30 October, 2026

Blog

A True Buddhist: An Analytical & Pragmatic Critique Of Buddhism

By Sarath Dissanayake –

Sarath Dissanayake

The Concept of a Mindful Practitioner / Why I Am Buddhist

Long before it was organized into a global religion, the core philosophy of Buddhism existed as an intimate, living reality of human consciousness. For a true Buddhist, to follow the path of the Buddha is not to subscribe to a system of blind faith, celestial judgment, or rigid dogma. Instead, it represents an entry into a highly systematic, practical, and empirical framework for understanding the human mind. While the title suggests a personal manifesto, this exploration is approached not through the lens of devotion, but through analytical introspection—evaluating the philosophy of Buddhism strictly for its psychological utility and rational alignment with human experience.

The choice to align oneself with Buddhist philosophy often springs from a profound, objective realization: that internal suffering is not an arbitrary curse, but a conditioned state that can be analyzed, understood, and ultimately dismantled. This logical approach to consciousness, intricately tied to the mechanics of karma, is not a modern reinvention. It is a well-documented perspective that traces its lineage directly back to the historical Buddha, Siddhartha Gautama, whose insights were born of his own lived experiences and preserved across millennia by a dedicated lineage of practitioners.

The Empirical Architecture of the Mind 

At the heart of Buddhism lies an analytical, almost clinical approach to the psyche. Rather than demanding belief in an unseen creator, the Buddha invited seekers to look inward and evaluate their own experiences—a principle known as Ehipassiko, meaning “come and see”.This practical framework treats the mind as a dynamic laboratory. Through intentional mindfulness, an observer begins to see that the mind is not a monolithic, permanent “self,” but a constantly flowing stream of thoughts, sensations, and impulses.

The structural beauty of this framework is found within the Four Noble Truths:

The diagnosis of suffering (dukkha)

The identification of its cause (craving and ignorance)

The assertion that an end to suffering is possible

The practical prescription to achieve that liberation via the Noble Eightfold-Path

By mapping human dissatisfaction directly to internal attachments rather than external forces, Buddhism empowers the individual. The mind becomes both the site of the problem and the vehicle for the solution.

Karma: A Mind-Centric Law of Cause and Effect 

A critical component of this framework is the law of karma. While popular culture often reduces karma to a cosmic system of external retribution, the Buddha defined it purely in terms of mental volition (cetana). In the very opening verses of the Dhammapada, it is declared that the mind precedes all mental states; if one speaks or acts with an impure mind, suffering follows just as the wheel follows the hoof of the ox.

Karma, therefore, is understood as an entirely mind-centric phenomenon. Every thought, intention, and action leaves an imprint on the subconscious consciousness, shaping future tendencies and perceptions. The “ill effects” of negative karma are not punishments meted out by a divine entity; they are the natural, psychological consequences of unwholesome intentions like greed, anger, and delusion. When an individual harbors anger, they burn themselves first. When one acts with cruelty, the mind is conditioned to perceive a hostile world. The Buddha skillfully illustrated how intentional actions actively build the reality a person inhabits, transforming karma from a mystical concept into a tangible law of psychological cause and effect.

Born from Lived Experience 

This brilliant psychological system was not concocted in a vacuum of abstract philosophy. The Buddha’s perspectives were deeply informed by the trajectory of his own life. Born into luxury as Prince Siddhartha, he enjoyed every sensory indulgence imaginable. Yet, his eventual encounters with sickness, old age, and death shattered his illusions of permanent happiness. Realizing that worldly pleasures could not offer lasting peace, he renounced his royal life to pursue extreme asceticism, pushing his physical body to the brink of starvation.

It was only after exhausting both extremes sensual indulgence and self-mortification that he discovered the Middle Way. Sitting under the Bodhi tree, he turned his attention entirely inward, conquering the defilements of his own mind to achieve full enlightenment. Because his teachings grew directly from his personal experiments with the human condition, they carry a unique, resonant authority. He did not speak as a god channeling divine laws, but as a human being who had successfully navigated the labyrinth of human suffering and mapped the way out for others.

Preserving the Dhamma: From Orality to the Written Word 

The brilliant, well-thought-out perspectives of the Buddha have traveled down to modern times through an unbroken chain of dedication. Following the Buddha’s Parinibbāna (passing), five hundred of his enlightened disciples (arahants) convened at the First Buddhist Council in Rajgir. Led by prominent disciples like Ven. Ananda, who chanted the discourses from memory, and Ven. Upali, who recited the monastic codes, the assembly systematically cataloged, cross-checked, and verified the teachings.

For centuries, these discourses were preserved through a sophisticated system of communal oral recitation by generations of monastics. This phenomenal tradition culminated during a period of political upheaval and famine in Sri Lanka at the Fourth Buddhist Council. To ensure the pure teachings would never be lost to time, the texts were officially committed to writing on palm leaves at the Aluvihara Temple around 29 BCE. This monumental effort gave rise to the Pali Canon, traditionally known as the Tipitaka (the “Three Baskets”):

Vinaya Pitaka: The basket of discipline, detailing rules and historical contexts for the monastic community.

Sutta Pitaka: The basket of discourses, containing the actual sermons, dialogues, and practical guides delivered by the Buddha.

Abhidhamma Pitaka: The basket of ultimate doctrine, which provides a rigorous, scholastic, and deeply psychological analysis of mind and matter.

Inherited through generations and meticulously shielded from distortion, these authoritative texts mark their preservation back to the dawn of the Buddhist Era (BE), which anchors its timeline to the Buddha’s passing in 543 or 544 BCE.

The Abhidhamma and the Modern Scientific Paradigm 

The Abhidhamma operates as an incredibly intricate cartography of consciousness. It breaks down the illusion of a solid, permanent “I” into lightning-fast flashes of consciousness (citta), mental factors (cetasikas), and material phenomena (rupa). It posits that what an individual experiences as a single thought is actually a rapidly shifting sequence of cognitive processes. Where a deep sense of consternation and contention arises among modern academic and scholarly circles across all beliefs of faith is how this ancient model confronts Western neuroscience. Modern science operates almost entirely on an objective plane. It views the mind through a materialist lens: the mind is what the brain does. It seeks to understand consciousness by measuring neurological firing rates, blood flow in the cerebrum, and chemical synapses. It is a top-down, purely physical observation.

Buddhism, conversely, masters the subjective domain without sacrificing empirical rigor. The Abhidhamma does not treat consciousness as a mere byproduct of grey matter. Instead, it treats subjective experience as a primary reality that can be investigated directly through deep meditative absorption (jhana). While modern science struggles with the “hard problem of consciousness”—explaining how a physical brain gives rise to felt, personal experiences—the Abhidhamma bypasses this deadlock by investigating the mind with the mind. It is this profound divergence that makes the dialogue between Buddhism and secular science so electrifying; it forces academia to question whether true empirical validation can only happen under a microscope, or if it can be achieved on a meditation cushion.

The Global Diaspora and Transnational Footprint of the Dhamma 

Buddhism maintains an extensive global presence that seamlessly bridges classical Eastern heritages with contemporary Western lifestyles. Across Pan-Asian geography—spanning South, East, and Southeast Asia—the faith functions as a vital cornerstone of cultural and national identity. Many of these nations extend formal state patronage to its philosophical tenets within their constitutional frameworks, while simultaneously safeguarding broad religious freedoms. Within these societies, millions practice the Dhamma not merely as an institutional religion, but as a revered, everyday way of life. Devout laypeople look to monastic custodians for guidance in core principles, within broader contours of Buddhist doctrine to promote spiritual resilience, structural good governance, and inner peace within geographical contours. .

