26 September, 2018

Blog

Political Iftars Have Ruptured The Sanctity Of Their Observances 

By Mohamed R. M. Farook

Mohamed R. M. Farook

Party politics and power politics are the twin scourges the Sri Lankan Muslims are faced with in what the Muslim society sees as the hegemonic display of strengths of some group (s) over the others contrary to the teachings of Islam. The Ramadhan fasting (any fasting for that matter) has two sanctioned events, one at the start of the fast each day (taking of the pre-dawn meal) and the other is the time of breaking the fast known as Iftar which is done by taking date fruits plus water first followed by khanji (porridge), short eats and then immediately performing the prescribed prayer. Taking of pre-dawn meal is done by all Muslims in one’s own homes, other than in exceptional cases where such persons may have other arrangements. Getting up and taking the pre-dawn meal is recommended (has Blessings). On the other hand, Iftar – breaking of the fast – Muslim males may do it in their own homes or in mosques where dates, water, porridge (khanji) and short eats are provided to all those who come to the mosques to break the fast. Mosques spend (from the contributions from their congregational members and other Muslim well-wishers) lavishly on the preparation of Iftar porridge, dates and short eats. The Iftar porridge is prepared in large quantities (in some mosques the Iftar porridge costs from around Rs.40,000/= to Rs.50,000/= or a little more per day) and the porridge is also available to Muslim households, Muslim businesses and Muslim groups in state or private organizations (universities, factories etc. where preparation of the porridge is not possible) around the area of these Mosques. Few persons and households of other faiths sometimes do come and collect the Iftar porridge and the Mosques offer them with generosity and without any reluctance – All Praise Be to God [Allah]. 

Iftar has a special significance for Muslims who are fasting – a short time period before the time for breaking the fast, they must get involved in supplications to God (Allah) for any shortcomings in their fasting, supplicate for the good in this world and in the Hereafter, be meditative and concentrative of Islamic teachings, read Qur’anic verses and finally break the fast at the correct time without delay when the call for prayers is announced. This time period is specifically to be religious / devotional and be devoid of distractions. Thus any function in the name of Iftar with even the slightest distraction is against the spirit of fasting.  

Many world leaders have hosted Iftar functions in the past in their respective countries – originated first in the White House (USA) – some of which are yet continuing, some were discontinued, some restarted again and some world leaders do not host such functions at all, some are totally against it and some boycott it even if invited – that is the scenario of these Iftar functions worldwide. Sri Lanka too followed suit and we have had state sponsored Iftar functions hosted by the President and the Prime Minister separately on different days at the Presidents House and Temple Trees respectively. People are invited: Diplomats of the Muslim countries, parliamentarians (MPs and ministers), Muslim clergy, leaders and office bearers of Muslim social organizations, trustees of Mosques and so on. There is no question of any Muslim invitee not attending these functions because they are cherry-picked by the Public Relations Units of the President’s and the Prime Minister’s Offices and / or by the Muslim parliamentarians themselves. The Muslim public in general are neither happy nor annoyed over the hosting of the Iftar by the President and the Prime Minister as they (the Muslims) perceive the hosting as the absolute privilege of the President and the Prime Minister and also as part of governance to honour and show a sense of fraternity to the Muslims. Many Muslims would be very thankful to the two leaders for providing the necessary space to do the Call for Prayers (Azdaan) and performance of prayer of the hour (Mahgrib) to the Muslim invitees there itself. This Iftar function cannot be called political as the practice of hosting Iftar had been in existence during different regimes in Sri Lanka and the speeches given therein by the heads of state are (were) about the values, virtues and benefits of fasting and nothing about the ruling regime’s political views. Apart from the sumptuous food at the time of breaking the fast and at the immediate Iftar dinner and the luxurious interiors of the Presidential House and the Temple Trees, there is nothing whatsoever to be said as distractions in the sense of individual or collective thoughts of the Muslim invitees that may go against the spirit of fasting. 

