allocate funds to the Pradeshiya Sabhas on transparent criteria. Co-operation between Pradeshiya Sabhas on subjects assigned to them, Pradeshiya Sabhas should be permitted by the constitution to create common institutions, similar to the power in the Swiss Constitution for Cantons ‘to create common organisations and institutions’ (Article 48) Partnerships between Pradeshiya Sabhas should also be permitted by the Constitution.

Panchayat system

The Secretary to the President in his Tweet also referred to India’s Panchayat. The Panchayat system was studied by the group of politicians from Sri Lanka some time ago who issued a report. A 1992 amendment to the Indian Constitution set up the Panchayat Raj for local self governance. An Indian Gram Panchayat consists between seven and 17 members, elected from the wards of the village. 1/8 of the seats in a Panchayat are reserved for women. Many Panchayats are presided over by women. The main source of income of the Panchayat is the property tax levied on buildings and open spaces within the village. Other sources of income include a professional tax, taxes on pilgrimages, animal trade, grants received from the State Government in proportion to the land revenue and level of local government above – the Zilla Parishad.

Analysts say that the Panchayat system has greatly strengthened the role of women in local self government. Anecdotes abound – one extremely rich one: the husband of the chairperson turned up for the meeting and when asked where his wife who had to preside was, said, ‘she is cooking’. The Panchayat Members ordered him, ‘You go back and cook and send your wife to preside over the meeting!’

Empowering communities

As stated earlier, given the investments made in Sri Lanka form the 1930s, from the time of universal adult franchise, in 1931, in social development, mainly education and health, there is a very strong case for empowering communities as against politicians or bureaucrats at the national or sub national level, by allocating powers and functions in a National or Provincial List.

Sri Lanka’s first world class social indicators, if anything reflect and indicate a capacity which the formal system does not acknowledge nor provide the space to operate effectively, it is dominated by politicians and bureaucrats .

The critical role of village level indigenous institutions like Death Aid Societies (Marana Adhara Samithi), Rotating Savings and Credit Organisations (ROSCAs/cheetus) is a reflection of this capacity and the yearning to get on with their lives, in the face of massive and frustrating politicisation and bureaucratic inaction and paralysis.

All religious institutions like Buddhist temples, Hindu kovils, churches and mosques have their voluntary boards of management.
When the State set up genuinely depoliticised rural organisations , such as D.S. Senanayake’s Rural Development Societies, S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike’s Praja Mandalas, Ranasinghe Premadasa’s Gramodaya Mandalas, Ranil Wickremesinghe’s Yauvvana Samaja (Youth Clubs), Women’s Organisations and Co-operatives, the people responded, magnificently. Unfortunately the political space for these institutions to operate in a depoliticised environment did not last long and were soon captured by local political strongmen.

Recurring criticism

One recurring criticism of any suggestion of empowering the Pradeshiya Sabhas is today objected to on the grounds of the numerous misdemeanours Pradeshiya Sabha members have been accused of in the recent past. These range from murder and rape, to kidnapping, assault of pedagogues, policemen and members of the public, etc. Their progeny also have got involved in this sort of behaviour!
The British High Commission in Colombo has expressed its deep disappointment over the fact that a trial has not commended in one of these matters, although18 months have elapsed since the incident. The short answer to this criticism, which ironically has a semblance of truth, regarding to the quality of people who put themselves up for election at the local level, is the powerlessness of the current Pradeshiya Sabhas.

Quality men and women of eminence and standing do not put themselves up for election, when they have no viable functions. If the local level authorities have actual power, the ability to get things done and genuinely respond to community needs, better quality people will consider taking office and the voter will certainly elect capable people, instead of run-of-the-mill thugs, murderers, cattle thieves and moonshiners.

