{"id":193147,"date":"2018-09-03T23:46:47","date_gmt":"2018-09-03T18:16:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/?p=193147"},"modified":"2018-09-07T13:59:29","modified_gmt":"2018-09-07T08:29:29","slug":"presidential-term-limit-is-unconditional-not-just-prospective","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/presidential-term-limit-is-unconditional-not-just-prospective\/","title":{"rendered":"Presidential Term-Limit Is Unconditional: Not Just Prospective\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>By <a href=\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/?s=Laksiri+Fernando\">Laksiri Fernando<\/a> <span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">&#8211;<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_92325\" style=\"width: 160px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/Laksiri-Fernando.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-92325\" class=\"size-thumbnail wp-image-92325\" src=\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/Laksiri-Fernando-150x150.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/Laksiri-Fernando-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/Laksiri-Fernando-50x50.jpg 50w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 150px) 100vw, 150px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-92325\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Dr. Laksiri Fernando<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/?s=19th+Amendment\">19<sup>th<\/sup> Amendment<\/a> or more specifically now highly debated Article 31 (2) of<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>the Constitution on the term-limit of the President should be considered in its overall application and not specific to the future or the past. That is the way it is amended\/drafted in the constitution like in the case of the 18<sup>th<\/sup> Amendment.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Whatever the criticisms that we may have on the Attorney General\u2019s Department, it is difficult to imagine that they or others behind the drafting were unaware of the possible legal ramifications when they were finally drafting the 19<sup>th<\/sup> Amendment according to the government\u2019s specifications. They must have had some constraints due to political requests\/pressure on other matters i.e. \u2018powers, functions and duties of the President,\u2019 but in the case of Article 31 (2), it is difficult to believe that it was the case.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>There is no apparent contradiction between the modified \u2018powers, functions and duties of the President\u2019 and the way he\/she should be elected and the required qualifications. Both are in the democratic direction.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The mere debate of prospective or retrospective application of<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>constitutional amendments is completely outdated. There are so many other ways of amending or drafting constitutions (i.e. sunset, sunrise, continuity or transitional clauses etc.) and what is important to ask is whether a particular clause or article is conditional or unconditional. Article 31 (2) in<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>the 19<sup>th<\/sup> Amendment is unconditional and applies in the overall context of the constitution and office of the President.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Comparative Examples<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<p>The Thirteenth Amendment in America outlawed slavery in 1865. Did this mean it outlawed \u2018slavery\u2019 for the future and not for the past, and the slaves before should have remained slaves? It is mere constitutional rhetoric that people like G. L. Peiris, Sarath N. Silva and Nihal Jayawickrama have been uttering in recent times directly and indirectly, arguing for yet another presidential contest for Mahinda Rajapaksa, and the only merit of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/disqualifying-twice-elected-presidents-a-failed-endeavour\/\">Dr Nihal Jayawickrama\u2019s article<\/a> is that he has taken great pains to justify his claim\/s.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The 18<sup>th<\/sup> Amendment abolished the term-limit by repealing Article 31 (2) in the original constitution of 1978. Did the amendment say it applies retrospectively? No. The 19<sup>th<\/sup> Amendment reintroduced it again of course with several other changes. The other changes were there even in the 18<sup>th<\/sup> Amendment. Both applied to the future as well as to the past or more correctly in overall terms. How come otherwise, Mahinda Rajapaksa managed to contest the January 2015 elections? Under the original 1978 constitution as per the Article 31 (2), he was disqualified to contest again after he was elected to the presidency for the second time in January 2010. This must be the very reason why Nihal Jayawickrama has put forward a convoluted additional argument that the Presidency after the 19<sup>th<\/sup> Amendment is completely different to the Presidency before, or to the original constitution of 1978.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>What does the Article 31 (2) exactly say?<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u201cNo person who has been twice elected to the office of President by the People, shall be qualified thereafter to be elected to such office by the People.\u201d<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>We should specifically note the term \u2018thereafter.\u2019 This means Mahinda Rajapaksa was disqualified until the 18<sup>th<\/sup> Amendment was introduced in September 2010. Now he is disqualified under the 19<sup>th<\/sup> Amendment again which has the same effect as before. That is a correction to the previous democratic aberration. The aberration was in respect of the repeal of the term-limit with the characteristic tendency towards authoritarianism. How come that those who were silent on the absence of a \u2018retrospective clause\u2019 in the 18<sup>th<\/sup> Amendment in repealing the term-limit now thunder about its absence in the 19<sup>th<\/sup> Amendment?