16 May, 2026

Blog

Tragedy & Coexistence: The Human–Elephant Conflict

By Vipula Wanigasekera

Dr. Vipula Wanigasekera

The elephants, revered for centuries in Sri Lankan culture and central to the country’s wildlife tourism industry, are continually facing an existential crisis. The numbers speak volumes. Between 2015 and 2024, over 3,484 elephants have died due to this conflict, along with 1,195 human lives lost (VOA News, 2024). Behind these statistics lies a deeper, more painful story of fragmented habitats, misunderstood behavior, and policy paralysis.

Elephants in Sri Lanka are not just wildlife—they are national icons. Tourists from around the globe visit parks like Minneriya and Udawalawe to witness wild herds in their natural habitat, generating millions of dollars annually for the national economy. Yet, year after year, these gentle giants are increasingly seen as intruders—straying into farmland, destroying crops, and clashing with human settlements. The year 2023 marked one of the worst in recent memory, with 488 elephants killed and 182 human deaths reported due to the conflict. By mid-2024, another 388 elephants had already perished.

The causes of this crisis are deeply rooted in land use and ecological imbalance. Once covering over 70% of the island, Sri Lanka’s forest cover has now shrunk to about 16%. As development projects expand and farmlands extend deeper into previously wild areas, the natural corridors that elephants have followed for centuries are being blocked. Their ancient migratory paths are now interrupted by roads, railways, and human settlements. These obstacles lead to tragic accidents—such as the February 2025 train collision near Minneriya, which killed six elephants instantly. In total, 24 elephants died on railway tracks in 2023, and nine more in 2024 alone (AP News).

Farmers, too, suffer significant losses. Elephants often raid crops in search of food, especially during dry seasons when vegetation becomes scarce due to climate change. Their appetite is enormous—an adult elephant can consume over 300 pounds of food a day—leading to devastating consequences when they move through agricultural areas. Property damage is frequent, and economic losses can reach hundreds of thousands of rupees annually for affected villagers. Understandably, frustration often leads to retaliation: some use electric fences illegally, set off explosives disguised as food (known as Hakka Patas), or even shoot the animals. The suffering inflicted is unspeakable.

Yet despite the mounting tensions, solutions do exist. One promising approach involves restoring elephant corridors to allow safe, unobstructed movement across the landscape. While a National Action Plan proposed in 2020 aimed to address this through mapped corridors and community-managed fences, political instability and bureaucratic inertia have delayed its implementation. Conservationists argue that identifying corridors scientifically and engaging local communities in their protection is vital.

Technology also offers hope. Early warning systems using motion sensors, seismic detectors, and drone surveillance have been piloted successfully in parts of India and could be adapted for use in Sri Lanka. Meanwhile, traditional methods—such as planting chili fences or using beehive barriers—have proven effective in discouraging elephants from entering fields without harming them.

Another emerging initiative is the concept of bio-fencing, using naturally grown trees such as Palmyra in zig-zag patterns to form long-term, elephant-resistant boundaries. These not only deter intrusion but also generate alternative income for local communities. Transparent compensation schemes and insurance for crop damage can further help reduce animosity and foster cooperation between communities and conservation authorities.

At its core, the human–elephant conflict in Sri Lanka is not just about space—it is about empathy, coexistence, and priorities. Elephants have given generously to the country, not only as symbols of its cultural identity but also as ambassadors who have attracted countless tourists and supported entire communities through wildlife-based economies. To continue losing them at the current rate is not only a conservation failure—it is an ethical one.

*The writer is a former diplomat, Head of Tourism, Academic in business studies, YouTuber, Meditation coach, and Reiki healer

Latest comments

  • 0
    0

    Elephant Repellent and Human Profiting – A Delicate Balance
    People often say that planting durian trees can help keep elephants away, but it’s testing is needed . However, the trees’ large size and thorny branches may act as a barrier, and the strong smell of the fruit can sometimes be unpleasant for elephants, which might lead them to avoid the area. In addition to durian trees, other methods such as using strong-smelling repellents, planting chili or pepper plants around fields, or even creating barriers with chili-infused ropes have also a sujestion used to deter elephants, as they dislike the intense smell and irritation caused by these substances.”

    Like in the paddy feils they place a puppet man to scare crows,
    Elephants are so terrified of bees they will flap their ears, stir up dust, make a noise and turn and flee.

    • 0
      0

      Thank you RBH59. Since these are medium and long term remedies, they may be dragging the feet. Its worth testing all these and adapt the most suitable method

      • 0
        0

        Mr Vipula

        Presntly to avoid killing and instant remedy Burning durian skin releases a strong, pungent smell that may help repel elephants. Its smoke can act as both a physical and sensory deterrent. Combined with chillies or dung, it could become a powerful natural remedy.

        • 0
          0

          Shall pass this to wild life. There are a few junior officers who know temporary remedies like this but they do not want to speak up as it is not an encouraged norm

  • 0
    0

    Vipula, thanks for the article.
    .
    In this regard, I believe the time has come for a bold solution. Villagers who live near elephant habitats endure ongoing hardships because no one else does. Their untold stories have not yet been published in any form of media, including social media. I was terrified to walk in the dark when I was younger, but I made it a big deal because I was a clingy little boy. However, after reading about some villagers’ encounters with human-elephant conflicts that were affecting areas of SL and how their lives were becoming a daily routine, I realized how dangerous their lives had been. Not enough money has been invested in this nation yet.

    It is, in my opinion, imperative that the armed forces unite at least today to address this protracted dispute. The diaspora in Europe and other continents can make a modest, affordable contribution (5 to 10 USD -among atleast 100K, would make 500000 to 10 00000 USD) if appropriate steps are taken to protect the elephants and the people who are harmed by those affected areas. Being a part of successful African nations (such as South Africa) and India’s counterparts can teach Sri Lanka how to handle and resolve this serious problem in a methodical manner.

    They ought to pick a reputable monk-led organization to plan this with specialists from the conservation and wildlife departments.

    • 0
      0

      Monks are busy organising Pujas and it is a good business

  • 0
    0

    Also another way is to place a fogger, similar to those used for mosquito control. You can install a fogger machine that emits smoke irritating to the eyes or nose, and activate it remotely when elephants approach. This not only helps deter elephants but also reduces mosquito populations, serving a dual purpose effectively.This can be implemented quickly and could start showing results within a month. It would help protect people, prevent damage to crops, and train the elephants to avoid these areas. With consistent use, it can become a safe, non-lethal method to manage human-elephant conflict.

    • 0
      0

      Shall notify wild life authorities. Thanks

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.