23 April, 2024


Mangala’s Gam Peraliya: Good Move But Essential Requirement A Village Level Database

By W A Wijewardena –

Dr. W.A Wijewardena

Gam Peraliya to the rescue

Finance Minister Mangala Samaraweera, announcing the Government’s decision to move for a flexible fuel price system based on international prices built into a pricing formula, made a side announcement as well.

That was to give back the entirety of the money saved from the adjustment of fuel prices to reflect their costs amounting to about Rs. 56 billion in this year to a new development programme titled ‘Gam Peraliya’.

This catchy title has been borrowed by him from the classic novel Gam Peraliya by Sri Lanka’s iconic writer, Martin Wickramasinghe. In this novel, Wickramasinghe had fictionalised the transition of power in a Southern village in colonial Sri Lanka from the traditionally rich to the newly rich. Going by the vision of Mangala’s project, there could not be a more appropriate title to it.

Creation of a rural entrepreneurial class

Critics were quick to point out that Mangala had tried to lessen the feeling of burden falling on people due to fuel price hike. There is an element of truth in this criticism because that occasion would not have been the best for him to make the announcement about the proposed new village development scheme.

However, in his budget as well as his closing speech at the Budget debate, he had made reference to numerous schemes to develop the rural-based economy of Sri Lanka, though the tagline Gam Peraliya had not been used at that time.

His philosophy of development of the rural folk, especially the rural youth, was cogently pronounced in his response in the final budget day as follows: “We envisage the day when the farmer’s daughter becomes an agribiz-entrepreneur, when the fisherman’s son becomes a seafood exporter. Sri Lanka needs to go back to its roots of being a nation of entrepreneurs, a nation of traders. To do this we must be open to global trade, embrace competition, and take on the world and win.”

Empowering the rural folk to stand on their own feet

Thus, his objective has been to link villages to the wider global economy as partners of the global production sharing system that is ruling the global economy today. Thus, his vision is not to pump money into villages as subsidies as had been done by Sri Lanka for long. He plans to increase the capacity of villages as viable production units so that, as he has claimed, they would be able to decide on their own destiny.

This is in line with the pronouncement by the 6th century BCE Chinese philosopher Confucius. When he was returning from a fishing expedition, a beggar sitting by the road had asked him for a fish. Confucius is said to have told him: “I will not give a fish to you, but teach you how to catch a fish”. A similar wisdom was pronounced by Chanakya, also known as Kautilya of The Arthashastra fame, in the Ethics of Chanakya in 4th century BCE. Said Chanakya, “It is enterprise and not charity that causes poverty to vanish”.

This vision at first sight appears to be a brutal one. But, it helps the poor people to stand on their own feet and become responsible members of society. If this can be achieved, it would really be true ‘Gam Peraliya’ repeating itself in a new cycle of converting villages into entrepreneurial hubs.

Showering the poor with free goodies

Expressing in public their love for developing the rural folk has been the popular game plan of every politician, past and present. That will be the game which future politicians too will play. That is because the rural folk as a group are made up of a very powerful voter base and winning them to his or her side is a sure way for victory for any politician. Hence, the tendency has been to shower them with free goodies at the expense of taxpayers.

In Sri Lanka’s case, since the government gets its revenue principally via indirect taxes levied on mass consumption goods, it is mainly the rural folk that contribute to fill the government coffers as well. Hence, in effect, it is the rural folk themselves who pay for such free goodies. Yet, since they are driven to a temporary myopia, they fall for such promises and help politicians to bind them to a never ending cycle of poverty, deprivation and destitution.

But, Mangala’s promise has been different. He suggests empowering the rural folk economically so that they would be able to stand on their feet and manage their affairs by themselves without depending on outside free goodies. Economists call this ‘weaning the rural folk away from dependency syndrome’.

Central Bank’s Isuru Project

This writer has the first hand experience in running a dozen odd rural development projects when he was in the Central Bank.

One such project was the Small Farmers’ and the Landless Credit Project, dubbed in Sinhala ‘Isuru Project’, first implemented as a pilot project in four selected districts but later extended to the whole island. The objective of the project was to help the rural poor to cross the poverty line by empowering them financially and entrepreneurially. The theme vision of the project was same as the diction of Confucius and Chanakya in ancient times: the project will help you empower yourself so that you can stand on your own feet and work hard toward your own economic liberation.

