
By Vishwamithra –
“When a diplomat says yes it’s yes; when a diplomat says maybe, it’s no; if a diplomats says no, he’s no diplomat. When a lady says no, it’s no; if a lady says maybe, it’s yes; if a lady says yes, she’s no lady.” ~ Unknown author
If the face of America is a combination of Donald Trump and Elon Musk, and if it continues for another four years consecutively, America’s international image would suffer irrevocably and any comeback would take another couple of terms of Presidency, if not two or three decades. Global diplomacy is certainly not played out in the open. For instance, the Vietnam Peace talks that were initiated and continued for more than one year between Henry Kissinger, American Secretary of State under Richard Nixon’s Presidency and Lê Dức Thọ of North Vietnam, took shape and form behind closed doors, far removed, secluded and remote from the inquisitive eyes and eras of the global media community. Neither Kissinger nor Tho pursued a media platform to augment their respective egos. The end result they sought was much larger and groundbreaking than their temporary and shortsighted self-glorification.
However, the advent of the second term of Donald Trump has modified that global diplomacy equation radically and dangerously. Resolution of defining global issues and its surrounding political contexts seem to be fast approaching the brink of a new paradigm. Two comedians, one a professional, comedian who turned politician, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and the other, a real joker-comedian of sorts, Donald Trump, gave irreversible impetus to this new dynamic, whereby the decent mechanism of negotiation for middle ground in any given issue is being destroyed beyond all recognition. Instead of the pros and cons of a given proposition, the settlement of which is sought after by the involved parties and the deal-making middleman, the very despicable conduct on the part of the middleman, United states of America and her leader, has now become the issue that is being discussed, dissected and analyzed by the international punditry and political leaders.
This dreaded collapse of class- a product of breed that teaches us etiquette, decorum and calmness of wisdom, and finesse and refined nuances of international diplomacy – might cause many more lives,, both Ukrainian and Russian, in the future. Nikita Khrushchev, the First Secretary of the then Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) came before the General Assembly of the United Nations and addressed with all his mite, vigor and condemned the USA and her allies in October, 1960. But that was a mere address or a protest-pronunciation of a policy position of the USSR. Khrushchev was not conducting negotiation of positions of two warring parties. US President Trump and Vice president Vance were in the midst of deal-making, in his own words by VP Vance. What an unworthy fashion of diplomacy; what a spill of accepted norms of international standards, what a collapse of class!
Zelenskyy is entrenched in a brutal war with Putin’s Russia. Russia is the aggressor; Ukraine is the victim, a very unfortunate and helpless one at that. Arguing for or against the position each party has taken is not the intention of my writing. Most international issues are neither wholly black nor purely white. More often than not, the truth dwells in the middle. A peace cannot be be achieved nor negotiated successfully without an exit strategy for either party. However, when in war, one also cannot accept a ceasefire on the terms declared and demanded by the original aggressor, in this case Russia and its leader Vladimir Putin.
Putin’s Russia is totally different from the Russia that was ruled by Lenin, Stalin, Khrushchev and Gorbachev. The USSR that was once the leader and Messiah of the Third World and the USSR-backed satellite nations such as Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania and East Germany in the now defunct Warsaw Treaty countries is dead and gone. While the Marxist economic policies and guidelines have failed miserably, the current East European nations have embraced socio-democratic governing policies and quasi-capitalist economic principles altogether. The rushing modern technology has passed by the then anachronistic Socialism and Marxism. Polarization of the global community along ethnic and religious contours has made the world not only interconnected as it was never before, it has also made the world smaller and very touchable on a day-to-day basis via Internet, Email, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube and other social media platforms.
Donald Trump made use of all these social media platforms to propagate his political message so intensely and craftily; he, in fact, was the undeclared ‘King’ of the social media world. During the circus of media conference Donald Trump conducted with his guest Zelenskyy last week, Trump indicated that he liked what was being exchanged between American President and Ukraine President. The spectacle that was being played as a live television drama was indeed spectacular as a television drama. It was made for the TV anchors and their editorial gurus.
But taken in the context of assessing each country’s governing position, each country’s political leanings and leadership qualities, it was an unmitigated disaster. Zelenskyy, a victim whose sad and grief-ridden position was enunciated in a not-so-eloquent fashion, his lack of richness in the English language came to his actual rescue. When Vance said that Zelenskyy was disrespectful towards Trump and America, that statement in itself was a an acknowledgment of failure on the part America. The sympathy was immediately transferred to Zelenskyy and Trump’s not-so-rich diction was also exposed, making his crude and unprofessional conduct utterly unbecoming of a Leader of the ‘Free World’.
Trump’s world is different. Its sociocultural parameters do not demand finesse. It does not require diplomatic tactfulness. Donald Trump does not know subtlety and polish. His actions and his thought process do not advance along delicate language and a repertoire of nuanced phenomena. His universe is either black or white. He may not sincerely believe that himself, but articulations and leadership characteristics cascade from cloistered and dark corners. Absolutely absorbed in his own narcissistic measurements, for him every dialogue and conversation he exchanges with his fellowmen, friend or foe, is literally a transaction; a quid pro quo methodology is the basis for any and all matters that is set on his Resolute Desk at the Oval Office in the White House. If any matter expands beyond the borders of his narrow, cushy and comfort zone, he stoops down to his obscene and pathetic harangue that is usually the fodder for political imbeciles and simpletons.