<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Undesirability of Retrospection?<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<p>Prospective vs retrospective debate is not completely limited to Sri Lanka although it is largely the past and not the present. In respect of the United States Akhil Reed Amar (<i>America\u2019s Unwritten Constitution: The Precedents and Principles We Live By, <\/i>2012) raised the following questions with legitimate inferences, ironically as if he was talking about Sri Lanka.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u201cOn which side of the line did the Nineteenth Amendment fall? Did it merely create new rules that would apply purely prospectively as with the Eighteenth Amendment? Or did it call for fully retrospective application, as with the Nuremburg prosecutions? Or was some intermediary approach called for? If so, what were it contours?\u201d<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>He was talking in respect of how to interpret constitutional amendments. In my opinion, Sri Lanka needs a new approach (which is already there among more enlightened people) where constitutional interpretation should be based on not whether a clause or an amendment is prospective or retrospective, but whether it is conditional or unconditional. If the application is unconditional<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>or overall, the prospective vs retrospective debate does not arise. There are several conditionalities in the 19<sup>th<\/sup> Amendment but not in respect of the two term-limit or the (five year) tenure of the President. Therefore, they are unconditional.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Legislation in retrospection is generally considered inconsistent with the principles of rule of law. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.alrc.gov.au\/publications\/common-law-principle-4\">As the Australian Law Reform Commission states<\/a> \u201cOne element of the rule of law is that laws are capable of being known in advance so that people subject to those laws can exercise choice and order their affairs accordingly. It follows that laws should not retrospectively change legal rights and obligations, or create offences with retrospective application.\u201d <span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>However, the \u2018undesirability of retrospection\u2019 does not apply in the same manner in the case of constitutional matters as in the case of ordinary law. Because a constitution is fundamental law of a country and when a Parliament or a Parliament plus people at a referendum approves a new constitution or a constitutional amendment they do so (presumably) under considerable consideration. Therefore, in a constitution, if a particular article, provision or clause is not specifically conditional, its application is overall.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Already Determined<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court (SC) has already given a determination, if not a verdict, in a similar matter on Article 30 (2) of the 19<sup>th<\/sup> Amendment which says \u201cThe President of the Republic shall be elected by the People and shall hold office for a term of five years.\u201d Whatever the reason, as we know, the incumbent President Maithripala Sirisena requested the Supreme Court to determine whether he could continue until January 2021, for six years, as he was elected in January 2015 before the 19<sup>th<\/sup> Amendment. Irrespective of the lack of a retrospective clause in respect of 30 (2), which was enacted in May 2015, the SC determined that the incumbent President\u2019s term in office is limited to five years from January 2015. Because the specific amendment to the tenure (from six to five) was unconditional.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>It is well known that the former President Mahinda Rajapaksa declared that time, if the SC determines in favour of President Sirisena, he himself could run again for the Presidency (<i>Indian Express<\/i>, 15 January 2018). However unfortunately, things didn\u2019t turn up that way. His tongue-tied position thereafter was an implicit acceptance of the verdict that the absence of a retrospective clause would not preclude its application in overall terms or even in \u2018retrospective terms.\u2019 <span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>A Historical Irony<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<p>Sri Lanka is well known for passing legislation in retrospect, when it suits political ambitions or necessary for political vengeance. In 1971, the then government passed the Criminal Justice Commission (CJC) legislation to prosecute the JVP leaders, making previously noncriminal acts suddenly criminal. Otherwise many of those who were prosecuted did not indulge in criminal acts although the whole insurrection was a \u2018criminal offence,\u2019 in my opinion, in political terms. There were so many well-meaning people who were unfortunately incarcerated. The most ironic in the present situation is that Nihal Jayawickrama who now opposes introspection was a key person who brought the CJC legislation in 1971 as the Permanent Secretary to the Ministry of Justice.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The general democratic reservations on retrospective application that they \u2018infringe the principles of rule of law\u2019 are in respect of ordinary legislation or law, covering legal rights and obligations and criminal offenses. However, this is not the case in respect of constitutions or constitutional amendments. Otherwise, what is the difference between fundamental (constitutional) law and ordinary law? For example, when a fundamental rights chapter of a constitution is changed, that applies in overall effect (present, past and future) empowering the whole population on those new rights. The same goes unfortunately for obligations, restrictions or reductions in rights. That can be done by a new constitution or constitutional amendment but not by an ordinary law without infringing the principles of rule of law. Because the principles of rule of law while emerges in and generally consistent with international law and democratic and justice principles, hinges within a particular constitution in a country. That is another reason why a constitution or an amendment itself should be democratic and consistent with justice principles and should not unnecessarily place conditions retrospectively (i.e. disqualifications on dual citizens) unless some democratic principles are necessary in overall terms, like in the case of term-limits and limited tenure. <span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>What Matter\u2019s in Interpretation?