
Lawyers and transparency activists monitoring Sri Lanka’s state banking sector have welcomed two significant decisions of the Right to Information Commission of Sri Lanka bringing key state banks, the Bank of Ceylon and the Peoples Bank, under the Right to Information (RTI) microscope to account for use of state funds to, among others, politically favoured persons.
Last week, the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by the People’s Bank challenging a decision of the Commission directing to release info on moneys spent on a Buddhist religious event by its Anuradhapura branch in 2002 when a past employee of the Bank demanded to know the amount of money and to whom the payments had been made, alleging large scale irregularities.
The People’s Bank had not released the information saying that the names of the persons to whom the money had been paid would be publicised, citing Section 5(1)(a) of the Right to Information Act (‘personal information’). The RTI Commission had refused to accept this position, ordering the Bank to release the details. The Bank had then appealed against the Commission order to the Court of Appeal.
The Court of Appeal agreed with the Commission that the release was warranted under the RTI Act with a two member judge Bench pointing out that, ‘the disclosure of a name or the identity of an institution’ to whom/which public funds are paid, ‘does not in itself, constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy of such third party.’
The Court said that, ‘such information relates directly to the use of public resources, which is inherently subject to public scrutiny. Public institutions operate under the principle of accountability and the expenditure should be transparent to ensure that they adhere to legal, ethical, and financial standards’ (per Justice MCBS Morais for himself and Justice R Gurusinghe, decision of November 26th 2024). In what activists say is a first, the Court also directed costs of Rs 100,000/= to be paid by the Bank in an indication that the Court will not treat frivolous appeals lightly.
Some weeks earlier, responding to an appeal filed by an anti-corruption movement (the Peoples Movement Against Corruption), the RTI Commission directed the Bank of Ceylon to disclose detailed information regarding the manner in which the Bank had awarded contracts to a former Chairman’s company, including the installation of ATM machines installed at the PA from the Informatics company which was a family owned company of the former Chairman (Gamini Wickremesinghe) from 2009-2012.
Other information directed to be released related to the question as to whether relevant tender procedures had been followed and what kind of loans and overdrafts granted to the company with the Commission dismissing the stand of the BOC that the information was not to be found.
The BOC has been given time till 31st December 2024 to release the information with the RTI Commission warning that if the information is not released, prosecution will be launched in the Magistrate’s Court. This is an important development in exposing the conflicts of interests and connections between the country’s state banking sector and politically favoured persons, anti-corruption activists told the Colombo Telegraph.
Other information directed to be released related to the question as to whether relevant tender procedures had been followed and what kind of loans and overdrafts granted to the company with the Commission dismissing the stand of the BOC that the information was not to be found. The Commission said that, ‘In the respective years asked for, the PA has declined to answer the connected question as to how many of these machines were purchased from the company in question, Informatics in that regard. We are in agreement with the submission of the Appellant that the fact of the said purchase of these machines from the company in question is borne out by the Annual Reports of the PA in the years 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012.
Mallaiyuran / December 5, 2024
Is that why the gentleman in the depiction taking a run to Bengal’s Dens.
/
RBH59 / December 5, 2024
Sri Lanka State Banks Forced To Reveal Info On Suspect Transactions, Comes Under RTI Microscope
It seems you’re referring to situations where a bank only provides information after being compelled by audit findings that is to revals the Transaction if dids not purposely hiding the report is going on.
Audits are meant to identify discrepancies or gaps in compliance.
If a bank responds only to audit findings, it suggests a lack of proactive transparency.
The system may be undermined by poor internal controls, lack of accountability, or deliberate negligence.
The responsibility for such lapses typically lies with senior management or operational heads not enforcing robust systems.
/
nancytwins17@gmail.com / December 7, 2024
Audit is a different issue altogether
/
chiv / December 5, 2024
Hope, this task ( RTI revelation) is less complicated and easier, compared to crook in picture, trying hard to lose morbid obesity.
/
Jaffna Man / December 5, 2024
Very good.
Thank you RTI
The election of NPP, strengthens the efforts of RTI
/
Mallaiyuran / December 5, 2024
Yeb,
One more chance the NPP has got to demonstrate that it will run its train only within the roundabouts track Evil Emperor created, nothing new or strange. If that is your argument that this is the 2nd or 3rd or 4th…… If you say so, deficiency in NPP’s creativity or imagination suggest that they are not the ones for systemic change. They are already enslaved by the UNP-SLFP Union’s black artists. Where or what connection is there for NPP’s election victory and RTI? Are you saying that, like in the Tamil proverb, the green elephant has dumped earth (RTI) on its head and has buried itself?
Could you explain please, is that, in one morning, out of your hundred years of life history, instead of going out to watch the birds in the wild fling opening the wings, exposing the colorful bare breasts, but you went to voting booth, and where even after seeing the well-known “Provincial Council” fighter Douglas’ name, still you voted for the unknown NPP candidate, because NPP would grant better recognition than any others? Or probably because you were believing that the NPP would deny spending on conducting Buddhists activities which are requested to be compiled within the Constitution itself.
/
Mallaiyuran / December 5, 2024
Can you explain that if a governmental bank discharging its duty of maintaining Buddhism has to be rated as an act needs to be transparent for public scrutiny, how the banks avoid their governmental duties, like tax payments collection accounts or pension distribution accounts they might be maintaining from public scrutiny demand?
Ha Ha ha ……..
What a flexible, getting along, Amorphous, Sanatana politics …………, from Deva, through Siri Ma O, Chandrika, Old Rowdies, Yahapalanaya, Hitler to NPP. Is that the maxim stems out from the fact that every bird is adorable of its color, other than Arumuganavalar who steals and sell Bible translations, while preaching Saathism?
Shepherds of the cows’ whichever udder drip milk! Guards of the tree wherever the honey bees build their comb!
/
Jit / December 5, 2024
Lol….the pilot photo shows who will run for life when the laws are passed to investigate the black money held in overseas investments …🤣
/
nimal fernando / December 5, 2024
There are laws in some countries ……. especially to counter drugs/narcotics importation/distribution and laundering of the proceeds. If someone can’t explain in a credible way how they amassed wealth …… their wealth is confiscated ……. without law-enforcement having to go through costly evidence-gathering and lengthy trials.
–
Also, if someone receives a deposit in their bank-account exceeding a specified sum – varies according to countries – one is called upon for an explanation.
–
These measures should be considered seriously …….. if they are keen on cleaning up an utterly corrupt place like Lanka.
/
LankaScot / December 5, 2024
Hello Nimal,
When my wife started building her new Grocery Shop, we regularly sent money from Qatar to one of her sons to pay the builders. On quite a few occasions we were called into the Bank (in Doha) to explain our remittances and provide evidence.
Her son was never asked for any explanation by his Bank in Sri Lanka.
I know from my Indian Colleagues that when they worked in Dubai they were never questioned on their remittances, even though they were of similar amounts to ours.
Best regards
/
nancytwins17 / December 7, 2024
The issue is drugs. In Canada it is the same. Need to document the purpose for wire transfers. Also one is subject to scrutiny when carrying more than $10,000 cash past the immigration counter.
/