In the midst of Trump’s politically deranged universe reside some of the Republicans whose academic credentials are worthy of instant recognition and acceptance. The real tragedy is that those academically rich individuals who have been elected as members of Congress, have chosen to be active in the same dark arena and play a slavish game of boot-licking and drooling for very selfish ends. Hitler’s immediate Cabinet also had very bright and IQ-rich men. But they were dwarfs in the presence of the Fuhrer.
Power is an absolute corrupter. Its magic cannot be resisted; when one begins tasting real power, one forgets its source, its illusory dimensions and its nasty byproducts. All that matters is what power brings to the holder; the luxuries and comforts, both mundane and super-mundane, the cocktail parties and other exploits of lust and avarice envelope the very concept power and the concept becomes real and untouchable. The only preoccupation for the power-holder is its perpetuation, flowing him or her to a magical vicinity which is not anywhere near the mere mortals. They literally walk on water and the cloudy skies become very near and achievable provided he can prolong his stay in the exalted cushions of power.
This power has begun its most destructive voyage and its stormy and turbulent waves have caught every such mortal who has been privileged with the switch to turn it on and turn it off. But America’s strength is not in Presidency; it’s not in its seemingly lasting democracy; nor is it in her people. It is in combination of the three pillars upon which the very machinery is founded: the Executive, the Legislature and the Judiciary. The very architecture of governance, its design, its foundation and its expanding branches have all held this great experiment together despite many attempts by many a misdirected and unworthy President who has emerged every now and then.
Donald Trumps is such an unworthy Chief Executive. His Vice President is a very articulate but deceptive hypocrite. His Chief Advisor thinks that the world is turning around him and his family. But that design, that architecture of governance would look after itself. Its lasting power is immense and yet incalculable. January Sixth (January 6th) might repeat itself; yet such ill-thought out insurrections will fail again. However much the Executive thinks that nationally ultra serious matters are referred to the Supreme Court, any deviation from the accepted norms of governance would be rejected by the court. That much faith and that much confidence I have, not in the men and women who sit on that Bench, but in the institutions of the Supreme Courts and the Legislature as a whole.
What happened on February 28, 2025 might happen again; its repetition would not be as serious as it was on February 28. People change; but a change of conduct on the part of Donald Trump is not going to happen. His outlook on politics in general and international relations in particular might not be the key factor ultimately. Ground conditions and other crises that might emerge thereafter may dictate the terms and conditions of future confrontations between another international leader and Donald Trump. Trump may have altered the trajectory of American Foreign Policy for the time being. But eventually, the ground situations shall dictate the global agenda. Yet, frequent failure on the part diplomatic conduct of America is not an option.
*The writer can be reached at vishwamithra1984@gmail.com
Nathan / March 4, 2025
The Unknown author is right. That does not extrapolate to Vishwamithra being right.
Take for instance: Trump’s Bullying Diplomacy.
When did bullying become a word in the dictionary of diplomacy?
/
Mani / March 4, 2025
Nathan, agree with you. ‘Bullying diplomacy’ is an oxymoron. What happened to the art of persuasion, how to influence people and win friends, etc. ?
/
SJ / March 4, 2025
M
Diplomats do bully.
We have had Indian diplomats who did it blatantly. I can name some.
Bullying happens subject to the relationship between countries.
With Trump there is a problem of style.
/
a14455 / March 4, 2025
It is very easy for a frog in the well fed by NGOs and the BBC truth machine to write an uneducated discourse like this. but the truth is that despite the labels that out stupid frog in the well Sri Lankans are used to it is a fact that the whole world is affected by this unnecessary war.
even a turd like this kid should understand that great power politics is not what a small country can implement or even comprehend.
Trump just like our AKD campaigned on a set of promises and one of them was to end this completely ruinous war. Biden in his senile ignorance did not understand or care. He just followed what he had been taught and what the military industrial complex wanted him to do, which was to follow the so called expert general who kept saying that Putin cannot be trusted as he is the second incarnation of Starlin and Rasputin combined. but the fact remains that the Russian over many decades have said than making Ukraine a NATO country was the reddest of the red lines.
He sat and waited while the west completely went back on what was promised to Gorbachev but he would not take a chance on Russia’s security with Ukraine joining the NATO. So can you really blame him.
/
SJ / March 4, 2025
“Trump just like our AKD campaigned on a set of promises and one of them was to end this completely ruinous war.”
That is not an intelligent remark I would say: Everybody campaigns based on promises.
/
a14455 / March 5, 2025
and most forget them as soon as they are elected. Trump for one does not do that. He Campaigned on ending the war and he is doing it.
Can you say that about AKD ?
/
Jit / March 5, 2025
a14455, You fancy being the unofficial Sri Lankan spokesman for Dumb Donald, don’t ya? But let me just quote what the Canadian PM said yesterday who put it in few sentences saving volumes of articles to show how dumb this idiot who run the USA is: “………..United States launched a trade war against Canada, their closest partner and ally, their closest friend. At the same, they are talking about working positively with Russia, appeasing Vladimir Putin, a lying, murderous dictator…… How do Americans feel about jettisoning one’s friends and allies in favour of a country that has never wished Americans well and continues to act in ways that harm the global economy and specifically the American economy and American values and principles…..”