Refreshing input

The Panchayat experiment in India, which the Secretary to the President referred to and which has been studied by our local politicians, while still being a work in progress, is declared by analysts to be having cautiously positive outcomes. In the present devolution debate going on in Sri Lanka, given the socio economic development context and the total domination of Colombo centric, politicised and bureaucrat dominated planning and implementation, this injection of a further additional genuinely empowered level of government at the Pradeshiya Sabha or Grama Niladhari Division level is indeed a refreshing input.

The fact that Sri Lanka’s leading business organisation, the Ceylon Chamber of Commerce, proposed this as far back as in the year 2006 and today, seven years later, a high official in the President’s office has, through a Tweet, reiterated the position is a refreshing and positive development.

The only factor which makes Sri Lanka different, in a developmental sense, from the rest of South Asia, and even the developing world, is the inherent capacity of its people. To justify the massive investments made in the past, sometimes to the detriment of other sectors of the economy, to achieve this, in education, healthcare, social development and to meet the reasonable aspirations of our people, it is imperative that a local empowered level of government be considered very seriously. It is rare indeed very that a top bureaucrat and the business community are of one voice on a matter of this nature.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 0
    0

    The scheme for a Grama Rajya is not a good idea.

    In the good old days of Sri Lanka they had some ‘Grama Rajya’s of sorts.

    These grama rajyas were led by titled officials called, Maha Mudaliars,
    Padikara Mudaliars, Mudaliyar of the Atapattu, Vidane Mudaliar, Mudiyanse’s, Muhandirams, Koralas, Rate Mahattayas and so forth. Once out of reach of supervision of the Top Honchos of the state, such as the Kings or the Colonial Rulers of the time, these grama rajya kings gave vent to their suppressed old enmities based on caste, creed, religion and family enmities and so on.

    As could be expected of a Sri Lankan in power these minor rajahs also became tyrants themselves and exploited all that unbridled power brought to them. The sum total of such a situation is as can be expected total subjugation of the hapless villager.

    So ‘Grama Rajya’ for Sri Lanka is not a good idea.

  • 0
    0

    Charitha

    After reading so many of your learned articles, I am a bit surprised at this one. Since much of the thought process for GR effuses from the Indian example, I wish to cite an excerpt from an article of mine – Myth About The Village – which appeared in The Island on March 23, 2010. Facts and figures are taken from authentic sources, mostly from P.C. Alexander’s book written about 10 years ago. The last sentence in the excerpt is mine. I hope you know the pace of urbanization in India. The wrongly styled ‘conservative state’ Tamil Nadu is the most urbanized state of India.

    “Panchayati Raj
    India has 600,000 villages. Out of them 286,000 have a population of less than 500. A further 145,000 villages have less than 1000. Thus 72% of the villages is home to an estimated 20% of the population or less. For 431,000 villages there are 265,000 Village Panchayats. The Panchayats are lower in number than the villages, since several thousand villages are so small that they have to be pooled together to form a Panchayat. Having no resources of their own, they subsist on meagre grants from the centre and the state. They attend to low technology work like gravelling lanes, de-silting drains, digging a well or erecting a few lamp posts. ‘Social evil’ like cross caste elopement is tackled by tattooing the culprits. Promoting cow worship and installing a biogas plant in a village are among the achievements. Better ones may do a little more”.

    Today may I add an anecdote from a speech made in Parliament by Dr. Colvin R de Silva about 50 years back. When he was traveling by train in India, a Gandhian expatiated on the virtues of the village, ending up saying that “finally the village will be so self contained as to produce everything the village needs”. Addressing the Speaker Colvin said “Sir, I was then young and I was irreverent, and I said you will reach it in your grave”.

