21 November, 2018

Blog

The Real Re-Election Deal For ‘Yahapālanaya’

By Rasika Jayakody

Rasika Jayakody

When the government launched its ‘Vision 2025’ plan last year, some saw opportunity in it, while others saw disaster.

The optimists thought having a mid-term plan of some sort would ensure policy stability and consistency, which was already in short supply. Further strengthening their hopes, the government was able to tie up its budget proposals with the ‘Vision 2025’ plan. It also sent the message that the government – whose popularity seemed to be on a sharp decline – had what seemed a genuine desire to be re-elected. Therefore, these moves could be counted as a morale booster for those who genuinely stood for the cause of good governance before January 2015.

Those who predicted doom placed this plan alongside many other ambitious promises of the government. These include the total abolition of Executive Presidency and the formulation of a new constitution – which have already run into a morass. They saw ‘Vision 2025’ as a fresh series of empty promises without substance or the required political will to be implemented. They openly said a fragile and a seemingly jury-rigged government had bigger problems to resolve on the ground than making grand plans for 2025.

Despite these doubts, however, ‘Vision 2025’ has already seen some progress. Enterprise Sri Lanka – in spite of many teething issues – seems to be a promising initiative. ‘Gamperaliya’ – a rural development plan – has been launched, with much fanfare. In addition, many other ministries have designed programmes in sync with the 2025 plan.

But, one common criticism against the current government is that it is hell-bent on making plans upon plans upon plans – with little focus on making a real impact on the ground. So, it is important to examine how the government can translate its grand vision into deliverable action that can be achieved within a specific period of time – before the ‘yahapalanaya’ seeks re-election, hopefully!

Now that’s where the real deal is.

In 2017, the now-defunct Cabinet Committee of Economic Management (CCEM), chaired by the Prime Minister, came up with a Tourism Strategic Plan which presented 144 action items that should be fulfilled by the four organizations under the Tourism Ministry within a three-year period (2017 – 2020). The plan, later approved by the Cabinet, is immune to changes at the ministerial or bureaucratic levels. The overall performance of each institution can be measured by its progress on the action items. The plan is public, the tasks are defined and the goals are set. And there is assurance that goal posts will not be shifted for at least three years.

Much of the progress achieved by the tourism sector in 2018 should be attributed to the TSP, as it narrows down the final objectives. Tourism is an area in which multiple stakeholders have diverse and often conflicting ideas on growth. Therefore, at every social gathering, direct and indirect stakeholders generously offer bright ideas on how to develop various aspects of the sector. That is why it is of great importance to narrow down the institution’s focus on a specific number of deliverable action items.

It is a model that can be used in relation to other important sectors as well. Take, for instance, the airport and aviation sector. Issues at the airport contribute to a major bottleneck for a few other sectors including tourism. Drastic changes such as automated immigration and more efficient ground-handling are non-negotiable for the development of this sector. Unfortunately, the problem seems to be the absence of clear and well-defined action items, that need to be fulfilled within a given time-frame. So, the politicians and bureaucrats overlooking the sector are not even clear on where to start with this seemingly arduous overhaul.

Relatively larger sectors such as health and education too have run into a similar problem. They have carried out important reform programmes in a haphazard manner without a clear idea of the big picture. The education sector, for instance, came up with the smart classroom project and the Suraksha insurance scheme for schoolchildren – two comprehensive initiatives that had the potential of revolutionizing the entire sector. But, a plan to grant tabs to school children, which was central to the success of the smart classroom project, got shot down at the Cabinet mainly due to political expediency.

The problem was that the Education Ministry had no strategic plan, nor did it have specific action items. Duly approved action items, incorporated into a time-bound strategic plan, leave very little room for political expediency – at least theoretically.

The Health Ministry has successfully brought down the prices of essential medicinal drugs. But there are many other factors that are pivotal to the mid and long-term success of this programme. That explains why such radical steps should be incorporated into a larger, irreversible action plan with a realistic timeline. That will ensure comprehensive and meaningful ‘change’ in the sector and long-lasting impact on the public perception.

If the government is serious about re-election, it has to adopt national action plans for at least five of the most important sectors. The action plans need to be in line with ‘Vision 2025’ and should present a specific timeframe, and should be clear on which state entity will undertake each task. In essence, it is a replication of the same model the government has adopted in relation to the tourism sector. The timeframe can vary on the strategic importance of the sector and on how fast the government wishes to see results.

In addition to the meaningful change it will bring about to the state sector, it will also be a KPI of sorts on the Cabinet ministers – a measure that is long overdue. So, when the government goes for the election, its stalwarts will have a ‘report card’ to present to their electorates before seeking re-election. That will, therefore, result in a slow, but steady change in the toxic election sub-culture of Sri Lanka – at least in a conceptual sense. That way, the winner will take it all and the loser will have a lot at stake.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 1
    0

    The pertinent question in the minds of majority of citizens is quite clear. Electorate is seemingly vary about the honesty and deceitful character of their representatives voted into power. Political party leaders , ministers and those appointed by them to sensitive govt. positions with unbelievable salaries and perks and allowing them to carry on regardless is a crying shame on the political party leaders. Can they get on a platform at the next Election and make a promise again to weed out all and sundry who the leaders very well know who is who and who is doing what. Many of them are confidants , buddies and family members of the leaders themselves. This is the naked truth. No economic theory or plan will ever produce solace to the poor and the marginalised sector of our nation ,they will only fatten the bellies of the privileged class of the different party leaders in addition to their kith and kin. If any one believes in truth and justice he or she can only hope against hope that a day will come when all these hidden things will come to the surface like oil. That new era is struggling to be born in our country. No one will be able to take cover behind one’s religion. The present and prospective political leaders please be ready to tell the people your hands are clean and that you have not aided and abetted criminals and been dishonest in your public duties. Can you brace that challenge? If you are one with sterling honesty you could but not otherwise.

  • 0
    0

    The article says that at least 02 plans out of three, namely the tourism and health sector are successful. This is a reasonable achievement within the Sri Lankan context. On the other hand education smart class room plan has not been successful due to political expediency. The fact is that no plan could be implemented if not acceptable to the politicians in power. But this plan should have been revisited and revised rather than abandoning.

  • 0
    0

    A plan for redistributing the wealth in the country is the most important plan that is needed.
    That is the best plan for reelection.At the moment wealth is well and truly lopsided and skewed heavily towards the rich with a gini coefficient of 39.We have to have a plan to bring it down below 35.
    gamperaliya might help because it is directed towards the village where the poverty levels are high.
    Whether it is enough i don’t know.Only time will tell.
    Another plan should be to make children less than 5 years not to be malnourished and underweight.These children are going to carry this burden well into their lifetime and our future generations will not be sturdy and will be weak.
    A third plan should be to increase the job opportunities for the youth.The youth unemployment has reached astronomical proportions and seems to be a product of a stale old fashioned labour law system.Either it has to be dismantled or youth should be given preference over others in employment.Youth are the ones finally suffering due to the archaic labour systems we have.
    A fourth plan should be to increase the purchasing power of the people.At the moment the income they receive is hardly enough to go around for a family.To bring the people out of poverty as china did we have to increase the percapita income on a purchasing power parity basis.That means there is no point if incomes rise and the prices of goods and services also rise correspondingly.The family will be back in the same boat as before with not enough income to go around for essential services.
    The fifth plan is to pray to god.Nothing will take place in our lives without the support of god.If we do evil things to our fellow citizens and not be fair o them then we can have no hope of success even if we have a thousand plans.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 300 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically shut off on articles after 10 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.