18 September, 2021

Blog

Sri Lanka: A System Of Governance Based On A Failed Idea

By Basil Fernando

Basil Fernando

Basil Fernando

The idea of the executive presidency, as found in the 1978 constitution, is now a failed idea.

Almost everybody agrees that it is a failed idea.

The people who are maintaining it also know that it is a failed political idea, but it helps them to have extraordinary power and the benefits of such power. Even they do not believe that it has any benefit to the state or to the population.

If there is anyone who may have some illusion about this idea having some effectiveness, it is only the opposition leader Ranil Wickremesinghe, who was closely associated with President JR Jayewardene. Unfortunately, he is the opposition leader, and therefore he is the main obstacle in the way of mobilizing the mass disillusionment about this idea.

Failed ideas cannot survive long. That is the lesson of history. Therefore, there is no reason to believe that this particular idea will prove to be an exception.

The factors that prevent the emergence of an alternative:

Firstly, there is the fear that no government can remain stable, as many of the members of the governing party can be bought over at any moment – this is one of the issues for which no solution has yet been proposed or discussed. The presidential system makes parliamentarians depend on the President and the President can use the state coffers to give extraordinary privileges and even to buy people who are engaged in active opposition, and thereby has the capacity to cripple the emergence of the powerful opposition. Therefore, the failed idea can survive not on the basis of its legitimacy but for other reasons, such as being able to maintain a government by whatever means.

Secondly, all parties fear the people. There prevalence of mass discontent is known to all political parties. They do not want to provide opportunities that allow the masses to express their discontent. The present form of government has more capacity for mobilizing repression than a functional democratic government. This is another negative reason in favour of the present system of governance.

Thirdly, no political party has a vision for resolving the problems in the national economy. Therefore, any government that comes into power is likely to be undermined by severe economic problems. The present form of government attempts to get over this problem by unscrupulous and undemocratic means, such as borrowing money from many sources without being restricted by the normal limitations imposed by economics, as well as by democratic norms. This way, they keep on postponing the crisis. Perhaps all political parties think that, having no solution to possible economic and financial problems, this is the only way to keep the government afloat.

A further factor that complicates the problem: The minority issue complicates this problem further. No political party has any kind of rational solution to the minority issue. If there is a democratic government, the pressure of solving this problem will weigh very heavily on that government. The present form of government can keep on postponing the reckoning by keeping an artificial form of consensus through the use of the power of the President and also mobilizing the armed forces in an extraordinary manner in the areas where minorities reside. Such kinds of virtual occupation will not be possible under a democratic government. Thus, a lack of solutions on this issue also act in favour of the present form of governance and, purely on this basis, more extremist sections of the majority will be willing to let this form of government stay.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 3
    1

    Well failed it may be, the person who overturns it will have to be a people person like Rajapaske but unlike him a true statesman. No one in the present line up of contenders fit the bill.

    Only a massive groundswell of support will overturn the incumbent and the power he holds. Either that or he gives up due to old age.

    There is still hope, not this term but after the next. I do not believe any other Rajapaske’s have the charisma to match Mahinda. So there will be an opportunity then.

    • 0
      0

      Basil Fernando –

      RE: Sri Lanka: A System Of Governance Based On A Failed Idea.

      Sri Lanka: A System Of Governance Based On A Failed IDEAS.

      1. Democracy based on Laws that are not implemented in Lanka.

      2.Democracy based on Laws and DOUBLE STANDARDS in Lanka.

      3. Sinhala Chauvinism.

      4. Sinhala “Buddhist” chauvinism, or Rather Fake Buddhism.

      5. Non-separation of Church, Temple and mosque, and the inability to form a Sri Lankan consciousness, bit only a Sinhala Buddhist Consciousness.

  • 2
    2

    Basil Fernando,

    Well said, that is why Mahinda will continue as president in the next election, and the country will be dragged down further.

    Until the masses reach the threshold of pain, both mental and physical (hunger, etc.), this system will go on, people will become poorer, and Tamils and the religious minorities will be repressed more and more.

    Democracy has been hijacked and degenerated to this state of affairs of miss-rule in 66 years. Appe aanduwa,

  • 2
    3

    Dalit ex captives in Mullative, fronted up to Miss Ananathi and her Vella Handlers with a demand for her to explain what happened to their children who were taken away by her Vellala Husband and the LTTE Tiger escort.

    And Ms Anathi’s Handlers are none other than the current Vellala rulers of the North.

    If we had the Rainbow PM Ranil ,could tese Dalits front up to the Vellalas , let alone Vellala Rulers with their own Police?.

    Even the Dalits will say this Basil is wrong and they would rather have this failed Idea basedd Governance.

  • 1
    0

    Failed idea or faulty design cum deliberate fiddling?

    Dr.RN

  • 2
    1

    The Executive Presidency could have conferred great benefits on a Multi Ethnic Multi Religious society like Sri Lanka. The greatest contribution could have been the building of democratic institutions and traditions, majoritarianism being tempered by the wisdom of a moderate and wise President. However the bastards who held the post of President, particularly J. R. Jayawardene perverted the Constitution and governance. The current President has even excelled J. R. Jayawardena.

    Lets put the blame for the failure where it belongs.

  • 0
    0

    This is a fairly reasonable response to Shyamon Jayasinghe’s pessimism relating to the seven reasons for the failure of a single issue candidate. A start has to be made somewhere. the discussions are at their initial stages and the detailed strategies have to be worked out. Bensen

  • 0
    0

    What people are asking for is that the politicians should relinquish some of their power by getting rid of the EP. The reason for having an EP in the first place was to increase their power. If they appear to unite to remove it, they are only hoodwinking the people once again.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.