–
Even Donald’s thick friends at Wall Street Journal has clearly said on the tariffs that have sent financial markets into a tailspin are “a very dumb thing to do”. What’s more needed to prove that he is dumb as, when his own mates at WSJ says so!! You call others ‘frog in the well’, well, better check with a mirror about that first but enjoy the fun while it lasts! ;)
/
a14455 / March 5, 2025
I am not a representative of Trump to Sri Lanka. I am a US Citizen who actually lives there. and My life is affected by political decisions that are made in the country. I am selfish as well just like any of you. I want the country I live in to have a good or great economy. I also unlike you dont think Putin is an incorrigible dictator . He is a Russian Patriot who wants the best for his country. While I do agree and support Trump in some of his ideas it would be crazy to say I agree with him in all the policies.
As for tariffs I dont agree with him. I do think they will end up affecting the inflation. But if you remember what happened during the last Trump administration he used those tariffs simply as a bargaining tool. and that is what I hope will happen. Now I may be naive but this is what I hope.
Just because I defend him about the Ukraine war does not mean I agree with lots of his policies. It was during the last Trump administration that he due to his xenophobia stopped the massive number of Chinese professionals coming to the USA. and we are seeing the effects of that right now with the Chinese being in the front of the AI race.
/
Jit / March 5, 2025
Yes, you are naive, and I will tell you why! Because you know next to nothing about the history of US trade deals. It was Trump’s Republican party that started all this globalization and free trade chaos. Not the Democratic party or Biden!! Republican President Richard Nixon in 1974 on Kissinger’s advice negotiated with Mao Ze Dong’s China to send American industries to China. Why? Two reasons. One was to give US capitalists dirt cheap, disciplined labour, free of trade unions. Two, to dismantle Chinese communist system and then dismantle the world Communist movement. Both worked well over the expectations. Apple started the first factory in 1975 and has been turning trillions of $$ profit ever since with cheap Chinese labour. Then in 80s Republican President Ronald Reagan promoted the ‘globalization’ concept such as low or zero tariffs, free trade and immigration. All those things actually led America to dominate the world with its products. Reagan also launched the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations and the U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement, which later expanded to include Mexico and called NAFTA. These are the facts your icon dumb Donald is now trying hard to reverse. So why do you blame Biden and Democrats but the Republicans who actually dragged USA to this chaos??
/
a14455 / March 8, 2025
Well well well who is Navie here? Yes ,it was Nixon who agreed to let China join the WTO. But if you think Trump is a typical Republican you have another thing coming. Trump stands for his ideas and principals not typical republican ones. He has campaigned against what the typical republican agenda and may be that is what you people miss.
I don’t agree with his trade agenda. He does not realize it will be impossible to bring back manufacturing to the US. If he does everything will be 3 times the price it is now.
USA is not in chaos everyone else responding to the Trump machine is. Canada and Mexico are in chaos. but China is not. It is because the Chinese planned for it but Canada and Mexico did not plan nd build alternative markets for what they sell to the US.
What I blame the democrats is for starting the proxy war with Russia which in my non economist opinion is what has ruined the world economy.
/
Agnos / March 8, 2025
“Apple started the first factory in 1975.”
Your larger point may be true, but this can’t be true. Apple wasn’t even founded then.
/
LankaScot / March 8, 2025
Hello Agnos,
Only one year out. The Apple I 1976, followed by the Apple II which I used and repaired when necessary. I also used an Apple II Clone called Banana around 1978/79.
Best regards
/
Jit / March 8, 2025
Agnos, Apple’s manufacturing in China is exclusively done by Foxconn, a company established in 1975 by the Taiwanese industrialist Terry Gou. Apologies for the mix up of the year with Apple, and thanks for pointing it out. Most leading US companies such as IBM, GE and Coca Cola started moving their factories to China starting late 70’s though, and the exodus continued up until to the new millennium.
/
SJ / March 8, 2025
J
The sums done by the US think tanks have gone wrong awfully.
*
The move to befriend China had an important consideration then. Both US and China saw in Brezhnev’s USSR a threat if not challenge. In 1968 there was even an armed clash along the Usuri (Wusuli) river border of China and USSR. Brezhnev even threatened to bomb China and China began to build underground shelters.
The People’s Republic China was unfairly isolated by the recognition of Taiwan’s government as authentic in the UN. But it did not matter with a friendly USSR to support it. Things changed under Khrushchev who was unfriendly. Brezhnev was hostile.
*
As for capturing China’s market etc., the US was wrong footed by China which laid down the rules of the game for foreign investment in China. Attempt to make China a source of cheap labour as well as a big market misfired. The US became China’s market and is now running dry of goods to sell.
I doubt if anyone would have imagined then how ‘capitalist’ (rather state capitalist) China would become the main challenge to the US in every economic sector.
/
Mani / March 4, 2025
Vishwamitra, the overall analysis of this article is rather naive – Russia, the aggressor, Ukraine the victim. There is such a thing as a global geopolitical arena and realpolitik. A leader of a nation in a backyard of a super power needs to understand the rules of the game. Zelensky was a pawn in this bigger game and he was not smart enough to understand his role and his limitations. The victim here is not Zelensky but the millions of Ukrainian people who have died and been displaced by his lack of judgement.
/
old codger / March 4, 2025
“For instance, the Vietnam Peace talks that were initiated and continued for more than one year between Henry Kissinger, American Secretary of State under Richard Nixon’s Presidency and Lê Dức Thọ of North Vietnam, took shape and form behind closed doors, “
Those who were around at the time may remember the millions who fled in boats,, and their accusations that the Americans sold them down the river. Ditto for Afghanistan a couple of decades later. But who can deny that nobody is dying in either of these places today? It will be the same in Ukraine.
But it is sad that it took a crass bully like Trump to start the process.
