
By Vishwamithra –
“I don’t like people who have never fallen or stumbled. Their virtue is lifeless and it isn’t of much value. Life hasn’t revealed its beauty to them.” ~ Boris Pasternak
Many an erudite pundit seems to have been rattled by the results of the recently concluded Local Government elections. Their tendency to measure the performance of the National People’s Power (NPP) exclusively on the basis of raw numbers has misdirected their analytical skills and scholarly reasoning beyond what is generally known to the average reader as common sense. When one takes numbers in isolation and crunches them in order to fit into their own prejudices and predetermined conclusions, scholarly men and women forget one significant factor: context.
All politics is context. Nothing occurs, nothing takes shape or form without context; nor do they happen in a vacuum. In such circumstances, it becomes rather effortless and casual to explain away some rudimentary episodes that, more often than not, evade the most educated and experienced intellect. Nevertheless, it is crucial to look at the numbers and ask why these numbers have happened? How did that happen and how did they manage to evade the most analytical minds of a leading political party, which is now heading the government? Such unpredictables are no more unpredictable in the current context of the social media and political sensitivities.
The NPP won the plurality in 266 out of 339 local bodies. They control those local government councils and will continue until the next elections are called.
(Please note that there has to be a correction in the above presentation table: Mis-placement of Ranil’s and Namal’s pictures in the Local Government Results column. It needs to be exchanged with one another.)
If one is interested in crunching numbers, here is the analysis: NPP has lost close to 2.3 million votes from what they scored in the parliamentary elections. Where has that 2.3 million votes gone? SJB has gained 289,764 more. UNP has gained 453.682 more. Namal has gained 137,977 and Dilith Jayaweera has gained 116,675. In total, the non-NPP votes have gained 998,098. If you round it off, close to one million 1,000,000 votes have gone back to the non-NPP bank from the NPP bank. What happened to the rest of the 1.3 million votes? Obviously, they stayed at home, without exercising their franchise. In the Parliamentary Elections, the total valid vote was 11,815,246 whereas the in the local government elections it was 10,616.087. A drop of 1,199,159 votes. Now one sees how close that number to the drop in the total valid vote from the Parliamentary elections to the local government elections.
Crunching numbers should not stop at the ascertainment of how much the NPP lost; it should go one step further and ask, where did it go? This is where the intangibles come to play. More than 50% of the votes that the NPP lost from the Parliamentary Elections, has stayed at home without voting. That is a significant number and one must be more careful and unbiased in rendering an opinion as to what happened to the loss and how it could have happened.
In making one’s arguments for or against a general disinterest or disillusionment with the government is the primary cause. Even if one attempts to present such an argument, one must also be logical and reasonable with his or her contention as to the validity of such contentions.
Local Government Elections are a totally different animal from Presidential and Parliamentary Elections. At the Local Government Elections, there is not a single national figure contesting a ward or a local council domain. Treating Local Government Elections as a referendum on the government could be partly valid yet, taken in the total context of the present situation in the country, more than 50% of the difference between the parliamentary registered voting bank and Local Government registered voting bank refusing to go the the polling booth on election day is also an intangible for which many an observation and conclusion is possible and reasonable, provided such conclusions and observations are backed by objective evidence, facts and figures.
The writer is privileged and fortunate to have had many a discussion with those IMF officials who have been observing and monitoring the country’s economy, its varying trajectory and its projected destination. All of those pundits have agreed that AKD as Finance Minister and the NPP’s Cabinet of Ministers as a responsible government are doing more than a fair job in managing an economy which was once nearing total collapse. They also agree that, despite the fact that the NPP, as a successor to the left-leaning JVP, has come to embrace the modern mechanics of running an economy with a very fair sense of balance and care which the previous governments did not care to display.
However, corruption and bribery has ceased to be a label that the government Ministers and parliamentarians wear today; however, it is still prevalent amongst the lower rungs of the bureaucracy. These are the intangibles statisticians do not see; nor would they be eager to see such unseen and unobservable nuances of governance.
All in all, the trust and faith the people reposed both in AKD as President and the NPP as an overwhelming majority of the government still seems to be sustaining itself. By not turning a majority of local government councils to the Opposition, they have shown in the most unequivocal fashion that their trust and confidence is still with the NPP and AKD. J R Jayewardene introduced the proportional representative (PR) system with the singular idea of retaining at least some kind of voter percentage for his Grand Old Party, UNP. And it has proven beyond any shade of doubt that J R succeeded in that venture. Albeit the fact that the UNP and its main alternative branch SJB have succeeded in keeping their heads above water mainly thanks to the PR system in parliamentary and other elections. If it were the ‘first past post’ system in existence at the time of these elections, one wonders whether even the SJB would have withstood the onslaught by the NPP.