Globally estimated at nearly 500 million practitioners, this demographic footprint extends dynamically into the Western hemisphere. In Europe and the Americas, the core essence of the faith thrives as an accessible framework for individual truth-seekers. Rather than demanding ritual devotion, its tenets are widely integrated into modern secular environments through the active cultivation of mindfulness, meditation, and yoga. Practicing the Dhamma in this transnational setting highlights a unique capacity for cultural adaptation. It demonstrates that the structured, mind-centric ethics of the Buddha offer a universal heritage—one that champions internal wisdom, ethical discipline, and compassion entirely above national, geographic, or political divisions.

Mind, Meditation, and Mindfulness: Universal Mindfulness Village (UMV)

While contemporary global wellness movements frequently highlight the ‘3Ms’—Mind, Meditation, and Mindfulness—these modern practices fundamentally trace their truest, most profound expression back to the foundational contours of Buddhist spiritual values. These mind-centric pillars serve as a gateway to universal truth-seeking, deeply rooted in the cultivation of the four sublime states (Brahmaviharas): Metta (loving-kindness), Karuna (compassion), Mudita (sympathetic joy), and Upekkha (equanimity). This practical framework thrives within a living, breathing ecosystem of deep civilizational devotion. Sri Lanka, which is home to nearly 13,000 registered Buddhist temples spread across a vast swathe of hinterland, offers profound peace of mind and sanctuary for over 40,000 monks. Within these sacred spaces, monastics dedicate themselves to their spiritual upbringing, Dhamma learning, and worship as part of a noble mission for the propagation of Buddhist teachings and the Triple Gem..

This vast monastic network directly underscores the vision behind the concept “Universal Mindfulness Village” (UMV) initiative, which was exclusively dealt with in an authoritative article titled “Project Of Universal Mindfulness Village (UMV): Transitioning A Concept Into Reality” published in the Colombo Telegraph on June 4, 2026. By positioning itself as a premier global center for Theravada Buddhism, Sri Lanka is exceptionally well-placed to share this profound essence of spiritual sanctity with the world. Leveraging these living sacred traditions and vast temple sanctuaries serves as a powerful catalyst to develop the nation into an ideal destination for religious and spiritual tourism. In doing so, it firmly reinforces its historical pride of place among Buddhist nations across Asia and the global landscape.

Finding a Timeless Sanctuary in the Triple Gem through Self-Observation 

Ultimately, to be recognized within the true conceptual paradigm of a Buddhist is to embrace a legacy of rational inquiry that spans more than two and a half millennia. Guided by the timeless wisdom of the Tipitaka, an individual learns to look at the mind not as a chaotic mystery, but as a structured field of cause and effect governed entirely by intention.

By rooting spiritual practice in empirical self-observation and absolute mental accountability, the practitioner discovers that liberation is entirely internal. It is a path that honors human intelligence, validates direct personal experience, and offers a clear, timeless blueprint for true inner peace, establishing an unshakeable sanctuary within the Triple Gem: the Buddha, the Dhamma, and the Sangha.

(The mind precedes all mental states. Mind is their chief; they are all mind-wrought. If with a pure mind a person speaks or acts, happiness follows him like his never-departing shadow.” — Dhammapada, Verse 2)

*The writer is a retired Ambassador and former Foreign Ministry Spokesman He can be reached at schandrad@hotmail.com

Reference:

1) https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/project-of-universal-mindfulness-village-umv-transitioning-a-concept-into-reality/

2) https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/reflections-on-buddhas-spiritual-awakening-wisdom-boundless-humanity/

*Author’s Note: This two-part article, compiled as a prelude to the historic International Buddhist Conference in Colombo (Nov–Dec 2026), offers a timely blueprint for universal peace and regional harmony.

Latest comments

  • 2
    11

    Dear Readers

    This is Part 1 of a two-part article compiled as a curtain-raiser to the upcoming International Buddhist Conference scheduled for November 28 – December 02, 2026, in Colombo, as follows:

    Part 1: A True Buddhist: An Analytical and Pragmatic Critique of Buddhism
    Part 2: The Spiritual Citadel: Sri Lanka as the Stronghold of the Theravada Lineage

    • 12
      2

      Hello Sarath,
      This is not a Critique of Buddhism any more than a Christian Apologists defence of Christianity is a Critique..
      Have you ever wondered why 3 Theravada Buddhist Countries have been accused of War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity?
      Here is a possible answer – “Our central claim is that Buddhist violence tends to occur in countries where Buddhism and the state are closely intertwined. We test this theory using both a statistical analysis of Buddhist violence in Buddhist-majority and Buddhist-plural countries and case studies of Buddhist violence (or lack thereof) in Myanmar, Singapore, Sri Lanka, and Thailand. Our findings show that religion-state integration emboldens Buddhist vigilantes to attack religious minorities. –
      https://direct.mit.edu/isec/article-abstract/49/4/119/130813/Monks-Behaving-Badly-Explaining-Buddhist-Violence?redirectedFrom=fulltext
      Of course as an insider you know all about the atrocities committed by the Rajapakses, so in the spirit of Truth and Reconciliation and as a true Buddhist, why don’t you come clean and give your evidence to the UNHRC.
      Best regards

      • 3
        11

        1/2

        LS,

        1) Thank you for your comment. However, your argument relies on a selective narrative that overlooks both the foundational philosophy of Buddhism and the stark realities on the ground in Sri Lanka. To address your central point, any attempt to link Buddhist governance to UNHRC’s myths and baseless allegations is a flawed generalization.

        2) Long before modern international frameworks existed, the Buddha eloquently spoke loud and clear about the inherent dignity, equality, and human rights of all living beings—more comprehensively than any other teaching. True Buddhism and human rights share a unique, inseparable thread. Labeling localized political conflicts as inherently “Buddhist violence” is a fallacy that ignores this core philosophy.

        3) Furthermore, the accusations leveled by the UNHRC against Sri Lanka since 2009 carry a undeniable double standard. There is no gain-saying that Sri Lanka violated human rights when it was simply engaged in a defensive war against the LTTE—recognized by the US State Department as one of the most ruthless terror outfits in the world

        (TBC_

      • 3
        10

        2/2

        LS

        4) If we are to talk about the “spirit of truth,” we must look at the actual evidence from those who witnessed the ground reality. In 2009, the UN Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs visited Sri Lanka and explicitly disclosed that the Sri Lankan forces had done a tremendous job under incredibly difficult circumstances. They successfully rescued over 100,000 innocent civilians, liberating them from the clutches of the LTTE, who were forcibly using them as a human shield.

        5) This firsthand account from a top UN official on the ground directly contradicts the heavily politicized allegations often repeated in international forums. True reconciliation cannot be built on selective academic theories or a distorted history that erases the liberation of tens of thousands of civilians from terrorism.

        6) Hope the above would shed light on the UNHRC myths and ground reality in Sri Lanka, and serve as a necessary course correction to a heavily biased narrative.

        Thanks for your understanding.

        • 12
          2

          Dear Mr Buddhist Diplomat,
          4) If we are to talk about the “spirit of truth,” we must look at the actual evidence from those who witnessed the ground reality. “
          Did the honourable Under-Secretary witness this too, or was it hidden from him? Who hid it? Is it true or not, Mr.Sarath? A straight answer please, for once., if you are a true Buddhist.
          https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cm1j4kl80z56o
          “By August, archaeologists had completed the third phase of the excavation at the site, during which they found the skeletal remains of 572 people, including children and infants.
          Among the dead were artefacts from their lives – bangles, a school bag, a milk bottle.”
          Is true Sarath?
          Is it true or not?

