24 May, 2022


Minority Power

By Nishthar Idroos

Nishthar Idroos

Nishthar Idroos

The people had made their verdict absolutely clear and all have to respect that. Sri Lanka has a new President. It’s a clear mandate for change; the onus is now on MS and RW to deliver. No more false promises, no more unfulfilled promises. The time has come to deliver and relieve the people of their many burdens. The minorities had made a strident and monumental contribution in this great election victory for the common candidate. It won’t be incorrect to state that their vote was directly instrumental in enthroning MS. The entire North and East virtually voted en-bloc for the common opposition candidate. They defied all odds to exercise their suffrage and make it known to the world. Their choice, preference for President crystal clear. Never in the history had the country witnessed such unprecedented unity for a presidential candidate from the minorities.

Much is expected from the new President Maithripala Sirisena. Maintaining law and order, appointing a new cabinet and  strengthening democracy is priority. The process of  abolishing the authoritarian executive presidential system and replacing it with an executive Cabinet of Ministers responsible to Parliament should be done as a matter of urgency. Repealing the 18th amendment to the Constitution with legislation to establish strengthened and independent institutions, including a Judicial Services Commission, a Police Commission, a Public Service Commission, an Elections Commission, a Commission against Bribery and Corruption and a Human Rights Commission is sine quo non. It’s also time to give back the lost dignity of the minorities. It’s up to the new administration to regain the waning confidence of minorities and make them excited participants in the system working hard for their beloved nation and people. The key requirement here is dignity and no one should be deprived of it.

Rauff and MaithripalaIn the past I had written a few pieces in which I ventured to challenge MR’s rather ill-advised strategy to postulate an uncompromising anti-minority policy tainted with majoritarian infused adrenalin and undiluted xenophobic rigour . A toxic combination never witnessed before in the political history of our beloved nation. I cannot recall any previous President subjecting minorities to such pain and pressure. This unabating trend over time got worse. The administration too got incomprehensibly insensitive. What made MR do this? Who were the protagonists and other coalescing forces to this kind of misguided, injudicious stratagem? Did MR ever give thought to its flip side?

Many were the victims in the past and contemporary history who either perished or drifted to oblivion for not acceding to common sense and sound reason? Marginalizing minorities was such a bad policy. In business just like in politics one got to be ever vigilant of competitors and their activity. You should not only be able to see the apparent but penetrate further to see the not-so-apparent. Always say what if? Surprisingly the campaign was lacking sound insight from the inception. A malaise that afflicts the under- prepared. A campaign devoid of versatility in terms politically savvy resources is vulnerable. Cardinal rule in life – read and understand the writing on the wall. You don’t become a looser because of Uva, the issues were too corrosive and   ingrained and denial did not do much. MR had the capacity and charisma to reach out to the minorities had he only shown sincere and genuine concern for minority issues. Had he taken affirmative action a different outcome could have been possible.

It may not come as a surprise that even Velupillai Prabakaran was one such intransigent specimen. Had he acquiesced to strong, intelligent counsel the nation wouldn’t have lost so many lives fighting a futile war? In MR’s case it was all the more baffling because he entertained such overt dynastic ambitions and finally gave everything in a platter. Sounds such an anti-climax. The discerning witnessed no wisdom or any semblance of pragmatism for his persistent anti-minority conspiracies. Ably choreographed and bedecked by the family the BBS carried out their act with immaculate precision. Obsequious to the palace yet spewing ear-shattering vitriol the BBS were an accompanying liability never, ever confronted. Their degrading theatrics hopefully will be captured on celluloid screen sometime in the future by an insightful film director much to the mirth, hilarity and amusement of the nation. As we slam a huge kick to a ravenous and acquisitive legacy lets sincerely hope we’ve learnt huge lessons from this calamity. Let this be a lesson to all future leaders who salivate to tread the racial path for petty political gain.

The war is over and MR was the indisputable hero, none dare to question this achievement. None will be able to take this unique position from MR. The people were saved from the shackles of misery and penury. Many Sri Lankans consider May 18 2009 as the new date of Independence. The nation was liberated and relieved. Common sense would dictate the best course of action from that point would have been to win the confidence of all people including all minorities in the arduous journey towards nation building and national reconciliation. The war had dismembered our collective psyche and the nation was restless for amelioration and deliverance. In this moment of somber expectation came further pummelling not just to the minorities but to all including the majority. Under the guise of a very strange genre of sanctimony laced patriotism emerged the grand project to rake-in all and sundry. People started to reel under unbearable taxes and duties. The cost of living was northward bound and was unstoppable.

