23 October, 2017

Truth, Accountability And The Last Stages Of Sri Lanka’s War; A Private Sector Perspective

By Chandra Jayaratne

Chandra Jayaratne

Chandra Jayaratne

Issues of Truth and Accountability; the last Stages of the War in Sri Lanka – Narrative iii – MARGA & CHA Colloquium; a Private Sector Perspective

The “Third Narrative” reviewed at the Colloquium presents an alternative narrative, of the events of the last stages of the war, and has been developed as a response to the UNHRC resolution of 2014. This is in the wake of the purported conflicting and contradictory accounts of the last stages of the war in Sri Lanka. These varying accounts have come from the Defense Authorities/ Army and the Government of Sri Lanka, I-NGO’s, University Teachers for Human Rights, Academics, Documentaries, Film Clips and Publications by Individuals, ex-Soldiers and Combatants, Diaspora Groups, Civil Society Groups, Activists and Collectives in and Outside Sri Lanka and presentations by the International Community, the UN Secretary General’s panel of experts, and the LLRC.

This presentation is made following an objective analysis looking forward at the socio economic consequences to flow from the processes now in progress. It is based on a private sector perspective. It has the sole focus of realizing the common future goals hopefully shared by all of the alternative view presenters. It further aims to assure that the truth and reconciliation will emerge, along with justice, equity, fairness, upholding the legitimate interests of all victims, the decesed and other local actors including the soldiers who sacrificed their lives and limb in the process of the military operations. It is also developed with an aim to restore the lives and livelihoods of those who suffered on both sides of the war theatre and lead to peace, reconciliation, reparation, restoration lives and livelihoods and alleviate the grievances of those innocent victims and allow loved ones to come to terms and closure with their dead, missing and disappeared family members and friends.

The end goal is to ensure sustainable growth and prosperity of the nation and its people, with peace, harmony, good international relations and socio-economic development, equitably benefitting all citizens. This goal has resonance with the private sector’s primary core value of placing the interests of the nation and its people first.

The current path and actions of the Government in addressing the international challenges it faces on the accountability for the last stages of the war and its commitments / obligations in terms of international human rights and humanitarian laws, appears to be inimical to the aforesaid core interests and values. These actions appear to be based on an aggressive, arrogant and self righteous stance that ignores the committed to obligations and desired foreign policy framework for effective international relations in the globalized world we live in today.

UN HRC process led international inquiry is also unlikely to support the common and end goals outlined earlier fully and in a timely manner. The victims and impacted families are unlikely to receive direct benefits from such a process in the short to medium term. Justice for the victims by way of restorative justice or retributive justice cannot also be expected delivered in the short to medium term.

With the Sri Lanka government’s stand of ignoring the UN HRC Resolution of 2014 and taking no part in the inquiry initiated by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, and in fact not allowing the inquiry panel even to visit Sri Lanka and further appealing to other nations to follow suit will lead to an acrimonious situation to the ultimate detriment of the nation and its people.

The UN Inquiry panel will, irrespective of the stand of the Government of Sri Lanka, continue with its tasks and have planned to receive submissions, hear and gather evidence in designated countries. The Inquiry team will engage in this task, under the guidance of the panel of international advisors recognized globally for their expertise and integrity. UNHRC team will provide an oral brief to the UN HRC during the September session and submit its final report to the March session of the UNHRC in 2015. Thus it will be an exparte inquiry, where Sri Lanka has forfeited an opportunity to present, its voice and advocacy, along with the presentation of any available contradictory evidence. Thus the presentations of the Government and the armed services will not be made available to the inquiry panel, in order to clarify, defend and raise objections to the evidence and submissions before the panel. The opposing views, evidence and negative presentations by other interested parties will most likely be received by the panel, irrespective of the stand of the Government of Sri Lanka. The inquiry process will document these and will guide the outcomes of the inquiry. Such evidence will remain available for access in the years to come, along with the final report to be presented in March 2015.

In the event the final report of the panel is inimical to the long term interests of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka’s international image and international relations will be negatively impacted. In addition the nation and the people may also be negatively impacted, along with any named parties against whom the inquiry findings and strictures are made and classified as parties accused of violation of international law and guilty of offences and crimes against humanity.