/
a14455 / March 5, 2025
The thing with trump is that He abhors war. That is why he made BiBi stop He knows when he has leverage and uses it . Now he may not have any soft spot for the Palestinians but it simply stopped that war did it not.
If you listen to CNN BBC or any of them apparently every one including the Europeans want peace ? Really ?What were they doing all this time? Since after Trump said so ? So yes Trump is a bully but he is definitely not a war monger. and if he can stop this war every poor country in the world should be thankful to him.
/
Jit / March 5, 2025
“….If you listen to CNN BBC or any of them …..”
As you enjoy Murdoch’s crap Fox News or ‘padangu’ SUN, or Bezo’s WP, then others have the freedom and right to enjoy BBC, Guardian, Al Jazeera or CNN too.
–
“….and if he can stop this war every poor country in the world should be thankful to him….”
How?
/
a14455 / March 8, 2025
I actually don’t watch so-called “News” channels. I don’t pay for cable because I don’t need to be taught what to think either by Fox or CNN.
/
SJ / March 8, 2025
“I actually don’t watch so-called “News” channels.”
“If you listen to CNN BBC or any of them apparently every one including the Europeans want peace ?”
*
I have some difficulty in reconciling the two utterances.
How do you know what they say if you do not watch any?
/
a14455 / March 8, 2025
Cost of living is how
/
Jit / March 8, 2025
Are the US egg and tomato prices gone down now? ;)
/
SJ / March 8, 2025
“He abhors war. That is why he made BiBi stop”
Really?
Why id he threatening Hamas now?
*
Bibi stopped because he was not winning. Hamas was back in full strength days after the ceasefire began.
/
SJ / March 4, 2025
M
I am afraid that the war is really not between Russia and Ukraine; and it started years before 2022.
Cannot you see the parties involved?
/
Mallaiyuran / March 5, 2025
Come on Comedy!
Don’t keep playing the same old, boring game.
What shame of poor idea to protect Putin. Every county will always like to fight their preemptive wars, when the one creator of these wars behaves like Stalin or Ma O or Siri Mao. Siri Ma O thought feeding JVP can help her to gain the country if she loses to Dudley. But the snake she brought up bit her. Unless the Indian Sikhs had fought the war to save you, you would not be there to do your proud waterman job.
/
SJ / March 8, 2025
Had the shot this morning?
/
Mani / March 5, 2025
SJ, my point was also that one needs to see the big picture here. Yes, this war started long before 2022. While the role and interests of the US and European powers are quite clear, one cannot discount the relationship between Russia and Ukaine – my point of reference here starts around the 18th century. I am merely challenging this simplistic analysis of aggressor-victim.
/
SJ / March 5, 2025
I am not going that far back in history.
What I had in mind was the Maidan Coup of 2014. It unleashed the neo Nazis of Ukraine to attack ethnic Russians,
/
LankaScot / March 4, 2025
Hello Mani,
“The victim here is not Zelensky but the millions of Ukrainian people who have died and been displaced by his lack of judgement”.
Where do you get these figures from?
Apart from that who invaded Ukraine? Do you remember that on the day the Russians invaded they were at the UN denying that they had any intention. They invaded on the 22nd Feb 2022. On the 25th Feb 2022 the Russians vetoed a UNSC Resolution condemning them – https://www.npr.org/2022/02/25/1083252456/russia-vetoes-un-security-council-resolution-that-denounces-its-invasion-of-ukra
“You can veto this resolution but you cannot veto our voices,” U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Linda Thomas Greenfield told her Russian counterpart and the council”.
Changed days nowadays? Trump is now on the same side as Putin and North Korea.
Best regards
/
Mani / March 5, 2025
LS, apologies for not being precise. I should have said that thousands have died and millions have been displaced.
“Fighting and air strikes have inflicted over 40,000 civilian casualties, while 4 million people are internally displaced, and 6.8 million have fled Ukraine. 14.6 million people need humanitarian assistance.”
https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/conflict-ukraine
I generally respect your views but this is a war which cannot be understood by simply pointing at who invaded whom or a single UN resolution. Looking at what happened in 2022 is like the proverbial blind-folded person grabbing the elephant’s tail and attempting to describe the elephant.
However, I agree with you that Trump is bad news and his actions will have disastrous consequences.
/
LankaScot / March 5, 2025
Hello Mani,
Yes there is a long history, however Ukraine gave up its Nuclear Weapons for Security Guarantees by Russia, the US and the UK. These were signed and sealed Agreements (Budapest Memorandum 1993). There was no Agreement ever signed that Ukraine would not join NATO. Since 2002/2008 Ukraine expressed a desire to join NATO, however nothing concrete was ever done.
Russia annexed Crimea in 2014, the US and the United Nations did nothing. When Putin started amassing his Troops around Ukraine in 2022, Russia denied any intention of Invasion.
Invasion of a Sovereign Country is against Article 2(4) of the UN Charter where all members of the UN “shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state”. Putin has an Arrest Warrant against him.
Either Countries abide by UN/International Law or we go back to the Law of the Jungle and to Empire Building. The UN will then follow the “League of Nations” into oblivion. Unless Europe and the UK can pressure Trump, the US will leave NATO leading to its collapse.
The Post WW2 consensus is in great danger.
Best regards
/
SJ / March 8, 2025
“There was no Agreement ever signed that Ukraine would not join NATO.”
No agreement signed, yes. But there was a pledge to Gorbachev which was violated.
What was the need to expand NATO when there was no threat from Russia?
