14 July, 2026

Blog

US-Independence Extravaganza & Iran’s Funeral Diplomacy

By Ameer Ali

Dr. Ameer Ali

There has already been for you a Sign in the two armies that met (in combat): One was fighting in the Cause of Allah, the other resisting Allah; these saw with their own eyes twice their number. But Allah doth support with His aid whom He please(s). In this is a warning for such as have eyes to see” (Al-Quran, 3:13).

This quote from the Quran refers to the famous Battle of Badr that took place in Mecca in the year 624 CE between 314 Muslims led by the Prophet Muhammad and Aby Sufyan’s estimated 1000 men from the Quraishi tribe in which the smaller Muslim army won miraculously. Before discussing the relevance of this war to the present context a few remarks about Donald Trump’s 250th year celebrations.

With 850,000 fireworks and an estimated crowd of around 150,000 in comparison to the 500,000 which thronged to watch the Bicentennial parade in Washington in July 1976, President Donald Trump’s 250th Anniversary celebrations were a mellowed affair. Even nature seems to have turned against this tamasha, because the fear of extreme heat conditions had kept away hundreds of thousands from attending. Yet, to Trump the celebrations marked “one of the most joyous and glorious milestones of all times”.

What is so glorious about those 250 years when that country was at war for 229 of those years fighting 36 major wars and conducting 469 military interventions at an estimated cost of nearly $12 trillion? The Iran war this year alone, according to Moody’s Analytics, had cost $132 billion and according to Public Policy Professor Linda Bilemes of Harvard Kennedy School the war expected to reach a trillion dollars at the end. US economy was built on the blood and sweat of its indigenous communities and African slaves. Today, US economy already lagging China has reached a point of inflection pointing towards stagflation. This dark side of the “glorious milestones” was conveniently hidden away and Trump’s ceremonial address to the crowd set the tone for his future re-election campaign by focussing on the so-called “Communist menace … the enemy of July 4, 1776” by which he really meant the Democrats.

But what made this celebration more memorable was what took place in another corner of the world – Iran, where a six-day mourning for the burial of its supreme Leader Ali Khamenei who was assassinated on 28 February by Trump’s US fighter bombers had begun amidst a crowd of millions. On that Saturday alone and according to the semi-official Iranian news agency Tasnim, an estimated 2.2 million mourners were said to have gathered and a record crowd of 20 million is expected attend over the six days. While none of the Western nations joined the mourning, either coincidentally or intentionally when the Saudi delegates were getting ready to pay their respect to Khamenei’s coffin the verse from the Quran cited above was heard being recited. The Battle of Badr and the victory of the Prophet and his 314 warriors over a much larger enemy marked a turning point in the history of Islam and that event is still being commemorated annually with special prayers by Muslims all over the world. The recital of that verse and that too when the Saudi delegation was preparing to pay their respects seem to be a shot at diplomacy to remind the Saudis and other Gulf regimes that their black sheep behaviour in backing US would cost them dearly. As if to drive that message further, US CENTCOM Retired General Frank Mckenzie has urged his government to shift those bases from Southern Gulf to Israel. Moreover, a new generation of Iranian political analysts insists on maintaining military pressure on those states to get any trade deal with them, because the previous neighbourhood policy had taken Iran nowhere.

The fragile ceasefire between US and Iran with a fourteen-point memorandum of understanding has now come to an end to keep Israel happy. Israel’s pressure on Trump to end this deal cannot be ruled out. While Trump has now labelled Iranian leadership as “sick people”, Iran in turn has declared that the “era of (US’) bullying and extortion is over”. Tit for tat bombing has started and once gain US bases in Kuwait and Bahrain had come under Iranian missile attack. According to Wall Street Journal there seems to have been a difference in interpretation regarding item 5 of that 14-point memorandum, which deals with safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz. In the end and despite Trump’s jingoism there is no easy passage through the Hormuz Strait without Iran’s cooperation, and that cooperation will not come through military bullying and coercion but through dialogue and negotiation. In the meantime, Iran has retaliated US bombing by attacking US bases and other US facilities in Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar and Jordan. These states would be the ultimate losers in this war. Their vassalage to US and perhaps to Israel will intensify. Will Trump therefore agree to another ceasefire? That cannot be ruled out altogether. As oil prices increase and consumers feel the cost-of-living pressure Trump’s jingoism must come to an end. Trump’s tariffs and wars are proving costly to US consumers even though Iran’s inflation has also surged by 80% according to one estimate. Ultimately, if the war continues a global economic recession is unavoidable.

