13 July, 2020

Blog

President Sirisena’s Second Coup: Reasons & Numbers  

By S. I. Keethaponcalan

Dr. S. I. Keethaponcalan

President Maithripala Sirisena became part of yet another political coup within five years. In the first coup, he parted ways with the Mahinda Rajapaksa government to become the common candidate of the opposition parties headed by the United National Party (UNP) in 2014. His shift, then, was considered as “traitorous” by Rajapaksa and his loyalists. 

The present one unfolded when he appointed former president Mahinda Rajapaksa as the new prime minister on October 26, 2018. This move surprised almost everyone I know in Sri Lanka. Maithripala Sirisena was elected president in January 2018 with the UNP, and minority votes as United People’s Freedom Party (UPFA) votes went to Mahinda Rajapaksa. Therefore, especially members and supporters of the UNP have reasons to believe that Sirisena betrayed them. 

The move ignited a political crisis in Sri Lanka as there are two prime ministers, currently. Ranil Wickremesinghe maintains that he is the legitimate prime minister because he commands the confidence of parliament. In other words, Wickremesinghe argues that he has the support of at least 113 members in parliament. This issue has the potential to prolong the crisis and instability, something the country does not need at this point in time.       

The Reason? 

Explaining the reason for sacking Ranil Wickremesinghe and appointing Rajapaksa as prime minister, President Sirisena accused the UNP of corruption and for promoting anti-national agenda. He tried to drive a wedge between the UNP as a political party and its leader Ranil Wickremesinghe. This aspect of his address seemed like a well-thought-out strategy to split the UNP. A split within the UNP would be extremely helpful to prove Rajapaksa’s majority in the national legislature. Nevertheless, his point was that he, as the president, could not work with Wickremesinghe. Hence, he needed to be fired.  

Predictably, he did not go into the question of why Rajapaksa was appointed the new head of the cabinet. That would have been an awkward episode because Sirisena could not state with a straight face that Rajapaksa is a clean alternative and he can work with him easily. Sirisena contested the 2015 presidential election accusing Rajapaksa of authoritarianism, corruption, and nepotism.  

On his part, Rajapaksa claimed that he was convinced to take over the administration, yet again, to save the country from decay. He cited the increasing cost of living, the collapsing economy and the rapidly depreciating rupee as the reasons for the removal of Wickremesinghe and dismissal of his government. Now we will save the country from this horrible situation was Rajapaksa’s message. Therefore, according to the President and the newly appointed prime minister, the coup or what some of the Sirisena-Rajapaksa axis backers call “revolution” was undertaken to save the country from Ranil Wickremesinghe’s bad government. 

However, the question is what is in it for President Sirisena? Sirisena is no Sri Lankan Mandela. He is an ordinary politician trying to survive in a challenging and profoundly problematic polity. The reality is that with his battle with the UNP and Wickremesinghe, he lost the possibility of getting elected for the second time in 2020. It was clear that the UNP will not support him for president in the next election and he has no chance of securing the UPFA votes. The UPFA voters are still loyal to Mahinda Rajapaksa. In the recently concluded local government election, the Sirisena headed faction secured only the third place in terms of national votes.  

Hence, it is pretty clear to me that the current move involves Sirisena’s calculations for the 2020 presidential election and beyond. The current Sirisena-Rajapaksa alliance could not have evolved without a givisuma (pact). Did Mahinda Rajapaksa promise something in return for his current appointment as prime minister? Would the Rajapaksa group support Sirisena for president in the next election? Alternatively, do they have other plan for Sirisena after 2020? Details of the possible agreement between Rajapaksa and Sirisena remain highly confidential. It is also imperative to note that Rajapaksa, the shrewd politician, knows that there is no guarantee that Sirisena will not come up with another coup if need be. Hence, the interaction or the nature of relations between Sirisena and Rajapaksa is something that needs to be carefully observed as well.   