There was plenty for Russia to be concerned.
Why did the US and UK block an early peaceful settlement facilitated by Turkey?
/
LankaScot / March 9, 2025
Hello SJ,
Even Lenin supported an Independent Ukraine – In 1918 in his “Ukraine” Letter he “urged the Bolsheviks to respect the self-determination and outlined his position on Ukraine’s independence”.
Later on “He felt that Ukrainian aspirations to independence were so strong, not only among Ukrainians in general but even among the Bolsheviks themselves, as to require the granting of a degree of autonomy and a status equal to Russia within the Soviet Union, the new state whose creation was declared in 1922” https://www.huri.harvard.edu/news/serhii-plokhii-casus-belli-did-lenin-create-modern-ukraine
My Romanian Colleagues were very supportive of Ukraine joining the EU. They were also warning about Putin’s duplicity, even before Crimea was annexed. These colleagues had suffered the conditions under Ceaușescu, but were still campaigning to rid Romania of their Oligarchs and Corruption.
Best regards
/
Agnos / March 9, 2025
LS, SJ,
The net result of actions by Putin and Trump will be Germany’s reinvestments in its military, jettisoning its post-Nazi hesitancy for military engagements and its possible re-emergence as a military-industrial power. This has become clear over the past few weeks after Merz was elected. Many used to ask why NATO was needed after the end of the Cold War. In addition to the threats from Russia and China that many countries still feared, NATO kept Germany from remilitarizing, which was perceived as a potential threat to other countries in the region.
/
SJ / March 4, 2025
““When a diplomat says yes it’s yes ; etc. -Unknown author”
So daft that it is good for him that he remains unknown
/
SJ / March 4, 2025
“Neither Kissinger nor Tho pursued a media platform to augment their respective egos. The end result they sought was much larger and groundbreaking than their temporary and shortsighted self-glorification. “
One-up-manship was there, but at levels where it really mattered. That was the case with the Korean war too.
It had nothing to do with personalities.
Media shows were rare and announcements were mostly by consensus and after something conclusive was arrived at.
*
Things have changed drastically in the ‘age of information’
The way media operate itself has changed very much in the post Cold War era.
/
Mallaiyuran / March 5, 2025
It was an unwanted show in Europe, as making peace between Ukraine and Russia, this week. Peace is between two political entities, so they both unavoidably depend on their rhetoric to gain more out of peace war, instead of armed war. There is another version of War and peace, inventor, Chandika Kumaratunga, war for peace. It is the format of Robert Knox’s patron, Lankaweyans, who believes their cheating cunningness is superior intelligence. They duped GG, SJV and Sampanthan Aiya for 75 years and voluntarily got caught in all the superpowers’ jugglery, indebting more $105b, while the lost growth of the country is much more than $1T. They worry always about what America did at any time, because it is the commandment of Lord Buddha that too matches it. This essay is no exception for the Langkang Culture. In any case, it is the strongest win in all fights. America knows too well what democracy is. So, it left Soviet President Gorbachev alone in democratizing the USSR. As per the expectation of democratizing the USSR, incoming President of Russia, Putin, is the new ruler, (not a Tsar, but Stalin). America would like to deal with that area of politics leisurely, without dipping its nose too deep into that. In America, the outgoing Democratic Party handled the immigration issue, (about 5,000, 10,000 job seekers flooding the country, daily) very leisurely.
/
Mallaiyuran / March 5, 2025
And they were in too long of slumber while losing control of the secular judicial system. Yet democrats were able to throw their penny in the middle of the warring parties, Hamas and Israel factions, in the Middle East. One has to wait and see when that penny germinates in those desert water fountains, whether it will be a sour grape or sweet dates, in the future. For a long time, (more than a year) Russia was mobilizing its troops towards the Kyiv and disputed Eastern Ukraine. Neither America nor the West took any serious action on that to de-escalate, ballooning troop mustering. After the unchallengeable victory in Crimea, President Putin was showing steady growth of greed to bring the world his umbrella. Putin’s wealth was growing beyond $200B. He murdered his friends and swindled their wealth. His victory against the enemies of Assad with his one only fishing vessel had brought him over the cliff of no return path. Putin witnessed the old Soviet arms America forcefully moved out of Ukraine to Russia, and the promise to Ukraine of war protection, not worth anything even in American’s opinion. He added some hyper and laser modern weapons to his stockpile. Furthermore, he was hoping to either capture Ukraine or at least swallow most of it, would curb the nagging, mosquito Britain. He described what a small island, Great Britain, is.
/
LankaScot / March 5, 2025
Hello Mallaiyuran
“He described what a small island, Great Britain, is”. He also knows that the UK has many Nuclear Weapons stationed around the World in Trident Vanguard Submarines. And they can act independently of the US or Europe (I doubt if they would).
But if NATO ceases, all bets are off for the future of Ukraine as a Western Aligned Country (or even Neutral).
Best regards
/
Mallaiyuran / March 5, 2025
Putin expected the Britain leaving the EU to encourage others to leave NATO. His wish is to make some meaning when the EU wants to realign the NATO. Because under Germany, the EU is a group of vassal states of Germany, which has an inseparable infatuation for Russia’s oil and gas. While Germany was signing Nord Stream II, Russia was rallying the troops for the war. The new Chancellor got a half-hearted promise from Putin that, though he was sending troops to Ukraine, he would not invade Ukraine. That time I wrote here on CT, if Putin gives a promise to international leaders, he must respect that but should not behave like Langkang leaders like Don Stephen and all others. At the start of the war, forgetting America’s promise to Ukraine that if it transfers the Arms it had from the USSR time, America will help Ukraine in wars, President Biden wanted the EU to take care of the War. Now, it is America declaring, “Ukraine should forget about its dream of joining NATO.” Separate from America and Britain somersault on trilateral pact, Germany after, dismantling its atomic reactors, signed a servitude for gas deed with Russia, which never in future Germany can’t take any independent decision on that and abandon it. Later when, Russia started raining in Ukraine, Germany did not offer any large amount of money or arms.
