9 September, 2024

Blog

In Memoriam: Jude Perera; Advancing Economic Democracy Through Solidarity Economy

By Lionel Bopage

Dr. Lionel Bopage

I first encountered Mr Jude Perera in late 2007 during a community discussion in Victoria. This gathering took place amidst the intense period of Sri Lanka’s prolonged civil war. Professor Joe Camilleri of La Trobe University’s Centre for Dialogue convened the event, which marked the inception of the Sri Lanka Community Dialogue—a year-long initiative.

Mr Jude Perera, who recently passed away at the age of seventy-one, held a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Jaffna. His professional journey spanned market research and information technology roles across Sri Lanka, New Zealand, and Australia. His memoir chronicled a personal and political odyssey—from Katana in Sri Lanka to Jaffna, then to Niue, New Zealand, and finally Melbourne, Australia. His travels were driven by both personal and political imperatives.

Jude Perera

As the first Sri Lankan-born and educated migrant to serve in the Victorian State Parliament, Mr Perera achieved remarkable milestones. His unwavering advocacy for multicultural communities in Victoria led to four consecutive terms as an exemplary parliamentarian. His retirement in 2018, due to health reasons, marked the end of an era. His legacy as the first Sri Lankan-born Member of the Victorian Parliament, spanning sixteen years, remains unparalleled. While I will not delve into his political career as the MP for Cranbourne, numerous heartfelt tributes have celebrated this aspect of his life.

Our political paths diverged within Sri Lanka’s left-wing landscape. Jude Perera began with the Lanka Sama Samaja Party (LSSP) before shifting allegiance to the Sri Lanka Mahajana Pakshaya (SLMP). In contrast, my journey involved the Community Party of Ceylon, followed by the Ceylon Communist Party and eventually the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) until February 1984. Our outlooks were shaped by our fathers’ political affiliations.

Central to our beliefs was a vision of a just, sustainable, and viable economy, fostering a harmonious society. Notably, Perera championed worker cooperatives in his farewell address at the State Parliament. In 2015, we met to explore fairer models of production and distribution through cooperatives. While I had theoretical knowledge, Mr Jude Perera’s firsthand experiences visiting worker cooperatives in Spain, Italy, the Czech Republic, and the United Kingdom enriched our discussions. These cooperatives prioritize solidarity, democratic decision-making (one member, one vote), and holistic development—integrating management, profits, and ownership. They thrive across diverse sectors of the global economy.

Distinguishing themselves from typical cooperatives in Sri Lanka, worker cooperatives operate within a broader framework of values and principles, transcending mere profit generation. Our joint efforts, alongside Chaminda Hettiarachchi, aimed to promote worker cooperative models in Sri Lanka through the ‘New Era for Sri Lanka’ policy platform (https://www.neweraforsrilanka.org/). Regrettably, civil society in Sri Lanka did not fully embrace this transformative vision.

Worker cooperatives represent a powerful embodiment of economic democracy and social equity. However, they do not exist in isolation. Mr Jude Perera and I never advocated for businesses to operate exclusively under the worker cooperative model. Instead, we championed a diverse matrix of business models, including worker-owned and governed cooperatives, mutual aid networks, and social and solidarity economy initiatives.

Our vision centered on self-organization at the neighbourhood level, with the specific form of business design tailored to context, people, and their unique needs and goals. Jude’s unwavering focus on the future, rather than dwelling on the past, shaped his political outlook. He believed in a common political agenda that transcended personality clashes, encouraging collaboration not only with like-minded colleagues but also with those who held differing views. His succinct observation—that a political “enemy” need not be from the opposition but could sit within the same ranks—reflects his pragmatic approach.

To honour Mr Jude Perera’s legacy, we must take seriously the cooperative possibilities available to both individuals and collectives. Models rooted in the solidarity economy can generate the momentum necessary to establish and reinforce democratic practices. By doing so, we explore the potential for societies that defy major systemic inequalities and withstand periodic global crises.

Now, let us delve into the concept of the solidarity economy:

The solidarity economy aims to create and fortify economic systems that serve people’s needs while remaining ecologically sustainable, socially just, and culturally diverse. This internationalist concept emerges from the struggles of those who fight for survival and their rights within racial capitalist environments (Akuno K 2017, Build and fight: The program and the strategy of cooperation; In Akuno K., Nangwaya A. (Eds.), Jackson rising: The struggle for economic democracy and Black self-determination in Jackson, 1–20). It signifies a new relationship between society and the economy.