<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<p>The people\u2019s or their representative\u2019s intent is primarily important, in interpreting an amendment, unless it is blatantly negated in legal drafting. There is no such a blunder in the case of the term-limit (re) imposed for the election of President in the 19<sup>th<\/sup> Amendment, whatever the other defects. The intent can safely be identified as the \u2018need to reimpose the accepted democratic principle of two term-limit, which was there in the original constitution, and accepted by democratic and civilized nations\u2019 (See Michael Korzi, \u2018<i>Presidential Term Limits in American History: Power, Principles and Politics, <\/i>2011). <span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>This is about the qualification or rather the disqualification of a person who would intend to stand for the presidential election under the current circumstances. The right question to ask is \u2018have you been elected twice by the people to the presidency?\u2019 If the answer is affirmative, the person is roundly disqualified. Neither Mahinda Rajapaksa nor Chandrika Kumaratunga can say, \u2018yes, but before the 19<sup>th<\/sup> Amendment in May 2015.\u2019 They were even disqualified before the 18<sup>th<\/sup> Amendment in September 2010. Because this was exactly the same in Article 31 (2) in the original Constitution of 1978 which became deleted for ambitious political reasons in the 18<sup>th<\/sup> Amendment. Therefore, the democratic aberration was in the 18<sup>th<\/sup> Amendment and not in the 19<sup>th<\/sup>. It is quite inappropriate for a person like Nihal Jayawickrama to raise the issue as an apparent \u2018rights issue\u2019 in the case of MR or CBK. <span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Are democratic principles valid considerations for constitutional interpretation? For G. L. Peiris or Sarath N. Silva, those democratic principle might not be relevant. But it would be strange, if Nihal Jayawickrama disregard these considerations. Under modern circumstances, legal principles and democratic principles are increasingly the same and should be the same. Even if the legal scholars appear to discard the democratic principles, the political science students and scholars should uphold them in constitutional interpretation.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Conclusion <span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<p>It is true that the argument by Nihal Jayawickrama about the absence of retrospective application of the term-limit in Article 31 (2),<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>particularly hinges on the premise that what is created by the 19<sup>th<\/sup> Amendment is a New Presidency and not the Old Presidency or a Reformed Presidency. Therefore, in his \u2018legal opinion\u2019 the term-limit disqualification does not apply to those who held office prior to the 19<sup>th<\/sup> Amendment<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>This argument is farfetched although it may have a democratic merit when it is taken in isolation to interpret \u2018powers, functions and duties\u2019 of the President. He goes to the extent of saying that the Presidency that is \u2018newly created\u2019 by the 19<sup>th<\/sup> Amendment is \u2018essentially non-executive, primarily symbolic and ceremonial.\u2019 This is highly questionable. How come that such a drastic change is achieved without referring to the people at a referendum as required by the constitution? If he is an independent scholar, Nihal Jayawickrama should criticize this lacunae or the misadventure, without trying to justify the eligibility of this or that past President for further election. <span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":26,"featured_media":92325,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,2186,46,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-193147","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-colombotelegraph","category-featured-news","category-constitutional-reforms","category-editorial"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Presidential Term-Limit Is Unconditional: Not Just Prospective\u00a0 - Colombo Telegraph<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/presidential-term-limit-is-unconditional-not-just-prospective\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Presidential Term-Limit Is Unconditional: Not Just Prospective\u00a0 - Colombo Telegraph\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"[&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/presidential-term-limit-is-unconditional-not-just-prospective\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Colombo Telegraph\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-09-03T18:16:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-07T08:29:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/Laksiri-Fernando.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"237\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"263\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Laksiri Fernando\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Laksiri Fernando\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/presidential-term-limit-is-unconditional-not-just-prospective\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/presidential-term-limit-is-unconditional-not-just-prospective\/\",\"name\":\"Presidential Term-Limit Is Unconditional: Not Just Prospective\u00a0 - Colombo Telegraph\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/presidential-term-limit-is-unconditional-not-just-prospective\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/presidential-term-limit-is-unconditional-not-just-prospective\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/Laksiri-Fernando.