          • 3
            10

            Nutgpt
            To answer you directly: any objective analyst must prioritize the authoritative, first-hand statements of the United Nations over the selective narratives of non-governmental groups like Amnesty International.

            UNUSG John Holmes operated with the full backing and diplomatic clout of the UN. His official assessments carry unparalleled weight. In contrast, Amnesty International (AI) has a history of lopsided scrutiny, often turning a blind eye to the realities of state defense against a ruthless terror outfit like the LTTE. Please read https://news.un.org/en/story/2009/03/295192

            Regarding the Chemmani excavations, a true commitment to the “spirit of truth” means letting verified forensic processes run their course completely. Ongoing excavations shouldn’t be pulled out of context to overshadow established wartime facts—such as the UN’s own documentation of the military rescuing over 100,000 civilians from LTTE clutches.

            Real peace is built on comprehensive facts from the highest international bodies, not by exploiting selective reports to score political points. As such, I turn this back to you for a candid answer: who should we trust to give an accurate picture of the ground reality—the UN or Amnesty International?

            Over to you. Tks

            • 10
              2

              Hello Sarath,
              “who should we trust to give an accurate picture of the ground reality—the UN or Amnesty International?”
              You forgot this – “Earlier in his tenure (2007), Holmes strongly urged the Sri Lankan government to properly investigate the execution-style murder of 17 aid workers from Action Against Hunger (Action Contre la Faim – ACF) in Muttur, labeling it one of the worst crimes against humanitarian personnel in recent history”.
              And this “Following the end of the war in May 2009, Holmes supported calls for an official, independent inquiry into allegations of violations and war crimes committed by both the Sri Lankan military and the LTTE, stating that the serious charges needed to be thoroughly examined”. We’re still waiting for the Independent Inquiry.
              Best regards

              • 2
                9

                LS,
                Please note my comment was entirely focused on the Chemmani issue and the humanitarian rescue operation, which is what UNUSG Holmes was on record stating and what is laid bare in the UN report. As such, my response was essentially in response to what Nutgpt raised. Introducing the Muttur incident conflates two completely separate events and is unhelpful.

                Furthermore, it is not just 100,000, but a staggering 230,000 civilians who were rescued and accommodated in government camps, as cited by Amnesty International in the link shared by Sebastian at https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/asa370122009en.pdf.

                On the Muttur killings, if military personnel are found to have been complicit in the killings, the perpetrators must face the full force of justice without any waiver. However, shifting the focus elsewhere does not alter the authoritative, first-hand documentation from the UN’s highest humanitarian official regarding the actual ground reality and the LTTE’s modus operandi versus the scale of the civilian rescue in the North.
                Trust the above clarifies. Thanks

                • 8
                  2

                  Mr. Sarath,
                  “LTTE’s modus operandi versus the scale of the civilian rescue in the North.”
                  Have you heard the term “comparing apples and oranges”?
                  Did the LTTE kill 500 civilians and bury them at any time?

                  • 2
                    6

                    Dear Nutgpt,
                    1) Thanks for your pointers. We can go on and on debating the past, much like the conflict that raged through three decades, but we must finally get down to the nitty-gritty of what those past misdeeds actually inherited. At the end of the day, we have spent nearly 17 years since the end of hostilities in 2009 just talking, yet nothing practical or sensible has come out of mere rhetoric. Progress is measured by what we achieve on the ground, not by endless arguments.
                    2) Let us be open and candid with our own thoughts, conscience, and wisdom. Enough blood has been shed in a senseless and cruel war that left no winners, only losers. We are left with over 50,000 war widows living in an endless cycle of acrimony and bigotry. For the sake of humanity, we must stop this insane nonsense once and for all during our lifetime; otherwise, future generations will rightfully curse us for our inaction.
                    3) Instead of debating competing tragedies, let us focus on the only path forward: a truly UNITED Sri Lanka where all citizens can live together in peace, unity, and prosperity.
                    Thanks

            • 7
              1

              Mr.Sarath,
              The quote YOU gave from John Holmes is about the end of the war, but you cleverly hid the fact that he commented on the Muttur killings. Why are you, as a “true Buddhist “, showing double standards?
              “letting verified forensic processes run their course completely (in Chemmani) “
              Were the three bodies pointed out by Sgt. Rajapaksa enough? Didn’t he at the time claim that there were 400 more?
              Why are you trying to deny that there were proven atrocities by the government? Who are you protecting, as a True Buddhist?

        • 13
          2

          Sarath,
          Re. “Spirit of truth”
          Doesn’t the fact that Navi Pillay is not in jail, and Mervyn Silva didn’t get the Nobel Prize tell you something?

          • 3
            9

            OC,
            Thanks. It reminds us that while we must fully acknowledge the international accolades and recognition given to UN officials for their monumental work globally, the reality remains that even as the UN performs vital humanitarian work across conflict zones, its institutional frameworks are unfortunately not often immune to the double standards and political double-speak that occur in certain theaters of war.
            If we are genuinely chasing the “spirit of truth,” we must look past individual names or symbolic titles. True objectivity means prioritizing the authoritative, first-hand findings of the UN’s highest humanitarian officials on the ground over the highly politicized, selective narratives that dominate external forums.

            Let’s keep the focus on verified institutional facts rather than political theater.
            Thanks

            • 7
              2

              Mr. Sarath,
              Addressing OC, you say “Let’s keep the focus on verified institutional facts rather than political theater.”
              But it is a verified fact that Sgt. Rajapaksa was sentenced to death for murdering 3 civilians, and he did claim there were 400 more. Why was he pardoned? This is not “political theatre”.

              • 2
                6

                Dear Nutgpt,
                1) What has happened has happened. No amount of words or arguments can bring back the precious lives that were lost, and we must not let our checkered past continue to haunt our present, our future, and that of our children.
                2) Let us be open and candid with our own conscience: continuing this debate will only bring further prejudice, hypocrisy, acrimony, and ill-will to the fore. This cycle of resentment is entirely unworthy of our shared humanity, a truth clearly espoused by all religious philosophies. As the Buddha famously taught, hatred is never appeased by hatred in this world; by non-hatred alone is it appeased. This is an eternal law.
                3) Rather than spending more years trapped in an endless loop of assigning blame, let us let bygones be bygones—whether regarding the government forces, the LTTE, —and focus entirely on the actual work of building a nation.
                4) Thanks for your understanding and your own inner wisdom to see the light at the end of this long, dark tunnel.
                5) May we all be blessed with the vision to live as an equal citizenry in unity and lasting peace in this Thrice-Blessed Land of ours. Regards

                • 4
                  1

                  Dear Diplomat Sarath,
                  The LTTE was a terrorist organisation. You say so yourself, and I agree. But here you’re writing “extreme terror, methods of the unprecedented level of brutality practiced by the LTTE.”, while trying to cover up terrorist acts of the government. Even Sebastian has confirmed bombing of civilians by the government.
                  You talk about “wild allegations” by the UNHRC
                  But even when evidence is presented, you say it isn’t complete. Isn’t this hypocritical or dishonest for someone preaching “True Buddhism “?
                  Acknowledgement of the past is the first step in finding the truth, isn’t it?

