22 June, 2026

Blog

Child Abuse Within Religious Institutions: Addressing It With Pragmatic Solutions Rather Than Sensationalism

By Harendra de Silva

Vidyajyothi Prof. Harendra de Silva

We should expect a situation similar to the well-documented occurrences in the Catholic Church in the West. Some may consider this to be mainly due to celibacy in both religions. However, it is not the only factor. The phenomenon of “samaneras” (novice monks) being abused in “pirivenas” (monastic )—similar to altar and choir boys in the Catholic Church—triggers an intergenerational, vicious cycle of pedophilia. Although there may be many willing adult women with various agendas, children are less demanding, more amenable, and more obedient, making them easier to control, especially considering the institutional wealth these entities command.

Although this issue is rampant everywhere and must be stopped, the bashing of the Sangha and Dhamma by certain YouTubers is driven mainly by financial gain and does not address the real issue. While the problem needs to be tackled, and public sensitization and awareness are necessary, sensationalism must stop. Now, “enough is enough.”

The reluctance of public figures, including politicians, to address this issue is disheartening. However, whatever is stated must remain neutral and not be politicized for personal gain or to bash opponents. We must also realize that the powerbase of governance relies heavily on religious institutions that wield an enormous amount of power, creating a mutually beneficial relationship. It is high time that politicians decide to cut this cord of mutual dependence. This dynamic is not confined to Sri Lanka alone; in India, the power of the Right Wing Nationalist government pivots around Hindu nationalists, and in the majority-Christian USA, although Right Wing Nationalist (MAGA) Evangelical Christians such as late Charlie Kirk or Pete Hegseth appear to hold control on the surface, ultimate influence is determined by the financial power of AIPAC.

What we must do now must be planned judiciously.

I believe that:

It is the responsibility of the government to address this issue. Although the President, at the request of the Mahanayakas, is to take steps to amend the 1931 Vihara and Devalagam Act and re-establish a “Dharmadhikaranaya” with the authority to handle disciplinary matters concerning Buddhist monks, the government should not pass total responsibility onto the Sangha (pass the buck) to resolve the matter. Patchwork solutions will only resurface from time to time or cause the issue to sink deeper into secrecy. There must be a strategic plan to address the varied aspects of the entire problem, and the government should take full responsibility for forming a task force of professionals who have a genuine interest in bringing the issue under control, rather than sweeping it under the carpet. I addition we should learn measures take by other countries including the Church.

The Sangha may proceed with utilizing the “Vinaya Pitaka” (monastic code) to formulate strategies for prevention and discipline, collaborating with lay experts and academics under the guidance of professionals.

Some aspects that need to be addressed include:

The age of child ordination

The age of ordination for children must be addressed both as a matter of government policy and as a principle by the Sangha. One of the main reasons for ordination is poverty, including single parents with large families. This must be specifically addressed by the central and provincial governments and affiliated institutions, because impoverished children are prone to abuse even within their own homes, and ordination is not the solution.

The next reason for ordination is the belief in astrological predictions regarding malefic periods or negative effects on oneself or family members. The Sangha and professionals must strategize on how to address these beliefs. Other reasons for child ordination must be researched and addressed.

Self-monitoring by the Sasanaya

Self-monitoring by the “Sasanaya” is crucial to prevent offenses, and the power to disrobe should be granted to a Sangha committee that includes knowledgeable laypersons. Ideally, there should be no divisions among nikayas (monastic orders), and the same official rules should be accepted by all nikayas without any delay in decision-making. The Sangha committee should be thoroughly vetted before and during their appointment. In other words, the members of the Sangha must adhere to a strict code of conduct monitored by “non-offenders.” However, how can “non-offenders” be identified?

Equal application of penal law

The penal law should apply to everyone equally, irrespective of whether they are in robes or not. Although Penal Code (Amendment) Act No. 22 of 1995 introduced crucial, positive changes, there are many aspects that need further amendment, including the severe aspects of sentencing (Draconian) and, more importantly, changes to introduce precise definitions of offenses.

