{"id":244993,"date":"2025-12-20T23:28:45","date_gmt":"2025-12-20T17:58:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/?p=244993"},"modified":"2025-12-29T03:54:56","modified_gmt":"2025-12-28T22:24:56","slug":"does-the-us206-million-imf-rapid-financing-instrument-pose-a-debt-risk-to-sri-lanka","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/does-the-us206-million-imf-rapid-financing-instrument-pose-a-debt-risk-to-sri-lanka\/","title":{"rendered":"Does The US$206 Million IMF Rapid Financing Instrument Pose A Debt Risk To Sri Lanka?"},"content":{"rendered":"

By\u00a0Asoka S. Seneviratne<\/a>\u00a0\u2013<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"

Prof. Asoka.S. Seneviratne<\/p><\/div>\n

\u201cIn times of crisis, the worst decisions are made by those who mistake delay for caution.\u201d <\/em>\u2014 Peter Drucker<\/i><\/i><\/p>\n

Sri Lanka\u2019s decision to secure US$206 million<\/b> under the International Monetary Fund\u2019s Rapid Financing Instrument (RFI)<\/b> following Cyclone Ditwah<\/i> has triggered an important and legitimate public debate. At its core lies a fundamental policy question: Does this emergency financing decision expose Sri Lanka to renewed debt vulnerability, or does it represent a rational, low-risk response to an extraordinary shock?<\/b><\/b><\/p>\n

Economic think tank Verit\u00e9 Research<\/b>, through its Executive Director Dr. Nishan de Mel<\/b>, has raised concerns regarding the effective cost<\/b>, exchange-rate exposure<\/b>, and opportunity cost<\/b> of IMF RFI borrowing. In parallel, the Government argues that speed, certainty, and credibility<\/b> are decisive factors in a post-disaster context, where delays themselves can generate economic and social losses.<\/p>\n

This article undertakes a cost\u2013benefit assessment<\/b> of the approved RFI facility by:<\/p>\n

1. Systematically presenting Verit\u00e9 Research\u2019s concerns<\/b> under five analytical headings<\/p>\n

2. Presenting the Government\u2019s justification<\/b> under three core arguments<\/p>\n

3. Assessing the validity of both positions<\/b> under Sri Lanka\u2019s present macro-fiscal constraints<\/p>\n

4. Drawing on international experience<\/b> with RFI usage<\/p>\n

5. Concluding whether the US$206 million RFI carries extended debt risk<\/b><\/b><\/p>\n

The analysis ultimately supports the view that this RFI does not constitute a renewed debt trap<\/b>, nor does it undermine Sri Lanka\u2019s reform trajectory\u2014provided it remains limited, targeted, and exceptional<\/i>.<\/p>\n

A.verit\u00e9 Research\u2019s Concerns: A Structured Review<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

1. Effective Cost of IMF RFI Is Higher Than Headline Rates<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

Verit\u00e9 Research argues that IMF borrowing is often misunderstood as \u201ccheap financing.\u201d While the headline interest rate<\/b> appears low, the effective cost<\/b> rises once the following are incorporated:<\/p>\n

* IMF surcharges<\/b><\/b><\/p>\n

* Special Drawing Rights (SDR)<\/b> valuation mechanisms<\/p>\n

* Exchange-rate movements<\/b><\/b><\/p>\n

According to Verit\u00e9\u2019s estimates, the effective dollar cost<\/b> of RFI financing could exceed 6%<\/b>, while the rupee-adjusted cost<\/b> could exceed 11%<\/b>, particularly if currency depreciation materializes.<\/p>\n

This challenges the perception that IMF emergency financing is automatically the lowest-cost option available to Sri Lanka.<\/p>\n

2. Time-Based Surcharges Increase Long-Term Cost<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

Verit\u00e9 further highlights that IMF facilities impose time-based surcharges<\/b>, adding 2.75%<\/b> if outstanding credit remains beyond three years.<\/p>\n

From a debt-management perspective, this raises concerns that short-term emergency financing can quietly transform into medium-term high-cost debt<\/b> if rollover pressures emerge or fiscal consolidation slows.<\/p>\n

3. Domestic Borrowing Could Be Cheaper in Rupee Terms<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

Verit\u00e9 notes that Sri Lanka\u2019s three-year Treasury bond yields<\/b>, hovering around 9%<\/b>, are currently below the effective rupee cost<\/b> of RFI borrowing.<\/p>\n

