4 December, 2020

Blog

Questionable (Or Absurd) Report On Poverty Indicators 

By Laksiri Fernando –

  • Dr. Laksiri Fernando

    Can a person live on Rs 139 per day?

  • Are only 843,913 people in poverty? 
  • Can the Official Poverty Line (OPL) believable? 
  • Why the Governments are trying to hide the country’s poverty? 

The latest Report issued by the Ministry of National Policies and Economic Affairs on ‘Poverty Indicators’ is both questionable and outrageous. This Ministry is under the responsibility of the Prime Minister, Ranil Wickremesinghe. Most of the statistics and calculations are based on the Household Income and Expenditure Survey (HIES) in 2016. It is not so much the Survey HIES which is questionable, but the Government’s Official Poverty Line (OPL) and some of the calculations and statements in the Report based on that. 

Questionable Measurements 

There are different ways of conceptualizing and calculating poverty. Amartya Sen in his ‘Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation’ (1983) has devoted two chapters on the subject. Most common measurement of poverty is by looking at the number of people living below a certain income threshold known as ‘poverty line.’ Then there are differences about how you determine this threshold. This is the primary question about the OPL used by Sri Lanka since 2002. 

On the method of determining this threshold, the following is what the Poverty Indicators Report states.  

“The method uses to calculate official poverty line is called Cost of Basic Need (CBN) method. This  poverty line is considered as an absolute poverty line and does not vary  geographically. The Official Poverty Line (OPL) for 2016 is Rs.4,166. That is the real per capita expenditure per month for a person fixed at a specific welfare level with the  consumption expenditure of food and non-food items.”  

The claim that ‘absolute poverty line does not vary geographically’ contradicts the regular Department of Census and Statistics charts given in Official Poverty Line by District, the latest being on 7 January 2019. Be as it may, can anyone believe that ‘the real per capita expenditure per month a person needs for a specific welfare level with the consumption expenditure of food and non-food items’ is Rs. 4,166? When you divide this by at least 30 days per month, it is mere Rs. 139! 

This is called the Cost of Basic Needs (CBN) in the Report. How does this Cost of Basic Needs of the poor calculated? The Technical Notes on OPL states the following in January 2017.  

The OPL is an absolute poverty line which is fixed at a specific welfare level that is a person who meets a certain minimum nutritional intake (2030 kilocalories per day) to compare over time with household food and non-food consumption and expenditure data.” 

Despite the confusion about ‘kilocalories, nutrition, food and non-food consumption’ of the poor, there is nothing particularly wrong in calculating an absolute poverty line although some countries (i.e. Australia) use relative poverty line. However, the way you arrive at this measure should be correct, reasonable and also transparent (under good governance). As the above statement makes it clear it is determined on the basis of a minimum ‘nutritional’ intake. This minimum is stated as 2030 kilocalories per day, which is in fact similar to the standard accepted in a country like Australia or USA.  

Living Reality 

The question about the method is what is the ‘food bundle’ selected for this nutrition calculation and on what scientific basis can it be said correct? The ‘food bundle’ is not revealed. However, the doubts arise when the given figures are considered in the day today living reality. 

During my last visit to Sri Lanka (July-August 2018), the cheapest rice meal (bath packet) I could observe was Rs. 160 which consisted rice with three little vegetables at Ratmalana where I was staying. It could hardly give anyone 500 kilocalories in my opinion (rice 300 + vegetables 200). Calories also do not necessarily mean nutrition for basic and sickness-free living. 

The obvious discrepancy between the price of a basic one meal (roughly Rs. 160) and the government’s absurd poverty line (Rs. 139) might be the case not only in the Western Province or Ratmalana, but in all other Provinces with little variation. The statistics given in the Report are not really about poverty, but may be extreme-extreme poverty. Therefore, there is nothing to be jubilant about as the Report tries to picture. According to the controversial Report itself, there are 843,913 people below this extreme poverty line, who might not be in a position to afford even one meal a day. That is why I call it the extreme of the extreme poverty. 

Then how do they live? They are not supported by the state or the government. They are probably supported by family, neighbours, temples/kovils and the society at large. Some might be mere beggars. Some of the figures are the following of this extreme poverty, if we consider the other calculations are not faulty except the bottom line of OPL.  

