29 September, 2020

Blog

Muslim Woman Must Remove Burka In Court

A young Muslim woman in a burka was told by the judge to take off her face veil, as she took to the dock to enter her plea, because someone could impersonate her. The judge has refused to let a Muslim woman in a full-length burka enter a plea until she showed her face to the court.

Judge Peter Murphy at Blackfriars Crown Court said the principle of open justice overrode the woman’s right to her religious beliefs, but the woman, 21, from Hackney, refused to remove the covering in front of men in the court room, Court News UK reported.

Judge Murphy told her: “It is necessary for this court to be satisfied that they can recognise the defendant.

“While I obviously respect the right to dress in any way she wishes, certainly while outside the court, the interests of justice are paramount.

“I can’t, as a circuit judge, accept a plea from a person whose identity I am unable to ascertain.”

He added: “It would be easy for someone on a later occasion to appear and claim to be the defendant.

“The court would have no way to check on that.”

The defendant, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, is facing an allegation of intimidating a witness in Finsbury Park, north London, in June.

Her barrister, Claire Burtwistle, told the court she was not prepared to lower her veil at all while men were in the room.

“In front of women, it is not an issue”, she said. “It is simply men that she will not allow to see her face.”

Ms Burtwistle suggested herself, a female police officer or a female prison guard could identify the defendant and confirm to the court that it is the same person as in the police arrest photos.

Prosecutor Sarah Counsell added that the police officer in charge of the case was content that he recognised the defendant while she was in the burka.

But Judge Murphy rejected the suggestions, saying: “It seems to me to be quite fundamental that the court is sure who it is the court is dealing with.

“Furthermore, this court, as long as I am sitting, has the highest respect for any religious tradition a person has.

“In my courtroom also, this sometimes conflicts with the interests of a paramount need for the administration of justice. In my court room, that’s going to come first.”

He said “the principle of open justice” could not be subject to the religion of the defendant.

“I am not saying this because of the particular form of dress by this defendant”, he added.

“I apply that to any form of dress that had the same issues.”

Judge Murphy adjourned the case for legal argument over whether the defendant should have to remove her veil.

It will be heard again on September 12.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 1
    0

    Finally, the world realized !!
    It is ok for her to have sex with men, but not to show her face.
    what stupidity. Leave U.K and go to Sadu Arabia or some where

    • 0
      0

      I do not think that the world realized, Sabrina … You check your food item boxes in the kitchen …. See how many food containers having halal logos … Some are very very smal to see (ie. tiny chocolate boxes) …. They definitely want all others to eat halal food … That is the trend in the world right now … Where would it stop?

    • 0
      1

      Islam, sorry to say, is the MOST BACKWARD of Religions! Beats BACKWARD Buddhism in Burma and Sri Lanka by a mile! 2 reasons that prove Islamd is the MOST backward of religions are:

      1. Muslim women have to cover themselves and have NO FREEDOM OR LIBERTY because Muslim men cannot control themselves and their LUST. Hence, women need to be covered to be PROTECTED from MUSLIM MEN and by extension all MEN! What a sorry view of human kind this ‘religion’ has!

      2. Muslim men do not TRUST each other (even their own brothers) NOT to mess with their women and have SEX with them. They, Muslim men know that they are an uncivilized lot – so their women have to cover themselves to not tempt the LUSTFUL brotherhood of Islam – men!
      What a BLOODY tragic comedy this so-called religion of the Muslims is…

      • 0
        0

        China Doll,

        Good 2 points, but it is not really Islam but those ho control it.
        There is democracy in the US and Sri Lanka, but see what what happens to people? Is it democracy.

        There is Buddhism in Sri Lanka, but see what Buddhists and the monks do?

        Similarly, Islam was taken over by the Mullahs, Ulema, the Tribals and they interpreted the way they wanted it in order to maintain their hegemony and tribal habits.

        They wanted to reverse the Egalitarian reforms of prophet Mohamed.

        They even went after Muslim Natural philosophers and scientists.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDAT98eEN5Q

        Neil DeGrasse Tyson – The Islamic Golden Age: Naming Rights

    • 0
      0

      Sex is an act coordinated by the lower parts, unless you prefer with the one below you nose.

  • 0
    0

    A judge with the Respect of law and not with prejudice.