The most contentious issue in any future negotiation between US and Iran would be around Iran’s ambition to become another nuclear power to maintain a power balance with Israel. Israel wants that be stopped at any cost. Once Iran’s nuclear progress is crippled Israel will target Turkey which has similar intentions. Even US bombing of Iraq and Libya earlier were to prevent those countries emerging as threat to the ruling Middle East Order. After destroying Iran’s nuclear capability Israel is determined to do the same to Turkey. Iran through its refusal to kowtow to US bullying is sending a strong message to the Arab leaders that their continuing dependence on that declining superpower for defence purposes would cost them dearly by turning them into vassal states, and that it is time to change the ruling post-World War Middle East Order.

Latest comments

  • 10
    0

    It is the height of hypocrisy for Trump to paint the Iranians as terrorists for alleged attempts to kill him, when he himself, with his toady Netanyahu, took the credit for killing most of Iran’s leaders, along with their children and grandchildren.

    • 0
      0

      OC,
      heard a scum kick the bucket. Good Riddance to Bad Rubbish.
      Hopefully one more to go.
      Mid Term came early.

  • 3
    2

    “Iran’s Funeral Diplomacy”
    Not a very complimentary terminology.
    I remember how Dudly Senanayake’s funeral was made into a week long show by JRJ for political capital.

    • 4
      1

      Didnt Sirima do the same with Banda’s funeral??

      • 0
        0

        Here you go again.
        Sirima reluctantly entered politics only in the 1960 elections after the SLFP failed to capture enough seats in March 1960 to form a government? She was an absolute novice then.
        You can sound a little more intelligent I guess.

  • 9
    0

    One has to admire the people of Iran for standing up to aggression by Israel and its supporting western powers.
    We all are EAGER to see the end of this war that was started when there was a real possibility of negotiated settlement between Iran and USA.
    The PM of Israel needs the war to go on for ever so that he doesn’t have to face the courts regarding his corruption. Mr Netanyahu will use all his means to sabotage the peacefully negotiated settlement between USA & Iran. Mr N had been able to convince Donald Trump that it was easy to a regime change by bumping off the top leaders of Iran. Understandably, Iran had a well thought out plan to carry on the leadership with new ones.
    The result of this stupid war war is affecting all the third world countries very badly. Stop the war and start fighting the poverty Hunger around the globe!

  • 5
    0

    During the last 30 or 40 years, there had been changes in the Muslims’ CULTURE in SL. The dress codes for women had changed. Was it the influence of Saudi Regime or other Muslim countries? Did they provide aid for these changes? It is for the good of the country the building in the east was taken over by the government controlled university. SL Muslims need to identify themselves as minorities in the country & continue to fight for rights of ALL minorities.

    • 8
      2

      Yes, Transnational Arab funding, primarily from Saudi Arabia and Gulf states, significantly fuelled radicalization and cultural erasure among Sri Lankan Muslims. By heavily financing mosques, madrasas, and educational networks in the Eastern Province town of Kattankudy, these donors promoted orthodox Salafism. This imported ideology marginalized traditional Sufi practices, while Arabic and Middle Eastern attire displaced centuries-old Tamil Islamic culture. Un-vetted philanthropic networks were actively exploited by extremist ringleaders, including operatives linked to the 2019 Easter bombings. Initially ignoring this Arabisation as a political strategy to divide the island’s Tamils, the Sri Lankan government is now forced to monitor unregulated charities to curb the export of militant ideologies.

    • 7
      2

      Arab NGOs and Gulf-based donors have historically funneled substantial capital into Sri Lanka’s Eastern Province—particularly Kattankudy—to establish orthodox Salafist institutions that marginalise traditional Sufi practices. This pervasive financing drives a distinct wave of Arabisation, pressuring local Muslims to abandon traditional Tamil Islamic culture and attire in favour of Middle Eastern norms, while mainstream Muslim communities largely fail to speak up against this growing religious extremism and ghettoisation. Backed by hardline educational networks and extremist literature, this environment provided fertile ground for radical preachers and ultimately cultivated the operative networks behind the 2019 Easter Sunday bombings. While the Sri Lankan state historically tolerated this creeping radicalisation as a tool to marginalise the island’s Tamil population, the catastrophic scale of this foreign funding and its violent fallout have finally forced the government to re-evaluate its foreign ties and aggressively scrutinise unregulated charities.

