25 June, 2026

Blog

Why Sinhalese Buddhist Nationalists Adore Israel?

By Punsara Amarasinghe

Dr. Punsara Amarasinghe

The explicit support demonstrated by the Sinhalese Buddhist community in Sri Lanka for Israel during the war in Gaza stands in stark contrast to the anti-Israeli mass rallies organized by leftist, liberal, and Muslim groups within the country. This persistent support for Israel, even as the state faces widespread international criticism for its military actions in Gaza, suggests the presence of a significant ideological motivation. In the Indian context, pro-Israeli sentiment is often associated with the Hindutva ideology, which positions Israel as a strategic barrier against perceived Islamic expansionism. However, the Sinhalese Buddhist fascination with Israel and Jewish identity appears to be driven by more complex and nuanced factors that extend beyond concerns about Islamic expansionism. Therefore, it is essential to investigate the underlying factors that have influenced the Sinhalese Buddhist community’s affinity for the State of Israel.

While the recorded history of Sri Lanka offers only limited evidence regarding the historical presence of Jews, the Buddhist nationalist movement in Sri Lanka demonstrated an affinity for Zionism, viewing it as a model for national revival. Anagarika Dharmapala, the legendary figure of Sri Lankan Buddhist nationalism, was the first modern Sinhalese Buddhist leader who admired the Jews and the Zionist movement. Dharmapala frequently expressed pronounced animosity toward the Muslim community in Sri Lanka by comparing them to European Jews, reflecting a form of racialized discourse that was prevalent in Western societies at the time. Notwithstanding these overtly anti-Semitic remarks, Dharmapala also appeared to be intrigued by perceived historical similarities between the Sinhalese and the Jewish people. In an article published in Sinhala Buddhist, a nationalist newspaper in British Ceylon, Dharmapala asserted that both the Sinhalese and the Jews demonstrated comparable valor in preserving their respective identities.

A significant similarity between Zionist ideology and Sinhalese Buddhist ideology lies in their shared emphasis on distinguishing themselves from other civilizations, highlighting a perceived uniqueness rooted in longstanding traditions. Historically, the Sinhalese have consistently celebrated their distinct status as a race, untainted by external influences. This preoccupation closely mirrors the Jewish concept of being a chosen people. In his influential work Ceylon: A Divided Nation, British academic B. H. Farmer explores how historical narratives have shaped both Jewish and Sinhalese identities, fostering a unique sense of collective status. The detailed accounts in the Mahavamsa, the principal chronicle of Sinhalese Buddhism that documents the nobility of ancient Sinhalese monarchs and their support of Buddhism, are analogous to the Books of Kings in the Old Testament. According to Farmer, the Sinhalese Buddhist psyche, grounded in Mahavamsa narratives that claim a special role as the true guardians of Buddhism, demonstrates clear parallels with the Jewish belief in their status as God’s chosen people.

In the turbulent period following Sri Lanka’s independence, Sinhalese nationalists promoted mass hysteria by invoking unsubstantiated historical parallels between Sinhalese and Jewish communities, thereby shaping nationalist rhetoric that fostered hostility toward Tamils. When Sri Lanka’s nationalist-oriented Defence Secretary, N.Q. Dias advised Sirimavo Bandaranaike’s government to strengthen the armed forces in anticipation of Tamil separatism; his initial reports proposed the establishment of agricultural settlements as buffer zones to deter potential Tamil expansion in the island’s Northern Province. Many Sinhalese nationalists, including N.Q. Dias, were deeply invested in the belief that Sinhalese Buddhists were entitled to the land as guardians of Buddhism, and the idea of establishing settlements in the North—where Tamils held a demographic advantage—was partly inspired by Jewish settlement policies implemented by the State of Israel. By emulating Jewish nostalgia for a glorified past recorded in scripture, Sinhalese nationalists sought to colonize the North in order to revive the perceived bygone glory of Sinhalese civilization as portrayed in the Mahawamsa. Despite differences in historical context and mechanisms, both cases share a key commonality: the fervent assertion of a divinely or historically “chosen” status attributed to their respective communities.