    • 0
      0

      She seems to be a revert and a NATIVE of UK… How many in here are Native Citizen of the UK or any other country? MOST of ya’ll are ” Transplants” in OTHER societies… She knows her rights and SHE CAN wear make for HER family and HER HUSBAND… her religion does NOT stop her from doing so… EDUCATE yourselves b4 ya’ll run ur mouths… The learned Judge should have simmered the situation by letting a female Guard or police officer identify her… She was willing and the Arresting POLICE officer DID identify her… The Judge made a Mountain of a Molehill…

      • 0
        0

        Fair N Square is so obsessed about his religion he is prepared to go even so far as for a proxy judgement. Imagine the extent these people’s brain must have transformed.

  • 0
    0

    Rumi
    ======
    “Come, come, whoever you are, come.
    Infidel, idolator, Wanderer, fire-worshipper, it doesn’t matter, come.
    Ours is not a convent of despair.
    Come, even if you have broken your vow a hundred times,
    Come, come again.”
    ― Rumi

  • 0
    0

    There are countries where muslim women show their faces.
    Muslim female professionals by necessity have to show their faces – else they cannot practice medicine,law etc.

  • 0
    0

    Why do Muslim women use make up if they do not like to show their faces to men?
    My belief is majority of Muslim females do wish to show their faces to men and women but they are scared to remove their face veils as they will be punished by their husbands or fathers.

  • 0
    0

    If I were the Judge, I would ask for the basis of covering the face.

    1. Scripture, and the specific verses.

    2. Validity of those versees.

    3. Rule on it and say yes, no you can or cannot based in the needs of the courts.

    The problem they would have is that, the basis for covering the fave is extremely weak.After all, this was not the case for the first 200 years of Islam anyway.

    • 0
      0

      If I were the judge I would say “If you live in our country, you follow our laws.”

      • 0
        0

        Yes, follow our laws.

        However, there is freedom od assembly and freedom of religion as well.

        However, it cannot interfere with the normal functioning of the courts.

      • 0
        0

        All of you are assuming this lady is an immigrant. What if she is native white (Caucasian) and Muslim in that order? Isn’t there any limit to your ignorance and stupidity? Surely?

        Its not about religion. Its about choices. I hope you guys grow up and accept that this is not a petty issue.

        Also accept that issues such as these have much more to do with run of the mill commentators on CT :)

    • 0
      0

      Idiot Amarasiri should know that the judge concerned is not judging Islam Muhammad or its scriptures. He has very clearly explained about his impartiality and the rules of his court. The woman should have been charged for contempt of court for undermining the credibility of the court.

      At that rate, soon burke clad woman and the likes would justify even fighting nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. I say that because, there are at least 109 verses in the Koran justifying and commanding Muslims wage war against unbelievers. If you want proof, just read Koran 2:191-193 without hiding ‘on context’.

      Islam is no religion. It’s all a political ideology to subjugate those that do not agree with the mad clique called Muslims. I say, Amarasiri is no doubt an apologist for them.

  • 0
    0

    The Judge is absolutely correct. Identification should be ascertained in open court. The interests of Justice is paramount. As this is case involving intimidation of witness, she must respect the law and the court. This does not in any way affect the religious significance. What happens if she comes with some sophisticated explosives hidden in the dress.

    • 0
      0

      simple.. DETECTORS…. from 8/11 on.. All the Western public offices have Detectors and pat downs too….

      • 0
        0

        Allah came to sri lanka very recently.. not more than 2 years.. before that these so called muslims never wore Burqas. but when he return to sri lanka. he asked muslims to wear.. ;)

        • 0
          0

          How come people have issues letting other follow their own religion. We did not tell you to wear or remove your dress. Even Islam doesn’t forces to cover the face. It’s her choice and who the hell are you to say otherwise.

  • 0
    0

    This is the culprit for the spread of cancer.

    The Saudi “charm offensive” still applies to the EU and all over the west as well as to the US, viz:

    The official Saudi newspaper in English, Ain al-Yaqeen, published an article on March 1, 2002 describing the Kingdom’s efforts at supporting Islam worldwide. It claimed that the Kingdom had spent “astronomical” sums of many billions establishing thousands of mosques, madrassas and Islamic centres in non-Muslim countries in Europe, North and South America, Australia, Africa and Asia.