      • 0
        0

        What do you think is India doing in the N&E and now Hill country?
        Bigotry always gets the better of reason.

  • 8
    1

    In one of the European countries the Government has banned the loudspeakers announcing the time for prayers. This should be looked into by the NPP government. The use of LOUDSPEAKERS in places of worship should be prohibited. This contributes to NOISE POLLUTION. This can be part of the “ CLEAN SRI LANKA “ actions program!

  • 7
    1

    There had been SLACKNESS in advancing the “CLEAN SL” movement.
    Had we been doing so the DENGUE EPIDEMIC would not have come about.
    POYA days can be used to mobilise the public for environmentally friendly activities. News media too should promote and support these activities

  • 5
    6

    The writer’s reference to the infamous battle of Badr that took place in 624 AD is instructive. History records that in the battle Muhammad routed his Quraysh brethren in Mecca whose caravans he had been raiding and who had reacted contemptuously to his prophetic call.. This battle with its brutal slaughter occured 450 years before the much maligned Crusades which sought to reverse the trend of global violent Islamic expansion and hegemony. There is much ignorance about the historical timeline which tells its own story. It is important to set the record straight.
    At any rate the victory at Badr was the legendary turning point for Islam.The battle of Badr is considered the first practical example of what had since come to be known and feared as the Islamic doctrine of Jihad – a doctrine that precipated the crusades that began centuries later as well as underlies the conflicts of today.
    The ruthless tyrant Ayatollah Ruhoallah Khomeni who deposed the Shah of Iran and wrested power 1979 and who is revered by those who rule Iran today was a powerful and inveterate proponent of Jihad. That is why the present regime in Iran is a threat to the world and needs to be overthrown.

    • 4
      1

      Professor ANIE,
      Why argue about stuff which happened 1400 years ago? For that matter, much of the Quran is taken from the Bible, which in turn descends from the Jewish Torah and earlier books.
      What is wrong with Muhammad killing people when the Bible too encourages it ?
      Exodus 21:12–17 — includes death penalties for various offenses.
      Deuteronomy 20:16–17 — commands the destruction of certain peoples in the conquest narrative.
      Deuteronomy 13:6–10 — prescribes severe punishment, including death, for enticing others to worship other gods.
      1 Samuel 15:2–3 — Saul is told to attack Amalek and destroy everything.
      Joshua 6:20–21 — Jericho is destroyed, with all living things put to the sword.
      Numbers 31:17–18 — commands killing male children and non-virgin women in the aftermath of war.

  • 1
    4

    Many who arrogantly take sides in this conflict know nothing of the history of the region. They are driven by blind prejudice, slaves to the usual postures and platitudes pertaining to the Palestinian question and victims of anti semetic propaganda by radical Islamists. In 637 AD according to the Nobel Prize winning author VS Naipaul just 5 years after the death of Mohommad the Arabs began to overun Persia. All Persia’s great past ( ie. the past before Islam ) was declared a time of blackness. The aggressive pursuit of Jihad has wiped Persia off the map and replaced it with the radical Islam of today’s Iran. No wonder the US Israel and other nations are apprehensive about the current regime in Iran with its nuclear ambitions , which reveres the fanatical Ayatollah Khomeini who came to power in 1979. Khomeini is quoted as saying ” Islam makes it incumbent on all adult males, provided they are not disabled or incapacitated to prepare themselves for the conquest of countries so that the writ of Islam is obeyed in every country in the world . . .” Not surprisingly in 1985 Iran’s permanent delegate to the UN declared that ” the very concept of human rights was a “Judeo-Christian invention and inadmissible to Islam. And according to Ayatollah Khomeini one of the “:most despicable sins” of the Shah whom he deposed was that Iran was one of the original nations that drafted and approved the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948 !!

    • 0
      0

      “Many who arrogantly take sides in this conflict “
      Is not this person taking sides, imagining that he is on moral high ground?

  • 4
    0

    Shah of Iran had been a puppet dancing to the tune of the Western powers especially USA. The western powers main aim is to exploit countries with resources such as oil , minerals etc as well as be an hindrance to these countries economically progressing. There are definitely NO genuinely helpful countries that the developing nations can hope for.
    The current Government of Iran needs to stand firm on tackling the war mongers who attacked a country first and try to initiate a regime change.
    Professor is not right to criticise the regime in Iran.

  • 6
    0

    “the much maligned Crusades “
    Massacres carried out in the name of Jesus cannot be bad after all. Can they be?

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.

leave a comment