21 August, 2019

Blog

Office Of Ethics & Morality – For What Purpose & Whose Benefit?

By Rajeewa Jayaweera

Rajeewa Jayaweera

Rajeewa Jayaweera

At best, the recent news item of a proposal by the Prime Minister to set up an office for Ethics and Morality to halt the erosion of ethics in our society, is reason for amusement. Why does our Prime Minister feel the common man needs the assistance of a special office to improve their ethics and morality? Is there any other group in this country requiring greater and more urgent assistance in improving their ethics and morality than our politicians starting with the 225 specimen in Parliament? Should not the ‘code of conduct’ for parliamentarians, which would have involved ethics and morality, promised by the ‘Yahapalanaya’ proponents almost on a daily from November 2014 till 09 January 2015 receive priority?

One is intrigued. In the Oxford dictionary, the word Ethics is explained ‘Moral principles that a person’s behavior or the conduct of an activity’ and the word Morality as ‘Principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behavior’.

It would be futile to even think of Ethics and Morality during the days from 2010 till January 08, 2015. It was non-existent. What would be of relevance in today’s context is the ethics and morality of those who ousted a regime totally devoid of ethics and morality, in January and August 2015, with the assistance of a naïve electorate. Regrettably, the electorate’s was a Hobson’s choice.

Democratic traditions demand, the Head of State call upon the party leader able to command a majority in parliament, to form a government. The first act of the newly elected ‘Yahapalanaya’ President, immediately after being sworn in as President, was to invite the then Leader of Opposition Ranil Wickremesinghe to form a government. Democratic traditions also demand a vote of confidence be taken in parliament no sooner the invited party leader has succeeded in forming a government. He or she is required to demonstrate the ability to command a majority in parliament required for governance. Had it been the case in January 2015, the newly appointed Prime Minister would have reverted to his previous position of Leader of Opposition on that day.

Ethics and morality based governance would have called for snap elections or at the latest after the 100 day program. In the light of the proposal to set up an office for ethics and morality, was the decision to do away with a vote of confidence for over six months ethically and morally correct?

Rightly or wrongly, Britain is known as the cradle of democracy where it all began with the Magna Carta in 1215. Britain, unlike Sri Lanka has a constitutional monarch. Prime Ministers are voted into and out of office with some resigning mid-term. Yet another tradition since 1900 is that of Prime Ministers voted out of office voluntarily resigning from party leadership, not contesting another election for premiership and limiting his/her role to that of a back bench MP in case he/she retains a parliamentary seat. The three unopposed exceptions were Sir Winston Churchill, Stanley Baldwin and Harold Wilson due to extenuating circumstances. Even party leaders in the opposition quit their party leadership after losing an election.

Sri Lanka, unfortunately never developed such a tradition from the time of independence. Defeated Prime Ministers (and now a President) have simply refused to fade away. Is it ethically and morally correct for electorally defeated Prime Ministers to continue to hold on to party leadership and subsequently contest for the Presidency and Premiership or be appointed to the office of the Prime Minister?

Similarly, ethics and morality goes out of the window when candidates rejected by the people are appointed to Parliament through the National List and to the Cabinet of Ministers, as well as the appointment of friends and relations to high positions in the state sector without ascertaining their suitability in terms of qualifications, experience and integrity.

It is often stated, not everything is black and white. In addition, there are different shades of grey. That applies to the commercial world and in international relations when national interests take precedence. However, Ethics and Morality cannot and should not be turned and twisted to suit political expediency. Neither should right and wrong as well as good and bad.

The list goes on. What is the purpose that would be served by the establishment of an Office of Ethics and Morality? Would the beneficiaries be a few friends and relatives receiving allowances, vehicles and other perks at state expense? Would it not be more meaningful and effective for our current leaders to set the desired standards by example?

French dramatis Jean-Anouilh said “Nobody has a more sacred obligation to obey the law than those who make the law”. Similarly, nobody has a more sacred obligation to uphold ethics and morality than those who preach such ideals to others.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 1
    6

    UNP is ther Sri lankan christian party. Ranil wickramsinghe is playing for thr church. Morality and Ethics are all Bible Related and Western propaganda.

