21 January, 2026

Blog

A Better Sri Lanka For All

By Jehan Perera

Jehan Perera

The government is rebuilding the cyclone-devastated lives, livelihoods and infrastructure in the country after the immense destruction caused by Cyclone Ditwah. The President Anura Kumara Dissanayake has been providing exceptional leadership by going into the cyclone affected communities in person, to mingle directly with the people there and to offer encouragement and hope to them. A president who can be in the midst of people when they are suffering and in sorrow is a true leader. In a political culture where leaders have often been distant from the everyday hardships of ordinary people, this visible presence would have a reassuring psychological effect.

The international community appears to be comfortable with the government and has been united in giving it immediate support. Whether it be Indian and US helicopters that provided essential airlift capacity or cargo loads of relief material that have come from numerous countries, or funds raised from the people of tiny Maldives, the support has given Sri Lankans the sense of being a part of the world family. The speed and breadth of this response has contrasted sharply with the isolation Sri Lanka experienced during some of the darker moments of its recent past.

There is no better indicator of the international goodwill to Sri Lanka as in the personal donations for emergency relief that have been made by members of the diplomatic corps in Sri Lanka. Such gestures go beyond formal diplomacy and suggest a degree of personal confidence in the direction in which the country is moving. The office of the UN representative in Sri Lanka has now taken the initiative to launch a campaign for longer term support, signalling that emergency assistance can be a bridge to sustained engagement rather than a one-off intervention.

Balanced Statement

In a world that has turned increasingly to looking after narrow national interests rather than broad common interests, Sri Lanka appears to have found a way to obtain the support of all countries. It has received support from countries that are openly rivals to each other. This rare convergence reflects a perception that Sri Lanka is not seeking to play one power against another, and balancing them, but rather to rebuild itself on the basis of stability, inclusiveness and responsible governance.

An excerpt from an interview that President Dissanayake gave to the US based Newsweek magazine is worth reproducing. In just one paragraph he has summed up Sri Lankan foreign policy that can last the test of time. A question Newsweek put to the president was: “Sri Lanka sits at the crossroads of Chinese built infrastructure, Indian regional influence and US economic leverage. To what extent does Sri Lanka truly retain strategic autonomy, and how do you balance these relationships?”

The president replied: “India is Sri Lanka’s closest neighbour, separated by about 24 km of ocean. We have a civilisational connection with India. There is hardly any aspect of life in Sri Lanka that is not connected to India in some way or another. India has been the first responder whenever Sri Lanka has faced difficulty. India is also our largest trading partner, our largest source of tourism and a significant investor in Sri Lanka. China is also a close and strategic partner. We have a long historic relationship—both at the state level and at a political party level. Our trade, investment and infrastructure partnership is very strong. The United States and Sri Lanka also have deep and multifaceted ties. The US is our largest market. We also have shared democratic values and a commitment to a rules-based order. We don’t look at our relations with these important countries as balancing. Each of our relationships is important to us. We work with everyone, but always with a single purpose – a better world for Sri Lankans, in a better world for all.”

Wider Issues

The president’s articulation of foreign relations, especially the underlying theme of working with everyone for the wellbeing of all, resonates strongly in the context of the present crisis. The willingness of all major partners to assist Sri Lanka simultaneously suggests that goodwill generated through effective disaster response can translate into broader political and diplomatic space. Within the country, the government has been successful in calling for and in obtaining the support of civil society which has an ethos of filling in gaps by seeking the inclusion of marginalised groups and communities who may be left out of the mainstream of development.

Civil society organisations have historically played a crucial role in Sri Lanka during times of crisis, often reaching communities that state institutions struggle to access. Following a meeting with CSOs, at which the president requested their support and assured them of their freedom to choose, the CSOs mobilised in all flood affected parts of the country, many of them as part of a CSO Collective for Emergency Response. An important initiative was to undertake the task of ascertaining the needs of the cyclone affected people. Volunteers from a number of civil society groups fanned out throughout the country to collect the necessary information. This effort helped to ground relief efforts in real needs rather than assumptions, reducing duplication and ensuring that assistance reached those most affected.

The priority that the government is currently having to give to post-cyclone rebuilding must not distract it from giving priority attention to dealing with postwar issues. The government has the ability and value-system to resolve other national problems. Resolving issues of post disaster rebuilding in the aftermath of the cyclone have commonalities in relation to the civil war that ended in 2009. The failure of successive governments to address those issues has prompted the international community to continuously question and find fault with Sri Lanka at the UN. This history has weighed heavily on Sri Lanka’s international standing and has limited its ability to fully leverage external support.

