21 May, 2019

Blog

Yahapālanaya Suffers From Lack Of Foresight

By Somapala Gunadheera –

Somapala Gunadheera

Of late Yahapalayaya has faced several embarrassments due to failure of foresight. It failed to clear the refuse dump at Meetotamulla, before it came crashing down on the neighbourhood killing many residents and causing heavy damage to property. It carried on with Uma Oya unadjusted to the topography, until it led to a public outcry and severe damage to the environment. The latest is the protest from the Maha Sangha regarding the proposed Constitution. May be that some of these problems were the leftover from the previous regime. It is pointless blaming the predecessors more than two and half years into power. The previous regime was rejected because they were not acceptable to the majority that brought in the current dispensation to make amends. That calls for foresight on the part of the successors. They are never short of ministries, institutions and experts devoted to planning. But the above were not anticipated until they exploded in crisis. This unpreparedness reminds one of the ancient rustic saying that refers to looking for cover only after the urge to defecate has arisen.

Constitution Making

What the Sangha Nayakas have pointed out to the Government is understandable. The Constitution making process is not a devil as black as painted in certain quarters. In my piece, “Updating the Law for release and peace” published in the Colombo Telegraph I said, “Yet another problem that has created a dilemma for the Government is how to create a new Constitution bringing out reconciliation between the majority and minorities by reassuring both sides. Some elements on the majority side are genuinely worried that efforts at reconciliation would lead to the extermination of the majority and they are prepared to lay their lives and those of many others down, to sabotage such a ‘Sirisangabo’ Act…

The minorities are suspicious that the majority is trying to take them for a ride with their siren songs of promises. They need concrete action to have faith in what is promised. They have been deceived in the past. This mutual distrust stands in the way of reconciliation, as it had for the last half century. What is needed in this situation is fair exchange on both sides. Each of them must give and take the optimum possible. Let us apply this approach to Constitution-making.

Prior information leads to reconciliation

Activists on the majority side are not asking for more through amending the existing Constitution. They will be happy if it is left as it is. Provided what is already granted to them by the original document is unchanged and guaranteed by the proposed Constitution, they do not mind any equality rights granted to the minorities. For instance, if the eminent position given to their race and religion is left intact, they do not mind equality rights given to the minorities. They want to be primus inter pares – leader among equals. The Minorities should have no objection to this arrangement provided their rights of equality are not limited to mere words, given today and violated tomorrow. Their new rights like freedom of language should be entrenched provisions in the new Constitution, supported by maximum penalties against their breach. This change of attitude can be deduced from statements made by the leaders in the North after the end of hostilities.

Only this position had to be explained clearly to both sides before Constitution making started in camera unknown to the parties affected by the secret move. In fact I mentioned the importance of bringing the Sangha into confidence in my “Who will bell the cat?”,  responding to a piece by Prof. H.L. Seneviratne in the Colombo Telegraph expecting the Sangha to rise in rebellion against the narrow and corrupt political values imposed on the country by the previous rulers.

It was my belief that such a moment had to be necessarily initiated by the State. This has been the practice even in the past when Sangãyanãs were actively organized by the government of the day. I still believe that the Sangha would not rise in rebellion unless they fall prey to a third party that would lead them astray to serve their own narrow agendas. The Sangha are piqued that the Government had kept them in the dark about a matter on which they had a prime hand in the past. It is remarkable that they cut across the petty nikãya difference to issue a joint warning to those in power. Theirs was not the sole protest by the Sangha against the confidential move. They were preceded by the Kotte chapter some time back. I had this factor in my mind when I insisted in my response to Prof. Seneviratne, “For an optimum effect on the society at large, this assignment (of putting the Sangha in the know) should be finalized before the new Constitution is framed and promulgated.” I said so as I expected the Sangha to revolt against a secretive attempt to dislodge what they have been preserving for centuries. They would not have moved a finger if they were told in advance that the supremacy of the ancient race and religion would not be affected by the exercise and the aim was to safeguard the rights of the minorities on humanitarian grounds, in a way that would not result in a fragmentation of the island.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 1
    0

    i fully agree
    as I have said before the govt must be proactive not reactive on todays burning issues

  • 2
    0

    reconciliation between communities cannot be acheved by taking away rights of one community and giving it to another.That will only create disharmony as we see today. all communities have to be treated by one law. The Rule of Law and good governance must apply equally. The politicians are trying ways to create a constitution that helps themselves to benefit like the constitution of JRJ that made the President so powerful that he could only not make a man a woman and vice versa.

  • 2
    0

    On 08 January 2015 we mandated the present government to harness the very visible corruption. The new GoSL has failed and we are back to day to day governance. The garbage collapse is an example – action ceases once the media interest ceases.
    The structure that has gotten established is difficult to penetrate. There is a “If you cannot beat them, join them” attitude. People with foresight are “Making hay while the sun shines”. What a foresight!!

  • 0
    0

    Successive Govts. after JR have lacked foresight (at least JR brought the country forward which had been going backwards until then) & the present Govt. is no better. It’s no surprise, having an uneducated, indecisive & weak President, lacking in leadership & a clear vision (who also has a questionable track record). Since SWRD had the bright idea of exploiting the ‘Sinhala Buddhist’ sentiment, all political parties have joined the band wagon. There have been politicians who have even given up their faith & appear to have, as far as the public are concerned, embraced Buddhism in order to further their political ambitions.

    Most Buddhists in Sl are hypocrites because they fail to keep the promise when they observe ‘pansil’ at the regular ‘alms giving’ to the Sanga, from which, they believe (really?) will wash away their sins. I will be surprised how many of the present day Buddhist clergy actually understand the teaching of the Buddha, judging by the actions of despicable thugs in robes like Gnanasara, & even the Maha Sanga, who do not condone this behavior. Certainly, monks can support the Govt. without getting actively involved in politics but their primary purpose is to provide spiritual guidance to the people. If a monk believes that he can contribute to the welfare of the people only by actively engaging in politics, then he should first leave the robes. My understanding of Buddhism is that a person becomes a monk to give up material wealth in order to attain Nirvana sometime in the cycle of life but in the case of ‘political’ monks, how many are willing to give up their comfortable lifestyle & have refused a salary or the perks that go with job in this already overcrowded Parliament, paid for by the suffering masses? In fact, Mr Nagananda Kodithuwakku will be able to say how many monks have made a profit by selling their car permits.

    Until we have a political leader who has the vision & has become a politician for the honour it brings & not the privileges, & who will not exploit the Buddhist Sinhala sentiment, Sl will continue with short sighted governance.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 300 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically shut off on articles after 10 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.