From a narrow cost-comparison perspective, this suggests that domestic borrowing<\/b> may appear cheaper, particularly if exchange-rate stability is maintained.<\/p>\n

4. Availability of Alternative Dollar Financing<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

Verit\u00e9 proposes that Sri Lanka could issue a domestic US-dollar-denominated bond<\/b>, targeted at residents and the diaspora, potentially at yields close to 5%<\/b>, given that local banks already mobilize dollar deposits at similar rates.<\/p>\n

Such an instrument, they argue, could meet disaster-recovery needs without incurring IMF surcharges or policy signaling risks.<\/p>\n

5. Preference for Grants and Concessional Financing<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

Finally, Verit\u00e9\u2019s preferred option is non-debt financing<\/b>, recommending that Sri Lanka seek disaster-recovery grants<\/b> amounting to roughly 1% of GDP<\/b> (around US$1 billion) from multilateral and bilateral partners.<\/p>\n

From a long-term sustainability perspective, this is undoubtedly the optimal outcome<\/b>\u2014but it assumes availability, speed, and certainty that may not exist in practice.<\/p>\n

B. Government\u2019s Position: The Case for Urgency and Certainty<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

1. Speed Matters in Post-Disaster Macroeconomics<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

The Government\u2019s primary argument is urgency<\/b>. Cyclone Ditwah<\/i> created immediate pressures on:<\/p>\n

* Foreign exchange liquidity<\/p>\n

* Essential imports<\/p>\n

* Social protection outlays<\/p>\n

* Infrastructure restoration<\/p>\n

IMF RFI is specifically designed for rapid disbursement<\/b>, without the prolonged negotiations associated with alternative instruments. In disaster economics, delays carry real costs<\/b>, including output loss, unemployment, and inflationary pressure.<\/p>\n

Verit\u00e9\u2019s alternatives, while theoretically sound, require time<\/b>\u2014time Sri Lanka does not possess in a post-shock environment.<\/p>\n

2. RFI Does Not Undermine the EFF or Debt Restructuring<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

Unlike new bilateral or market borrowing, RFI financing is explicitly compatible<\/b> with IMF-supported reform programs. The Government correctly notes that:<\/p>\n

* The RFI does not alter debt restructuring commitments<\/b><\/b><\/p>\n

* It does not dilute fiscal targets<\/b><\/b><\/p>\n

* It does not require renegotiation of the IMF program framework<\/b><\/b><\/p>\n

This preserves policy credibility<\/b>, which is critical for market confidence.<\/p>\n

3. The Quantum Is Limited and Non-Transformational<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

At US$206 million<\/b>, the RFI represents:<\/p>\n

* Roughly 0.25% of GDP<\/b><\/b><\/p>\n

* 26% of Sri Lanka\u2019s IMF quota<\/b><\/b><\/p>\n

* A fraction of annual external financing needs<\/p>\n

This is not a scale capable of fundamentally altering Sri Lanka\u2019s debt dynamics<\/b>. Risk arises not from the instrument itself, but from excessive reliance<\/b>\u2014which is clearly not the case here.<\/p>\n

C. Assessing the Competing Claims: Economics Over Ideology<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

Are Verit\u00e9\u2019s Cost Concerns Valid?<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

Yes\u2014in a pure cost-comparison framework<\/b>. Over a multi-year horizon, IMF surcharges and SDR dynamics can raise effective costs.<\/p>\n

Are Verit\u00e9\u2019s Alternatives Immediately Feasible?<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

Not fully. Grant mobilization, ESG bonds, and domestic dollar bonds require:<\/p>\n

* Institutional preparation<\/p>\n

* Legal adjustments<\/p>\n

* Market testing<\/p>\n

* Negotiation timelines<\/p>\n

These are medium-term tools<\/b>, not post-disaster liquidity instruments<\/b>.<\/p>\n

Is the Government\u2019s Urgency Argument Convincing?<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

Yes. Disaster economics prioritizes liquidity, certainty, and speed<\/b> over theoretical cost minimization.<\/p>\n

D. International Experience: Has RFI Created Debt Traps Elsewhere?<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

The IMF RFI has been widely used following exogenous shocks<\/b>, including:<\/p>\n