Required Urgency

At a time when the international community is demonstrating enormous goodwill to Sri Lanka, the lessons learnt from their own experiences, and the encouraging support they are giving Sri Lanka at present, can and must be utilised. The government under President Dissanayake has committed to a non-racist Sri Lanka in which all citizens will be treated equally. The experience of other countries, such as the UK, India, Switzerland, Canada and South Africa show that problems between ethnic communities also require inter community power sharing in the form of devolution of power. Countries that have succeeded in reconciling diversity with unity have done so by embedding inclusion into governance structures rather than treating it as a temporary concession.

Sri Lanka’s present moment of international goodwill provides a rare opening to learn from these experiences with the encouragement and support of its partners, including civil society which has shown its readiness to join hands with the government in working for the people’s wellbeing. The unresolved problems of land resettlement, compensation for lost lives and homes, finding the truth about missing persons continue to weigh heavily on the minds and psyche of people in the former war zones of the north and east even as they do so for the more recent victims of the cyclone.

Unresolved grievances do not disappear with time. They resurface periodically, often in moments of political transition or social stress, undermining national cohesion. The government needs to ensure sustainable solutions not only to climate related development, but also to ethnic peace and national reconciliation. The government needs to bring together the urgency of disaster recovery with the long-postponed task of political reform as done in the Indonesian province of Aceh in the aftermath of the 2004 tsunami for which it needs bipartisan political support. Doing so could transform a national tragedy into a turning point for long lasting unity and economic take-off.

Latest comments

  • 6
    1

    Gehan Perera is interesting human being or chameleon. While I agree most of he has written in this article he was blowing his trumpet for Ranil Wickramasinghe before the election promoting him as economic savior of Sri Lanka Condemning NPP and Anura Kumara.

    • 7
      0

      Jack: Many people changed before the elections. If not, how did the AKD win the Presidency and receive 159 seats in the Parliament?

      That change I welcome. The people have learned to view political matters beyond party and personality mirrors. That perception teaches a valuable lesson to political parties and their leaders.

    • 0
      2

      J
      Have you heard of the weathercock?
      They do not have it in meteorological stations anymore.

  • 7
    2

    “A Better Sri Lanka For All”
    The natural disaster along with the bankruptcy should have given an opportunity to resolve with honest realisation of truth that a combined effort from both Sinhalese speaking people and Tamil speaking people. Of course the past 77 years of politics and political culture should be analysed throughly to understand why this island failed itself in all aspects of governance and it is time to think about what can be now or how can we change our system to eliminate the barriers for the better Sri Lanka. A better Sri Lanka means it is better for all communities or all different language speaking people within this island. AKD or NPP have the opportunity to resolve most of the issues of the people not by one political party but making all communities to feel that they belongs to this island by each communities get the same level of protection or same kind of justice together.

    • 4
      2

      AKD/NPP should not think about that it is their political party have to resolve everything under their rule. They should realise that this opportunity will come again because it is an election based democracy. If they really want to remain in power they need to do more preparations and make sure that they change the political culture and the change in the system where no one can violate the principle of governance. The political party system should be reviewed with strict rules about leadership, time limits, and other factors. The unitary system should be changed with sharing power.

      • 3
        7

        Rest assured that AKD will be all ears to listen to these words of wisdom.
        Very probably VP lost because the sage was silent at the time.

  • 0
    0

    A better Srilanka for all ? Will Hewage say it in English ? Handun MBA ?
    How about Vijitha ? Vijitha will start but the crowd won’t be there when
    he finish it . Lal , no doubt will make it in Sinhala for Trump to hire out a
    translator . We do have shiploads of funny men with dreams that are only
    dreams . Who is going to make us a better country and with what ? Did
    JVP teach and learnt in the past to do what it is doing today ? I mean their
    armed struggles ? We can safely say the 76 year rulers were trained to do
    whatever they had been doing . They did what they were born to do . And
    the present lot ? Where is their change ? Why are these guys madly
    breaking English into pieces displaying their stupidity to the whole world ?
    The guys who do not understand the value of clear public speech , the
    meaning of a speech , are they going to make a better country and for all ?
    Answering without understanding the question ? People today truly have a
    big problem of getting to know these guys before anything else .

  • 0
    0

    Has JVP changed ? People were informed ? World community
    understands what these guys speak ? If you get the right answers ,
    a better Srilanka is feasible .

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.