The Number Game   

The Rajapaksa government was ousted in 2015 mainly due to its problematic style of governance. However, Rajapaksa played mostly by electoral rules. He conducted too many elections, and when defeated in 2015, he left the office without too much fuss. This history influenced me to be surprised when Rajapaksa readily accepted the prime minister position and is working to form a government, which in the eyes of a substantial segment of the Sri Lankan population seems illegitimate and problematic. This was a coup because he did not become prime minister through a legitimate election. Various tactics are being used for this hostile takeover. 

It is suggested that the Rajapaksa administration will present a “vote on account” before presenting a budget. The vote on account is an interim measure aimed at securing funds for the expenditures before a full budget is presented and approved. One can expect too many “handouts” given to voters to alleviate their economic woes. The Rajapaksa group would expect the masses to respond positively to these popular measures. The other state resources could also be handy during the election.  

To continue as the new government and to present a vote on account, the Rajapaksa group has to go to Parliament and prove its majority, which seems like a problem at this moment. If the Rajapaksa group has a provable majority in parliament, they would have happily gone to the national legislature and faced a vote. They did not do that because right now the group does not have the support of at least 113 members of parliament. Hence, they are adopting a plan which could be called “consolidate and then prove” strategy. As part of this strategy, parliament was prorogued by the President until November 16. The prorogation, although legal, seems undemocratic.  

The time gained by proroguing parliament will be used to (1) consolidate the power and authority of the Rajapaksa group over state machinery, and (2) convince or “buy” opposition MPs. If one goes by the history of the country, the possible involvement of foreign funds to cement the Rajapaksa deal cannot be ruled out. One of the first countries to congratulate Rajapaksa on his new appointment was China. He can count on China for international support as well. The Rajapaksa group will also hope that the appearance that they have established a new government will be helpful to lure UNP members.   

The UPFA has 95 MPs, and the Eelam People’s Democratic Party (EPDP) can supply one vote. Hence, the Rajapaksa group has 96 reliable votes. Therefore, in order to prove his majority in parliament, Rajapaksa has to convince about 17 Members of Parliament from the UNP led coalition. Rajapaksa could target Muslim parties in the government, especially the All Ceylon Makkal Congress (ACMC), which has five seats. If the ACMC could be convinced to cross over, Rajapaksa will need to get the support of about 12 UNP MPs. Given Ranil Wickremesinghe’s grip on the UNP parliamentary group, getting 12 MPs from the UNP will not be an easy target. Hence, Rajapaksa has to work hard to prove his majority if and when parliament is reconvened.      

Meanwhile, the UNP has 87 MPs of its own, and if it manages to preserve the support of Muslim parties and the Tamil Progressive Alliance (TPA), it will still be short of about six seats. In my view, JHU is unlikely to shift loyalty. The Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) has announced that it will remain neutral. It likely will stay neutral.   

The only way the UNP could produce signatures of at least 113 members is to get the support of the Tamil National Alliance (TNA). Given the internal troubles within the TNA and general Tamil sentiments, the TNA will find it difficult to endorse the UNP openly. Voting in favor of the UNP in parliament is different, which the TNA has been doing despite officially occupying the office of the main opposition party. Hence, it will be easy for the UNP to prove its majority in parliament than producing 113 signatures. This should explain the UNP’s demand to reconvene parliament immediately.   

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 24
    5

    M&S has already tasted the sweetness of presidential executive powers. Now, he feel like many others to taste it for another 7 years. It is his deal with MR and co. His dream will be shattered once MR is well established in power. Now, UNP must impeach him soon. UNP with all other parties have enough majority to impeach him. He does not deserve to be Sri Lankan president. A village man with farming background came into politics with support of Bandaranayake family and with support of UNP in 2015. Now is behaving like crook.. Shame on him to manipulate constitutions : He is playing with Parliament: Parliament is not his own grocery shop to open and close has he likes.. it has more than 225 elected members to represent people’s view …
    His behaviours is dictatorial. If the country descends into anarchy he must take responsibility for all destruction and lost of life..

    • 4
      0

      Spot on.. Nicely put together.

