26 May, 2022


Revisiting The JVP-NPP Equation: In Conversation With Dayan Jayatilleka

By Nandaka Maduranga Kalugampitiya –

Dr. Nandaka Kalugampitiya

I should begin by thanking Dr. Dayan Jayatilleka for his prompt response in the form of the piece “NPP Revisited: JVP-NPP Equation: Response to Dr Kalugampitiya” (January 18, 2022). It is a pleasure to be in conversation with Dr. Jayatilleka. I don’t want this to become yet another cyber-battle, but I would be failing in my responsibility if I did not address some of the points that he raises in his response.

Dr. Jayatilleka talks about front organizations and avatars. Front organizations and avatars are nothing new in politics. They are everywhere. Some have argued that the Republican Party and the Democratic Party in the United States themselves are front organizations of something bigger that is behind the scene. And also, the idea of a façade/avatar is not limited to politics. As Dr. Jayatilleka would agree, there is a sense in which even institutions as fundamental as religion and the education system could be considered façades or avatars of something bigger and more fundamental (with apologies to Althusser). The point is front organizations and avatars are part of society. The JVP is not the only political party that has used front organizations/avatars. I grant that the JVP has used such organizations in a notable way, but they are certainly not the only group to have done that. Two things about front organizations: Firstly, the front organizations/avatars need to be understood in their proper context. The ones that Dr. Jayatilleka has named all came into existence in a specific sociopolitical context, and to read them out of that context can lead to serious misconceptualizations. (This is not at all to justify everything that is attributed to such organizations/avatars, but to point out that such organizations/avatars need to be read in their proper context, against the grain.) Secondly, and most importantly, I don’t subscribe to the view that all front organizations are simply ones that dance to the tune played from behind the scene. I would argue that there is a dialectic relationship between the front organization and what is or what is perceived to be behind it (with apologies to Hegel). It’s always possible that one part will eventually overpower the other, but the beauty of the dialectic relationship is that the victor and the vanquished won’t be the same as what they were before. This is why the whole JVP-NPP thing is important. Even if, as Dr. Jayatilleka implies, it is the JVP that calls the shots, the NPP will have an impact, and an important one at that, on the JVP.

The point that Dr. Jayatilleka is trying to make with his reference to Indika Gunawardena, Sunila Abeysekara, and Kelly Senanayake is not quite clear to me. I will not pretend to know what exactly happened with them, but I wish to point out that the JVP that he is talking about there is pre-1994. I am not at all suggesting that the pre-1994 JVP and the post-1994 JVP are two completely different organizations or realities, but the differences between the two are way too fundamental to be ignored. And, while on names, Dr. Jayatilleka refers to Rajini Thiranagama and Nirmala Nithiyanandan as “first-rate intellectuals, who enthusiastically joined the LTTE and of only one survived.” Anyone with the faintest understanding of recent Sri Lankan history would agree that the perceived comparison that Dr. Jayatilleka is drawing between the LTTE, particularly of the late 80’s and the early 90’s, and the JVP of 2021 is a bit of a stretch. Dr. Jayatilleka’s claim reflects the general tendency among certain segments in society to discredit anything and everything that the JVP is part of in the present context, on the basis of the pre-1994 life of the party.

Dr. Jayatilleka says, “I have to say though that I am far from opposed to, and would in fact be broadly supportive of and in solidarity with, a campaign of mass agitation which leads via a general strike to a political general strike and a hartal.” While I share the same sentiment, I wish to say that this is exactly why one should not take seriously the anti-government protests that took place in Colombo in November last year.

As for the two suggestions that Dr. Jayatilleka has for the NPP, I agree that university ragging should be abolished. As someone who stood firmly against the barbaric practice of ragging during his undergraduate days and as someone who had to face serious consequences as a student due to that stance, I want to see university ragging abolished. There is no question about it. Not only the NPP but all the political parties should denounce university ragging. What I fail to understand is why the NPP in particular? Will that change anything in the universities, which both Dr. Jayatilleka and I are part of? I believe Dr. Jayatilleka knows why I am asking this question.

Dr. Jayatilleka’s second suggestion is as follows: “[I]t [NPP] should strive to really represent a progressive civic alternative by incorporating respected radical personalities such as Pubudu Jayagoda and Duminda Nagamuwa who belong to the FSP. The NPP should become the platform on which the JVP and FSP can come together.” I agree that Pubudu Jayagoda and Duminda Nagamuwa are respected radical personalities. I also agree that the JVP and the FSP should be on the same platform. I sincerely hope that the NPP will take this suggestion seriously. The question I have though is if Dr. Jayatilleka would have described Pubudu Jayagoda and Duminda Nagamuwa with the same adjectives had the JVP-FSP split had not occurred.

In my view, any assessment of the role of the JVP in both the NPP and the broader political scene should factor in the turn that the party took in 1994.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 9

    I did not think NPP as a front organization of JVP , but rather, a United Front with a common programme with the participation of all progressive forces opposed to SLFP/SLPP and UNP/SJB.

    • 5

      Yes, Srikrish, we should all support NPP, because we dont have any other better choice. Of course, they are not perfect, but for sure, they are not infected with traditional corruption and crime promoting politics.
      To me whenever I listen to AKD, his speeches cover all the facets that we the neutral expats fele that should be addressed.
      I think Tamil and Muslim parties too will join them later.💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪

      • 2

        Thanks! Leela,
        I assume NPP to be a broad front that could accommodate various shades of opinion. and it is better if Tamil and Muslim parties to join early so that it could be a genuine multiracial, multi-religious body , if delayed it I will be too late for them involved in policy formulation. JVP. of course is the natural leader.

  • 2

    It’s time for everyone who wants to embark on RIGHTEOUS PATH in politics should support the NPP.
    SJB of Premadasa should join this group asap.
    Minorities will be in full support of this movement to get our country out of corrupt evil disastrous dangerous politicians’ hands

    • 1

      Naman: “SJB of Premadasa should join this group asap”. I doubt it very much. Sajith’s main ambition is to be the President like his father and on “Family’s” ambition. He has no other “Vision”, “Policy” or “Action Plan”. On top of it, he is no “Leader”. But SJB has a few candidates like Harsha, Hakeem,Eran who could easily join NPP and I am sure NPP will consider them to be taken in. They need not become members of JVP. There is no condition like that in NPP. For example, NPP Secretary is Dr. Jayasinghe who is not a member of JVP. So with MP Ms. Harini Amarasuriya. In fact, all three MPs including AKD are from NPP because they were given nominations from NPP. Of course, JVP is the “Front” organization of NPP.

      I have consistently asked that NPP be introduced to the PEOPLE as the “Alternative” to form a New Government. I have even suggested that Dr. Harini be the nominated candidate of NPP for the Presidency. If that is done Dr. Harini will definitely win.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.