12 December, 2017

Blog

The Politics Of Pusswedilla: A Review Of The Antire Solooshen Summit

By Hafeel Farisz

Hafeel Farisz

Hafeel Farisz

Sri Lankans know how to laugh. They also know how to laugh at themselves. They can even laugh with others who laugh at them. They know how to make political jokes and to use humor to critique people, things and political positions. ‘Puswedilla’ is a hit and has been one for a long time now.

Pusswedilla, as the ‘stage play’ or rather series of plays is referred to, in fact does what political satire is supposed to do, which in the most crudest of terms is ridicule dedicated to exposing the difference between reality and appearance in public life,although with many a caveat.

The inverted commas used when describing the ‘play’ is intentional because if there ever was something that was a cross between a street show/ political carnival and a play it has to be this. The audience got a kind of a preview even before the show began. They were made to be part of a long queue walking towards a ‘ Poling boother’ to get their tickets sealed , for no apparent reason except to indicate what it might feel to be at a polling booth. That’s what the audience was welcomed with. Walking out of the theatre three hours later and realizing that the polling booth had no connection to the play or its theme, was reflective of the play as a whole- It was something that seemed to have been put there simply because it was funny.

The cast was impressive with the likes of Pasan Ranaweera, Dominic Kellar and Gehan Block who have over the years proved to be versatile actors, but the play was little more than slapstick comedy. It possessed little imagination, taste and sarcasm. Perhaps the lack of all that was intentional given the fact that the audience the writer was catering to did not enter the Lionel Wendt to watch a tasteful play, but sarcasm or else the producers imagined they were so.

The play revolved around a parodying of events which were very real to the average Sri Lankan but the construction of such was too crude to fall within the ambit of sarcasm. Instead it was a parody of events that many in this country read and hear through the media. A parody constructed and designed to make an audience starved for political comedy of any sort laugh.

Reviewing a play of the likes of ‘ Puswedilla’ cannot be done without an understanding of the larger political reality in this country. Puswedilla was inherently political. This review mirrors the play in itself. Colouring the colourless is next to impossible, instead ‘slapstick’ is what was dished out to a packed house on two occasions I had the oppurtunity of witnessing the play, which the review also seeks to reflect.

Pasan Ranaweera who played the role of the secretary to the lead role was exceptional, as he has been throughout the Pusswediila series. He played the role to perfection and was the funniest among the actors on stage. The ‘play’ would have most certainly been a drab drag if not for the wit that Ranaweera brought on to the stage. The rest of the actors too played to their optimum with none of them showing any sense of discomfort in their roles. This however, should not be construed to mean anything other than the fact that they did the job assigned. There was little room for them to play beyond the script.

‘Puswedilla’ needs to be located within the larger political reality in this country because it is inherently political. It boiled down to mimicking a system that we have either confused ourselves about or ridiculing a system that those in Colombo love to loathe. ‘Yakkos’ governing the country is not something that many have been used to prior to the incumbent regime assuming power. The Premadasa era is often used as a case point to negate this argument, but fact remains that even during that era, the institutional mechanisms had not felt the social ‘turnaround’ as it has now. It is in this context that the writer seems to be making hay, through Pusswedilla, catering to an audience that largely comprises a population segment that is becoming negligible in the larger political schism of Sri Lanka.

It would be interesting to observe how a Sinhala speaking audience would respond to the play, although I have my doubts as to the effectiveness of such an experiment, it could be assumed that they would would either feel insulted or relate to what takes place on stage. This as opposed to the ‘reflection’ of ‘thinking’ that I ascribe the Colombo based audience’s response to.

It is beyond logic and reason to find the Colombite social phenomenon that is associated with play, except for the very fact that many of us are starved of any sort of comedy on the one hand and the love for the loathing and mimicking of a system we now have little or no control over on the other. It is these subconscious or conscious callings of an audience that was exploited by the phenomenon.

To give but two examples there is little or no explanation otherwise to watch an audience roar in laughter- a mature, English speaking audience at that, during the scene where Chaminda Puswedilla while reading a letter that was sent to him by Al- Qaeda continuously spat at another character. The letter he read was written in English which had words which the character did not have a problem pronouncing albeit the pronunciation being very native. Each time the character came across the letter ‘K’ or its equivalent he turned around towards Robert Western Thinking, the journalist in the play, and spat. It is of course understood that Arabs pronounce the letter or its equivalent with emphasis on the throat, but the letter is neither in Arabic, nor was it read by a character that possessed anything distinctively Arab.