Key tenets of the solidarity economy include:

* Sustainable and Inclusive Development: Business models within the solidarity economy prioritize just and equitable outcomes. They place social and environmental concerns at the heart of their design. Examples include fair trade, organic trade, and circular economy initiatives. These models span a diverse network of entities, including not-for-profits, charities, cooperatives, mutuals, foundations, and social enterprises.

* Empowering the Downtrodden: Drawing inspiration from Amartya Sen’s work (Sen, A K 1999, Development as freedom. New York: Oxford University Press), the solidarity economy recognizes that marginalized individuals face limited access to opportunities. Their struggle involves challenging systems that curtail their freedoms. By deliberately coming together and engaging in collective efforts, they resist economic and political oppression.

* Global Crises and Transformation: Recent global crises have intensified interest in the solidarity economy. Questions arise about transforming existing economic models to address future challenges. In April 2023, the UN General Assembly acknowledged the critical role of the social economy in fostering inclusive and sustainable economies.

* Diverse Movements: Various movements champion the solidarity economy under different names—social economy, sharing economy, collaborative economy, steady state economy, and community economy. Their shared objective is to challenge the dominant economic system, which often relies on fossil fuels, resource extraction, and unequal wealth distribution.

In response to the shortcomings of both capitalism and state socialism, the solidarity economy emerges as a grassroots approach toward a more democratic economic system. At its core, the solidarity economy prioritizes human relationships. It rests on principles of solidarity, cooperation, mutualism, equity, participatory democracy, sustainability, and pluralism. Without embracing the ideals of a solidarity economy, genuine systemic change remains elusive. Ignoring this path risks perpetuating a reformed capitalist economy that clings to outdated neo-liberalist notions.

True political democracy cannot thrive without economic democracy. Our current democracies remain incomplete, demanding critical examination. The global economy exacerbates income disparities within and across societies. Neo-liberalism forcefully draws regions and nations into its orbit, often through economic and military coercion. This globalized neo-liberal economy teeters on the brink of catastrophe, with the spectre of a third world war and the ominous possibility of nuclear conflict threatening our planet.

Worker cooperatives, a vital facet of the solidarity economy, offer a potent antidote to prevailing neo-liberal trends in politics and economics. Amid crises faced by many countries—including Sri Lanka—millions express dissatisfaction with their lives under neo-liberalism. Marginalised by governance systems, they grapple with social, economic, and political exclusion. Unsustainable “development” looms as a constant peril.

Worker cooperatives represent companies collectively owned and democratically managed by their workers. These cooperatives operate across diverse economic sectors worldwide. Designed to address crises and improve working conditions, they embrace less hierarchical, participatory organizational structures. In our era of interconnected economic, social, political, and environmental crises, worker cooperatives assume heightened relevance and urgency.

Fundamental to worker cooperatives are collective ownership and participatory decision-making. The world’s largest worker cooperative, Mondragon Corporation in Spain, thrived during the recent global financial crisis and beyond. Its agility and resilience contrasted starkly with conventional firms suffering due to non-democratic ownership and governance models.

Cooperative-managed institutions not only safeguard people and the planet during critical moments but also exemplify the ethical essence of economic democracy. Worker cooperatives can blaze transformative, even revolutionary, paths. Nurturing these democratic economic organisations becomes increasingly vital for humanity’s long-term survival.

Worker cooperatives wield transformative power, not only for individual workers but also for their communities. These innovative enterprises foster more equitable labour-management relationships. Workers engage in their tasks with dignity, resilience, and a sense of solidarity. What sets them apart is their multifaceted role: within a worker cooperative, individuals simultaneously function as owners, workers, patrons, and community members. This dynamic environment cultivates robust internal and external relationships.

Worker cooperatives extend beyond immediate needs, offering a blueprint for the future. They embody an inclusive, equitable, and ecologically sustainable outlook. By prioritising cooperation and solidarity, they challenge the crisis-ridden status quo. Our collective efforts must ignite grassroots movements, birthing alternative economic models capable of radically transforming the prevailing neo-liberal system. Recognizing that long-term climate resilience hinges on re-localised supply chains and community-centric economic infrastructure, we must shift away from profit-maximisation at any societal cost.