    Among the biggest projects was the King Fahd Islamic Center in Malaga, Spain. In addition, the Kingdom has established a number of academic chairs in some of the most respected universities in the developed world in order to “encourage understanding of the true nature of Islam by explaining clearly Muslim beliefs and by correcting misconceptions and misrepresentations”. Especially mentioned are the King Abdul Aziz Chair in Islamic Studies at the University of California, Santa Barbara; the King Fahd Chair in Islamic Sharia Studies at the College of Law at Harvard University; the King Fahd Chair in Islamic Studies at the School of African and Oriental Studies (SOAS) at the university of London and the provision of a resident professor for the Prince Naif Department for Islamic Studies at the University of Moscow.

    • 0
      0

      They want mosques everywhere in the world while no temple can be opened anywhere in the middle east.
      Yet I vehemently condemn attacking them physically.Instead let us encourage Muslim women and girls to fight for their rights.

      • 0
        0

        Have you been to the middle east, in every middle eastern country other than Saudi arabia there are churches, kovils and other worship places. very few temples because you buddhists will not spend a cent to finance the temples. do some research before you put idiotic comments.

        • 0
          0

          As an example, the defunct charms of a front desk reception of Lankan embassies itself queries a visitor with a million riddles.

    • 0
      0

      Masha Allah, the information provided by Fukushima is quite encouraging for Muslims. No wonder we have such excellent debators supporting Islam and Islamic jurisprudence, core values and practices coming out of highest learning institutions like the Oxford Union and Cambridge Universities, people like Mehdi Hassan are taking Islam to new heights and the world by storm. Yes we need the Saudi funding to continue to put their wealth into more and more places to educate the Muslim Ummath to face the new threats to distort the true teachings of Islam, that which will be fought with challenges in intelligence, Quranic knowledge and Islamic literature, and will be known the world over as The Great Islamic Revival.

  • 0
    0

    This is the culprit for the spread of cancer.

    “The Saudi “charm offensive” still applies to the EU and all over the west as well as to the US, viz:

    The official Saudi newspaper in English, Ain al-Yaqeen, published an article on March 1, 2002 describing the Kingdom’s efforts at supporting Islam worldwide. It claimed that the Kingdom had spent “astronomical” sums of many billions establishing thousands of mosques, madrassas and Islamic centres in non-Muslim countries in Europe, North and South America, Australia, Africa and Asia.

  • 0
    0

    Subjecting her to the man made law is sufficient humiliation for the defendant, lets end the matter and get on with it. The judge can surely appoint a competent and eligible female representative to file in all required information of the defendant after a one on one meeting, there is no harm in that. Its the muslim womens fundamental right not to expose her face in front of non-related males, all so called democracies must understand this. If nudity has its recognized position in western democracies surely modesty too should have its position.Come on!

    • 0
      0

      More than majority of scholars say that women don’t have to cover her face. Whoever say face should be covered has excempted covering the face in front of judge when giving oath, while praying and more situations.

      Please don’t twist the religion. Sit with a scholar and get an opinion.

    • 0
      0

      Abu Abdullah,

      You say:

      “Its the muslim womens fundamental right not to expose her face in front of non-related males, all so called democracies must understand this.”

      Give the relevant chapters and verses from the Quran.

      This did not happen for the first 200 years of Islam.

      This face covering is not Islam. It is Tribalism and Mullah Ulama Hegemony.

    • 0
      0

      Well this kind of logic is beyond the modayas how frequent CT. Sadly

    • 0
      0

      Exactly. If the world accepts nudity in women statues as work of art, and women’s provocative dress as morally acceptable to society, then why the other extreme of women;s modesty in dress, where full body including face cover be morally unacceptable. This is sheer hypocrisy and that is why they say the law is an ass. All of the man made laws are made to suit their whims and fancies, with absolute disregard and disrespect to religious laws (which are God’s Law). .

  • 0
    0

    Quoting : The Slander of
    Sabrina’s accusation & Charging in writing :It is OK for her to have sex with men! ***************
    ********

    =========
    Unquote:
    ======================================
    CT is what I have is what The Burqa women is charged with?
    —————————–
    Then what Sabrina is commenting is Slander & not connected to what the women in question (women in Burka) has been charged with.
    ——–
    In this case can a Lawyer approach CT legally to expose the true Identity of the Nick Sabrina ? so as to take necessary legal action? if Yes, can Our group of Muslim Lawyers in UK contact your office with regard to this?
    Thanking you in advance in anticipation of your good cooperation,

    Slandering someone without proof of being promiscuous in sex life – is Slandering a person & destroying the person’s character, which is considered one of the worst crimes & punishable if the character assassination is proved false .