About nation building MS had this to say to Padma Rao Sundarji of Hindustan Times on the eve of the election “We needed a nation-building project which can’t happen unless all factions come together and now –this is precisely that dream coming true. It is this diversity that will ensure success. We consider ourselves blessed to have this disparity. If Sri Lankan voters were uncomfortable about it, they would have expressed resentment weeks ago. But no such thing has happened. On the contrary, there is a big surge to vote for me” About militarizing the north he said “Sure. But I will ensure that the army will exit civil administration altogether and give local police and civil servants that task. I only said that existing army cantonments like at Palali in Jaffna will not be shut down. And of course I will act totally in consonance with the security apparatus and our generals. The point is, all democratic Tamil parties of the TNA are backing me right now”

Mr President wish you all the best and let’s get to work.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 7

    Nishthar Idroos –

    RE:Minority Power No. It is Democracy and Law and Order Power

    It is actually Democracy, Law and Order, Good Governance power which the minorities and the Sinhala Majority support.

    MR , despite all his flaws, was the President when LTTE was defeated. o, the Sinhala as well as Tamils and Muslims give him Credit and he got their support, despite the mR discriminatory policies against them.

    Maithripala Sirisena 6,217,162 51.28%
    Mahinda Rajapaksa 5,768,090 47.58%

    Valid Votes 12,123,452 98.85%
    Rejected Votes 140,925 1.15%
    Total Polled 12,264,377 81.52%
    Regis.Electors 15,044,490

    Sinhala Buddhists 0.7019 =70.09%

    Non-Sinhala Buddhists =0.2981 =29.81%

    About 55% of the Sinhala Buddhists Supported Mahinda Rajapaksa=0.55*12,123,452
    =4,734,601= 39.05% of Polled Votes

    About 45% of the Sinhala Buddhists supported Maitripala Sirisena=0.45^12,123,452
    =3,873,764 = 31.95% of Votes Polled.

    So, the Ethic Voting Breakdown for the Two Candidates comes down as

    Sin Budd Non-Sinh Budd
    Mr.Sirisena 6,217,162 51.28% 31.95% 19.33%
    Mr. Rajapaksa 5,768,090 47.58% 39.05% 8.53%

    So, the 30.6% non-Sinhala Buddhists, still voted for Mr.Mahinda Rajapaksa, whereas 69.4% of them Voted for Mr. Mautipala Sirisena.

    • 2

      I have posted this somewhere here on CT as well
      Add the digits of the total number of votes as declared for Mahinda until you get a single digit.
      Mahinda”s astrologer got one thing right fir the wrong reason

    • 2

      This will be the new government’s nightmare – The demands by Wahabists fortheir pound of flesh.

      We shall see how long the demands to separatist to think of the nation ahead of self-rule.

      Might have to call Solheim again to get advice soon. And that will be done.

  • 2

    Agreed with most of what has been written in this article.
    No doubt, the minority vote was crucial and critical in this victory. Had this vote been allowed to be freely expressed in 2005, perhaps the history of SL would be different today as RW would have been the victor.

    It is alleged MR secretly and illegally bribed VP to prevent the Tamils in the North from exercising their soveriegn franchise. It is also alleged he attempted to do the same in 2015. These allegations need to be investiagted as they are criminal offences, if they are found to be true. The new Government needs to actively pursue these allegations and all other alleged corrupt deals and practices and ensure justice prevails irrespective of who the offender is.

    The writer says MR is the undisputable hero of the war. I beg to differ. While it is true MR was the Leader when the war was brought to an end and he played a critical role (for which we owe him the gratitude), it was General SF who masterminded the victory with the backing of his Forces. Furthermore, leaders prior to MR (CBK and RW) also played their part while in Office to dismantle the LTTE. It was RW who engineered the split in the LTTE and brought about an International net around the LTTE. What the Dictator did to the war hero General SF is a disgrace. For this act and many other crimes, MR was banished by the voters. The most dastardly act was to violate the Constitution of SL by seeking a third term. Had he won, it would have meant, the voters would have legitimised this violation thus creating a precedence. On this count alone, he should have been shown the door!

    MR was a pathological liar and a ruthless Dictator who was not fit to govern in a Peaceful Democracy. A peaceful change was imperative and that is what was achieved inspite of many obstacles. Now, lets move forward to build a peaceful and prosperous Democracy.

  • 2

    Unfortunate headline ! Takes away from the content.

    You wish the new administration well but if minority power is the emphasis, they are doomed before they start.

    BTW isn’t it time the minorities got some REAL leaders , instead of long jumpers ?

  • 0

    Dear Nisthar;

    Good Article. Extracts “Ably choreographed and bedecked by the family the BBS carried out their act with immaculate precision.”

    Whether Majority support or the Minority support, one thing we should remember and confess is that there can be Planners, Strategists and Conspirators, BUT “Almighty Allah” is the Supreme of everything above who brought “LIGHT AND DIRECTION” to all “Patriotic Citizens” of Sri Lanka irrespective of Caste, Crede or religion and for the elected leaders to lead Sri Lanka with Wisdom.


  • 1

    as long as sinhalese buddhists are divided into 2 parties, parayas enjoy undue avantage

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.