*Vidyajothi Prof. Harendra De Silva. Emeritus professor of Paediatrics, Founder Chairman National Child Protection Authority (NCPA)

Latest comments

  • 11
    5

    Pallegama has been removed from all his ‘rajakaaree’ duties and is now just a yellow robed wretched soul. It happened so because mahanayaka chapter called the culprit to face a panel and respond to the incidents. And the response seems to be an admittance of the alleged incident, so the person was removed from all current responsibilities. How did this happen? Only because mahanayakas are clear about law and order now. Because the government is not supporting ‘ape hamuduruvane’ concept like Mahinda did, but pushing hard to seek justice for the victim as per the rules of the law books. This is the difference between the past governments and of the present, people! End of story!!

    • 5
      0

      Jit,
      It seems Pallegama Hamuduruwo has been involved in more unsavoury activities, which are coming out now:
      https://youtu.be/NVHdOjf1w7I?si=R2S0z8n5B3loMaKi
      This happened 3 years ago, so it shows that all political parties are beholden to corrupt clergy.

  • 2
    0

    “This dynamic is not confined to Sri Lanka alone; in India, the power of the Right Wing Nationalist government pivots around Hindu nationalists, “

    We all forget to understand that Sri Lanka is a multi cultural, multi ethnic, multi religious country. It is true that the problem is alone to Sri Lanka but to many countries but Sri Lankan constitution gives special status to Buddhism which fundamentally deny the rights of other religions. If we look at the Indian constitution it reads as follows:

    “The constitution declares India a sovereign, socialist, secular,[11] and democratic republic, assures its citizens justice, equality, and liberty, and endeavours to promote fraternity.
    It does not give any special status to any religion or all the governments are responsible for any religion and I don’t think that it is governments responsibility to protect any religion but only to make sure that the law is equal to all, not specific to one religion

  • 3
    0

    What is before us is a crime against a civilian by a clergyman.
    The Sangha should not intervene in the matter, as the crime has nothing to do with faith.
    Let the law take its course.
    *
    If the present government is more courageous than earlier governments, will it stand by the law against the clergy in unlawful constructions in the N&E?

  • 1
    1

    There are a couple of fallacious arguments in this write up.
    1) … reluctance of public figures, including politicians, to address this issue
    What special power do politicians have in relation to the subject. (This is sensationalisation!)
    2) … It is the responsibility of the government to address this issue.
    What has the Government got to do with this. It is a responsibility of the family and the society.

    • 3
      0

      Nathan,
      “reluctance of public figures, including politicians, to address this issue
      What special power do politicians have in relation to the subject. (This is sensationalisation!)”
      Elected politicians must have the backbone to condemn crimes by anyone, even “holy men”.
      Elected politicians have been elected to enforce the law.
      Now the UNP has put out a statement that this is a campaign against Buddhism. Political opportunism at its worst!
      A lot of Lankan Buddhists (including this Professor) are dead scared of monks.
      Who are the real rulers of this country?

  • 6
    0

    “Child Abuse Within Religious Institutions: Addressing It With Pragmatic Solutions Rather Than Sensationalism”


    “Pragmatic solutions” for 76 years (or is it 2500 years) got us here.

    Where a 76 year old man – let alone a Buddhist Priest – kissing/eating the vagina of a 14 year old girl is a trivial matter! …….. The real descriptive language/words should be used. If not, the way our minds are trained, the language/words look vulgar: not the act/deed.

    A 76 year old Buddhist Priest kissing/eating the vagina of a 14 year old girl is nothing but sensational! ……… in any decent society!!!

    It’s the sensational aspect of the deed that brought it to the public attention. Thanks to a brave persistent bunch of journalists and You-tubers.

    This culture is embedded and condoned by the Lankan society to such an extent ……. no one took the dirty old fucker to task: not the Police, not any politician or prominent public figure: they were all hell bent on protecting him.

    The leader of the opposition or any opposition pol/pols have not spoken about it ……… except to call the child a 14 year old whore.

    The old dirty bastard is getting his just deserts because of a brave lady lawyer in the Child Protection Authority ……. and the few persistent You-tubers who keep it in the public domain.