The modus operandi adopted was the following. The poor were organised into self-help groups of five to 10 members. Thrift and savings were inculcated in them right from the very beginning because anyone who does not know how to save would not be able to handle the money given to him by another. The requirement was for each member to save just Rs 5 a week and deposit into a group account with the Regional Development Bank of the district concerned, the banker to the project.

A six- to 12-month social mobilisation program was carried at the expense of the project. In that program, they were given ideological wisdom as to why they were poor and how they could come out of poverty.

In addition, they were trained in the art of conducting group meetings and working as a team. Then, they were given technical know-how in the fields of comprehensive farming, livestock development, handicraft, selling, etc. Then, they were ready to get a bank loan because in the terminology of bankers, they were now ‘bankable customers’.

Mutual or inter se guarantees 

The guarantees for the loans were given by other members of the group in what is known in microfinance as ‘mutual guarantees’ or ‘inter se guarantees’. Thus, the loan supervision was made the responsibility of the group which was more effective than the supervision done by bank managers who relied on the remote mode rather than onsite sight of the borrowers.

Loans were given to them first in small amounts and later when they repaid the old loan, new loans of higher amounts were granted. This is known in microfinance as a graduated scale of lending. The essential feature of the project was that loans were given at slightly above the market rates rather than at subsidised rates. That was to keep the well-to-do in the villages away from the loan scheme.

Poverty alleviation is not a rosy path 

This approach to poverty alleviation is not easy and without hiccups. A large number of governmental and non-governmental organisations teamed up with the Central Bank to make the project a success. Among the governmental agencies, a prominent role was played by the Industrial Development Board, Department of Agriculture and the Department of Livestock Development. The prominent non-governmental players were Sanasa, Sarvodaya and World Vision.

It was not an easy path to prosperity. Many members who joined the project got themselves dropped out in the midstream and special strategies had to be employed to get them back to the project. According to an impact assessment survey conducted by the donors of the project, namely the International Fund for Agricultural Development or IFAD and the Canadian International Development Agency or CIDA, in 1997 it was revealed that 80% of the original beneficiaries had succeeded in crossing the poverty line in about five to seven years.

A subsequent impact assessment survey conducted by the Regional Development Department of the Central Bank in 2005 has put this number to 63% where the participants have agreed that they were able to cross the poverty line through the support given by the project. What it means is that there is no possibility to maintain a hundred percent success rate in poverty alleviation projects. The success rate is always below that ideal. Even then, that success rate begins to shrink as time passes due to their inability to cope with new adverse developments.

Village level statistical base a must 

Thus, Mangala’s Gam Peraliya will remain only wishful thinking unless he is able to establish an effective machinery to convert it to concrete action. One problem he faces in this respect is the absence of a reliable data base for providing the support to villages and effectively monitoring their progress.

For this, a comprehensive village level data base has to be assembled, regularly updated and used at the centre for progress monitoring. Without this, Mangala will simply pump money to a project where he would not know even where the moneys have gone.

National Operations Room

The importance of timely availability of data had been felt even in the past when it came to implementing development projects. To address this issue, in 1989, the Governor of the Central Bank, Dr. H.N.S. Karunatilake, established a National Operations Room in the Central Bank. All the socio-economic data relating to Sri Lanka’s regions and the centre were collected, digitised and made available for the purpose. However, this operations room was transferred to the Ministry of Plan Implementation later and there, it is reported to have met with a natural death. If there is a genuine interest in undertaking a development initiative in the country, it is necessary to resuscitate similar machinery within the government.

Nihal Ranasinghe’s personal initiative

A senior public servant, Nihal Ranasinghe, presently the Controller General of Immigration, has developed a comprehensive data base for all the villages in Sri Lanka titled Extended Rural Development Monitoring System or ERDMS. This exercise he has completed on his own because of his personal interest in development administration. He had been an administrative service officer in the regions for a number of years and during that period, he had experienced the necessity for reliable socio-economic data at the village level in order to implement development work there.

This interest was further strengthened when he took courses in development economics and development administration for his MPA degree at the Postgraduate Institute of Management.