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-09-03T18:16:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-07T08:29:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/#\/schema\/person\/ba664bcbbf228984b735f2321054aded\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/presidential-term-limit-is-unconditional-not-just-prospective\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/presidential-term-limit-is-unconditional-not-just-prospective\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/presidential-term-limit-is-unconditional-not-just-prospective\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/Laksiri-Fernando.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/Laksiri-Fernando.jpg\",\"width\":\"237\",\"height\":\"263\",\"caption\":\"Dr. Laksiri Fernando\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/presidential-term-limit-is-unconditional-not-just-prospective\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Presidential Term-Limit Is Unconditional: Not Just Prospective\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/\",\"name\":\"Colombo Telegraph\",\"description\":\"In journalism truth is a process\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/#\/schema\/person\/ba664bcbbf228984b735f2321054aded\",\"name\":\"Laksiri Fernando\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d35f75ac5b0232f7513159abc570c284937d59e47e433b5eeb87b272e9891708?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d35f75ac5b0232f7513159abc570c284937d59e47e433b5eeb87b272e9891708?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Laksiri Fernando\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/author\/laksiri-fernando\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Presidential Term-Limit Is Unconditional: Not Just Prospective\u00a0 - Colombo Telegraph","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/presidential-term-limit-is-unconditional-not-just-prospective\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Presidential Term-Limit Is Unconditional: Not Just Prospective\u00a0 - Colombo Telegraph","og_description":"[&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/presidential-term-limit-is-unconditional-not-just-prospective\/","og_site_name":"Colombo Telegraph","article_published_time":"2018-09-03T18:16:47+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-07T08:29:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":237,"height":263,"url":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/Laksiri-Fernando.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Laksiri Fernando","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Laksiri Fernando","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/presidential-term-limit-is-unconditional-not-just-prospective\/","url":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/presidential-term-limit-is-unconditional-not-just-prospective\/","name":"Presidential Term-Limit Is Unconditional: Not Just Prospective\u00a0 - Colombo Telegraph","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/presidential-term-limit-is-unconditional-not-just-prospective\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/presidential-term-limit-is-unconditional-not-just-prospective\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/Laksiri-Fernando.jpg","datePublished":"2018-09-03T18:16:47+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-07T08:29:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/#\/schema\/person\/ba664bcbbf228984b735f2321054aded"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/presidential-term-limit-is-unconditional-not-just-prospective\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/presidential-term-limit-is-unconditional-not-just-prospective\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/presidential-term-limit-is-unconditional-not-just-prospective\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/Laksiri-Fernando.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/Laksiri-Fernando.jpg","width":"237","height":"263","caption":"Dr. Laksiri Fernando"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/presidential-term-limit-is-unconditional-not-just-prospective\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Presidential Term-Limit Is Unconditional: Not Just Prospective\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/","name":"Colombo Telegraph","description":"In journalism truth is a process","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/#\/schema\/person\/ba664bcbbf228984b735f2321054aded","name":"Laksiri Fernando","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d35f75ac5b0232f7513159abc570c284937d59e47e433b5eeb87b272e9891708?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d35f75ac5b0232f7513159abc570c284937d59e47e433b5eeb87b272e9891708?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Laksiri Fernando"},"url":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/author\/laksiri-fernando\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/Laksiri-Fernando.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193147","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/26"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=193147"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193147\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":193311,"href":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193147\/revisions\/193311"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/92325"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=193147"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=193147"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=193147"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}