In memory of Jude Perera, let us champion “change”. Encourage, advocate, and actively transform our economic landscape. Together, we can forge a more democratic, participatory, ecologically conscious, and fair society—one that honours both humanity and the environment.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 5
    0

    Thank you for an interesting article about a common person who dedicated his life to the cause of wider economic liberation of the average citizen with social justice. What Jude was trying to achieve in his lifetime is now more recognized as the Social Solidarity Economy (SSE) among contemporary social economists. SSE is an alternative to mainstream conservative capitalism in Europe and America, and to socialist state-dominated authoritarian economic systems such as the Chinese model. In the SSE concept, members play an active role in shaping most dimensions of human life and it exists in all sectors of the economy, be it production, finance, distribution, exchange, consumption, or governance. In academic terms, they are called the ESG values – environmental, social, and governance values. SSE essentially strives to overcome inequalities, which includes all classes of society and employee democracy. SSE has the ability to re-invent the best resources such as technology and knowledge to transform the current status of a particular community to uplift its socio-economic and welfare status based on common values and goals. Contd…..

  • 5
    0

    Cntd……..The essence of the Social Solidarity Economy (SSE) is based on community-led economic activities and initiatives that place social benefits foremost and financial profits least. This concept was initiated by a revolutionary Spanish professor, Felipe Alaiz, in 1937 when he advocated for the development of economic solidarity among worker collectives in urban and rural areas during the Spanish Civil War. Naturally, it became a very popular social discussion in Latin America with its high Spanish influence as well as its immensely popular left-wing politics, particularly in the 60s to 90s. The first meeting of like-minded people took place in Lima, Peru in July 1997 with participants from more than 30 countries who agreed that there needed to be strong integration between the participants of this new concept. In fact, SSE fundamentals had inspired some capitalist companies in Latin America too. The young CEO, Ricardo Semler, at SEMCO in Brazil, a medium-sized company, did implement SSE concepts in their company as early in the late 80s such as workers deciding their own salaries or the time they come to work. It inspired so much interest among the western corporate circles at that time and became so viral that he was invited as a guest lecturer at Harvard and also contributed a lengthy article to HBR in Sept 1989. Contd…

  • 5
    0

    Cntd….However, as in any other progressive social movement, SSEs can meet huge challenges from conventional businesses or even the orthodox society. Mainstream capitalism is predominantly based on labour exploitation so resistance from organized cartels, monopolies, or oligopolies are not uncommon when SSEs offer much better socio-economic and welfare benefits to workers. Organized underworld mafia is another threat as well! Even the state machinery in developing countries unleashes tremendous pressure on SSEs as the politicians are mostly nourished by huge cartels and other vested interests. One fine example is the harassment encountered by Prof. Yunus in Bangladesh for steering one of the best examples of SSE movements – Grameen Bank. The colossal workload one single man has carried out so altruistically in his entire lifetime to uplift the living standards of the poorest of the poorest in this world warrants the best recognition, commendation and accolades in his own country, but instead, he is now entangled with zillions of legal cases to battle with!

  • 2
    3

    The FIRST step in Economic Transformation is to achieve RECONCILIATION with the traumatised minorities in SL. Secondly we need a BRAND new constitution that is put for Referendum soon after the Presidential Election. Can RW publish the drafted constitution?
    “Fostering a harmonious society” is very difficult with those Sinhala Buddhist Supremacists.
    There is no REAL discussions between the Singhalese and Tamils in SL or rest of the world, still the HARD feelings EXISTS.

    • 3
      0

      This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn’t abide by our Comment policy. The key to maintaining the website as an inviting space is to focus on intelligent discussion of topics.

      For more detail see our Comment policy https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/comments-policy-2

  • 2
    2

    One of Jaffna’s first graduates.Sounds a nice and interesting person. I wish I had known him

    • 1
      0

      He would have be among the first graduates of Jaffna. (Was it the Jaffna Campus then, as all Sinhalese students left Jaffna after the police-provoked violence of 1977.)
      Looks like he had left the country at the turn of the century.