* Pakistan (2022)<\/b> \u2013 Flood recovery financing<\/p>\n

* Ecuador (2016)<\/b> \u2013 Earthquake response<\/p>\n

* Haiti (2010)<\/b> \u2013 Post-earthquake stabilisation<\/p>\n

* Mozambique (2019)<\/b> \u2013 Cyclone Idai<\/p>\n

* Nepal (2015)<\/b> \u2013 Earthquake recovery<\/p>\n

In none of these cases did RFI financing alone<\/b> trigger a sovereign debt crisis. Where debt risks materialized, they were driven by pre-existing structural weaknesses<\/b>, not the RFI instrument itself.<\/p>\n

Empirical evidence therefore suggests that RFI is a shock-absorber, not a debt accelerator<\/b>, when used sparingly.<\/p>\n

E. Why the US$206 Million RFI Does Not Create Extended Risk<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

1. It Is Emergency Liquidity, Not Structural Borrowing<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

RFI is short-term, front-loaded, and exceptional.<\/p>\n

2. It Preserves Reform Credibility<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

Unlike market borrowing, it signals policy discipline<\/b>, not distress.<\/p>\n

3. The Scale Is Too Small to Alter Debt Trajectories<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

Sri Lanka\u2019s debt sustainability hinges on growth, revenue reform, and governance<\/b>\u2014not a US$206 million inflow.<\/p>\n

4. The Counterfactual Risk Is Higher<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

Without rapid liquidity, Sri Lanka risks:<\/p>\n

* Exchange-rate pressure<\/p>\n

* Import compression<\/p>\n

* Social instability<\/p>\n

* Reform fatigue<\/p>\n

These risks exceed the marginal cost<\/b> of the RFI.<\/p>\n

Conclusion: A Defensible Decision Under Extraordinary Circumsta<\/b>nces<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

The debate over the IMF RFI is not a contest between prudence and recklessness, but between theoretical optimization<\/b> and real-world urgency<\/b>.<\/p>\n

Verit\u00e9 Research performs a valuable role by highlighting cost structures and long-term discipline. However, in a post-disaster context<\/b>, the Government\u2019s decision to secure US$206 million under the IMF RFI is economically defensible, proportionate, and low-risk<\/b>.<\/p>\n

This facility does not<\/b>:<\/p>\n

* Compromise debt sustainability<\/p>\n

* Undermine reform commitments<\/p>\n

* Signal fiscal indiscipline<\/p>\n

On the contrary, it buys time<\/b>, stabilizes expectations<\/b>, and protects recovery momentum<\/b>.<\/p>\n

The true risk lies not in using the RFI\u2014but in confusing emergency tools with permanent financing strategies<\/b>. As long as Sri Lanka avoids that mistake, the RFI remains exactly what it was designed to be: a bridge, not a burden<\/b>.<\/p>\n