Nihal: Reliable data are a must

On inquiry, he revealed to me why he used his free time to develop this data base. “Without data, those of us who plan and implement village level development schemes have to grope in the dark. The conditions in villages are different from each other. Hence, it is wrong to work on the assumption that they are all in a similar situation. Some villages have the problem of water. Some have the problem of roads. Some other villages are faced with the problem of marketing their agricultural produce. Some don’t get bank financing in time. All this information has to be gathered and made available to planners as well as plan implementation agencies to enable them to address the issues at hand in each village. I have gathered data for 32,000 villages and they are all available in a single computer data base. This can be used for developing appropriate strategies for handling village level issues.”

Mangala should tap this goldmine

This is indeed a goldmine to be tapped by Mangala in his initiative to support the development of a village level entrepreneurial class. Ranasinghe’s ERDMS can be used as the basic input when framing any national level development activity monitoring programme.

The data form has three parts and when information relating to province, administrative district, division, etc. is inputted, it autogenerates a unique identification number for each village. These numbers collected into a single compendium can be used, like a telephone directory, to refer to any particular village of choice.  The other parts consist of demographic data and development data. Once projects are completed, they can be automatically updated to provide any centre-level supervision and monitoring. According to Nihal Ranasinghe, an additional advantage of his ERDMS is that any visiting Minister or senior public servant can arm himself with the profile facts of the village before he goes there. He is therefore in a better position to address the specific issues relating to that village.

These are real innovations done in the public service and Mangala may use them in order to effectively implement his development programmes.

*W.A. Wijewardena, a former Deputy Governor of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka, can be reached at waw1949@gmail.com   

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 3

    Dr. Wijewardane: Why should a politician start these programs on his own when the elections are near by. Why the subsequent govts do not have policies or policy implementation instead, individual politican including president and downward every one shows they have the formula to devlop the country. Mangala Himself said that for 70 years they cheated the country. So, writers are writing for money.

    • 3

      Dr, Wije, First Things FIRST! First The politicians and Mangy for starters, should first give up their super lux cars and SUVs and other free bees including free lunch in the Parliament of corrupt clowns and morons, instead of loading taxes onto the people.
      All the tag lines, hype and feel good narratives of Gam Peraliya wont work as long as Lanka smells rotten with CORRUPTION at the top and there will be no FDI as long as this corruption racket continues with Bondscam Ranil protecting Mahinda Jarapassa family of looters of the wealth.
      We need a Malaysian Mahatir type leader to put Ranil, Sira and Jarapassa behind bars and cease their assets to pay of the debt which is crashing the rupee.

  • 0

    This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn’t abide by our Comment policy.For more detail see our Comment policy https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/comments-policy-2/

    • 1

      1… Sri Lankan poverty experts like Mr. Wijwardna should stop pretending that the Lankan poverty rate is 3.5 percent in Lanka, because no one can live on 1.5 USD or 225 LKR.
      The idea that only 3 percent of the Lankan population lives beneath the world bank concocted poverty lin in Lanka is fiction– provided by the World Bank/ IMF and promoted by corrupt politicians. The REAL poverty rate is 25 percent of the population who live under 3 USD which should be the ABSOLUTE POVERTY LINE in Lanka a day as Dr.. Coomaraswarmy has noted . Sri Lankan economic think tanks to should insist that the realistic ABSOLUTE POVERTY LINE must be 450 LKR or 3 USD per capita in Lanka and stop using the bogus indices of the World Bank.
      In any case per capita GDP calculations of poverty is useless given massive ad growing economic inequality.
      2. Instead of blaming village folk for lack of entreprenership and ‘innovation; the buzz word of the century, that totally misses the global digital divide and massive inequalities, better to focus on catching CORRUPT politicians and their relatives and cronies who kill enterprise at national and village level through their corruption.
      the lack of a fair and level playing field.to do business. is why Lanka villages and urban folk are stuck. in a Massive DEBT trap not of their making!

      • 0

        Right on Kalu! SL has a Fake Poverty line in an era of Fake News, post facts, and fake data and development narratives.
        It is not lack of village level poverty data, but the Fake narrative that only 3.5 % of SL population is poor , that is the problem..

        Anyone living one less than 2..5 dollars a day is living in absolute poverty. The real poverty rate is and should be 25% today in SL. and once this FACT is recognized policy must be made for poverty reduction, This is an era of fake facts, data fetishism. and fairy story narratives.. The real problem is under the carpet!.