In such an eventuality the private sector assesses that the under noted economic risks may crystallize, most of them dependent on the contents, gravity and the weight of the purported evidence listed in the report, the findings and recommendations of next steps and any suggested punitive measures highlighted;

  1. Banks and finance houses may impose stipulations requiring all documentary credits to be ‘confirmed’ by acceptable first class, designated country, international banks with global credit ratings
  2. Down grading of Country risks and associated increases in country specific risk premiums. These actions will impact on cost competitiveness and deter expansion of  import export trade transactions
  3. Inclusion of “Sanctions and Boycott” clauses in insurance, loan and credit agreements and import export  trade and credit documentation
  4. Foreign Investors, and Commercial entities entering with trepidation in to long term trade, service and technology transfer arrangements and agreements with Sri Lankan business
  5. Slowing down of foreign direct investments, at a time high growth targets require significant FDI flows, especially in the wake of domestic savings being inadequate to meet supportive investment targets
  6. Insecurity led slowing down, significant disinvestment and repatriation of capital from  securities listed in the Colombo Stock Exchange
  7. International bond holders of Sri Lanka Government Securities (Government Bonds and Treasury Bills) discounting bills in the secondary markets prior to maturity and repatriating capital. If a significant portion of the government securities in issue at present are discounted, the foreign reserves of the country can be significantly eroded and lead to foreign currency reserves available to support future imports being drastically reduced. Such an eventuality can even lead to foreign exchange restrictions being imposed to avert a potential balance of payments crisis.
  8. If the UNHRC report were to make specific negative references and raise valid charges accusing the state and / or high officials of continuing post war ethno religious persecution, discrimination and targeting of minorities, (especially the Muslim Community), it may trigger a slowing down of employment opportunities for Sri Lankan expatriates in Middle Eastern Countries and even give rise to key trade embargos and boycotts. These actions will significantly impact on the balance of trade and balance of payments of the country.
  9. If charges of genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and continuing persecution of minorities are raised in the report and accusations are leveled against leaders in governance and the armed services, Diaspora groups and other parties, especially those belligerent groups in South India, EU, USA, Canada, Britain, Australia and some middle eastern countries, ( ie. those who have led the voices of advocacy and even legal challenges against the Government) who are against the actions of the authorities, may launch effective advertising and promotional campaigns in key export destinations, calling for the boycott of imports and services Sri Lanka and travel to the Country. These campaigns may be similar to previously seen “Boycott goods and services from blood stained nation”. Such campaigns, where successfully implemented, could have disastrous economic consequences. Such campaigns and boycott actions can slow down the growth of tourism, tea, apparel, gems& jewelry, spices, ITC, entrepot and shipping/aviation sectors of Sri Lanka.
  10. As a consequence of 9 above the financial media, risk assessors/managers, analysts and rating agencies may impose amber signals in their communications and reports dealing with Sri Lanka
  11. As a consequence of 9 above, trade chambers, shipping/aviation, transportation and logistics support service entities and customs, quarantine, inspection and quality control entities in import / export destinations, may discriminate, slow down, impose added conditions and even boycott services support, so essential for effective trade and services transactions.
  12. If American and European Banks, finance houses and global insurers/re-insurers down grade the country risks and join even in a marginal way in supporting the call of opposing parties as stated in 9 above, this could have disastrous consequences for trade and services credit, documentation, payments and settlements.
  13. With a majority of Sri Lanka’s trade transactions being channeled through US based Clearing Banks and transacted in dollars, ant slowing down, boycotts and added conditionality by such Banks will have significantly negative impact on business.
  14.  As a consequence of 9 above, visas and travel restrictions may be imposed not only on those accused persons, but also on trade delegations and business persons visiting Sri Lanka as well as overseas.
  15.  There may even be the imposition of bi-lateral country sanctions and boycotts
  16.  The PR image of Sri Lanka as a destination for trade, commerce, services, investment and travel could be tarnished, with long term adverse consequences and possibly lead to classification of Sri Lanka marginally above some of the failed states, in investment, trade and travel friendly states listing international indices.