In post-civil war Sri Lanka, the efforts forged by many Buddhist nationalists to construct a resemblance between Jewish and Sinhalese identities seemed to have taken a turn glorifying the speculated historical connectivity between the two groups without any provable historical evidence. This tendency was born when Sinhalese chauvinist writers like Dr. Mirando Obeyasekere advocated for propagating King Ravana’s legacy as an alternative history that challenged the conventional historiography of the island, dominated by the historical chronicles such as the Mahavamsa. The pseudo-scientific narrative begotten in the post-civil war context in Sri Lanka contained many stories that were intended to perpetuate the historical relations between Sinhalese and Jews. In one of his best-selling works, Dr. Obeyasekere brings a hypothesis claiming Sri Lanka’s mythical king Ravana sent one of his relatives called “Judah” to establish a land in the Middle East, which later became Israel. This claim has not been supported by any concrete historical evidence proving it to be an imagination of Obeyasekere. Yet the effect that emerged from this fabricated story made a profound impact upon the Sinhala nationalists in their irrational justification for making Sinhalese links to Israel.

The aforementioned story, based on myths, is a quintessential example that reveals the efforts of the Sinhalese to connect their identity with the Jewish community as a way of showing their distinctiveness. Although post-independent Sri Lanka’s relations with the State of Israel took many twisted turns, the general psyche of the Sinhalese Buddhist nationalists reflects a sharp emotional allegiance to Israel. It should be noted that this fascination is completely driven by myths, legends, and beliefs that harbor Sinhalese nationalists to portray them as a chosen nation to defend Buddhism, which is a sheer emulation of the Jewish faith in themselves as God’s chosen people.

Latest comments

  • 3
    2

    One hit on the head and the nail is down!

  • 10
    6

    Sinhala Buddhist people are different from Sinhala Buddhist racists.
    It is the latter like the Hindutva fascists that admire Zionist fascists,

    • 2
      2

      “Sinhala Buddhist people are different from Sinhala Buddhist racists.
      It is the latter like the Hindutva fascists that admire Zionist fascists,”

      Who are the Sinhala Buddhists and who are the Sinhala Buddhist racists? How do you differentiate these two groups? what is the proportion of the each group out of the total Sinhala people? What is your purpose of comparing it with Hindutuwa facists and Zionist farcists? Why can’t you talk about Islamic racists or farcists?
      Do you think special status of Buddhism is from Sinhala Buddhist racists?

      • 4
        2

        They are very much like the Tamil Hindu fascists that you should know well.

        • 1
          0

          Dear Readers,
          Sinhala Buddhists do not, in my opinion, constitute real Buddhism. I have met Buddhists from Korea, Japan, Europe, Tibet, India, and other parts of the world. The majority of people in Sri Lanka are persuaded to practice AMISA puja-dominated Buddhism, while actual Buddhist values are kept hidden from followers. I have gotten to know my close relatives back in my home country as a result of Katina-PINKAMA holding it above for no logical reason; nonetheless, Katina-Pinkama or similar rituals are misunderstood and have lately become a part of practical Buddhism due to certain monks’ actions. We need a lot more good monks to preach significant “Bana SESSIONS” rather than promoting joker-monks to convert our SB-buddhists to true Buddhists who follow the principles espoused by Buddha.

  • 2
    2

    I dont know of any Sinhala Buddhists who align with Jews ?

    What ever anagarika dharmapala said is not really a thing. Thats just like how tamils compare themselves ro jews. a meaningless statement.

    • 2
      2

      Hello a14455,
      There is a difference between Jews and Zionists. Jews are a people (as well as having a Religion, Judaism). There are even Christian Zionists, many in the US.
      Best regards

      • 0
        1

        I am aware . but I don’t think there is any link for either.

  • 6
    0

    “Dr. Obeyasekere brings a hypothesis claiming Sri Lanka’s mythical king Ravana sent one of his relatives called “Judah” to establish a land in the Middle East, which later became Israel. This claim has not been supported by any concrete historical evidence “
    This sort of fabricated history stems from the insecurity of a people who are uncomfortable with who they actually are. We are a mediocre theocratic agrarian society, influenced in every way by being located next to a huge multi-faceted civilization . Are our languages or religions indigenous?
    Expect more charlatans to pop up peddling fairy tales to gullible consumers.

  • 3
    3

    Some of our gullible Sinhalese will swallow the Judah syllables hook, line, and sinker, so they will be different from the Tamils, even though they might soon have to flee to Tamil Nadu. Jews are going around the world from Burma to China, digging into religious and historical texts, picking out phonemes, and saying “There! This is the proof that we originally come from here and therefore this is our land.”
    Still, opening up our land to about 10,000 fleeing Jews is a noble thing because these people are suffering. They will be also very good for the economy. See how well they have built up USA.