/
SJ / March 5, 2025
“Putin expected the Britain leaving the EU to encourage others to leave NATO. “
Someone who can mind read Putin.
Hurrah!
/
Mallaiyuran / March 5, 2025
On the other hand, America restricted the of the weapons by Ukraine. Nobody granted an Iron Dome like protection, Israel has, to Ukraine to protect Ukrainian from Russia. Lately, President Biden was not able to send arms or money for Ukraine for more than a year, because congress was trying to capture power by debilitating Democrats locally and internationally. Republican’s behavior at that time resembled Appe Langkang leaders blowing anti-Tamil rhetoric into the Sinhala Buddhists’ ear drums, for election victory for over a 77-year period.
What Britain and the EU did last week was the most meaningless thing which happened in the near past of the EU’ history. Their behavior appeared like using the despair and devastated Ukraine as their punching cloves in their boxing match with America.
EU and UK’s actions would have made some sense:
1). Supporting Ukraine temporarily to protects it from “Russia to walk over Ukraine and then refuse to release”. Everybody saw what happened in Chechnya and Crimea. Once Russia holds something, it will never lose its grip. That exactly like Don Stephen did to Tamils, after the Soulbury Constitution’s slavery deal.
/
Mallaiyuran / March 5, 2025
2). EU is finding ways to make a settlement with America. While the EU is in rivalry with America, making peace negotiation between Ukraine and Russia is only “sand play of nursery kids”, dull & nincompoop action. If ever in the future, if Russia should not target another country anywhere in the world, NATO should be ready to exhibit its might. Putin sees Americans and their president as invalid kids, so he plans to give them candy on their way to school, kidnap them.
/
Mallaiyuran / March 5, 2025
By cane or carrot, Putin is looking to grab Ukraine. Putin is looking to America & NATO to indemnify the act of the EU giving monopoly for oil and gas and allowing Russia to play pink pong with tanks and bombing planes on the Ukraine border for three years. Peace talks with President Putin are only about extracting water out of rock. If NATO is not in one unit, how much illusion America has on its method of peace making by making Ukraine lose, that much illusion is there in what Britain and EU are trying to do by protecting Ukraine. I wish that America and EU would hire Chandrika to carry out the peace for war between them, instead their fake peace with Russia deals. By offering two separate versions peace, they are only spoiling Russia. By the economic sanctions imposed on the USSR, it took 40 years to collapse and give up communism. If anybody were looking for a serious result to the sanction enforced on Russia for invading Ukraine within three years, they have no idea of what politics means and why countries start to fight with neighbors. The cost of war for Langkang is much more than $1T, but the Sinhala Buddhists feel worth to stand in queue after having subdued the Tamils to take the bitter pills of Sinhala Only, standardization, Buddhism only constitution…..…..
/
Mallaiyuran / March 5, 2025
3). So, America and the EU must normalize their relationship immediately and restart helping Ukraine in resisting Russia, and stop to propose alternate peace deals, until another option comes forth for them. The EU put up a show to oppose the White House plucking minerals. That jealousy has no role in peace making. Further, America should not confuse its trade war as the liberation of Ukraine, or taming Russia.
Still there is one benefit can emerge from these dramas: If President Putin had noticed that President Zelensky went to America with hope of making peace, but America missed the opportunity, then he may want to invite both EU and America to try to make one real, instead of two fake ones. What a strange act, America is dying hard to find customers for oil and gas of Russia, while almost half the world has put a ban on that! The first country Russia denied gas and Oil is Ukraine. Why not America trying to get gas for Ukraine from Russia, instead of Germany? Bravo for the Putin “Divide and Rule” game between the EU and America. If they are in a rush to sell their version of a peace deals to Russia, then whoever the party shows him the most leniency will make the world to race individually and in groups for WW III.
/
ramona therese fernando / March 5, 2025
It’s exactly as Trump said : World War lll !!! That’s the only thing the world has to be a worried about. Everything has to revolve around this as everything else is moot at this time. And Putin has to be got rid of for the world to come back to its usual normalcy.
/
Mallaiyuran / March 6, 2025
Good one [edited out] Thanks for commonsense.
You’re, at least, one making a difference out of the thousand CT bluffers who come here only to spend their retirement time, and they spray oil through their sarcastic revelation over escalating events so they can watch the fun and be entertained. Fearing of true danger enclosing the world now and caring to disable it might, by the writing in Free Media (not just by freedom of expression, but even by free from any payments), certainly makes it worth for the followers of this.
/
UK Citizen / March 7, 2025
The author has no understanding of the US or Donald Trump.
*
What we are seeing is a complete change. It is long overdue. A good thing.
*
The collapse and exposure of the unelected Deep State. A good thing.
*
The end of the war in Ukraine that should never have started. A good thing.
*
Exposure of Government waste and corruption. A good thing.
*
The truth behind COVID and the useless harmful vaccines forced on us. A good thing.
*
I for one am going to enjoy the next 4+ years. What’s not to like?