As the above figures show, the highest number of people in extreme poverty are in the Central, Sabaragamuwa, Eastern and Western provinces. However in terms of headcounts (% of provincial population), Northern, Eastern, Sabaragamuwa and Uva provinces are the most affected. 

Absurd (or Miracle) Claims  

The Report claims “The poverty headcount index for 2016 was 4.1 and it has decreased from 6.7 in 2012/13.” This is obviously a miracle. This might be the lowest poverty in the world for a developing country. As I had pointed out before, this was the same claim under the previous government. There was a (economics) Minister who claimed that ‘a family of three could live a comfortable life with an income of Rs. 7,500 per month’ (Daily Mirror, 19 March 2012). This means Rs. 83 per person per day in 2012!

It is difficult to believe that a country with slow growth during the same period could eliminate poverty by half a million within three years (2013-2016). Therefore, common sense should have prevailed before issuing the Report and the officials and the Minister should have checked where they were going wrong.  

There are about 767 million people in extreme poverty in the world today. This is counted on the basis of who live under $ 1.90 per day, based on World Bank standards. This is around 10.7% of the world population. Sri Lanka or the Report does not talk about extreme poverty, but poverty which is ‘miraculously’ reduced in unimaginable proportions. According to this absurd report “The total poor households  were 3.1 percent of the total households and it was approximately 169,392 households in 2016.”  

There are wonderful or deceptive Figures and Tables given in the Report. Most absurd to my mind is Table 2 which calculates the so-called Poverty Gap Index (PGI), to show the monthly ‘shortfall of income’ that one has to overcome the poverty in Sri Lanka! This is just Rs. 620 as an average! This means if you are in poverty (eating possibly one meal as I have pointed out), you need only Rs. 620 per month or Rs. 20 per day to overcome the Official Poverty. These figures are calculated for sectors (urban, rural and estate), provinces and districts. For example, if you are in Hambantota, you need only Rs. 396 per month or Rs. 13 per day to overcome poverty. 

It is like saying, all those who are under the OPL (Rs. 139 per day) should study carefully this table and take measures to overcome their poverty. Therefore, by the next report, the poverty in Sri Lanka might be totally eliminated! 

Insult to Injury 

Most hilarious or outrageous in the Report is the two quotes given one from Norman Vincent Peale and the other from Adam Smith as follows. 

Empty pockets never held anyone back. Only empty heads and empty hearts can do that.” ~ Norman Vincent Peale 

The real tragedy of the poor is the poverty of their aspirations. ~Adam Smith 

It does not appear that the authors of the Report (or the person/s who inserted them) were very familiar with the two authors. The quotes appear to be taken from ‘Brainy Quotes’ website. But there is an ideological (or idiotic) message given from the quotes. From the first quote, it says to the poor ‘it is not your empty pockets that holds you back, but your empty heads or hearts.’ 

From the second quote, it says ‘the real tragedy of the poor is their poverty of aspirations,’ which may be partly true. However it is given out of context. It is difficult to imagine whether the authors of the Report are familiar with Adam Smith’s ‘The Wealth of Nations’ (1776) at all. Whatever the disagreements one has bout Adam Smith’s economic philosophy, to be fair, he was never a person who intended to insult the poor like our neo-liberals do in the Report.  

Conclusion 

Counting poverty or devising necessary measures to do so is not an easy task and errors can happen. However, using completely an outdated, unscientific and obviously erroneous Official Poverty Line (OPL) and submitting reports to the country on that basis is outrageous. It is equally absurd to claim that the OPL is calculated on the basis of Cost of Basic Needs. 

What are basic needs? A traditional list of basic needs include food (safe water), shelter and clothing. Many modern lists emphasize not just those but also sanitation, education, healthcare and even internet (Wikipedia). If a person is not in a position to afford sanitation, health care or his or her children’s education, undoubtedly that person is in poverty. 