So far so good but few issues show the downsides of these Iftar functions viz. the marginalized and poor Muslims (even those of other faiths) are left out and they the marginalized poor do not get any benefits from these functions. One aspect of Ramadhan is to help the poor irrespective of their religious faith. Thus the alternative could have been to have given handout of food packets (cooked) to the poor people in the impoverished areas in Colombo and its suburbs to start with, for the poor Muslims to beak their fast and the poor of other faiths to partake the food along with the Muslims in joining in the Iftar. The other issue is that the invited Muslims in being obliging to honour the invitations do forego the usual merits / blessings of the Iftar they were accustomed to gain in being with their family or within the Mosques and involved in the beneficial rituals of supplications, recitals and concentrations that are part and parcel of activities that precede immediately before Iftar, though every Muslim may not be said to be partaking in these beneficial rituals. Another issue is that this Iftar function is elitist, grandeur, and extravagant which could give the Muslim attendees, without realizing by themselves, the emergence of false pride within them in perceiving that they have attended a ‘grand Iftar’ – such ‘grand Iftar’ functions have no place in Islam. However, as said above, this state sponsored Iftar function should not be construed as political and has to be accepted as part of governance. The rationale of the top leaders of the State (The President, the Prime Minister and their supportive cohorts) in having the Iftar function must be looked at in the sense of their appreciation of the involvement of Muslims in one of their fundamental religious obligations viz. Ramadhan fasting – and from the Islamic point of view, all who were instrumental in helping the Muslim invitees break their fast at this function, even if this write-up would have said anything differently above, will definite gain the Merits and Blessings of God (Allah).

Next we come to Iftars organized and carried out by certain Muslims who could be rightly classed as opportunists who are of the opinion that the past regime will be brought back into power in the forthcoming presidential and parliamentary elections so that the Iftar they have sponsored and administered would be the groundwork for these opportunistic Muslims to get all sorts of favours and benefits from their predicted personalities in case they come to power through the next elections. Such individual Muslims, Muslim collectives and Muslim organizations who did sponsor such Iftars did that solely for their own benefits and not for the Muslim community even if the appendage ‘benefits to the Muslim community’ could have been marketed by the sponsors to ‘hoodwink’ the Muslim populace. In fact, there is no need to do any functions – let alone Iftars – to get favours and benefits to the Muslim community because the ruling regime whoever they may be should look after every community with equality and fair treatments as per the Constitution of Sri Lanka. The said Iftar functions gave a platform to the invitee politician-guests to air their views, among other points, as to the perceptions of the Muslims regarding them which did contribute to their regime defeat in the last elections. Thus the said functions were really a political platform under the auspices of Iftar which in no way could be condoned within the spirituality of Ramadan. The sponsors have really shamed themselves through these functions though they may not realize it immediately since they are more focused on the political dividends they are supposed to reap in case these politicians come to power. 

The two parties to these ‘faulty’ and unspiritual Iftars – which are absolutely political and which may be acceptable and the done-thing in political game-playing but not in a religious context – in which each being covertly hypocritical as to their fondness to the other by way of articulating, appreciating and accepting the contributory characteristics of the other to the overall success of each other in the political game playing of the so called Iftar functions. Many of the Muslims who attended these functions were wittingly or unwittingly not bothered as to the reason (s) for the function and were willing participants to the variety of activities that constituted those functions which by necessity lacked the required spirituality of Iftar and thus rendered the participants forego the merits and blessings had they done their Iftar at their homes or in the Mosques where an atmosphere of tranquility and religiosity would have been present definitely. These political Iftars though not to the liking of the Muslim community as a whole nevertheless would continue to be repeated in the future too as long as party politics plays a leading role in the lives of politically motivated groups of Muslims who are hell bent to enrich themselves through favours from the ruling polity with scant regards to the progress and wellbeing of the Muslim community at large.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 9
    0

    The depths to which Ifthar has been desanctified in Sri Lanka is best illustrated by the fact that on the 04th of June 2018, none other than the ACJU itself hosted an Ifthar Party for over 100 Muslim journalists (all males) at a ‘fine dining restaurant’ in Colombo 3, where among other things, “a comprehensive description of the activities of the All Ceylon Jamaiyathul Ulema was presented” according to the ACJU Website. Interestingly, a commentator at another website reviewing this particular restaurant describes it as ” a religious extremist establishment “. Is the Restaurant owned by a member of the ACJU ? The photographs of the event shows that every participant was also given a mysterious brown-bag gift pack. What gifts did the ACJU shower on these 100+ male Muslim journalists to thank them for attending this party ? A copy of the Holy Quran, hopefully.
    Check it out for yourself at :
    http://www.acju.lk/news-ta/acju-news-ta/item/1341-2018-06-05-11-21-21
    Shouldn’t these Islamic Scholars be at the very forefront of any endeavor to preserve the sanctity of Ifthar ? Or, did they have some other ulterior motive (self-promotion ?) in organizing this event for journalists ?