*
Hope we can get rid of that awful Marxist Keir Starmer as well.
/
Agnos / March 8, 2025
Hey Trumpie,
Ask the MAGAts (maggots) how they are doing with the cost of eggs, seeing no Jack Daniel’s from Kentucky in Canadian liquor shops, higher prices for cars, stock market collapse, potential recession, etc. What is there not to like, huh? A couch-surfing UK citizen who has no skin in the game?
/
LankaScot / March 8, 2025
Hello UK Citizen,
Marxist Keir Starmer, don’t make me laugh. My Grandaughter’s Mother in Law went to Leeds University with Starmer and knew him well. She is of the same opinion as me, he is a complete knob and fake Socialist.
Where do you get your ideas from – QAnon, Truth Social or James Whale?
Best regards
/
Champa / March 7, 2025
During his meeting with Zelensky, Donald Trump warned about World War III. Yes. There are all the signs for an imminent WWIII due to the Trump administration’s territorial aggrandizement. It is apparent that the US will be involved in two future wars, probably simultaneously. One between the US and Europe, if Donald Trump sends US troops to Greenland to expel Greenlanders and seize their land, and the other one is between the US and Iran, if he tries to expel Palestinians from Gaza and capture their land.
In the meantime, the Trump administration is pursuing a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia.
When I wrote my first comment on the Russia-Ukraine conflict in February 2022, I knew nothing about the origin of the issue. We believed what the US and western media wanted us to believe. When I did some research, I realized that Russia has a valid case in Eastern Ukraine where Russian speaking people were kept as hostages of the Ukraine military since 2014 and also Ukraine cutting off 85% of water supply to Crimea. Ukrainians’ NATO dream heightened the tension between the two countries further.
1/2
/
Champa / March 7, 2025
The US led NATO, former Biden administration and Ukraine tried to portray a different picture for Russia’s military operation in Ukraine. The truth is, Ukraine is not innocent.
There has been an ongoing war in industrialized Eastern Ukraine since 2014 where the majority population is Russian. The Ukraine military has been committing war crimes on Russian speaking people in Eastern Ukraine and trying to expel them since 2014. Water infrastructure was destroyed and water engineers and workers were targetted by the Ukraine military cutting off pipeline water to 3.1 million people and large industries in Eastern Ukraine. According to UNICEF, there have been 450 incidents of military water infrastructure damage between 2016 and 2021 in the Donetsk region alone. People were living in underground bunkers since 2014 without even basic facilities until Mr. Vladimir Putin sent troops to war-ravaged Eastern Ukraine in February 2022 to protect Russians in the region from genocide.
I am happy that there is going to be an end to the 11-year Russia-Ukraine conflict which cost the lives of a large number of people and infrastructure. It is important that Eastern Ukraine remains with Russia. If it returns to Ukraine, the first thing the Ukraine military would do is, massacring all Russian speaking people in Eastern Ukraine. Commonsense.
2/2
/
LankaScot / March 8, 2025
Hello Champa,
You forgot to mention Crimea being stolen in 2014 by Russia from Ukraine. You also forgot to mention “the Little Green Men” in the annexed areas of Eastern Ukraine. Who shot down Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 with a Russian BUK Missile killing 298 people?
Did Russia invade Ukraine in 2022 despite having signed an Agreement that they wouldn’t? The Budapest Memorandum 1994 – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum
Speaking of Water “The Kakhovka Dam was breached in the early hours of 6 June 2023” It was “under the control of the Russian military”.
I am sure there is a suitable Treatment for Memory Lapses, let us all know when you find it.
Best regards
/
SJ / March 8, 2025
LS
Crimea has to be seen in the context of the Maidan Coup and the return of the neo-Nazis..
There was a legitimate referendum in which Crimeans voted overwhelmingly to leave Ukraine. That occurred when Crimea still under Ukrainean control.
*
The invasion of 2022 was not a simple act of aggression. The Minsk agreements (the series of international agreements seeking to end the Donbas war) were willfully breached by Ukraine. (I do not claim that Russia was all innocent, but Angela Merkel said subsequently that Ukraine was not sincere. See “Former German Chancellor Merkel admits the Minsk agreement was merely to buy time for Ukraine’s arms build-up” in https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2022/12/22/ffci-d22.html.
Then came the NATO bid.
The build-up to 2022 was not as simple as it is made out to be. The role of other players is generally played down.
/
SJ / March 8, 2025
LS
Crimea has to be seen in the context of the Maidan Coup and the return of the neo-Nazis..
There was an essentially free referendum in which Crimea voted overwhelmingly to join Russia, that was when Crimea was under Ukrainean control.
*
The invasion of 2022 was not a simple act of aggression. The Minsk agreements (the series of international agreements seeking to end the Donbas war) were willfully breached by Ukraine. (I do not claim that Russia was all innocent, but Angela Merkel said subsequently that Ukraine was not sincere. See “Former German Chancellor Merkel admits the Minsk agreement was merely to buy time for Ukraine’s arms build-up” in https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2022/12/22/ffci-d22.html.
Then came the NATO bid.
The build-up to 2022 was not as simple as it is made out to be. The role of other players is generally played down.
/
Champa / March 9, 2025
LankaScot
Oh, there is nothing wrong with my memory. 😊
For your information, I will combine and repost some of my comments posted on CT in 2022 and 2023 regarding the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
This is what I said on Donbass.