              • 2
                6

                Nutgpt,
                1) Thank you for your comment. While it is easy to become trapped in an endless loop of debating past misdeeds, doing so only drains our collective energy and distracts from the core purpose of my article, “A True Buddhist: An Analytical & Pragmatic Critique Of Buddhism.”
                2) Rather than remaining anchored to a past that inherited nothing but misery, hatred, and a heavy baggage of lost cause and opportunities.True progress requires us to focus on the present and look toward the timeless, eternal teachings of the Buddha. Buddhism is not a tool for political rhetoric; it is Ehipassiko—an invitation to “come and see” a philosophy and way of life centered entirely on the cultivation of the mind.
                3) As the Dhammapada beautifully reminds us: “The mind precedes all mental states. Mind is their chief; they are all mind-wrought. If with a pure mind a person speaks or acts, happiness follows him like his never-departing shadow.”
                4) Enough has been said about what once divided us. Let us now move forward and focus on what matters most: advancing our collective peace, wisdom, and shared humanity in the present.
                5) Thanks for your understanding. Best regard

                • 4
                  0

                  Ambassador Sarath,
                  When I ask you for direct answers, you hide behind the Dhammapada. You will not talk about government murders, even of children.
                  Is this the sort of Buddhism you are trying to teach us?
                  “While it is easy to become trapped in an endless loop of debating past misdeeds, doing so only drains our collective energy and distracts from the core purpose of my article, “
                  But you yourself talk about LTTE atrocities.

                  • 0
                    1

                    Nutgpt,
                    Thanks. At the outset, let me say that your false narrative “that I preach while hiding behind the Dhammapada” lacks credibility and stands in utter contempt of the long-cherished principles of honesty and integrity that I have stood for all along.
                    2) Furthermore, repeatedly pointing to the same old perceived allegations and painting a bleak picture based on a distorted narrative of past events is entirely unhelpful for an open, healthy dialogue on the current issues impacting all Sri Lankans across the board.
                    3) While the masses face pressing issues and economic doldrums, the government ought to focus on resolving their immediate plight and predicaments with determination. We, as a responsible citizenry, must bring their woes and pressing needs to the immediate attention of the powers that be with due diligence and urgency, while ensuring our voices prevail upon the status quo in the name of all who deserve better.
                    4) Allowing the conversation to remain permanently frozen in past acrimony does nothing to help our citizens survive the present or build a stable future. Let us do our duty by the motherland and prosper.
                    5) Thanks for your understanding.

      • 3
        10

        Hello LankaScot
        When any ideology, not just Buddhism, and the state are closely intertwined it becomes subservient to the rulers who use violence to maintain power. This was intially the “divine right” doctrine of the ancient kings and Christiandom went about massacring opposing ideologies and “heresy”. The Holy Roman empire became what is the West today. Then it becames the “white man’s burden” or the Manifest destiny of the hegemon. You saw it in the Irish-UK civil war with Father Patrick Rayn even making bomb times for the IRA. You saw how Bishop Makarios behaved during the Cypriot-Turk war. You see how extreme Jewish Rabbi’s justify the genocide of the Palastinians. You see how the Mullahs of Iran or Afgansitan justify their fascist rule. Abrahamic, Islamic and Marxist ideology are directly political ideologies and there, state and ideology are completely intermixed and become essentially fascist. However, we must remember that Jesus said, “leave unto Ceaser what is his” domain. Buddha too refused to get drawn into the wars between the Koliyas and Sakyans, and told the Lichchivi princes that as as long as they consult and collaborate peacefully no one can beat them.

        • 4
          9

          Dear Sebastian,
          Thanks for your analysis of status-quo of UK-IRA and comparable cases elsewhere including Afghanistan, Palestine.

          When evaluating the terror perpetrated by the LTTE during its three-decade-long campaign of terror and crime, any objective analysis must account for the extraordinarily hostile terrain and extreme terror, methods of the unprecedented level of brutality practiced by the LTTE.

          This was an adversary that fundamentally altered the landscape of asymmetric warfare through the widespread deployment of child soldiers, a relentless campaign of suicide bombings, and inhumane methods of extreme nature. These actions carried the distinct hallmarks of a uniquely barbaric campaign of violence and crime, ultimately earning the LTTE its classification by the US State Department as one of the most ruthless terrorist outfits in the world.

          Understanding the sheer scale and nature of these terror tactics is essential for any balanced perspective on the ground reality and the immense challenges involved in liberating the civilian population.

          Thanks for your understanding.

          • 9
            2

            Hello Sarath,
            You replied to SebastianSR “Thanks for your analysis of status-quo of UK-IRA”.
            What does that mean? What “status-quo”? The Catholics are now the Majority Group in Northern Ireland and should become part of Eire. If you thought to consider what led to the “Troubles” you might see the Sri Lankan Situation in a different way (but I doubt it).
            Here is a little bit of that Irish history – https://cain.ulster.ac.uk/events/crights/chron.htm
            The following link puts the Northern Ireland Civil Rights Movement in its International Perspective – https://alphahistory.com/northernireland/northern-ireland-civil-rights-movement/
            Best regards

            • 3
              9

              LS

              Thank you for clarification and.sharing your perspective on the situation on Northern Ireland

              By referencing the “status-quo,” my intention was simply to acknowledge Sebastian’s broad comparative analysis of the historical timeline and structural frameworks surrounding the UK-IRA conflict, rather than suggesting that the political or demographic situation in Northern Ireland is static.

              While the historical root causes and political developments of every conflict are unique and deserve study, my primary emphasis remains on the nature of asymmetric warfare itself. The focus of my point was that regardless of the theater of war—be it Ireland, Afghanistan, or elsewhere—the specific deployment of extreme tactics like widespread suicide bombings, violent campaign of terror and child soldiers by the LTTE led to a highly destructive and exceptionally harsh consequences that must be accounted for in any objective evaluation of Sri Lanka’s ground reality.

              Hope this clarifies. Thanks

              • 6
                1

                Hello Sarath,
                The Provisional IRA did not use Suicide Bombers. I am not a supporter of the Provos, however I visited Manchester not long after the 1996 bombing of the City Centre. The damage was immense, but no-one was killed by the Explosion as they had telephoned a warning beforehand. Tens of thousands were evacuated.
                Do not equate the Provisional IRA with the LTTE. Even my Military Colleagues that fought against them had a much different view of them. Basically they viewed them as enemy soldiers and contrary to the Views expressed by the British Press they did not think that they were Stupid, Uneducated Terrorists.
                I took my Granddaughters to see the Jonas Brothers Concert 2009 at the Manchester Arena. I waited in the Car Park and then went back to collect them at the end. No-one stopped me from entering the Building to meet them.
                In 2017 there was a bombing at an Ariane Grande Concert in the same Venue where 22 people were killed and hundreds injured. The Inquiry “found that “serious shortcomings in security” contributed to the devastation. Salman Abedi (Islamic State) walked across the foyer at the end and detonated a Bomb.
                Best regards

                • 1
                  3

                  1/2

                  Dear LankaScot,

                  1) Thanks for your comment.

                  2) To clarify, my intention was never to create a perfect historical equation between the LTTE and the IRA, but rather to highlight that both organizations systematically deployed indiscriminate violence, financial crimes, and coordinated attacks targeting innocent civilians to achieve narrow separatist ends.

                  3) Having lived in London myself during the mid-to-late 1990s, I witnessed firsthand the climate of fear created by the IRA’s bombing campaigns. While you noted a warning was given in the Manchester center attack, we cannot overlook the broader reality of their modus operandi. Between 1995 and 1998, the UK suffered devastating, cold-blooded assaults on soft targets. Landmark tragedies like the Docklands bombing (February 1996), the Manchester city center bombing (June 1996), and the horrific Omagh bombing (August 1998) collectively killed over 30 innocent individuals and maimed more than 450 others. Under United Nations covenants, such deliberate targeting of civilian populations fundamentally amounts to crimes against humanity.
                  (Contd)

                • 1
                  3

                  2/2

                  LankaScot,

                  4) While the LTTE pioneered suicide terrorism on an unprecedented scale, the IRA’s choice of tactics was no less callous in its destruction of innocent human life. This shared reliance on terror and criminality is precisely why both entities carried the same hallmarks of lawlessness and were legally proscribed under the UK’s Prevention of Terrorism Act and designated as foreign terrorist organizations by the United States.