With such risks as those listed above, looming overhead in the external environment is it the time today to;

  1. Take the position that the UN HCR has neither mandate nor a moral right to investigate the human rights issues of the last stages of the war?
  2. Ignore and boycott with arrogance and articulated acrimonious statements, the UN HRC process, already initiated and proceeding for targeted completion
  3. Not defend the Country and the Armed Services by effective diplomacy, advocacy and raising valid objections to unacceptable evidence and submissions before the panel
  4. By words spoken and by actions taken deny /discourage access to the panel and not allow them entry to Sri Lanka, which may further give rise to negative perceptions
  5. Argue that the UN HRC process is illegal and canvass international support to deny access and space for the panel to operate in other countries
  6. Argue about sovereignty of Sri Lanka being violated
  7. To highlight double standards of those leading and supporting the UN HRC Process
  8. To allow an exparte trial, listing of unchallenged evidence and publication of an uncontested report
  9. To remain silent on questions as to why some LTTE leaders are entertained in high political posts and given freedom with protection and unhindered access
  10. Deny to family members open access to records, centres of detention and information on processes to confirm the dead and find the disappeared
  11. To not effectively support the process of resettlement of  Muslims who were chased out by the LTTE many years ago, and
  12. To place restrictions on free access to religious sites, and cemeteries but allow new religious and sacred sites to be established for the majority community
  13. To ignore the charges of not speedily supporting processes for reparation, restoration of assets, gold, jewelry and bank holdings of families taken over by the LTTE and later recovered by the Armed services and the State
  14. To not support the processes for effective closure by those with family members grieving over dead, and disappeared
  15. To not to provide for truth and justice to be facilitated to the satisfaction of the impacted families
  16. To not provide for psycho social support and long term care for the war injured and persons with shrapnel yet implanted in their bodies
  17. To not address the purported allegations of land grabs, expanding high security zones, militarization, civilian administration being dissolved and replaced by military administration, and
  18. To ignore charges of failure to provide essential resettlement options for the  displaced, and ignore the need for establishing livelihood options, housing , water and sanitation  for war impacted families
  19. To delay the implementation of an effective power devolution process in the North
  20.  To fail to engage in resolving the ethnic crisis by classifying the conflict as terrorism or a language issue
  21.  To not effectively engage with the political groups that have gained due recognition following an election in the Northern Province
  22.  To not have in place an effective long term programmes for investment and employment generation, and
  23. To not have in place an effective process for rapid restoration of education, training and empowerment, health and in dealing with women’s issues, especially of war widows and single women headed households
  24. To not have in place an effective process for repatriation back to Sri Lanka of those living in camps in India and displaced persons in other parts of the island wanting to return to the North
  25.  Failure to effectively and comprehensively deal with issues raised by the LLRC to be addressed by specific independent investigations as well as its general and specific other recommendations
  26. The need to address some of the truth and justice issues raised by the civil society activists and organizations, including issues connected with extra judicial killings, rule of law failures, continuing post war ethno religious hate speech, incidents targeting segments of society and minorities, some of which are openly created by identified members of society, who freely participate in such actions with impunity.
  27. To engage the Services of professional PR firms at significant costs to canvas and influence opinion leaders /decision makers, whilst ignoring the need to actively participate in the international inquiry process

Further is this the time for an “Alternative Narrative” from high Intellectual Civil Society Groups;