*The writer, among many served as the Special Advisor to the Office of the President of Namibia from 2006 to 2012 and was a Senior Consultant with the UNDP for 20 years. He was a Senior Economist with the Central Bank of Sri Lanka (1972-1993). He can be reached via asoka.seneviratne@gmail.com<\/b><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[…]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2725,"featured_media":242663,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,46,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-244993","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-colombotelegraph","category-constitutional-reforms","category-editorial"],"yoast_head":"\nDoes The US$206 Million IMF Rapid Financing Instrument Pose A Debt Risk To Sri Lanka? - Colombo Telegraph<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/does-the-us206-million-imf-rapid-financing-instrument-pose-a-debt-risk-to-sri-lanka\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Does The US$206 Million IMF Rapid Financing Instrument Pose A Debt Risk To Sri Lanka? - Colombo Telegraph\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"[…]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/does-the-us206-million-imf-rapid-financing-instrument-pose-a-debt-risk-to-sri-lanka\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Colombo Telegraph\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-12-20T17:58:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-12-28T22:24:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/anura-kumara-dissanayake-and-kristalina-georgieva-IMF.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"450\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Asoka. S. Seneviratne\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Asoka. S. Seneviratne\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/does-the-us206-million-imf-rapid-financing-instrument-pose-a-debt-risk-to-sri-lanka\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/does-the-us206-million-imf-rapid-financing-instrument-pose-a-debt-risk-to-sri-lanka\/\",\"name\":\"Does The US$206 Million IMF Rapid Financing Instrument Pose A Debt Risk To Sri Lanka? - Colombo Telegraph\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/does-the-us206-million-imf-rapid-financing-instrument-pose-a-debt-risk-to-sri-lanka\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/does-the-us206-million-imf-rapid-financing-instrument-pose-a-debt-risk-to-sri-lanka\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/anura-kumara-dissanayake-and-kristalina-georgieva-IMF.jpeg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-20T17:58:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-12-28T22:24:56+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b111fcf4253ada71e638c0d3ad232b92\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/does-the-us206-million-imf-rapid-financing-instrument-pose-a-debt-risk-to-sri-lanka\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/does-the-us206-million-imf-rapid-financing-instrument-pose-a-debt-risk-to-sri-lanka\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/does-the-us206-million-imf-rapid-financing-instrument-pose-a-debt-risk-to-sri-lanka\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/anura-kumara-dissanayake-and-kristalina-georgieva-IMF.jpeg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/anura-kumara-dissanayake-and-kristalina-georgieva-IMF.jpeg\",\"width\":800,\"height\":450},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/does-the-us206-million-imf-rapid-financing-instrument-pose-a-debt-risk-to-sri-lanka\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Does The US$206 Million IMF Rapid Financing Instrument Pose A Debt Risk To Sri Lanka?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/\",\"name\":\"Colombo Telegraph\",\"description\":\"In journalism truth is a process\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b111fcf4253ada71e638c0d3ad232b92\",\"name\":\"Asoka. S. Seneviratne\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c9924cc30581258b289539a6a7328050c6f1748b943ca65d2095a928c7dc65a8?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c9924cc30581258b289539a6a7328050c6f1748b943ca65d2095a928c7dc65a8?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Asoka. S. Seneviratne\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/author\/asssen\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Does The US$206 Million IMF Rapid Financing Instrument Pose A Debt Risk To Sri Lanka? - Colombo Telegraph","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/does-the-us206-million-imf-rapid-financing-instrument-pose-a-debt-risk-to-sri-lanka\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Does The US$206 Million IMF Rapid Financing Instrument Pose A Debt Risk To Sri Lanka? - Colombo Telegraph","og_description":"[…]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/does-the-us206-million-imf-rapid-financing-instrument-pose-a-debt-risk-to-sri-lanka\/","og_site_name":"Colombo Telegraph","article_published_time":"2025-12-20T17:58:45+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-12-28T22:24:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":800,"height":450,"url":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/anura-kumara-dissanayake-and-kristalina-georgieva-IMF.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Asoka. S. Seneviratne","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Asoka. S. Seneviratne","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/does-the-us206-million-imf-rapid-financing-instrument-pose-a-debt-risk-to-sri-lanka\/","url":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/does-the-us206-million-imf-rapid-financing-instrument-pose-a-debt-risk-to-sri-lanka\/","name":"Does The US$206 Million IMF Rapid Financing Instrument Pose A Debt Risk To Sri Lanka? - Colombo Telegraph","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/does-the-us206-million-imf-rapid-financing-instrument-pose-a-debt-risk-to-sri-lanka\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/does-the-us206-million-imf-rapid-financing-instrument-pose-a-debt-risk-to-sri-lanka\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/anura-kumara-dissanayake-and-kristalina-georgieva-IMF.jpeg","datePublished":"2025-12-20T17:58:45+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-28T22:24:56+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b111fcf4253ada71e638c0d3ad232b92"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/does-the-us206-million-imf-rapid-financing-instrument-pose-a-debt-risk-to-sri-lanka\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/does-the-us206-million-imf-rapid-financing-instrument-pose-a-debt-risk-to-sri-lanka\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/does-the-us206-million-imf-rapid-financing-instrument-pose-a-debt-risk-to-sri-lanka\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/anura-kumara-dissanayake-and-kristalina-georgieva-IMF.jpeg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/anura-kumara-dissanayake-and-kristalina-georgieva-IMF.jpeg","width":800,"height":450},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/does-the-us206-million-imf-rapid-financing-instrument-pose-a-debt-risk-to-sri-lanka\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Does The US$206 Million IMF Rapid Financing Instrument Pose A Debt Risk To Sri Lanka?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/","name":"Colombo Telegraph","description":"In journalism truth is a process","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b111fcf4253ada71e638c0d3ad232b92","name":"Asoka. S. Seneviratne","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c9924cc30581258b289539a6a7328050c6f1748b943ca65d2095a928c7dc65a8?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c9924cc30581258b289539a6a7328050c6f1748b943ca65d2095a928c7dc65a8?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Asoka. S. Seneviratne"},"url":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/author\/asssen\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/anura-kumara-dissanayake-and-kristalina-georgieva-IMF.jpeg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244993","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2725"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=244993"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244993\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":244995,"href":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244993\/revisions\/244995"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/242663"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=244993"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=244993"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.colombotelegraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=244993"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}