    Sincerely
    Life member for international Lawyers on Injustice watch against world Islamic Citizens & Interfaith for Peace
    ======================================
    Quote:www.hackneygazette.co.uk/news/crime-court‎

    Hackney woman, 21, faces terror charges over Lee Rigby video clips
    Tuesday, August 13, 2013
    6:22 PM

    A woman will appear in court tomorrow charged with terror offences over video clips about the death of Lee Rigby.

    Rebekah Dawson, 21, from Hackney, is accused of dissemination of terrorist publications and encouragement of terrorism, and is jointly charged alongside Royal Barnes, 22, also from Hackney.

    Barnes appeared yesterday at Westminster Magistrates’ Court, where Dawson is also due to appear, to face terror charges linked to the footage.

    Dawson is accused of making two video recordings on May 22, the day of Fusilier Rigby’s murder, and distributing them with the intention of encouraging others in the commission, preparation or instigation of an act of terrorism.

    She is also accused of encouraging terrorism by publishing a statement with Barnes entitled “Muslim laughs at British Soldier killing”.

    Barnes is due to appear at the Old Bailey on Friday

  • 0
    0

    Fathima is right. Eastern Sri Lanka is being filled with Madrassas. Could Daham Pasalas be allowed in Saudi to convert Muslims?

    ‘The cost of King Fahd’s efforts in this field has been astronomical, amounting to many billions of Saudi Riyals. In terms of Islamic institutions, the result is some 210 Islamic Centers wholly or partly financed by Saudi Arabia, more than 1,500 Mosques and 202 colleges and almost 2,000 schools for educating Muslim children in non-Islamic countries in Europe, North and South America, Australia and Asia. Among the biggest is King Fahd Islamic Center in Malaga, Spain, on an area of 3,848 sq. m., whose foundation stone was laid in 1998. The university-like Center embraces academic, educational, cultural, and PROPAGATORY activities.

    All over the world the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has supported and contributed in the establishment of Mosques and Islamic Centers’

    http://www.ainalyaqeen.com/issues/20020301/feat3en.htm

    • 0
      0

      Assalam Malikum Puswella.

      “Allah’s Apostle said, “The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. “O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.”

      – Bukhari (52:177) Hadith.

      • 0
        0

        Fatuma Fukushima and All Avtars,

        Just Dismiss All Hadith. (Just Quote the Quran.) It has very little validity. It was all political and Tribal, used to enhance certain viewpoints after Prophet Mohamed ny Mullahs and Ulema. At one time there were over 700,000 Hadiths many traced to the Old and New Testament, before Mohammed’s time.

        The Haidith is used by the extremists, and by the Mullahs and Ulama to validate their positions.

        • 0
          0

          How can a Muslim dismiss the Hadith? Don’t sin against the Messenger of Allah (PBUH).

          • 0
            0

            Egalitarians, those who follow reason and investigation and history can dismiss, unless there is support or facts to support it.

    • 0
      0

      Islam is newer than Buddhism. So, even if you establish Daham Pasals in Saudi Arabia, you cannot convert Muslims into Buddhists. Evolution doesn’t take place backwards. There were many religions in the past and disappeared with time. I think Buddhism and Islam also will disappear one day, maybe after a couple of millennium.

      What is wrong in Saudi Arabia propagating Islam when a poor country like Sri Lanka propagate Buddhism?

      By the way, were you there at that wedding ceremony in Kandy, because your name sounds like push balla?

  • 0
    0

    to Pusy.

    You fool- The eastern Muslims are born & descend Muslims- you knowing nothing of history and what a stupid logic are you making, as long as fools like you remain sri lanka will progress, look how you think?

    • 0
      0

      Yes, the truth is scary isn’t it? Produces vehement barely intelligble denials.

      • 0
        0

        Puss, Madrasas are meant for Muslim religious education. Dhaham Pasel is meant for Buddhist education.
        Why are you confusing the two.

        Further religion is a matter of choice. So if Buddhists are not religious why envy the Muslims.

        Fix your own problems brother. Others will look after theirs

        • 0
          0

          Sin Hela,

          “Puss, Madrasas are meant for Muslim religious education. “

          WRONG.

          Madrassa was for Education, not exclusively religious education.

          The Madrassas that tauhgybNatural History and Mathematics got converted to only religious education, and that resulted in the decline of Islamic Science and Investigation.

          So, it is religion, the Mullahs ans Ulama who took over Madrasa curriculum, that is the problem. Same with the Buddhist Temples.