    • 3
      0

      This woman belives in aa god who not one has ever seen other than in their dreams and talks about gullible sinhalese. She should go dto China and see how well it is built up.

      no piss smelling subways like in NY no homeless . pratically no crime. Insted of believing old books written by medieval peasants

      • 2
        0

        Don’t forget her god father is Trump.

      • 1
        0

        a14455
        “believing old books written by medieval peasants”
        I guess that you include the Mahavamsa.
        *
        The Chinese do not reject ancient wisdom altogether.
        They take what is valid and appropriate and leave the rest,

        • 1
          1

          Mahavansa was written by medivial monks and that bias is plain to see. They took some real history and made a nice fairytale out of some parts. That is why these old books have to be taken with a grain of salt. And unlike some people it’s not considered “gospel ” what ever that means

          • 1
            0

            a14455 / January 11, 2026
            As Lankan expatriates, we have seen and contrasted the ideas of many individuals who have different beliefs, but there are also many people in the US who believe in Trump because to biblical affinities. Similarly, South Asian nations would find it difficult to abandon their customs. This explains why poverty is more prevalent in that region of the world than in any other. The Mahanwansa was composed during the Middle Ages and was not updated by the knowledgeable monks who might have done so. Even if scientists and other professionals have found new facts over time, the followers should be taught appropriately. But there would be no possibility for improvement for individuals who are fixated on falsehoods.

            • 0
              0

              Poverty is more prevalent in colonized places. and these places were colonized for centuries. Look how well or poorly Europe is doing without the riches from the colonies.

              The Mahawansa is a chronicle of the sinhalese people. but like most books myths written they have a touch of the fantastic. Things like the Sinhabahu chronicle or the vision of Dutugemunu being taken to heaven. I dont think it could be corrected even if one wanted to.

              • 0
                0

                HongKong and Makau are the exceptions.

          • 1
            0

            Why do some works become written by medieval peasants while others get exempted as written by medieval monks?
            Any religious text needs to be read with more than a grain of salt.

            • 0
              0

              same thing

  • 2
    2

    Sinhala Buddhist Nationalist may not have heard of the word “Israeled”.
    Soon Arugambay will be Israeled and in the long run the entire sri lanka will be Israeled.

    “Israeled” is a new word coined to describe the act of Isaraelis occupying a piece of land and then claim that bit was given to them by God as Gods Chosen people.

    Arugambay will soon be claimed by IDF/Israelis as a their land given to them by God and they are the chosen people to live there.

    Sri Lanka will soon be next.

    • 0
      0

      No. The jews have no place in Sri Lanka,

  • 1
    2

    A rather silly article. Jews were displaced from their homeland (Israel) for around two millennia. The Sinhalese were never displaced. In fact, they did the exact opposite. Fight off South Indian (Chola) invaders and then European colonizers, with varying degrees of success. The Jewish Diaspora is very old, their experience is unique.

    • 1
      0

      Dear Lester
      Certainly there are Jews that can legitimately call Palestine “home”, such as those who lived there in peace among their neighbours during the runup to WWI and the general defeat of the ottoman Empire but I never knew that Northern European, Eastern European Germanic/Slavic types had an ancient homeland in the Middle East from which they were displaced from.

  • 0
    0

    This superficial article by someone connected with the Hebrew University is an example of pure hyp. Can the writer give some statistics to show that most “Sinhala Buddhists” adore Isreal? As he has links with Hebrew University, people who meet him may be wittingly or unwittingly showing a pro-Israeli stance.
    This author makes the common error that the Mahawamsa is a Sinhala-Buddhist chauvanist story. A correct evaluation of the Mahawamsa was given by Dr. Karthigesu Indrapala. Reading him, and looking at the Mahawamsa, you realize that the Pali Chronicles (Deepawamsa written may be 1st century BC, Mahawamsa written 5th century CE, Chulawamsa (13th to 18th centuries) are a heroic composition adulating Buddhist good deeds of Lanka’s kings. The author monks did NOT care if the kings were “Sinhalese” as long as they were Kshatriya Buddhists. Many kings are recorded to have clear Dravidian (Pandiyan, Chola, Chera etc) geneology, with no intent to hide. No claim of pure “sinhala” characteristic (the bugbear of modern Identity politics) is in the Mahwamsa. In fact, lacking a Kshatriya “sinhala” successor to the Kandyan throne, they unhesitatingly brought a Telegu-speaking Nayakkar South India Prince, requiring only that he showed a Buddhist facade.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.