  1. Where the conflicting and contradictory previous narratives are highlighted
  2.  Where the unfortunate and unacceptable procedures driving the previous narratives are highlighted
  3. To  define an acceptable definition of a ‘Combatant’, a ‘Terrorist’, a ‘Civilian’, ‘ civilian population’,  ‘take direct part in hostilities’ and a ‘No Fire Zone’ in engaging in the number game
  4. To argue on the numbers dead or disappeared in the war against terror, the last stages of the war, once the surrender process commenced and after the war effectively ended with the decimation of the LTTE Terrorists
  5. To reflect how the international community had not at any stage contested the strategy leading to the operation to defeat the LTTE and to liberate the land and administration illegally taken over by the LTTE.
  6. To highlight how the international community remained silent in the wake of the eastern province liberation war, (ie after Mavil Aru) and even provided thereafter tactical and intelligence support and even at times access to necessary military infrastructure and thereafter post the completion of the war, change their attitudes on the last stages of the war.
  7. To point out the serious flaws, the validity of the evidence and material used to support the findings in the UN panel of Experts and IPEC reports.
  8. To challenge the views opposing the validity of the objectives/planned intent  of the government and armed services in conducting operations in the Northern theatre in the last stages with the intent of rescuing the civilian hostages, fought on the lines of a humanitarian operation , and classify it not as a rescue operation aimed at minimizing civilian casualties,
  9. To question the role of the NGO’s who operated in the Northern front and highlight that evidence dictates that in fact they aided the LTTE and made available tactical material and support to them in waging war,
  10. To question the methodology of determining and the specific numbers of dead and disappeared civilian (casualties in excess of 40,000).
  11. Highlight the failure to recognize the conditions created by the LTTE in the last stages of the war, that led to the outcomes and call to examine the war crimes created by the LTTE
  12. To question the validity of charges of indiscriminate and excessive bombing and targeting of hospitals and no fire zones, without tracking the origins of and sources of intentional acts of the LTTE that preceded and necessitated such action
  13.   To charge that the panels of under valuing the beneficial role of the armed forces in rescuing civilians, receiving IDP’s and surrendering combatants and humane treatment and rehabilitation efforts that followed
  14. Highlight that the LLRC did not find valid the allegations of large scale torture rape and sexual violence
  15. Stress that the POE report as being a prosecutors brief on war crimes of the Government and armed services
  16. Contest the evidence connected with the allegation of intentional denial of food and medicines to civilians trapped in “enemy Territory”
  17. Point out the failure of the panels to recognize how the war was fought by the LTTE, the atrocities and accountability of the LTTE , the accountability of the International Community , UN and its agencies
  18. Point out the inadequacy of a genuine and credible process of assessments to determine the proportionality of the Government’s military action
  19. Point out the failure to give due emphasis to the LTTE actions in preventing civilians from leaving the conflict zones with the creation of no fire zones
  20.  Canvass the need for changes in IHL, IHRL and R2P doctrine in the face of tactics and strategies adopted by the LTTE

By turning to what the Buddha taught and the Emperor Asoka’s Edicts, is the strategy of the State and Civil Society in line with what the Thathagatha preached and what ancient emperors practiced, especially;

  1. “Nahi Verani Verani” as articulated by Sri Lanka post World War ii-“ Hatreds never cease through hatred in this world; through love alone they cease. This is an eternal law
  2. Dammapada Verse 223; Conquer anger with love, Conquer evil with good, Conquer stinginess with giving and conquer lies with the truth.
  3. In the wake of the enmity between the Sakhya and Kholi over river water sharing, the Buddha preached “Value life more than Water” and placed a message that looking beyond the proximate cause and immediate challenges and looking for the cause of the conflict and focusing on the bigger picture will bring lasting beneficial results.

In the wake of above and the current strategies not delivering the desired objectives and end goals , can a new path and a strategy be charted by leaders of society caring for the sustainable future of this nation and people, move forward to actively canvass and seek global leaders like the Dalai Lama, Desmond Tutu, Nobel laureate Amarthya Sen and Abdul Kalam along with Justice Weeramantry to bring together all stakeholder, victims, complainants, representatives of Diaspora, NGO/I-NGO representatives, UN/ UNHRC and the  mediate over grievances, accountability issues , reconciliation options, restorative/retributive justice processes required and agree a common non acrimonious processes and find an alternative path to assure what was articulated as objectives at the beginning of this paper.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 10
    6

    It is too late to talk about reconciliation. Tamils are tired of abrogation of pacts and treaties by the goverments again and again.Dudley-Cheva pact, Banda-Cheva pact,treaty of Ranil and Tigers, The 13th Ammendment pact with India, all these were abandoned and broken by the Sinhalese government leaders.How can you propose to win the Tamil mind. Even now after the Tamils chose TNA for Northern province, the government undermines NP council by deploying Douglas Devananda(the stooge) and Chandrasri(the military might). Is this your reconciliation???

    • 5
      3

      They had the opportunity to ” live and let live ” as per their teachings, but chose to be buried. It is all history now.

      Long live TAMIL EELAM

    • 5
      2

      Chandra Jayaratne,

      You say:

      “In the wake of above and the current strategies not delivering the desired objectives and end goals , can a new path and a strategy be charted by leaders of society caring for the sustainable future of this nation and people, move forward to actively canvass and seek global leaders like the Dalai Lama, Desmond Tutu, Nobel laureate Amarthya Sen and Abdul Kalam along with Justice Weeramantry to bring together all stakeholder, victims, complainants, representatives of Diaspora, NGO/I-NGO representatives, UN/ UNHRC and the mediate over grievances, accountability issues , reconciliation options, restorative/retributive justice processes required and agree a common non acrimonious processes and find an alternative path to assure what was articulated as objectives at the beginning of this paper.”