          See what the Catholic schools teach? All subject including Catholicism

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madrasa

          Madrasa (Arabic: مدرسة‎, madrasah pl. مدارس, madāris) is the Arabic word (of Semitic origin; viz Hebrew midrash) for any type of educational institution, whether secular or religious (of any religion). It is variously transliterated as madrasah, madarasaa, medresa, madrassa, madraza, madarsa, medrese, etc. In English the word normally specifically means any type of religious school or college for the study of the Islamic religion, though this may not be the only subject studied. Today, 20,000 Madrassas educate over 1.5 million students per year.[1]

          Neil DeGrasse Tyson – The Islamic Golden Age: Naming Rights

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDAT98eEN5Q

          Published on Mar 18, 2012
          Neil deGrasse Tyson, an American astrophysicist and Director of the Hayden Planetarium, discusses how Islamic scholars contributed to the Islamic Golden Age and how over time independent reasoning (ijthad) lost out to modern institutionalised imitation (taqleed) present in the wider islamic society today.

    • 0
      0

      Islam is funniest religion in the earth… they pray 5 times a day, but getting nothing lol.. what a stupidity. come out of the box. :D :D :D

      • 0
        0

        Civilized World

        All Myth based religions are Funny, unless there is data to support the myths. Pick your religion which gives you the least risk. The Pascal’s Wager.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal's_Wager

        Pascal’s Wager is an argument in apologetic philosophy which was devised by the seventeenth-century French philosopher, mathematician, and physicist, Blaise Pascal. It posits that humans all bet with their lives either that God exists or does not exist. Given the possibility that God actually does exist and assuming the infinite gain or loss associated with belief in God or with unbelief, a rational person should live as though God exists and seek to believe in God. If God does not actually exist, such a person will have only a finite loss (some pleasures, luxury, etc.).[1]

        Pascal formulated the wager within a Christian framework. The wager was set out in section 233 of Pascal’s posthumously published Pensées. Pensées, meaning thoughts, was the name given to the collection of unpublished notes which, after Pascal’s death, were assembled to form an incomplete treatise on Christian apologetics.

        Historically, Pascal’s Wager was groundbreaking because it charted new territory in probability theory, marked the first formal use of decision theory, and anticipated future philosophies such as existentialism, pragmatism, and voluntarism.[2]

        However, the Monks, the Priests and Mullahs get to keep their hegemony.

        Hinduism 330 million gods, rebirth and Nirvana

        Buddhism, Rebirth, Nibbana, Sansara, Triple Gem etc.

        Judaism, Tribal. one God, Heaven Hell,

        Christianity Original Sin, Trinity, One God, Heaven, Hell, Limbo, Purgatory

        Islam, One God. Heaven, and Hell

      • 0
        0

        There are even more funny religions in the world. But, what is sad is the Muslims taking the religion very serious and killing Muslims and non-Muslims alike. Hindus, Buddhists and Christians are also following this path now.

        I think, all the people should leave the God to look after himself and concentrate on humanitarian works. I hate seeing Muslim women and children begging outside every Mosque and the Imam and worshipers not solving their poverty. If 1400 years is not enough for Allah’s Islam to eradicate poverty from Muslims, what is the point in praying five times a day in a mosque?

        • 0
          0

          Ahamad,

          Do you know where the problem lies? Mullah, Ulama Hegemony.

          Madrassa was for Education, not exclusively for religious education.

          How many Engineers, Scientist, Doctors and philosophers did the Religious Masrassas train and produce over the past 1,200 years? None. They produced a lot of Mullahs and Ulema.

          The Madrassas that tauhgybNatural History and Mathematics got converted to only religious education, and that resulted in the decline of Islamic Science and Investigation.

          So, it is religion, the Mullahs ans Ulama who took over Madrasa curriculum, that is the problem. Same with the Buddhist Temples.

          See what the Catholic schools teach? All subject including Catholicism

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madrasa

          Madrasa (Arabic: مدرسة‎, madrasah pl. مدارس, madāris) is the Arabic word (of Semitic origin; viz Hebrew midrash) for any type of educational institution, whether secular or religious (of any religion). It is variously transliterated as madrasah, madarasaa, medresa, madrassa, madraza, madarsa, medrese, etc. In English the word normally specifically means any type of religious school or college for the study of the Islamic religion, though this may not be the only subject studied. Today, 20,000 Madrassas educate over 1.5 million students per year.[1]

          Neil DeGrasse Tyson – The Islamic Golden Age: Naming Rights

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDAT98eEN5Q

          Published on Mar 18, 2012
          Neil deGrasse Tyson, an American astrophysicist and Director of the Hayden Planetarium, discusses how Islamic scholars contributed to the Islamic Golden Age and how over time independent reasoning (ijthad) lost out to modern institutionalised imitation (taqleed) present in the wider islamic society today.