                  5) At the end of the day, irrespective of internal military discipline or whether an outfit gave telephoned warnings, utilizing senseless violence against defenseless civilians to force a political outcome earns both groups the exact same global notoriety: they were banned terror outfits whose methods remain entirely indefensible.

                  6) Trust this makes sense. Regards

              • 5
                0

                Ambassador Sarath,
                “the specific deployment of extreme tactics like widespread suicide bombings, violent campaign of terror and child soldiers by the LTTE “
                So what prevents you from talking about terror tactics by the State? It is not only the Tigers who killed innocent people. The fact that you cannot explicitly condemn government atrocities disproves your claim to be an independent interlocutor promoting “Buddhism “.

                • 0
                  1

                  Nutgpt,
                  1) Thanks. I acknowledge your concerns regarding the painful historical legacy of the 3-decade conflict. However, your attempt to frame references to the Dhammapada as “hiding” completely misinterprets my original article. 2) The core purpose of my piece was to explore the rational philosophy of the mind, not to provide a platform for an endless, cyclical debate over historical military atrocities. Citing the Dhamma is not an evasion; it is a call to anchor our mindset in wisdom rather than ongoing acrimony. Pointing out historical realities on all sides—including the well-documented tragedies of that era—is not about keeping score. It is to show why we must break free from a paralyzing cycle of blame.
                  3) Right now, people are enduring hardships on all fronts. Continuing to use religious philosophy as a tool for political confrontation serves only as a distraction from the real, immediate predicaments of people. Our shared priority should be working together to support basic needs and well-being of all citizens.
                  4) If we genuinely desire a lasting, honorable peace, we must stop letting past conflicts paralyze our present, and instead channel our energies to solve the present challenges of all. Regards

              • 3
                0

                Sarath,
                You keep repeating “the specific deployment of extreme tactics like widespread suicide bombings, violent campaign of terror and child soldiers by the LTTE ……..”
                Is Mr. Nutgpt justified in doubting your bona-fides when you go on talking of the crimes of one side but don’t talk about the other side? Instead you change the subject to the Dhammapada.
                If reconciliation and forgiveness is the aim, ALL sides must admit to their crimes (as in South Africa) . Reconciliation cannot start if one side only takes the blame.
                To prove that you are a true Buddhist, why don’t you start?

                • 0
                  1

                  OC,
                  Thank you for your response. My reference to the core philosophy of the Dhammapada is not a mechanism to change the subject, but rather the very foundation of how we must approach true reconciliation.
                  2) If we are to look at models like South Africa, the fundamental objective is to break the cyclical loop of retributive acrimony. Highlighting the extreme tactics of asymmetric warfare deployed by the LTTE is a matter of documented historical reality, not an evasion of collective accountability. True reconciliation indeed requires an honest acknowledgment of the tragedies of the past, but it cannot begin if the dialogue remains permanently frozen in a selective blame-game designed to score points rather than heal wounds.
                  3) As explored in my article, a true commitment to Buddhist principles means cultivating a mindset focused on the present. Delving into past historical legacy would only make the future bleak and trap subsequent generations in an endless cycle of inherited resentment.
                  4) The government’s priority should be solving the peoples’ pressing basic needs and challenges so as to ensuring honorable peace, progress and a dignified future for all within a united Sri Lanka for all.
                  5) Trust the above clarifies.

        • 9
          1

          Hello SebastianSR,
          I lived in Aberdeen in the late 60s when Families started to arrive from Northern Ireland. Many were traumatised by what was happening. Later on I met many from the Civil Rights Movement that had been forced to leave by the Protestant Para Militaries.
          I visited Northern Ireland not long after the Good Friday Agreement of 1998. I saw the Surveillance Outposts in the middle of Catholic Communities and at their Borders.Just like Gaza and the West Bank.
          I know the atrocities that have been carried out by both sides. I even knew one of the people mentioned in Phil Miller’s book “Keenie Meenie”. The KMS Personnel in the main cut their teeth in Northern Ireland. One of my Colleagues in the Diving Industry was active in Northern Ireland and then worked undercover for the Sultan of Oman. Another of my (Ex-Military) Colleagues was campaigning for Immunity from Prosecution
          “The Feather Men” by Ranulph Fiennes is a Novel, but a number of my ex-Military Colleagues reckon it is pretty close to the Truth.
          By the way can you name one Christian Theocracy (apart from the Vatican)?
          Best regards

          • 4
            9

            Hi LankaScot I am amazed by your varied levels of experience in so many locations! As for a Christain Theocracy (depending on definition), large-scale Christian theocracies vanished by the 19th century. Last examples were the Papal States governed by the Pope until annexed during the unification of Italy in 1870. The Taiping Heavenly Kingdom (1851–1890) was massive state in China led by Hong Xiuquan, a heterodox Christian who claimed to be the younger brother of Jesus Christ and enforced a strict, pseudo-Christian theological rule. In the 1870s, Under Jurez, people were burned for heresy in Mexico. I dare say that Under Dona;d Trump the USA is heading towards a vulgar form of Evangelical+other Christian+MAGA de facto government whose motto is “in God we Trust”. UK has never had a single defining revolution or a strict, written constitutional clause separating church and state. So it retains many “theocratic remnants” built directly into its legal structure. The British Monarch is Supreme Governor of the Church of England. During coronation, the King is anointed in a sacred ritual and swears an oath to the Protestant Reformed Religion. He cannot even be Catholic let alone any other religion.

            • 7
              2

              Hello SebastianSR,
              Being amazed doesn’t make it untrue. Working in the Oil Industry took me to many places. Working in Government/Military IT also took me to places that most people don’t see. Also working within the Military Circles in the Middle East and other Countries, I met many varied “characters”.
              Best regards

              • 6
                2

                LS
                In your wide experience, did you come across as many arrogant b***s******s as you do on CT?

              • 1
                4

                Hello LankaScot,
                You say you’ve met many characters throughout your career, but have you ever encountered anyone quite like our gaslight coach, aka Hairy Deepthi aka The Truth ? Having interacted with many nationalities during my hostel days and professional life, I’ve rarely encountered someone who so consistently mistakes condescension for competence, both within and beyond the CT forum.

                • 1
                  1

                  Hello Leelgemalli,
                  Yes I have, more than one. To give you an example from Academia – My PGCE Supervisor had a number of Degrees, Masters in Education, BEd and a Psychology Degree. I had a debate with her in the Classroom about Alzheimer’s Disease. She claimed it was part of aging. I claimed that it was a build-up of Plaques that blocked Neuron Communication. She exclaimed in front of the Class “well that’s your opinion and you’re entitled to it”. I knew she was wrong because my Father was misdiagnosed with Alzheimer’s but no Plaques were found. He recovered later after the correct treatment. After that she would criticise my work especially when I questioned David Kolb’s and Mumford’s theories on Learning Styles in my essays. The final blow to our relationship was when I questioned Maslow’s 5 levels “Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs”. She maintained that this was a well researched and verified Sociological Paper and who was I to question it. My reply was met with laughter by the whole class “well that’s your opinion and you’re entitled to it”.
                  I successfully passed and was awarded the PGCE.
                  Best regards

            • 4
              9

              SSR,
              I fully agree with you. LankaScot has accumulated a wealth of experience from many places, and I learn something new from him every day. His migration to central Sri Lanka should be an asset, given his well-rounded knowledge, despite attempts by some commenters, such as “Hairy Deepthi aka The Truth” and Lester, to ridicule him.
              –
              It is time for people to become more mindful. As Ehipassiko Vietnamese Thero highlighted upon returning to the US after his “Walk for Peace” across Sri Lanka, many people lack mindfulness despite identifying as Sinhala Buddhists and living among numerous Buddhist temples.
              –
              If our citizens become genuinely mindful, respect the law, and contribute productively to the country without laziness or bias, we can work together for the common good.