  • 0
    3

    Guess a place like Australia would have taken Jude Perera’s expertise on Solidarity Economy very, very, seriously, and placed a lot of money to develop the concepts in the
    Australian economy. There has to be constant implementation, almost religious in nature, and taught in schools from a very young age for the concepts to sit naturally. Our people on the other hand, have been trained in the neo-liberal Western model at a great expense of the public purse.

    • 5
      1

      Ramona,
      “Our people on the other hand, have been trained in the neo-liberal Western model”
      Yes, yes, but you voted for Donald Trump, not Bernie Sanders, right?

      • 1
        2

        OC,……suits the West. But if Bernie Sanders had been on the ticket, I would have voted him.

        • 4
          0

          Ramona, Trump and Sanders are poles apart characters at two extremes and I am curious about your political literacy when you say you treat them alike!

          • 0
            2

            Jit,

            Be curious no more: One would have brought about a global peace (and he did), and the other would have brought global socialism. Still it is not known how far either would have sustained America. How long would a peace like what Trump brought, last with Russian expansionist policies, and how long would America’s financial hegemony last with China creeping around all over the place? But starting somewhere for the good of the planet is an excellent thing to do. Sander’s socialism is deep-seated within me. Well, Democrats are right in the middle – don’t know if they are aiding or abetting the situation. One has to continuously consider and ponder.

          • 3
            0

            Thanks for opening her eyes!
            .
            Lm

            • 0
              0

              LM……..Lame!

  • 12
    1

    RIP


    Just curious …… perhaps Lionel can answer. Would he have got elected if his name was not Jude Perera?

    In an ignorant party-affiliated predominantly White electorate …….. a name like Jude Perera or Ramona Therese Fernando …… would have a better chance than a typical Lankan name like Ranasinghe Premadasa or Veluppillai Chelvanayakam


    “worker cooperatives operate within a broader framework of values and principles”

    Lionel, living in a functional truly socialist country, you are forgiven for your unseen blind love and harking for pseudo “socialist” “cooperative” utopian un-functional dreams/shindigs.

    Most successful “democratic” Capitalist countries function as Socialist countries without the bogus fancy name: the tax-rate is close to 50% – in addition to state, consumption taxes etc. The citizens work half the year/life for the state. And then some. What could be more Socialist, cooperative, community-consideration-ed than that?

    Discard bogus ideological/theoretical Socialism, cooperative-isms …….. and concentrate on the real (in reality: not just in name) Socialism/cooperative-isms out there already ……… and try to hone that for everyone’s benefit ……..


    More interested in how societies/humans actually behave …….. more than how they should ……..

    • 4
      1

      nimal fernando


      “What could be more Socialist, cooperative, community-consideration-ed than that?”

      What about the Socialist projects initiated and enforced by SJ’s old flame Siri Mao and her Merry Men in the 1970s, not to mention the destruction of cooperative institutions of the country?

      I believe the idea of Socialism is to alleviate people from poverty.

      • 1
        0

        Dear NV,
        .
        Long time no see, we missed you… wie geht es Dir denn so ?
        .
        “I believe the idea of Socialism is to alleviate people from poverty”

        If that is the truth, why did not it work on long run ? Why did USSR collapse ?
        Bulgaria, Romonia and many other like minded countries have more poverty even if they were ruled by communists for long.
        Most of them today are happy with new rulers. How do you make of current situation in those countries ?

    • 4
      2

      Nimal,
      In Socialism, they take your money before you earn it.
      In Capitalism, they take it after you earn it.
      Such a significant difference….

      • 3
        0

        old codger

        “In Socialism, they take your money before you earn it.”

        Under S W R D’s socialism people were led to believe they didn’t have to work and earn a living and everything was provided by the state.


        ” In Capitalism, they take it after you earn it.”

        In most cases rich are allowed to keep everything and more, through Tax planning and cheer corruption under stated income and over stated expenses, ….

        Do you think the commissioner of Inland Revenue has the b***s to open an investigation into the financial affairs of all key politicians including Rajapaksa clan…….?