      • 0
        0

        Old Jackass, you seems like a jack in a box.

    • 0
      0

      Fool, read the Hadith.

  • 0
    0

    ALLAHUAKBARU !!!

    Showing her face is haram, but killiing those people with this bazooka is HALAAL

    Long live islam hahahaha :D

    Dear Folks,

    Does allah really want his beautiful woman creation to be like this or is this the fantasy of a deluded, woman harting paedphile who lusted after 6 years old children ?? . . . What has this self styled prophet and hate obsessed warlord done to millions of kind and loving people of Islam ?

  • 0
    0

    We are just day away from a massive Muslim massacre in Syria. US bombing will kill at least 100,000 Muslims in Syria. If the war spreads to Jordan, Iran, Iraq, Turkey, Lebanon, over 1,000,000 Muslims will die within the next few days.

    • 0
      0

      It will be precision hits by tomohawk missiles and drones.
      The leadership only will be taken out.
      US cannot afford civilian casualties.

  • 0
    0

    I am getting message:

    Forbidden

    You don’t have permission to access /wp-comments-post.php on this server.


    From CT to Marwan
    use https://www.colombotelegraph.com/
    https instead of http

  • 0
    0

    AS A MUSLIM, I AM WITH THE JUDGE WHO RIGHTFULLY ASKED THAT STUPID WOMAN TO IDENTIFY HERSELF. HOWEVER, MOST OF THE COMMENTS ABOVE ARE EQUALLY STUPID, SINCE JUST LIKE THE WOMAN THESE IDIOTS TOO DO NOT UNDERSTAND ISLAM.

    • 0
      0

      Mr Anvar Manatunga,

      Please don’t DILUTE Islam and the sanctity of Islamic women.

      Today they tell Muslim women to remove the burqa, tomorrow, everything.

      This has to be nipped in the bud.

      A concerned Muslim woman from Japan.

  • 0
    0

    Battle against God’s Law and man made Laws, which in the present day MML seems to reign supreme. But ultimately it will be God’s Law that will finally win and be accepted as the norm. Man made Laws don’t stand a chance and will be broken time and time again, subjected to amendments including its many versions, created at different periods throughout history, but will not stand the test of time. The momentum has just begun and is slowly but surely building up. Islam and its core values are showing up everywhere, and people are turning defiant to protect it by by living it, in keeping with God’s Law as He would have like it, through many sacrifices that will be made to be pure, good and decent practicing Muslims. Like how Swedish women stand up together in solidarity to beat Islamophobia, French girl attempts suicide after ‘veil attack’, and many other such reports from Muslim perspective, happening around the world.

    • 0
      0

      Marawan.

      “Battle against God’s Law and man made Laws, which in the present day “

      Can you please confirm that it was actually Gods Law. Why?

      The killings, the Wahhabi killing other Muslims, other non-Muslims all point a suspicious finger that it may have been tampered by Satan, the Devil- Shaitan.

      Can you please confirm that this was NOT corrupted by the Devil or Satan.

      This can save man from agony.

  • 0
    0

    Hope this is true.

    “A grim “urgent action memorandum” issued today from the office of President Putin to the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation is ordering a “massive military strike” against Saudi Arabia in the event that the West attacks Syria.

    According to Kremlin sources familiar with this extraordinary “war order,” Putin became “enraged” after his early August meeting with Saudi Prince Bandar bin Sultan who warned that if Russia did not accept the defeat of Syria, Saudi Arabia would unleash Chechen terrorists under their control to cause mass death and chaos during the Winter Olympics scheduled to be held 7-23 February 2014 in Sochi, Russia.”

    • 0
      0

      Fathima Fukushima (aka Lorenzo)

      It’s the kinda comment your erstwhile fellows at LW would believe in and relish at.
      Good for you Lorenzo, you doing a damn good job with the senile, demented lot at LW- keep it up

      • 0
        0

        Chandra aka Osama Bin Ladin’s wife,

        I only copy his great comments for the benefit of the ignorant.

        So Muslims are NOT going to die from a flare up in Syria? Well, we will soon find out! :)

        • 0
          0

          Lester reborn!!!

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.