  • 5
    0

    might’ve got truncated,

    The leader of the opposition or any opposition pol/pols have not spoken about it ……… except to call the child a 14 year old whore.

    The old dirty bastard is getting his just deserts because of a brave lady lawyer in the Child Protection Authority ……. and the few persistent You-tubers who keep it in the public domain.

    • 8
      0

      After Panama, Pandora ………. this is our own ………. Epstein files.
      For each case exposed, there must be thousands hidden, involving politicians, elites, who is who ………….

  • 3
    0

    Sexual desire is one of nature’s greatest physiologies, appliacble to both plants and animals. So these Buddhist clergies too are gifted with these desires. But the Bikkus in some form are an exception because they have no responsibilities in life, every thing is given on a patter and worst still super luxurious life, wealth and more dangerously utmost and evil political power. For guys with these gifts, excessive sexual desires and sexual perversion is inevitable. In todays context, with porno and various forms of sexual acts and perversions are freely available on line, these monks cannot control their carnal desire by mere masturbation alone. So they want real sex. Child become easily available owing to their presence in the temples, especially in the villages, blind faith, fear of repraisals, poverty, money and political power of the monks, this evils sex has already become rampant. For most of the monks, Buddhsim is a way of survival and prosperous living. What Buddha preached is just for them to recite in Pali but no belief or faith in them. Illegal sex, alocoholism and drug abuse, greed for wealth and power are the most important aspect of the Buddhsit monks.Who can question them? Every fellow worships the feet of these evil creatures. So they dont just care of the law of the land. That thug priest Gnanasara says that sex abuse by monks is ” a podi mistake”. We have reached a stage where even Buddha cant save our Sri Lanka Sinhala Buddhsim.

    • 7
      0

      Soon after typing above comment, saw this .
      Police arrested , 41 year old Pedophile Thero in charge of Ampara Vihara,
      who apparently had been abusing teen aged boys.

    • 1
      0

      “We have reached a stage where even Buddha cant save our Sri Lanka Sinhala Buddhsim.”
      Lord Buddha or Lord Siva or Lord Allah or Lord Jesus or any others Lords going to save the their religions or their followers because they are very old and they never reappeared for many centuries(Over 2000 years). The way people interpret from different locations, fight each other I am superior, you are inferior etc. clearly shows that the people whether it is political or religious leaders are not prepared to accept them as their model but misuse them for their benefits.

      • 1
        2

        “Lord Allah or Lord Jesus”
        You sound like the guy who wrote “Siva Perumal”

  • 2
    0

    “ The phenomenon of “samaneras” (novice monks) being abused in “pirivenas” (monastic )”
    At present we aren’t talking about this issue which is entirely a different topic. This should be LOOKED INTO urgently as well. What we are talking about sexual abuse by an high ranking priest. How the GoSL is going to tackle this issue will also decide the country’s future economically, socially and politically. It is very long time that politicians made use of the Buddhist monks in capturing political power and ALSO to bash the minority Tamil Speaking Citizens (TSC). The Buddhist Monks who were spilling out hatred towards other ethnic & religious people in the country had caused huge harm to the country. Can we have a NEW CONSTITUTION that will sort out this as well.

  • 2
    0

    Politicians of any party should from now on stop involving the religious people in any official functions of the government.

  • 2
    0

    “ It is the responsibility of the government to address this issue. Although the President, at the request of the Mahanayakas, is to take steps to amend the 1931 Vihara and Devalagam Act and re-establish a “Dharmadhikaranaya” with the authority to handle disciplinary matters concerning Buddhist monks, the government should not pass total responsibility onto the Sangha (pass the buck) to resolve the matter”
    Agree with this statement of the author. Government and high standing LAY people too should be deciding the fate of unruly corrupt Monks

  • 2
    0

    “ Ideally, there should be no divisions among nikayas (monastic orders), and the same official rules should be accepted by all nikayas without any delay in decision-making.”
    Is there any need to have different nikayas based on caste system?
    Amalgamate them into ONE

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.