    • 0
      1

      Siva,
      Thanks for your comment. I enjoy reading your writings.
      Individual villages may not have the depth for devolving power, but the Pradeshiya Sabha level is different.
      The point is that Sri Lanka has invested huge resources in giving people health and education and raising their aspirations – shouldn’t accountability for at least some aspects of their lives, be also their responsibility? Instead making it the sole responsibility of bureaucrats and politicians ? Who are too remote and ‘insulated’ to be accountable. The CCC suggestion is for a specific local list of subjects and functions and funds from the Finance Commission allocated, may be per capita, to PS’s to carry out those functions in line with the principle of subsidiarity.I agree this may be not exactly what Sec / Pres: Lalith W. advocates in his Tweet.
      Charitha

  • 0
    0

    It is nice to see three ex ministry secretaries contributing to the devolution debate. While Austin appears to defend Provincial Councils by drawing a red herring by challenging the Secretary to the President (LW) to look after the Saddantha White Elephants of the State Enterprises, The article of Austin appears to be more a convoluted critique of LW and has no clear statement on devolution.

    Charitha has unequivocally recommended that the unit of devolution should be the Pradeshiya Sabha.
    A question on the unit of devolution as the Pradeshiya Sabha is whether it is a viable enough a unit to undertake the current range and scale of development functions (economics of scale). A better option would be the District which was the proven unit of decentralization before the White Elephant of the Provincial Council stampeded.
    Sivathasan seems to be out of date on the powers and functions of the Indian Panchayati which are as stipulated in the Constitution of India are as follows:

    Section 243G.
    Powers, authority and responsibilities of Panchayats:-
    Subject to the provisions of this Constitution the Legislature of a State may,
    by law, endow the Panchayats with such powers and authority and may be
    necessary to enable them to function as institutions of self-government and
    such law may contain provisions for the devolution of powers and
    responsibilities upon Panchayats, at the appropriate level, subject to such
    conditions as may be specified therein, with respect to—
    (a) the preparation of plans for economic development and social justice;
    (b) the implementation of schemes for economic development and social
    justice as may be entrusted to them including those in relation to the
    matters listed in the Eleventh Schedule
    243H. Powers to impose taxes by, and Funds of, the Panchayats
    The Legislature of a State may, by law, —
    (a) authorise a Panchayat to levy, collect and appropriate such taxes,
    duties, tolls and fees in accordance with such procedure and subject to
    such limits;
    (b) assign to a Panchayat such taxes, duties, tolls and fees levied and
    collected by the State Government for such purposes and subject to
    such conditions and limits;
    (c) provide for making such grants-in-aid to the Panchayats from the
    Consolidated Fund of the State; and
    (d) provide for constitution of such Funds for crediting all moneys
    received, respectively, by or on behalf of the Panchayats and also for
    the withdrawal of such moneys therefrom,
    as may be specified in the law.

    Tasks of the Panchayat Raj are:

    “ELEVENTH SCHEDULE
    (Article 243G)
    1. Agriculture, including agricultural extension.
    2. Land improvement, implementation of land reforms, land
    consolidation and soil conservation.
    3. Minor irrigation, water management and watershed development.
    4. Animal husbandry, dairying and poultry.
    5. Fisheries.
    6. Social forestry and farm forestry.
    7. Minor forest produce.
    8. Small scale industries, including food processing industries.
    9. Khadi, village and cottage industries.
    10. Rural housing.
    11. Drinking water.
    12. Fuel and fodder.
    13. Roads, culverts, bridges, ferries, waterways and other means of
    communication.
    14. Rural electrification, including distribution of electricity.
    15. Non-conventional energy sources.
    16. Poverty alleviation programme.
    17. Education, including primary and secondary schools.
    18. Technical training and vocational education.
    19. Adult and non-formal education.
    20. Libraries.
    21. Cultural activities.
    22. Markets and fairs.
    23. Health and sanitation, including hospitals, primary health
    centres and dispensaries.
    24. Family welfare.
    25. Women and child development.
    26. Social welfare, including welfare of the handicapped and mentally
    retarded.
    27. Welfare of the weaker sections, and in particular, of the
    Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes.
    28. Public distribution system.
    29. Maintenance of community assets.”.

    Let there be more professional approach to devolution.
    With the current experience of Provincial and Pradeshiya politicians abusing their powers is it not more appropriate to go back to the decentralized system of administration combined with the political authorities confined to policy making and monitoring?

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.