There is no question that the country has achieved some economic progress and development irrespective of the country’s setbacks during the open conflict and war period. There is a possibility that the income/expenditure position of the bottom 10% of the population has moved slightly upwards, but largely in monetary terms. As the Report itself admits there is a large number of people just above the OPL. Likewise, the claimed decrease of the poverty headcount from 6.7% to 4.1% between 2012/13 and 2016 can be due to this monetary fact. In essence, the present OPL is completely undervalued or underestimated. If it is increased by 10% for example, the extreme poverty in Sri Lanka might remain more or less the same as in 2012/13.  

Sri Lanka’s OPL’s has been well below the poverty line used by the World Bank even before 2015 when it was changed. Now it is roughly $ 2 per day. What does this mean? Those who have an income below Rs. 364 per day or Rs. 10,920 per month would be in poverty. Sri Lanka should adopt either the World Bank criteria or in my opinion should go for a more progressive ‘relative poverty line’ like in Australia.      

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 8
    3

    Dear Laksiri,

    It is well known fact your attempt for a political coup to bring back Mahinda through backdoor and now you are trying to justify your failed illegal political coup (bribe) through a 500 million rupees bribe for each. Your analysis does not tell anything about what method used for poverty index before 2015 by your god Mahinda. It is a well known fact they manipulated every aspect of statistics including poverty indicators, number of people lived inthe vanni zone and number of deaths during the last phase of war.

  • 6
    3

    Yes, this man gave full cover-ups for the most corruptive Vc in Colombo University history. Now do not trust this man’s writing. It is just gossips.

    • 4
      1

      Yes you are right, but Laksiri Fernando changes his nature time to time.
      :
      May well be while being in Downunder, he may have been offered some perks by RAJAPAKSHE BLACK MONEY BANK for some work.
      :
      But current ARTICLE, I dont think he has been biased.
      :
      My recherche on the Web also provided that those Experts intend that we have 4% of under poverty living people.
      :
      Correct numbers should be 10 fold more.
      .
      I now believe, Rajapakshes should then have doctored the INFORMATION in order them to allow various kind of loans during the his second term. His obsequeous CB governer Kabral even today toots his own horn about the fake achievements as louded by them those days.

  • 8
    3

    Poverty is brought to Sri Lanka by Mahinda family ..
    It is a common sense how Sri Lanka is made poor and now Mahinda robbed the country.
    Who do you want to fool?
    Public?
    Judges?
    Academics?
    Monks?
    All know that ?
    Billions of money wasted by them ..
    China wants part of Sri Lanka?
    This is politics of Mahinda..
    A lot of countries got way with China trap but we become prey to it ..
    So; what do you expect nothing but poverty

    • 5
      1

      Lakan@.
      You may be right. But saddest thing is local media does not want to educated the public with facts.
      They lived and live luxury life styles having OUR people made part of chinese debt trap. Rajapakshes has been abusing srilnaken nation for the power greedy tactics. No matter, even if over 40% of the populate would live not having 2 dollars a day, they have never done welfare work to this nation.
      American presidents, after their two terms are over, all what they have been doing is voluntary welfare work ?.
      Have you guys ever heard, that Rajakashes did anything from your pockets during the last 4 years ? Never.
      Alone his helicopter charges during last 3 months is estimated to be 840 lacks of people funds.
      But MAIN stream media is shut up for the burning issues.
      I WAIT WHEN THIS FAMILY WOULD BE SKINNED FOR ALL THE HIGH CRIMES they have deliberately been doing to this nation.
      Ironically, among the poor, they have been made believe as if Rajakshes are the saviour of srilankens. Actually, media stays as if they have been FED with KIRIMATI. NOthing no and expose about the size of huge funds grabed deliberately done by RAJAKASHE parasites.

      • 3
        0

        apologies _
        .
        It should be “Have you guys ever heard, that Rajakashes did anything from THEIR pockets during the last 4 years ? Never.

      • 0
        0

        Dear Ban…
        you are right. Our politicians once they got votes from public behave like a king. they are above all laws. and they take all advantages.. Now, in election time they must do some change. send good people into Parliament.? tell me how to do that.