      Dalai Lama, Desmond Tutu, Nobel laureate Amarthya Sen and Abdul Kalam are not fools or people without scruples to fall for your ruse, or the cunning of the Sinhala ruling elite.

      The guilty must be punished for their mass atrocities and genocide of Tamils. Then only can reconciliation follow on a basis of equality and fair play to Tamils democratic rights, not otherwise as you wishfully think.

      • 2
        2

        Chandra Jayaratne,

        is not any different from the typical Sinhalese elite justifying the state and the regime’s actions against humanity and genocide of Tamils.

        You can list hundreds of arguments but your ulterior motive is to perpetrate the Sinhala Buddhist hegemony of the island and decimate the minorities and the Tamil Nation.

        You can speak in volumes about Buddha and his teachings but Sinhalese don’t follow Buddha’s teachings but rather the racist Mahavamsa which is inimical to Buddhist teachings.

        Sinhala mentality will never change so long as the warped Mahavamsa writings are inculcated in Sinhalese people from childhood through their Kumarothaya books.

    • 1
      1

      The government has no intention for a reconciliatory will with the Tamils except to show the International Community that the Government wants reconciliation. Instead Rajapaksas, the Southerners want to subjugate the Tamils all along. The TNA is very weak and split and cannot do anything for the Tamils. I see Mr.Vigneswaran attending functions and being garlanded. He is powerless but shows a big face. The Tamils are helpless and the Government knows about it. Thousands of Army soldiers in white Verti parading the streets of Nallur Temple indicates something which the TNA leaders cannot comprehend.

  • 7
    7

    An excellent analysis Mr Jayaratne. Do you think that the morons in power really understand what you have stated. They are arrogant and drunk with power that they feel that nothing will happen to them. They do not realize what they are in for. if they have nothing to hide why prevent the investigators of the Human Rights Council visit the country and hear from these morons justifications for what they did in the final stages of the war. They are thus missing an opportunity which will only be to their detriment not only for for the incumbents but for the country as well.

  • 7
    7

    Singhala Electorate show their willingness of subjugating Tamils by electing corrupted regimes which thrive on racism against Tamils. If they are for reconciliation they could have rejected parties and persons who promoted anti Tamils sentiments by hate speeches. Can anyone tell about the anti Singhala , anti Budhism speeches or activities made by any Tamils including by LTTE.Unless the Singhala Electorate changes their attitude of electing representatives based on anti Tamil sentiments there can not be any reconciliation.The human right violation and war crimes was occurred throughout the post independent period, the last stages of war is only a part of it. Singhala Sri Lanka is not able to get out of corruption, lawlessness and thuggery. They try to impose it on the Tamil society. That is why the Tamil resistance started and progressed. They teach about truth and honesty and act in the opposite way. The best way for peace and harmony is leave the Tamils alone to look after themselves. The people world over is beginning to understand the reality and truth about the Sri Lanka Tamil problem. Their will will bring a fair solution for the Tamils soon.

  • 8
    9

    This is NOT the private sector view.

    This is ONLY Chandra’s view. He is NO representative of the private sector.

    • 6
      4

      So, all Tam`ill`s can go back to TN because SL will be hell.!

      J. Tam`ill` woman will always support Tamils.

      • 3
        6

        So Ja_vi SLAVE:

        All 20 million Sinkalams can go back in the same ” Kallathoini” back to Mahabodhi. Goodbye.

        (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕)(^‿◕)(^‿◕)(^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕)

        • 5
          3

          If Jaffna Tam`ill`s follow Tigers, they too will go extinct!

          Tigers WILL BE dead too!!

          tam`ill` EeeeLla la laaaalal la. in the sea bed.

          Hole In One Monster VP.

          • 1
            4

            Ja_vi SLAVE:

            You havenet achieved it in 3000 years ( give or take a few yerars) and how are you going to do it now:

            BLOODY LOOSER. Keep dreaming you fools.Mahinthas Kingdom has CRUMBLED. The shorterst in history

            (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕)(^‿◕)(^‿◕)(^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕)

            • 4
              2

              So you got a rocker fart that has tickled your balls. Phew!!

