By Rusiripala Tennakoon –

Rusiripala Tennakoon
Nations that emerged from colonial rule commemorate their Independence Day in different ways. Some mark it quietly as a national holiday, while others celebrate it with grandeur. Countries such as Sri Lanka, India, and Singapore have consistently chosen the latter path—upholding unbroken traditions since gaining independence from the British Empire.
At the heart of these celebrations lies a shared purpose: affirming sovereignty, national pride, and independence. Military parades, cultural displays, religious observances, and the participation of schoolchildren together reflect a nation’s defence strength, cultural depth, and collective achievements. Central to these commemorations is the national address by the Head of State, which lends meaning, authority, and direction to the occasion.
Sri Lanka’s 78th Independence Day celebrations this year followed this long-standing tradition. The ceremony was dignified, simple, and well-attended by the diplomatic community. Notably, unnecessary extravagance was consciously avoided, creating an ambience that reflected restraint, respect, and national maturity. Overall, it was a pleasing and commendable expression of sovereignty.
Before reflecting on President Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s address, I am reminded of an experience from Singapore. In August 1990, I had the privilege of listening live to the National Day speech of Lee Kuan Yew. He spoke not in slogans, but in clear, practical terms—explaining how Singapore had been built from near nothing into a debt-free, secure, and globally respected nation. He spoke of strong defence, disciplined governance, economic self-reliance, and even future challenges he anticipated decades ahead, along with solutions already in motion.
That speech exemplified leadership rooted in vision, planning, and execution—not rhetoric. India today, under dynamic leadership, offers another example of long-term economic direction, steadily progressing despite immense social challenges.
It is therefore encouraging that Sri Lanka’s newly elected President appears to be positioning himself along a similar trajectory.
President Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s Independence Day address marked a clear departure from the confrontational tone often associated with political debate. Speaking as a Head of State rather than as an opposition figure, he delivered a message of unity, economic reconstruction, and national purpose—without hostility or divisiveness.
His emphasis on rebuilding Sri Lanka through unity, strengthening the economy, rejecting racism and extremism, restoring the rule of law, and undertaking transformative education reforms was both reassuring and confidence-building. Importantly, he framed economic development not as a break from our cultural and historical roots, but as a process firmly anchored in them.
The President’s call to prioritise human capital—knowledge, education, discipline, compassion, and modern skills—reflects a realistic understanding of today’s global realities. His insistence that true freedom is incomplete without economic strength is a truth Sri Lanka must now confront honestly.
Equally symbolic was the presence of the Leader of the Opposition at the ceremony, quietly reinforcing the very unity the President appealed for.
This address helped dispel many apprehensions about the President’s future direction. It outlined practicable goals grounded in national and global realities, rather than abstract promises.
What is good, must be acknowledged as good.
On this occasion, the President’s speech deserves appreciation.
We congratulate him—and wish him the resolve to translate words into action.
Ajith / February 7, 2026
“His emphasis on rebuilding Sri Lanka through unity, strengthening the economy, rejecting racism and extremism, restoring the rule of law, and undertaking transformative education reforms was both reassuring and confidence-building.”
Sri Lanka is the only country that faced continued bloodbath, riots, war, corruption, racism, religious terrorism etc. since independence until today. We should carefully look at his statement that he is prepared to racism and extremism but not violent Buddhist terrorism?
/
Thanga / February 11, 2026
President Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s Independence Day speech sounds reassuring, even eloquent. Yet serious misgivings remain. The JVP’s violent history shows that it was not merely a bystander but an integral part of Sri Lanka’s political problem. Despite presenting itself as a Marxist-oriented leftist movement, its actions repeatedly betrayed those ideals. The JVP was deeply complicit in promoting racism, communalism, and Sinhala-Buddhist supremacy—no different in substance from the traditional Sinhala-Buddhist–dominated parties it claims to oppose.
Against this backdrop, it is reasonable to ask: why should we believe that Anura Dissanayake has genuinely undergone a change of heart? Do tigers really change their spots? Symbolism matters, and so do appointments. Nearly 99% of members of commissions continue to come from the Sinhala majority. There is not a single Ceylon Tamil in his 30-member cabinet. The Muslim community, too, has been entirely excluded, with no ministerial representation whatsoever.
Ultimately, the proof lies not in speeches but in governance. The taste of the pudding is in the eating. What the country needs is concrete action and inclusive decision-making—not lofty rhetoric or carefully crafted words.
/