      • 4
        4

        “Have you ever wondered why 3 Theravada Buddhist Countries have been accused of War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity?”
        I agree 100 % with you that all these so called Buddhist Countries used the Buddhism for their political and religious extremism. When Sarath talk about LTTE he completely ignores the violence of state terrorism and Buddhist terrorism well before LTTE. The special status to Buddhism was the start of 1972 constitution is the killer of the country.

        • 2
          6

          Ajith,
          1) Thank you for your comment. While it is easy to become trapped in an endless loop of debating past misdeeds, doing so only drains our collective energy and distracts from the core purpose of my article, “A True Buddhist: An Analytical & Pragmatic Critique Of Buddhism.”
          Rather than remaining anchored to a past that inherited nothing but misery, hatred, and a heavy baggage of lost opportunities, we must let bygones be bygones. True progress requires us to focus on the present and look toward the timeless, eternal teachings of the Buddha. Buddhism is not a tool for political rhetoric; it is Ehipassiko—an invitation to “come and see” a philosophy and way of life centered entirely on the cultivation of the mind.
          As the Dhammapada beautifully reminds us: “The mind precedes all mental states. Mind is their chief; they are all mind-wrought. If with a pure mind a person speaks or acts, happiness follows him like his never-departing shadow.”
          Enough has been said about what once divided us. Let us now move forward and focus on what matters most: advancing our collective peace, wisdom, and shared humanity in the present. Thank you for your understanding.
          Best regards,

  • 3
    10

    Furthermore, Ideology (be it Buddhism or Christianity) gets corrupted not only when it gets mixed with state power, but even with rich and powerful private sector patrons. It is the realization of this that made made many freligious leaders to insist that the monks remain poor mendicants. The early Christians practiced poverty as avirtue. The Buddha insisted that a monk should only possess a couple of robes (made by stitching together rags), a begging bowl, a razor, needle and thread and some medicianl herbs as the only Vinaya allowed worldly belongings. The principle of poverty and lack of material power, and the exercise of power derived from moral dignity were what were preached by these religious leaders.
    But most of the time, they built this moral doctrine on supernatural assumptions such as total obedience to an almighty God. When these movements became successful, they were made into commercial movements wielding power –e.g., by the Popes or by people like St. Paul or Mohammod who even had armies. Of course, popes too had armies. Early Christians who faced persecution & were also not just matyars, but also a type of sacrificail army (gods battalions).

    • 3
      9

      Sebastian

      You raise a profound point about how material wealth and state patronage can complicate the original purity of any moral doctrine.

      While history shows that institutions across all faiths have struggled with the corrupting influence of power, the foundational core of the teachings remains unchanged. The Buddha’s original emphasis on detachment and moral dignity established a unique, enduring thread for human rights that transcends historical politics or institutional wealth.

      Ultimately, the true value of the philosophy lies in anchoring ourselves to those core ethics rather than the contradictions of historical institutions.

      Trust the above helps. Thanks

  • 0
    0

    They successfully rescued over 100,000 innocent civilians, liberating them from the clutches of the LTTE The accurate figure is about 299,000. According to UN and Amnesty International (AI), by late May 2009, a total of approx. 230,000 civilians had been registered in humanitarian zones across four districts, while an additional 50,000 to 60,000 individuals were in final screening and registration at transit borders.
    [I will locate the reference and give it next]
    While the Canadian think tank, Mackenzie Institute defended the GOSL actions as a great short-term humanitarian response, anti-GOSL groups linked to Yasmin Sooka ( International Truth and Justice Project) an Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu (Center for Policy Alternatives) characterized them as Nazi incarceration centers and moved to attack and not reconcilliation. Independent reporting from the UN and AI, and Human Rights Watch established that the camps were neither welfare villages nor concentration camps; rather, they were military-controlled facilities facing an acute humanitarian crisis. The tight military control was fueld by fear of remnant LTTE suciders blowing up inside camps. Earlier a female LTTE suicider mingled with roughly 1,000 IDPs, detonated her explosives and killed & injured many at a transit registration point in Sugandirapuram (Mullaitivu).

  • 3
    8

    The refernce to Amnesty International data on IDPs camps in 2009 can be found at:
    See: https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/asa370122009en.pdf

    • 3
      8

      SSR,
      Thank you for sharing the Amnesty International link, which clearly demonstrates that the number of people rescued and accommodated in government camps was around 230,000, as opposed to the initial estimates of 100,000.

      This AI report speaks for itself, which is very helpful in understanding the post-2009 facts on the ground and the unprecedented humanitarian rescue operation spearheaded by military personnel under very difficult circumstances.

  • 3
    8

    The above amnesty international report
    https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/asa370122009en.pdf
    shows that the statement
    They successfully rescued over 100,000 innocent civilians, liberating them from the clutches of the LTTE, should re rectified as it was actually more like 299,000 civilians.

    • 2
      6

      SSR,
      1) Appreciate your taking the time to share this insightful analysis, which perfectly complements our discussion. Thank you for highlighting these comprehensive institutional figures, which serve as a powerful validation of the ground reality.

      2) By confirming that between 284,000 and 300,000 Tamil civilians were successfully received, screened, and accommodated in government facilities by late May 2009, your data effectively underscores the monumental scale of this humanitarian rescue operation. These cross-verified numbers from leading international bodies and watchdogs like Amnesty International lay bare the absolute truth: the military successfully executed a mass liberation of civilians from the LTTE on a scale far greater than initial operational estimates.
      3) This independent documentation completely refutes the minimalist narratives often repeated by lopsided critics. It proves that despite an extraordinarily hostile theater of war, the priority remained the preservation of human life.
      4) Thanks once again for taking the time to revisit these records and bring forward the historical truth.

  • 3
    8

    Sebastain
    Ref comment / thread above, please see below my comment to Nutgpt.

    Hope this is self-explanatory.

    To answer you directly: any objective analyst must prioritize the authoritative, first-hand statements of the United Nations over the selective narratives of non-governmental groups like Amnesty International. UNUSG John Holmes operated with the full backing and diplomatic clout of the UN. His official assessments carry unparalleled weight. In contrast, Amnesty International (AI) has a history of lopsided scrutiny, often turning a blind eye to the realities of state defense against a ruthless terror outfit like the LTTE

    Regarding the Chemmani excavations, a true commitment to the “spirit of truth” means letting verified forensic processes run their course completely. Ongoing excavations shouldn’t be pulled out of context to overshadow established wartime facts—such as the UN’s own documentation of the military rescuing over 100,000 civilians from LTTE clutches.