    • 4
      0

      Mohamed R. M. Farook

      RE: Political Iftars Have Ruptured The Sanctity Of Their Observances

      “Shouldn’t these Islamic Scholars be at the very forefront of any endeavor to preserve the sanctity of Ifthar ? Or, did they have some other ulterior motive (self-promotion ?) in organizing this event for journalists ?”

      This is nothing new. Throughout history Ulama have used the rulers. public opinion, that is favorable to them. That is all politics. Ultimately they used the rulers to sideline, banish and burn the works of those with common sense, with reason abd philosophers with demonstrative evidence as well. The male journalists are being used with gifts, is that they will spread the word. that “The Ulama are infallible and only the Ulama can translate or convey the meanings in the Quran and Hadith”

      Ibn Rushd in his darkest hour

      https://www.alaraby.co.uk/english/artsandculture/2015/4/9/ibn-rushd-in-his-darkest-hour

      In all the struggles endured by free thinkers in which they were either killed or exiled, we find the same elements of decline no matter the time or place. This includes the time and place of the struggle of Abul Walid Muhammad Ibn Ahmad Ibn Rushd (1126 -1198), or Averroes in the Latinised form of his name.

      Ibn Rushd is the most capable rationalist philosopher in the history of Arab civilisation, and the best versed on the achievements of his age and the ages before him.

      A final reason offered was Ibn Rushd’s book The Incoherence of the Incoherence, in which he responded to the fallacies of Abu Hamid al-Ghazali’s The Incoherence of Philosophers. He did this despite knowing Ghazali was the master of the Almohad dynasty who were in power, and believed the earth was located between the horns of a bull.

      PS. Rajapaksa uses Sil Redi, Ulama uses brown bags. What is the mean IQ of Sri Lankans? 79. Of the Ulama? As low as that of the Saudi Wahhabi Salafis?

    • 5
      0

      Mohamed R. M. Farook,

      RE: Political Iftars Have Ruptured The Sanctity Of Their Observances

      The Ulama have a hard time thinking, using reason , despite there are no restrictions in acquiring knowledge in the Quran. Read up on the Works of Ibn Rushd.

      Here is an alternate view of God, and the Human mind and God, beliefs.

      Are we primates out of Africa or fallen angels? What does the genes say?

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iMmvu9eMrg

      Why We Believe in Gods – Andy Thomson –

  • 5
    0

    Mohamed R. M. Farook,

    RE: Political Iftars Have Ruptured The Sanctity Of Their Observances

    “Party politics and power politics are the twin scourges the Sri Lankan Muslims are faced with in what the Muslim society sees as the hegemonic display of strengths of some group (s) over the others contrary to the teachings of Islam”

    This, the power politics and religious politics , have been used by the Ulama for well over 1,000 years and the Ulama is following in the Ulama “Tradition” by using Religion (Islam) to maintain their hegemony, by self-appointing the Ulama as the sole-interpreters of the Quran and Hadith, as being “Infallible”, just like the Catholic Church did with the “Infallible” Popes.

    The brown bag culture, is a culture they may have learned from the Rajapaksas. Did the brown bags contain coupons for laptops, or tickets to heaven, a kind of reverse “indulgence” by the Ulama, to keep quiet on MMDA and other hegemonic activities of the Ulama?

    Science in a Golden Age – Al-Razi, Ibn Sina and the Canon of Medicine.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8HlFFDTBWQ

    Empirical Evidence and Reason.

    Then Came the Ulama Hegemony, and the Decline. Now the Sri Lankan Ulama bribe with brown bags, because their theology is shallow, and cannot use the rulers. Just look at the Wahhabi-Salafi graduates IQ’s. They are the lowest in the World.