The other example was the ‘rape’ joke. Many of Colombo’s pseduo feminists/ feminists would most certainly have taken offence at “if it’s broken consider it sold” joke among a few others, when discussing the ‘ Rape Marriage’ law in any other context, comedy or otherwise. The act reportedly provided an opportunity for rape victims to choose to marry their alleged rapist. As frightening as even a thought of such nature is the ‘ Rape marriage’ law was in fact proposed a few months ago by Tissa Karaliyadda, the Minister in Charge of Women’s Affairs. It was in this context that the joke came about in the play. I am no proponent of boundaries or socially constructed do’s and do not’s when it comes to comedy. Anyone should and must be able to joke about rape or any other social ill, impediment or otherwise. As long as a joke is constructed well, anything can be funny. The joke, however, lacked any such construction and instead was confined to parlance used by a few sex starved school boys. The entire ‘Rape’ episode which ran into roughly three jokes drew roaring laughter from the audience on both occasions I was at the Wendt, and I assume it was the norm rather than the exception. The joke in any other forum that the audience was present could not have garnered anything less than a long stare.

The production as a whole, lighting, sounds, diction projection and clarity were as good as it has been in some of the best theatre productions in the country. Having occupied the last seat on the balcony first and one of the best seats in the first few rows next, it could be safely said that the audience were given the best they could ask for as far as the production was concerned. It would be futile to enter in to the details of the production as the ‘play’ was not reliant on such. Instead it was the message, the idea and the mimicking that the ‘play’ was all about.

The above examples are but two case points of a theme that ran throughout the show, which however, kept the sell out audience which included me entertained. Ranaweera and his assistant were a personification of two village folk getting into high office, with the main character Chaminda Pusswedilla coming in a close second.

If there is similarity to be drawn in real life, it was like watching Mervyn Silva on rampage. Entertaining and insightful, insightful to the extent that it provides an opportunity to view the real thinking behind what goes on within the system. But that happens every other day. Pusswedilla was no different. For me the play, answered the many questions as to why the media continuously gives credence by way of publicity to the antics of many of our politicians- there is a market, and there is an audience that thrives on such antics.

Despite the above what mattered to many of those was a solid three hours of laughter, and to that end, I believe Pusswedilla was a success. If there is a Pusswedilla 6 make no mistake, I’d be the first to book tickets, whether that is a reflection of the levels or depths the Colombo based audience has sunk to or risen towards is a different question altogether.

*A version of this article appears in print on Daily MIrror lifestyle section

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 5
    4

    Congratulations to Chaminda Pussswedila and his team for excellent entertainment . This hilarious comedy should be watched by all in SL .

  • 6
    4

    Pusswedilla is a fantastic show, at least it gives the audience a laugh in spite of the show showcasing the predicament we all are in.

    • 2
      3

      Afzal

      Pusswedilla Banned By The Censor Board

      The performance of Chaminda Pusswedilla Part 4.1 ” The Comon Welthings Sumit” was banned by the Censor Board. Watch the announcement by Feroze Kamardeen, Playwright and Director of the popular “Pusswedilla” series to a crowd deprived of seeing their latest due to a ban by the Censor Board;

      December 3, 2013
      Posted by: COLOMBO_TELEGRAPH

      President clears Pusswedilla

      President Mahinda Rajapaksa has cleared the latest edition of the popular political satire ‘Pusswedilla’ to be staged after the Colombo Gazette had reported that the censor board had banned the new comedy.

      December 6, 2013
      Colombo Gazette

      MR sees the funny side of Censor Board.

  • 1
    3

    Tell that to the Saudi dictators and see what happens!!

    • 3
      1

      Thalaivar ( without the Thalai)

      At least the Saudis will thank their lucky stars that the Sharia law has served them well and hasnt corrupted their Country unlike Sri Lanka where there is widespread corruption at the top and brothles everywhere.

  • 3
    1

    At least onething is ceratin that we have enough for the world to laugh at us and that is why we are the laughing stock of the world. For example Diplomats fighting each other in public after being drunk.

  • 1
    1

    UNP has more to laugh about.

    It is a matter of time someone comes up with jokes about Ranil, etc.

    Ultimately the clowns (not the wise) will win the laughing game!

  • 2
    1

    Darling Fathima

    The joke is already out and that is Ranil laughs at himself all the time and the word is that he has been laughing for years and the treatment hasnt worked.
    As for the clowns I am sure you are referring to our king and that has been settled as the world is laughing at him at his inabilty to see the humliation handed out by the world. MR thinks he is smart but the world thinks he is an ass hole.

  • 0
    0

    “Pusswedilla” is a great way to portray the local political shenanigans. Stark reality through absurd comedy.

    Unfortunately the majority of patrons are the urban English-educated (not necessarily elite).

    If only one could show this ‘nadagama’ in the rural areas in a medium and language with which the ordinary villager could resonate, then it would serve the broader political purpose.

    For the moment “Pusswedilla” is merely a great diversion for the middle-class urbanites, most of whom would perhaps retire for drinks and dinner at a nice restaurant after the play to complete a fun-filled evening!

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 300 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically shut off on articles after 10 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.