    Real peace is built on comprehensive facts from the highest international bodies, not by exploiting selective reports to score political points. As such, I turn this back to you for a candid answer: who should we trust to give an accurate picture of the ground reality—the UN or Amnesty International? Over to

    • 3
      7

      Sarath, you continue to say
      such as the UN’s own documentation of the military rescuing over 100,000 civilians from LTTE clutches.
      Regarding the “299,000” that I quoted. The UN Secretary-General’s Panel of Experts and various UN agencies (like UNHCR and OCHA) documented that between 280,000 and 300,000 Tamil civilians were trapped in the rapidly shrinking “No Fire Zones”. By the end of May 2009, approximately 284,000 Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) had crossed over into government-controlled areas. This is well established and hence your 100,000 number is extreme underestimate, and even pro-LTTE writers dont go that far down. Give credit to the GOSL army for saving 300,000 and not just 100,000.
      The values given by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the World Foood Program gave similar numbers. The ICRC similarly based its operations on a civilian baseline population of well over 250,000 people,

      • 3
        9

        SSR,

        You hit the nail on the head. Thank you for bringing these comprehensive institutional figures to light, and I gladly give full credit where it is due: the Government of Sri Lanka (GOSL) forces achieved an even more staggering humanitarian feat by safely rescuing and sheltering nearly 300,000 civilians, rather than the initial 100,000 previously discussed.

        Your inclusion of data from the UN Secretary-General’s Panel of Experts, UNHCR, OCHA, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the World Food Programme serves to strongly validate the sheer, unprecedented scale of this rescue mission. By confirming that approximately 284,000 to 300,000 Tamil civilians successfully crossed over into government-controlled areas by the end of May 2009, your comment effectively dismantles the minimized narratives and myths propagated by elements with vested interests.

        These cross-verified figures from the world’s leading international bodies highlight a monumental effort under extraordinarily hostile conditions. Thank you for anchoring this discussion in verified numbers that showcase the true magnitude of the civilian liberation from LTTE clutches.
        You Made My Day. Thanks After all, “GREAT MINDS HAVE IT ALL IN COMMON”

  • 3
    10

    Hello Sarath, thanks for the article.
    Buddhism is not a label to display before others, nor a political refuge to win votes; it is a way of life rooted in mindfulness, compassion, wisdom, and self-discipline. Sri Lanka’s greatest challenge is not a lack of people who identify as Buddhists, but a shortage of people willing to translate Buddhist values into daily conduct. When politicians exploit religious traditions for power, and citizens accept myths, hatred, and blame without questioning them, the true spirit of Buddhism is lost. A society that honours the Buddha’s teachings must learn to distinguish genuine values from political theatre, evidence from superstition, and wisdom from manipulation.
    Tbc

    • 2
      8

      LM
      Thank you for your profoundly moving post, which so clearly underscores the absolute futility of war and the devastating toll that violence and conflict inflict upon all sides.

      The conflict, which raged for nearly three decades with a heavy toll on human lives, reminds us of the absolute truth articulated so eloquently and abundantly in the Buddha’s sacred Dhamma: that the essence of human life is supreme and uniquely precious.

      As responsible citizens, our highest duty to our motherland is to collectively strive for lasting peace, non-violence, and loving-kindness. This path honors the core principle that every life is invaluable, and that any loss to the horrors of warfare is a tragic waste. Realizing the total futility of man-made conflicts compels us to reject violence entirely, work tirelessly to protect the dignity of all living beings, and prevent the repetition of such devastation in the name of our shared humanity.

    • 8
      1

      Leelagemalli,
      Isn’t Buddhism demeaned when people hide behind Buddhism to justify rape and murder and protect the Rajapaksas?

      • 2
        5

        nutgpt,
        We all know that what is practised in Sri Lanka today does not always reflect the true teachings of Buddhism. Buddhism itself is not demented; rather, certain practices associated with Buddhagama, which shares historical and philosophical connections with Hinduism and Jainism, deserve critical examination. For instance, elephants should not be confined to temples or paraded in ceremonies such as the Kandy Perahera if their welfare contradicts Buddhist compassion.
        –
        The peace march led by the Ehipassiko Thero highlighted such concerns. Many people in our island claim to be devout Buddhists, yet rarely question rituals, symbolic threads, or social customs imposed on others.
        –
        Religious traditions are often exploited by politicians, as seen under both Mahinda Rajapaksa and AKD.
        Similar patterns exist in the United States, where some Christians supported Trump’s return to power. Ultimately, blind religious allegiance discourages critical thinking, allowing religion to become an instrument of political power rather than a path towards truth and compassion.

  • 4
    11

    cont.
    The real measure of a Buddhist society is not the number of temples, robes, or religious ceremonies, but the integrity of its citizens, the conduct of its leaders, and its respect for truth, justice, and humanity. No government deserves unquestioning loyalty merely because it invokes Buddhism, just as no politician should gain public trust through religious symbolism alone. Sri Lanka needs greater political literacy, scientific thinking, and a younger generation courageous enough to question inherited beliefs without abandoning compassion. Perhaps the most meaningful tribute to the Buddha is not simply to worship him, but to practise his teachings.
    –
    A nation changes when its people stop electing politicians who speak their values and start electing those who genuinely live them.
    –
    May our people be blessed with greater wisdom, mindfulness, and courage to rebuild our nation on the foundations of truth, justice, and genuine Buddhist values.

  • 2
    8

    LM,

    I cannot agree more that the true measure of any society lies in the integrity of its actions and its respect for truth, justice, and humanity, rather than in mere symbolism or empty rituals.

    The Buddha’s teachings are a living testament for conduct, not just an inheritance to be blindly worshipped. True wisdom and mindfulness require us to look past political rhetoric and anchor our civic responsibilities in genuine Buddhist ethics—where compassion and moral courage guide our choices. Rebuilding a nation on these authentic foundations is a goal we should all collectively strive for.
    Your insights speak for themselves. After all Great Minds have a lot in common. Regards

    • 2
      7

      Sarath,
      I believe the failure lies within our own people. The hostility displayed by many, including CT-forum and YouTube commenters, is striking. They seem more interested in pulling others down than building one another up. Is this not contradictory in a country where over 70% of the population is said to be Buddhist? Whenever I return to Europe after my annual holidays in my homeland, I am left wondering why people who appear kind on the surface often become agents of conflict rather than peace. I had hoped that, following the physical end of the war, the blessings of all religions practised in our country would help rebuild society. Yet racism, even within the same ethnic community, continues to grow. Perhaps Ehipassiko Thero will have to wait much longer before our nation is ready to embrace the mindfulness he envisions.
      Tbc

  • 3
    7

    cont.
    What should have followed the war was not merely physical reconstruction, but a concerted effort to rebuild society by teaching people the basic difference between right and wrong.
    –
    The present government reportedly gained power by campaigning against former leaders, yet it appears to have struggled with even day-to-day issues, let alone fulfilling its grand promises of “system change.” The President’s public statements have also invited ridicule, including his earlier promises about house construction and 4G towers. Meanwhile, reports of essential medicines being unavailable in state hospitals raise far more serious concerns. Our nation needs less political rhetoric, less hatred, and more compassion, accountability, and genuine social transformation.

    • 1
      5

      LM

      Thank you for your forthright stance on the commentary often seen across these forums. It is indeed disheartening to witness the kind of deflection and vitriol from commenters who seem more interested in hostile rhetoric than addressing the genuine issues affecting our collective progress. It’s a pity that without engaging in the real challenges that impact every citizen across the board, these discussions unfortunately turn into counterproductive arguments that do nothing to foster peace, unity, or harmony.

      Your observation about the deep contradiction between a shared cultural heritage of mindfulness and the ongoing presence of social division hits the nail on the head. True transformation requires a concerted effort to rebuild our societal values and teach accountability over political rhetoric. We must get our act together, look past superficial divisions, and strive hard to build a peaceful nation where all Sri Lankans can thrive regardless of ethnic, religious, or cultural differences. Let us work collectively to make that meaningful change a reality within our lifetime.