    Science in Islam, Part 4: Al-Ghazali incoherence

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ln13_9kO0II

    Ibn Rushd in his darkest hour

    https://www.alaraby.co.uk/english/artsandculture/2015/4/9/ibn-rushd-in-his-darkest-hour
    A final reason offered was Ibn Rushd’s book The Incoherence of the Incoherence, in which he responded to the fallacies of Abu Hamid al-Ghazali’s The Incoherence of Philosophers. He did this despite knowing Ghazali was the master of the Almohad dynasty who were in power, and believed the earth was located between the horns of a bull.

    • 0
      3

      Here the web mania Amarasiri with his usual posting – Ulema, Ibn Rushd, Wahabism, Najd, Incoherence of the Incoherence, IQ etc. etc… You dumb fellow, don’t you have anything to post relevant to the subject. Earlier you gave a shit answer to my questions but unfortunately when I was back to reply the posting was disabled by CT. Everybody knows you are a Shia or Shia licker but just don’t write irrelevant answers or comments.

      • 2
        0

        This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn’t abide by our Comment policy.For more detail see our Comment policy https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/comments-policy-2/

      • 3
        0

        Ameen Ralli,

        Amarasir went over the word limit.

        “Ulema, Ibn Rushd, Wahabism, Najd, Incoherence of the Incoherence, IQ etc. etc…”

        The problem the Ulama and Wahhabi-Salafies and their clones have, like you, is that they do not have the intelligence and critical thinking skills to understand knowledge, demonstrated and demonstrated, even though the Quran requires it. So what do they do? Do ad hominem attacks,use rulers and politicians to maintain their convoluted ideologies, the standard practice of the Ulama and the Church.

        Why not for a change read up on the works of the philosophers, especially Ibn Rushd. You may finally get to the age of enlightenment.

        Is the Hadith of Najd a strong Hadith or a weak hadith? After all the Devil, Satan Inblis appeared from Najd, 300 years ago.

        Text of the hadith. According to two narrations in Sahih Bukhari, Muhammad(Pbuh) asks Allah(swt) to bless the areas of Bilad al-Sham (Syria) and Yemen. When his companions said “Our Najd as well,” he replied: “There will appear earthquakes and afflictions, and from there will come out the side of the head (e.g. horns) of Satan.”

        Save yourself from Hell-Fire.

  • 5
    0

    Many years ago, a politician claimed that journalists could be ‘bought’ for a bottle of arrack. This politician is today a leading member of the Yahapalanaya government who seems to be acting on his claim.
    Will someone now claim that male Muslim journalists could be ‘bought’ for a brown-bag of halal goodies ?
    By the way, why didn’t the ACJU invite female Muslim journalists for this party. Is it because the ACJU do not perceive female Muslim journalists as ‘journalists’ ? Or is it because the ACJU do not perceive female Muslim journalists as ‘Muslims’ ?
    Over to you, Amarasiri

    • 5
      0

      Kemo Sabey,

      “By the way, why didn’t the ACJU invite female Muslim journalists for this party. Is it because the ACJU do not perceive female Muslim journalists as ‘journalists’ ? Or is it because the ACJU do not perceive female Muslim journalists as ‘Muslims’ ?
      Over to you, Amarasiri”

      The answer, my friend, is blowin’ in the wind. The answer is blow’n in the wind of Islamic history and Ulama hegemony.

      How many roads must a man walk down
      Before you call him a man?
      How many seas must a white dove sail
      Before she sleeps in the sand?
      Yes, ‘n’ how many times must the cannon balls fly
      Before they’re forever banned?
      The answer, my friend, is blowin’ in the wind
      The answer is blowin’ in the wind

      Is the Pope Catholic? Is the Pope a women?

      The Ulama have taken over Islam, just like the Catholic Church and the Popes took over Christianity. It is a great Divine business. Any reports from heaven, hell, purgatory, Nivana etc?

      Unfortunately, the Philosophers, Rationalists, Scientists, free thinkers, the women and the Muslim masses, ( both ignorant and non-ignorant) are at the losing end of this hegemony.

      Will any, yes any, Muslim Journalist who received a “brown bag” of indulgences, return the brown bags and write about the points raised by Amarasiri and others?

      If no, is it because their IQ’s are equally low, or afraid of being labelled a heretic, kuffar (unbelievers) , or calling it bida(innovation), from the Ulama toolbox?

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 300 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically shut off on articles after 10 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.