              • 1
                3

                Ja_vi SLAVE:

                You are predictable and You are going to choke in your vomit. There is no need to get agitated when you loose the argument. But then again loosers cant think straight.
                Sign of things to come.
                ^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕)(^‿◕)(^‿◕)(^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕) (^‿◕)

                • 4
                  1

                  There are 65 million Tamils in TN. Only 3 million Tamil Madu in SL.
                  So Tamil Nadu should get 90% of benefits.

                  Pit Tamils against Tamils.

                  Let Tamil Nadu fishes rob Tamil Madu’s fish.

                  It only benefits Tamils. So bust it.

    • 2
      1

      As former head of Ceylon Chamber of Commerce and a person who has strong ties with the private sector (being part of the sector nearly all his life) and as an advocate of their views Chandra is adding his voice. While we cannot say the entire sector upholds similar views it is also true many in the sector who are fearful of repercussions prefer to express their views through people like Chandra. In that sense he is reflecting their views and he is entitled to do so whether we agree with it or not. What is key is the message in the article.

    • 1
      1

      Mr. Chandra Jayaratne, FCA, FCIM (U.K.) served as the Managing Director of Eagle Insurance Company Ltd. Mr. Jayaratne has over 25 years of top management experience in the industry, commerce and service sectors. He served as the Chairman of the Ceylon Chamber of Commerce. He served as an Independent Non-Executive Director of Finlays Colombo PLC from January 1995 to May 31, 2012. He served as Director of Ceylon Tobacco Company PLC until March 25, 2008. He served as Director of Sampath Bank Ltd. from August 10, 2005 to May 9, 2008. Mr. Jayaratne is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Sri Lanka (FCA) and of the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants, UK.

      yep Fathima (aka Lorenzo) you are right, this is not the private sector nor a representative view.

  • 4
    1

    Mr. Jayaratne, unless and until Chinese Government tells Sri Lankan Government to change its response nothing is going to happen. Sri Lanka is following exactly what China has done in the past (I mean in the domestic actions). If you look at the way the military has been built up even after the war, the military spending after the war, the military involvement in civilian matters, harming civilians who are against or protesting against the Government etc. We are in effect a Province of China or Special Administration area of China. Although China’s policy is not to get involved in internal matters of other countries, as far as Sri Lanka is concerned they are getting involved in Sri Lankan internal matters through Gotha.

  • 3
    1

    As Pacs says the Sinhala electorate does not elect the government.sinhala electorate is divided between JVP/UNP/SLFP. the king makers are the minorities. If the Tamils say their Rights are subjugated so are that of the Sinhalese .ie why Minister like Badudeen Mohamed was allowed to pass a area rule bill mainly to benefit muslims. Political thuggery is also used to subjugate them. The 13th amendment has only provided a second tier of political thugs to subjugate the people. Unless these political thugs that pervade every political institution are made accountable the country will suffer poor governance and injustice. The Sinhala bashing by Tamils and Muslims on the long term is counterproductive and will only lead to violence in the future and destabilisation as it creates rifts in society. Until the different communities realise that ,the country has no future.

    • 1
      1

      Also recall Thondaman crossing back and forth from UNP to SLFP to make and break governments.

  • 2
    3

    Dear javi
    Instead of all tamils going back to TN, just think about if all tamils of TN are coming to lanka.ur life will become hellrotten.u dont find place to hide.u wll b the minority who will recieve the wrath of tamils.then ur si halese women will b raped periodically at will…

    • 2
      0

      ¬then ur si halese women will b raped periodically at will…¬

      sihal kella kakula ussala lassani. (sinhala legs are pretty)

      here fly this kite:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5XwhNlORh8

      Tumhī kasē āhāta – how do you do??
      Marāṭhī madhyē bōlatō – Speak in Marathi

    • 0
      0

      In that case, I don’t think Sinhalese people would stay in the country anymore to live with those ugly, smelly, toiletnadu people. It is better to risk your life going to Australia in a boat or jumping in to the ocean than living with those TN creatures.

  • 0
    0

    Dear Mr Chandra Jayaratne,

    Do you think The ruling moronic Clan and their supporting morons may understand, what You have mentioned in this Essay???????????.

    Thoese Jarapassas Are a Heard of Dumb Asses.

  • 0
    0

    SL air force is still using BIA as a civilian cover for their operations. In fact they use the BIA site for military operations.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 300 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically shut off on articles after 10 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.