1. Ukraine is not innocent. They did the same thing Israel did to Palestinians.
2. As a part of the US orchestrated coup in 2014 in Kiev, in April 2014, former Ukrainian President Poroshenko formally declared war against Ethnic Russians in Eastern Ukraine. US military-trained Azov-Nazis invaded Donbass on May 9, 2014 and formed a military regime there. Since then, the citizens of Donbass were subjected to violence, cruelty and genocide which continued until February 22, 2022.
3. According to the International Crisis Group’s visual explainer, “Fighting in the Donbass region of Eastern Ukraine that began in 2014 (and continued up until early 2022) which killed over 14,000 people provides a crucial background for understanding “what is happening today” (in Ukraine).
4. Eastern Ukraine was deprived of food, water, medicine, electricity and education for children, and ethnic Russians who were confined to underground bunkers for 8 years in Donbass were liberated by Mr. Vladimir Putin in 2022.
1/5
/
Champa / March 9, 2025
5. Within one year, Russia not only liberated the war-ravaged Donbass, but also restored water and electricity supply in the region. Public schools, children’s parks and new hospitals were open. Fully furnished new houses were built. Existing roads were repaired and new roads were built. What Russia did for Donbass in one year, 25 Arab speaking countries couldn’t do for Palestine for 100 years! (PS: Palestine’s heartbreaking history is going to be changed for the better this year!)
.
Re: Crimea
1. Crimea had been part of Russia for 200 years until 1954, when it was gifted to the Soviet Republic of the Ukraine by the then Russian Premier, Nikita Khrushchev. This was to commemorate the 300th anniversary of Ukraine unifying with tsarist Russia.
2. When the US military-trained Azov Nazis invaded Donbass in May 2014 and formed a military regime there, the Russian military in Crimea swiftly took hold of Crimea where 65% of the population is ethnic Russians.
3. Crimea is the most strategically important location in East Europe. I think it was Crimea which the US-led NATO was after as Crimea could be the base from which the NATO can launch an attack against Russia and China.
2/5
/
Champa / March 9, 2025
4. The United States is fully responsible for the heartbreaking predicament of Ukraine.
5. President Putin deployed troops at the border in late 2021 only after seeing US drones and Navy planes patrolling at 53,000 feet on the Russian border and US Navy Poseidon planes at the Russian airspace border (Crimea) at 10,000 feet. (April 2, 2021)
6. NATO’s membership to Ukraine will allow the United States to build strategically necessary military bases in Ukraine which is a direct threat to Russia’s sovereignty and Independence. The only reason that the US led NATO didn’t send NATO troops to Ukraine is the non-existence of military bases in that country.
7. There is no justification of NATO’s membership to Ukraine, other than to launch an attack on Russia, one day. The United States has a strong intolerance to the unique cultures of other countries which is proved by the list of countries that they attacked and destroyed. In many cases, they themselves created a crisis in a chosen country and then sent troops to ‘resolve’ the crisis. The world would be a much better place without the US-led NATO.
3/4
/
Champa / March 9, 2025
Re: The Budapest Memorandum
1. The Budapest Memorandum is no longer valid. It was first violated by Ukraine in 2008 by applying for NATO’s Membership Action Plan (MAP).
2. Then, the violation of the Budapest Memorandum continued. Since the US-orchestrated coup in Kiev in 2014, with the support of the US-led NATO, Ukraine built military trenches in Donbass and stockpiled weapons supplied by NATO to attack the Russian military base in Crimea. Besides, hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers including Azov Nazis have received NATO standard extensive weapon training since 2014 obviously as a preparation for a US-led NATO’s proxy war against Russia which is a gross violation of the Budapest Memorandum.
3. Talking about agreements, contrary to popular belief, the international treaty between the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (RSFSR) and the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic (USSR) signed on 19 November 1990 NO LONGER VALID as the Friendship Treaty (in short form) between Ukraine and the Russian Federation signed on May 31, 1997 REPLACED AND SUPERSEDED the PREVIOUS TREATY signed in 1990.
4. Even the Friendship Treaty 1997 is NO LONGER VALID as Ukraine UNILATERALLY TERMINATED it on December 3, 2018.
4/5
/
Champa / March 9, 2025
5. Basically, there is absolutely no international border agreement between Ukraine and the Russian Federation currently in force. Ukraine’s ill-advised decision to terminate the Friendship Treaty in 2018 can be viewed as an “INADVERTENT ACTION” to return Crimea and Eastern Ukraine back to Russia.
6.The sad truth is, Ukraine was misguided by the US+NATO+EU. Although they hailed Ukraine’s preposterous decision to terminate the Friendship Treaty in 2018, upto date, they couldn’t ensure the same security guarantee that had been offered by the Russian Federation to Ukraine under the 1997 Friendship Treaty.
7.Ukraine’s best bet is to sign either a Friendship Treaty or MINSK Agreement III with Russia defining new borders and recognizing Donbass, Kherson and Crimea as regions under Russia (based on historical rights, of course),
5/5
/
Champa / March 9, 2025
The world is teaming up against Donald Trump’s territorial aggrandizement dream and his unwinnable trade war against the USA’s allies and trading partners. Even consumers in developed countries have stopped buying products made by US companies. People in the UK, Norway, Australia and several European countries complain that Canadian products are not available in their countries.
The latest, greatest news is Europe’s “Big Three”; France, Germany and Italy along with the United Kingdom have issued a joint statement extending their support to the Egyptian-drawn, Arab-Muslim endorsed Palestine Peace Plan. I continue to call it a “Peace Plan” for obvious reasons.
/