  • 3
    14

    MS came to power with a promise to clean up the country. He was not allowed to do it by the chief bank robber suing his hidden agenda of corruption and fraud. At last MS had the courage to stand up against Ranil the dictator and sly fox. MS decided to clean up Ranil’s mess of a country and economy. Well done MS and give these colombians a good hiding using your madu walige or so called rusty sword even if it failed to cut at the right time.

    Uncontrollable wild fires have to be stopped by another controlled fire, and MS is doing just that. It will all be resolved soon; let the fires extinguish themselves and I am sure they will. CT Kopi Kade gang has no say in the governance of the country, a lot of them do not even have votes. No wonder they are delerious and writing a lot of rubbish in these columns.

    • 3
      0

      Thrishu

      You may be right about Ranil, but my point is why should he appoint a man whom he said he will send him to jail for committing murder, robbery, thuggery and deceit to the chair of Prime Minister!

      That was his chief election pledge.

      How is he going to answer to the 6.2 million who voted him to power on that pledge. Aren’t there anyone more suitable for the post of Prime Minister? Are all others worse than Rajapakse when it comes to crime?

      Then why did Sirisena then back stab Rajakpakse in 2015? He split the party. He then told lies of Rajapakse and won the elections. He let down all those who voted for him. How is he going to answer to Thajudeen’s family and all those went missing during Rajapkse’s rule? I am not accusing Rajapkase but it was Sirisena who came out with all the allegations against his boss in the presidential elections.

      It is actually Sirisena who should be sacked.

  • 11
    4

    This disgraceful godaya gamarala piece of sh&t should be tilling the fields. I am not sure what he is doing in the parliament. Now he has invited the barbarians to the event as well.

  • 7
    0

    What has MR to gain from accepting appointment as the new PM? Don’t forget, among other things, there are a lot of cases pending or were due to come up against his kith and kin for various actions of theirs when MR was president.

  • 4
    0

    ” Given Ranil Wickremesinghe’s grip on the UNP parliamentary group, getting 12 MPs from the UNP will not be an easy target. Hence, Rajapaksa has to work hard to prove his majority if and when parliament is reconvened. “

    Great article. At least it will be a fair fight.

    I think the President already knows he will get the support of UNP MPs and be able to make the majority. These are not fools, and my sense is that will be UNPers joining to support the current initiative – but only short term.

    There is about 2 years more until the next elections, enough time for the UNP to reform and win.

  • 8
    0

    Thrishu, you ass hole, lick well the balls and back of Mara and Sira. You forgot the past misdeeds of the miserable lot, and wait all would get the taste of it soon.

  • 5
    1

    It is obvious, as stated in the article, that MR is buying time to get a majority in Parliament. He has bought parliamentarians before by offering Ministerial posts & will be doing it again. Thanks to him, we already have a bloated cabinet & now there is bound to be still more yobs with Ministerial positions, all paid for by tax payers. At a time when the Govt. coffers are empty & dwindling FOREX reserves, we will be spending more on duty free cars for new Ministers. At this rate, there will be anarchy in the country but I am sure Gota will be there as well to put his foot down at the first sign of an uprising.

    Indeed SL is ‘no country like other’.

  • 4
    0

    Everyone be patient and watch what this godaya hick from Hambantota will do to the gamarala Sirisena once he gets the momentum. He will hang him by his ba**s.

    • 0
      0

      The ITAK component of the TNA is the crucial factor. It’s Colombo based sections have traditionally not hesitated from lending support to the UNP whenever possible.
      But the hitch is Uthayan ex-Sabra Finance outfit with it’s close nexus to people like Mavai Sena, CVK and certain others like Douglas D can tilt the balance to play a role if rumours about former media man Vidyatharan who is close to MR who is now a PM appoints as Governor NP.

    • 0
      0

      Tamil from the north – “He will hang him by his ba**s.” Or the tsunami hora might cut off Sillysena’s “lunch parcel” and bury him a live!

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.