  • 0

    Making village level data base is not a big issue.
    If all the schools can easily collect the information and through data entry makers could do the job as their home work. That way, school going advanced levels students can also learn how data bases are maintained. If there is a will there is always a way.
    Just to stay not starting …. the kind of collection of village level data information – should be broken by starting this today.
    Even rural tempes and those monks work with schools to promote this. That is how some villages in India work today.
    What is seen as mammoth work will easily be done if it is just started. There are lot more hours of teachers and school going children are available if anyone wants to go for this project.

  • 0

    Chanayakaya and Confusious may have said a few more things too.
    The path to Poverty alleviation is Providing a Good Education.
    This applies not only to the Farmers’ Daughters and Fishermens’ Sons.
    But also for Rosy Akkas road Sweepers, Ganeshan’s Tea Pickers ,CTB Bus Drivers and a myriad of many other categories who are the battling majority trying to feed the kids, send to schools and make them do better than their parents…
    Before becoming AgribBiz Experts and Live Seafood Exporters, these Daughters and Sons have to find a decent meal and go to school.
    What has this Yahapalanaya done on these fronts.
    They stopped the 1000 Mahavidyalayas .
    And went hell for leather to give MBBS to Rajitha’s DIL and the other rich kids who couldn’t make the cut .
    While Maggie’s buddies among the Colombo Rich are having the greatest time in history, since Arhath Mihindu landed in Mihintale..
    Talk is usually cheap.
    It is not only cheap but also put in to good use to cheat the public by these Yahapalana Politikkas.
    What did this dude do for the first 3 years of Yahapalanaya ?.
    If Sira didn’t sack the Rogue ex FM.this one would have been busy massaging the ex Tigers in London and drafting same sex Legislation.
    Where is the Champion of the UNP Gamaralas’, Keselwatta Kid?.
    Is Mangy trying to do some Public Relation work for the Kid ,before the Kid put his hand up to get the PM Gig from President Dr Ranil…

    • 2

      KASmaalam K A Sumanasekera

      “The path to Poverty alleviation is Providing a Good Education.”
      Did Chanayakaya and Confusious really say this to you?
      I don’t believe in both.
      Tell us how many wealthy crooks and war criminals are educated? Look at you, enjoying life like the elites, consuming imported malt, cheese, sausage, Biriyani, ………….. and a bit of Golf, ………….. yet you still type like a pleb.

      How do you manage an elite life style without accumulating elite tools? You are the living example. Poverty alleviation does not depend on good education.

  • 0

    Oh good yet another useless slogan to fool the voters. There is only one worthwhile Gam Peraliya and that’s the 1963 film.

  • 1

    HOw do you think they create it. where has it happened in the world instead they make policies to support that. I think he wants some one to sell him some software. So, he can collect some commis. Writers write for money. They import Fertilizer and the ground water is full of toxic ions and Farmers are dieing with CKDUs. They import rice and the Wheat flour consumption is three times the previous govt. How do they empower rural folks. you say it is not a ROSY path. Rosy since the day she came , not very lonf may be two months, she wants money . money. It is not coins beig amounts. HEr wash room had not been used for four years. sO, SHE NOW WANTS THE HELP OF THE PRIVATE SECTOR AND SHE IS SPENDING rs. 57 million. This guy knows he is unpopular so he stole something from MArtin Wickramasinghe/LEster James PEris. that is lowest class of politics.

  • 0

    Right on Kalu! SL has a Fake Poverty line in an era of Fake News, post facts, and fake data and development narratives.
    It is not lack of village level poverty data, but the Fake narrative that only 3.5 % of SL population is poor , that is the problem..

    Anyone living one less than 2..5 dollars a day is living in absolute poverty. The real poverty rate is and should be 25% today in SL. and once this FACT is recognized policy must be made for poverty reduction, This is an era of fake facts, data fetishism. and fairy story narratives.. The real problem is under the carpet!.

  • 0

    W A Wijewardena suggests ~ “………Thus, Mangala’s Gam Peraliya will remain only wishful thinking unless he is able to establish an effective machinery to convert it to concrete action. One problem he faces in this respect is the absence of a reliable data base for providing the support to villages and effectively monitoring their progress…….”.
    The ‘data base’ my be used to interpret result (of course to suit).
    Gam Peraliya is stymied by other factors – standing tall is corruption.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.