One other intangible is the great trust the people have placed in AKD as the Chief Executive of the country as a whole. However, this is a double-edged knife. So long as that trust lasts, it would be celebrated by the NPP and its supporters as some sort of magic wand. In the event that trust goes below the water level, the oncoming waves would not only submerge the NPP with all its leaders, it might end up as a cataclysmic event for the country.
In 2024, the country voted AKD as its President with an enormous amount of trust and confidence. Gotabaya Rajapaksa was dethroned by a non-violent uprising of the people. It is the writer’s view that if AKD and the NPP fail to fulfill their collective promise of affordable living for the people and clean and fair governance as a whole, the next uprising will not be non-violent; nor would it be forgiving and forgetting. Blood-shedding and unruly riots will be the order of the, should that day dawn upon this breathtakingly beautiful island.
*The writer can be reached at vishwamithra1984@gmail.com
Ajith / May 15, 2025
“It is the writer’s view that if AKD and the NPP fail to fulfill their collective promise of affordable living for the people and clean and fair governance as a whole, the next uprising will not be non-violent”
It is true that who won the local government elections is no matter for the people but the needs of the people are not alone affordable living and clean and fair governance but also people consider their identity, their existence, their security in the future etc. In other words, devolution of power or a permanent system that ensures all the communities to take partnership in the governance. There is no guarantee that the AKD/NPP is going to be in governance forever. So, the system of governance should be their during this term.It is a necessity, otherwise, as you say bloodshed could be a possibility.
/
davidthegood / May 15, 2025
V, you say the next uprising will not be non violent. Our citizens are fed up with violent uprisings. Even Gotha creeping back and receiving things not deserved even has not made them violent. We have a peaceful future with AKD and Harini and so let it be that way without the robbers.
/
leelagemalli / May 15, 2025
Dear Writer,
I am surprised to learn that it was you who blew up Housana to bring the current L-board men as leaders.
–
We’ve had enough blood baths, and our people have safrified their blood and properties over the years. I believe we should band together to drive away AKD-led groups that are only wasting people’s time for their own economic gain.
–
We are a nation that has the potential to rapidly advance economically and in other ways, but because we have been unable to reach a consensus for national-level development, we have fallen behind. Now that over 6.8 million people (60%) have given them a higher mandate, despite the fact that they have done nothing in the last 8 months, what more should the people give them to get this country back on track? If they can’t manage simple tasks, how can people expect them to perform miracles that result in systemic changes?
–
Northern and southern rebels, also known as AKD-led rabblerousers, and all other perpetrators should be marginalized at the speed of a tsunami if we are to improve living standards in this country and create another South Korea for our youth in the future.
/
old codger / May 15, 2025
“More than 50% of the votes that the NPP lost from the Parliamentary Elections, has stayed at home without voting. That is a significant number and one must be more careful and unbiased in rendering an opinion “
If the author is as “careful and unbiased” as he expects others to be, he ought to be aware that it is not only NPP votes that stayed at home. Quite likely, the same proportion of anti-NPP voters too stayed at home.
Another fact that the author pretends to be unaware of is that even AKD secured only 42% at the Presidential election. The parliamentary election handed the NPP a 2/3 majority as per tradition. This might not have happened if the Parliamentary elections were held first.
/
SJ / May 17, 2025
oc
People are subjective as they have preferences.
But when subjectivity gets the better of sense, one gets into trouble.
In order to convince others, one tries to convince himself of his falsehoods.
One lie leads to another to another and so on.
*
You may know that according to mythology the arrogant sage Vishwamitra severely harassed king Harishchandra because he would not tell a lie.
/
leelagemalli / May 16, 2025
Dear rational thinkers,
He has demonstrated his abilities to the fullest extent possible, but nothing has been accomplished in the last eight months to fulfill his duties. May our Tompachaya, the incumbent head of state, and his dirty but public speeches be understandable to the gullible majority as soon as possible to avoid them wasting more months or years.
Even Trump’s exorbitant taxes were not negotiated before being imposed on the collapsing country.
Every resident of our sinking island will benefit from the following quote from Lord Buddha, provided they have the knowledge to consider it.´
–
“Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do not believe in anything simply because it is found written in your religious books. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders. Do not believe in traditions because they have been handed down for many generations. But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it.”
–
Buddha quotes (Hindu Prince Gautama Siddharta, the founder of Buddhism, 563-483 B.C.)
/