By Abdul Samad –
Leading up to the presidential elections in January 2015, national debt was a major topic of discussion. It was considered as a major failure of the Rajapaksa regime, and was used as political propaganda by the unity government to influence voters. The objective of this article is to understand the gravity of this issue.
Generally, national debt of any country is measured as a percentage of its GDP. It reflects the ability of a country to repay its debt without requiring further assistance. Any financial institution or a government, prior to assisting a country considers two major factors. Present debt level and the potential of growth. An article published by Business Insider U.K. in Oct. 2015 listed out seventeen countries with the highest debt levels. Below table gives the information together with GDP growth of the countries.
Now, let us look at Sri Lanka and some of its peers in the SAARC region. The below table provides the information.
According to the Central Intelligence Agency Sri Lanka is ranked 29th in debt levels. Srilanka’s Economy grew at 4.79% in the 2016. This is not a fair reflection of our economic potential. Post- war economy registered growth rates in excess of 6%, registering high’s of 9% in 2009/10. The present slow down is much to inefficiencies of the unity government and poor economic policy/planning. Central bank of Srilanka in its last monetary policy meeting raised rates. It is an appalling decision to further tighten a depressed economy, ruining the capital market. The Colombo stock Exchange is among the worst performing markets in the region. The government has accelerated its deterioration.
Coming back to the original discussion, it is very clear that Sri Lanka’s debt level is nowhere near alarming levels when compared to prominent economic powerhouses. The country also offers the potential to achieve 7% + growth easily albeit managed properly. The overall situation is not as grave as it was projected, leading up to elections in 2015. There was never a question of the Rajapaksa regime going bankrupt. In fact, political continuity would have propelled the country to a powerful force in the region. Fiscal policy to increase state revenue cannot help much in the Srilankan context to boost GDP with a limited domestic market size. Only resort to achieve sustainable economic growth is the use of the global debt market. Sri Lanka, if managed properly, certainly has the ability to pay its debt and service its finance cost. How many countries in the world offer growth in excess of 7%? How many countries in the world offer geographical supremacy? How many leading major South East Asian economy’s offer potential for financial deregulation? Singapore, Hongkong, Malaysia all represent highly deregularised financial policy. Sri Lanka has a competitive advantage in all areas. In an increasingly sluggish global economy Sri Lanka can be viewed as an investor’s paradise.
The Rational of debt
It must be understood when a country gets financial assistance, neither the borrower nor the lender wishes to be on the losing side. It has to be a win-win deal. Reflecting this in a micro sense, when an individual or a company seeks financing from banks, are they able to get it without justifying credentials? A thorough evaluation process is in place to justify the financing. The pre-requisites and stakes are far greater for countries. Sri Lanka’s borrowings are from some of the leading institutions with supreme credentials. The IMF, World Bank, Asian Development Bank, the European Union, India, China. Can Sri Lanka secure financing without evaluation? The Greek Bankruptcy was a classic example. The EU sponsored economic bailout was agreed following the Greek governments commitment to implement unprecedented austerity measures in its budget. It involved months of negotiations. Prior to the elections, voters were made to think that the government at the time received loans, assistance on a platter. This is a mere conception. It involves a lot of hard work, endless discussions, and lengthy diplomatic efforts to convince the international investment community. The case of Greece should make us realize the challenge of securing international financing.
I believe, all above facts and figures only offer one conclusion. The so called “Debt trap” in Sri Lanka is a mere myth. It is fair to state this is nothing but political propaganda. This also highlights, all accusations on the Rajapaksa regime are null and void. The truth is, it is being repeatedly used to cover up the inefficiencies of the present administration.
This raises one important question. Are the Sri Lankan voters so lame? The answer is very simple, lack of education. A good example of this is Singapore. A highly educated society has selected a strong leadership that has ensured continued economic success and political stability. Sri Lanka was well on its way to being the next economic miracle in Asia at least until the political catastrophe of January 2015. As citizens of this country we should have access to fair information.
« Implement The UNHRC Resolution: GTF Tells Sri Lanka And IC
Moral Universalism Or Immoral Nativism »