    Yahapalanaya is a joke. Maithriapala Talks about buddhism. Ranil wickramsinghe talks about Christianity. CBK talks about Tamils. Rajitha Senarathe talks about muslims. Wigneswaran and TNA talk about “Tamilness”.

    • 4
      0

      So what is wrong with every one talk about everything.

      • 0
        0

        Quite right RJ! Thanks.
        Corruption has been TRICKING DOWN from the Diyawenna Parliament of corrupt morons for years!

        Even though the fish rots from it head down, Ranil and Sira now they are planning to have a COde of Conduct for Provincial Politicians.

        Meanwhile Ministry Secretaries are to have Mercedes Benz and BMW cars, a step in advancing corruption so that Ministry Secrataries will turn a blind eye to their corrupt political bosses.

        People of Sri Lanka should NOT pay any Taxes VAT, income tax or otherwise until the politicians release their assets declarations and tax returns.
        IMF should go after the corrupt parliament of clowns and their wealth hidden off shore bank accounts rather than increasing POVERTY and INEQUALITY and CONFLICT in Sri Lanka by asking the working poor to pay for the corruption of the politicians, their cronies and families in the Miracle of Modayas!

    • 0
      0

      What do Buddhist precepts mean but Morality and Ethics?

  • 0
    6

    Corresponsding buddhist words Are SEELa and Vinaya.

    Ranil wickramsinghe began with Dasa Raja dharma. It looks he ends of with Bible.

  • 0
    0

    Yahapalanaya started with the 19th amendment with the Police commission , JSC etc . What is the status of these institutions. The Police commission is a disgrace led by a so called professor the commission is now recognised as a institution that justifies Police criminality. There is no legal advisor in this institution and the secretary a half baked administrator who cannot even distinguish a civil from a criminal act heads the investigations. They hide behind a facade by not replying the public complaints. Prof Hettige is a disgrace . He sees no evil, hears no evil ? does no evil .
    This is an example of the rhetoric of Yahapalanaya, 19th amendment and accountability standards set by Ranil and co. Into this we add ethics and morality. A load of Bull shit. This country needs men with character,vision and morality not parrots who keeps on saying nice things but does not mean it.

  • 3
    0

    “At best, the recent news item of a proposal by the Prime Minister to set up an office for Ethics and Morality to halt the erosion of ethics in our society, is reason for amusement.”

    And not just “amusement”, it is hilarious to even think that our elected administrators, most of who haven’t the foggiest idea of Ethics and Morality, can pontificate to the electorate on these subjects.

    As Christ is reported to have said, “Physician heal thyself” is what came to mind when I read about RW’s proposal.

    Be that as it may, it is food for thought about the need for ALL teacher-trainees to undergo a course in Ethics and Morality as part of their syllabus so that they could impart this knowledge to their students.

    Excellent analysis, Rajiva!

  • 2
    0

    Place an ad for a new CEO for the country and ask Duarte from Philippines to apply !!!

  • 4
    0

    All at present in the country are lost generation as far as Ethics and Morals are concern but we have to catch the young from the kindergarten on wards so that all would have good future.

  • 1
    0

    It is worse than a joke it is gregorious. Is the PM serious about setting up this office?
    As they say charity begins at home. In my view same goes for ethics and morality. It is not something you study and get a Phd as an after thought.
    Rajeev as you have stated; its jobs for the boys! Don’t ask me which boys, which school, party or club.
    Give us a break . The public are not as stupid as you think. The are smarter than some of the law makers of the land

  • 1
    0

    Another steaming load of bull!

    Ranil will not know if the twins pit bulls of Morality and Ethics came up and bit him on his bum.

    In a political milieu that primarily serves itself (and relations and its hangers-on) the only thing that seems to stop a political career in mid-flight is assassination. Our present political leaders, once they have tasted office (ie power) believe that it is their God given right to go on, and on. They will never acknowledge defeat or fall from favour, and hand over the reigns to somebody else.There is no riding off into the sunset to write their memoirs and make money from after-dinner speeches.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 300 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically shut off on articles after 10 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.