  • 4
    1

    Dear LF,
    Please find time to read and comment https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/of-war-heroes-and-war-crimes/

    • 5
      0

      That request is a tall order. He has a habit of asking Tamils to declare LTTE as terrorists, but when asked to declare Sri Lanka government as terrorist for committing worse crimes goes silent. So much for his integrity and scholarship.

  • 1
    2

    Yeah, what Laksiri Fernando says is true about the poverty line.
    This “one size fits for all” poverty line criteria won’t apply the same way to every country.
    There is a big difference between poor people in wealthy countries and poor people in other countries in terms of bare necessities.

  • 0
    1

    Both Mahinda Rajapakse and RanilWicramasinghe are one and the same. They both rely on western knowledge to develop the country. The west, in their economic models, believe that therer should be certain percentage unemployed always. If the unemployment is very low, inflation would overtake and would result Recession. Similarly, the Poverty is a must. If there is no poverty, there is no one who engages in looking for new ways to earn money. country would stop acculumating more money. But, the Old Raajandu did not have such exploitative models. One idiot who came from dutch/Belgium criticizes kings. Always there were bad apples. The idiot do not know even among Indian and Chimese emperors, there were kings who always thought what did I do wrong in order to my subjects that way. both Ranil and Mahinda Rajapakse are very arrogant, very narcisstic and that is why all the curses. Ranil and his mimisters are lieing to the teeth. Newspapers do not publish.

  • 1
    1

    ‘Can the Official Poverty Line (OPL) believable?’, – What kind of English is this??

  • 0
    0

    OPL is Rs. 139/- per day? And I pay the servant who works for about 6 hours a day Rs.800/- per day plus lunch and a cup of tea in addition to Santhosams for Awurudhu and other festival days. That would work out to at least Rs. 1000/- per day. And, it is so hard to get a servant even at that rate. So, the servant’s earnings, who works for just about 6 hours a day, is SEVEN times the OPL.

    OMG! My servant is NOT poor. Must be Lower Middle Class!! And me? Super Rich though I manage to survive ONLY because I have my own little house and am spared the Rental expenditure.

    Didn’t somebody say: “There are three types of lies — lies, damn lies, and statistics.”

    • 0
      0

      The Rs. 139 per day (Census) and the Rs 364 per day (World Bank) figures are per capity and for a single earner family work out at Rs 514 and 1347 per day given the average household size of 3.7 and will be approximately half of these for most families who have two earners

  • 0
    0

    Laksiri Ferrnando,
    We have a welfare government and for years carrying out poverty alleviation progrrammes,but of course they were poorly targeted..

    The department of Social services carry out a lot of welfare programmes in addition to PAMA,free education, free uniforms,, free mid day meals, free school books , free health services and free housing.

    what about religious organizations and philanthropists?

    We have Samudri, earlier Diivinnegua and let the dependency syndrome to survive

    After all poor is statistics!

  • 0
    0

    Dear Sir

    Thank you. Another more important issue not discussed enough on a daily basis in parliament and in CT. We us the word poverty for political milages but have no clue how to come up with the required framework for eradication to date……..even in a blessed land like ours. I like the way it is presented too such we can all learn thank you.

    “Empty pockets never held anyone back. Only empty heads and empty hearts can do that.” ~ Norman Vincent Peale

    “The real tragedy of the poor is the poverty of their aspirations.” ~Adam Smith

    Our aspiration were all killed by the Neighbours breeding program requires plunder of all our resources.

    We export all the coconuts and sesame oil along with many other nuritional products overseas when our masses suffering from basis calories needs shows the level of ignorance in the elected????

    We import all the proven/known packaged/processed items with the plastic/foil packaging we do not even know how to dispose of this trash environmentally.

    Discussing absolutely irrelevant topics in the parliaments time at the expense of our tax money……………democracy is not for us at least for another 20 years as we elect the wrong crowd from North to South and East to West. We need something more assertive than this to get the Nation back to her progressive path/relevant discussions making up for the lost time killing each other.

    We need green politics and environmental planning as a basis for our development planning.

  • 0
    0

    This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn’t abide by our Comment policy.For more detail see our Comment policy https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/comments-policy-2

  • 0
    0

    This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn’t abide by our Comment policy.For more detail see our Comment policy https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/comments-policy-2

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.