    • 3
      0

      Hello Nimal,
      Every day on our way to School in the 1950s we passed the Local Co-op Stores. They were almost Hypermarkets before the term existed in the UK. My Grandmother and many others were members and looked forward to their yearly Dividend paid in Cash .My Grandfather, a Trawl Fisherman (on my mother’s side) had been a member of the Communist Party until he left in the late 1930s because of the Stalinist Purges (but don’t tell SJ). He encouraged my Grandmother to support the Co-operative Movement. He told me about the Diggers and Levellers and their disagreements with Cromwell in the Civil War. We never heard about these people in our History Lessons at School. In 1966 the Co-op built a new Department Store in the Centre of Aberdeen which we all thought very futuristic https://c20society.org.uk/buildings-at-risk/norco-house-aberdeen
      Unfortunately the Co-ops suffered a huge decline due in part to competition by the new Hypermarkets built on the outskirts of the Cities from which they never recovered. With increased mobility and almost universal household Fridge/Freezers shopping became a weekly occurrence and the local Co-ops disappeared. However Farmer’s Markets had a resurgence in the 1990s and 2000s.
      Best regards

      • 0
        0

        LS,
        The only co-op here that even came close to being a supermarket was the CWE in Colombo Fort back in the day. That was probably because it was housed in a defunct department store.

  • 1
    0

    “Michelle Renuka Ananda-Rajah” was elected the first Labor member for Higgins in the seat’s 73-year history.

  • 1
    0

    I firmly believe both capitalist and socialist economic theories are non-existent anymore in this universe. Because, in capitalism everything is left to be resolved by market forces which to me are only prevalent in books such as ‘The Wealth of Nations’ or ‘Capitalism and Freedom’. Similarly, we don’t see any economy following Karl Marx or Richard Wolfe theories. They used to have some life during the cold war era, but absolute socialism is totally dead now. All what we get in this universe are mixed economies with either market dominant or state dominant or characteristics. USA being a good example for the former and China for the latter. Some economies in the Nordic region practice more centrist method collecting high taxes but giving them generously back to people, earning world’s highest socio-economic status by any standards. Whichever the system it is, essentially ALL states collect taxes and formulate fiscal and monetary policies that seriously divert the natural patterns of any human economic activities. That is absolutely against the capitalist laissez-faire theme. Even in the USA, the government hugely interferes with the market forces theory to change consumer behaviour. E.g. Predominant farmer subsidies or incentives for electric cars are such market manipulations by the world’s biggest so-called capitalist economy.
    Cntd…

    • 1
      0

      Jit,
      There seem to be several ways of doing things. One is the US system, not quite full-blown capitalism, with state intervention to save big business but not for cheap medical care, education, or housing.
      There is Singapore, with state-provided housing, añd tight control on private vehicles and society in general. Very low corruption.
      Then there are China and Vietnam, with successful state-run capitalist economies which make sure no individual gets rich enough to challenge the system.
      The Nordic model uses high taxes to provide better conditions for their citizens.
      There are still two Communist countries, Cuba and North Korea, where salaries are state-controlled and nobody gets any richer than is good for them. But practically all services are free, though life is austere to say the least. Cuban taxes are higher than here. Private sector workers pay a 20% income tax on earnings above 30,000 Cuban pesos, about $109 per month
      The most interesting one is found in the Gulf States. Very low or no taxes, subsidies on everything from food to fuel, but run by corrupt families who keep a good part of the oil income.

  • 1
    0

    In China the state controls almost everything, own shares in majority of dominant industries but allow private enterprises and let their owners to ‘exploit’ labour which is against Marx-Engels socialist theories.

    …….I used to believe market forces would give solutions to any issue when I was a student but as I grew seeing economies in the last three decades, I now firmly believe that state interference is essential, I stress – where necessary, for any economy to run viably. Best example came from USA when Obama government bailed out so many mega companies such as General Motors during the GFC era. They simply couldn’t afford to obey the devastating market forces. While anyone can always argue that both USA and Chinese models have their own rot, where I see the biggest issues are in the developing countries in Latin America, Africa and Asia such as Honduras, Venezuela, Myanmar or Sri Lanka where staggering corruption at all levels of the economy demoting the lives of people and the economies together. It is no brainer that these countries are run by hugely corrupt political figures and by an equally corrupt machinery consisting of the bureaucracy and businesses. Essentially, powerful underworld mafia is tightly interwoven to these figures of ‘black economies’, and they altogether make their own theories and rules running these economies.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.