      Regards

  • 2
    5

    Dear Readers,
    Sri Lanka is facing deeply troubling questions about governance, accountability, and the future of democracy. Twenty-six months after assuming power, the NPP leadership faces growing public scrutiny over its unfulfilled promises, the slow recovery from Cyclone Ditwah, displaced families still awaiting permanent solutions, and essential bridges that remain unrepaired. Concerns have also been raised about the pace of reconstruction despite reported international financial assistance. These issues demand transparent answers, credible evidence, and responsible action—not propaganda or political hostility.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7gQJtdggnGA
    Tbc

  • 1
    5

    cont.
    The recent controversy surrounding the alleged forced removal of a Buddhist monk’s robe, alongside calls for justice in matters involving Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thero, has further intensified public debate. Any action perceived as political interference in religious affairs deserves careful scrutiny under the rule of law.
    –
    Sri Lanka must not return to the climate of fear and violence that scarred the nation during the late 1980s, when thousands of young lives were lost amid political insurgency and repression. Regardless of who holds power, intimidation, disinformation, and authoritarian tendencies must never be normalised.
    –
    Citizens, journalists, and civil society must remain vigilant, demand accountability, and defend democratic freedoms peacefully. A change of political colour must never mean a change from one form of oppression to another.

  • 2
    1

    I am not criticizing, but I am not clear on this basic premise of the doctrine. I was educated at Ananda and I believed that I had a good knowledge of the philosophy until now.

    We seem to be contradicting everything what the Buddha’s basic premise of Anatta with the Suthra Pitaka where everything is identity and reincarnation. Even Sumedha’s journey to be born finally as Prince Siddhartha carries the identity, which the Buddha attempted to deny. Should it be treated as a book of fairy tales concocted by the Bhanakas?

    What is rebirth? what causes rebirth? What carries one’s accumulated Karma from one or more births, identities, to the succeeding? Are we back to the Sanathana Dhamma with a soul and reincarnation?

    I an inquiring as even Open AI cannot find me an answer. Could any one of you learned people enlighten me please?

    • 1
      3

      1/3

      Nancytwins,

      1 ) Thank you for sharing your thoughts and for your openness in expressing these profound questions. It is completely natural to experience moments of confusion when diving deeply into the philosophy of Dhamma, and your background at Ananda certainly provides a strong foundation for this exploration. Please be assured that questioning is a welcome part of the journey toward understanding.

      2 ) To look at things as they truly are, it helps to approach the teachings without preconceived or conditioned mindsets. When we look closely at the Sutta Pitaka and the core tenets of the Dhamma, we find that the concepts of rebirth, karma, and Anatta (non-self) do not contradict each other, though they can certainly feel paradoxical at first glance.

      3 ) Here are a few perspectives to consider on the points you raised:
      A- Understanding Rebirth without a Soul: In Buddhism, rebirth is distinct from the concept of reincarnation found in Sanatana Dharma, which implies a permanent soul (Atman) migrating from one body to another. The Buddha clearly enunciated that there is no unchanging soul. Instead, rebirth is a continuum of consciousness.

      (TBC)

    • 1
      3

      2/3 ( Contd from 1/3) Nancytwins

      3.
      B. The Transmission of Karma: What connects one life to the next is not a fixed identity or soul, but the cause-and-effect chain of accumulated Karma. Think of it like a flame passing from one candle to another: the second flame is lit because of the first, yet it is not the exact same flame, nor is it entirely separate. In the same way, the journey from the ascetic Sumedha to Prince Siddhartha represents a continuous stream of cause and effect (the accumulation of paramis or perfections), rather than a permanent, unchanging identity.

      C. The Role of the Bhanakas: The Bhanakas (reciters) played a sacred role in preserving the oral tradition of the Tipitaka with immense precision before it was committed to writing. Rather than viewing these accounts as concocted tales, we can see the narrative illustrations in the texts as profound, essential expressions of the Dhamma, meant to illuminate the deep realities of existence for our minds to contemplate.

      ( TBC )

      • 3
        0

        Sarath,
        “Think of it like a flame passing from one candle to another: the second flame is lit because of the first, yet it is not the exact same flame, nor is it entirely separate”
        Your argument is logically wrong.
        A candle by itself cannot light another candle. A person has to do it. So who is this “person “?
        Please don’t go round in circles again.

        • 0
          2

          OC.
          1) Thanks for your interesting perspective, but you are looking at the mechanics of the candles rather than the nature of the flame itself.

          2) The classic candle analogy—traditionally found in the Milinda Panha—is not about the physical act of moving an object, but an explanation of dependent origination (cause and effect). The first flame provides the necessary condition (heat and energy) for the second flame to ignite. No physical entity, “soul,” or “person” travels from the first candle to the second, yet the second flame arises purely because the first one existed.

          3) In Buddhist philosophy, there is no external “person” or permanent unchanging self steering this process. Instead, it is an internal dynamic of energy and consciousness continuing from one moment to the next based on cause and effect. The second flame is entirely dependent on the first, yet it is a new light.

          4) After all, the candlelight example brings us out of darkness and into the light of wisdom..
          Best regards,

          • 0
            0

            Sarath,
            You are going in circles again. According to you, “consciousness ” passes from one life to another. To illustrate this, you (or the Milinda Panha) use two candles as examples of the process.
            1. Applied to life, one person dies when the other receives consciousness.
            2 If there is a time gap, where is the consciousness residing in the interim? A “soul” ?
            3. Both cannot be conscious at the same time.
            4 With regard to candles, both can stay lit at the same time.

      • 0
        0

        Hello Sarath,
        Where is this “accumulated Karma stored?
        Best regards

    • 1
      3

      3/3 ( Contd from 2/3 )

      Nancytwins

      4) Engaging with the Three Sacred Refuges gives us the framework to move past a half-hearted or doubtful approach, allowing us to see through narratives that might otherwise feel contradictory. The Dhamma invites us to investigate patiently and with an open mind, rather than feeling restricted by the limitations of modern AI or immediate intellectual answers.

      5) We are all learners on this path, and your inquiry is a beautiful reminder of how deep the Buddha’s teachings truly run. May you continue your exploration in good spirits and find the clarity you seek.

      6) Thanks fro your understanding. Trust the above helps and clarifies
      With warm regards,

  • 1
    4

    Improving mindfulness in a country where almost everyone seems inclined to spread hate rather than work to eliminate it is a serious challenge. To me, it is like standing before a mirror and seeing one’s image upside down. People must be made to realise that hatred cannot lead us towards progress; instead, cultivating peace of mind and mutual understanding should be our priority. This is especially important at a time when former rebels turned ruling politicians seem determined to win votes by distancing the nation from religion. Religious beliefs and people’s identities have deep roots in society, and separating them is not an easy task.
    –
    Tbc

  • 1
    3

    cont.
    However, economic development may gradually help ease these divisions. Economic hardship often drives low-income people towards resentment and hatred, particularly when they feel neglected or deprived. Europe experienced similar challenges during the early stages of its economic transformation. After the Second World War, many European nations worked hard to rebuild their economies and improve living standards. As economic opportunities expanded, societies gradually moved away from some of the divisions and hostilities of the past. Therefore, alongside promoting mindfulness and religious tolerance, reducing poverty and creating economic opportunities are essential to building a more peaceful and united nation.

    • 0
      0

      LM,

      1) Thank you for your candid reflections on the historical parallels of economic transformation. While the challenges of overcoming division can sometimes feel overwhelming, we must approach the future with a resolute sense of hope and optimism rather than allowing pessimism to cloud our potential.
      2) True national progress requires a forthright commitment to elevating the daily lives of our people, many of whom have long been hard-pressed for basic necessities. Our collective resolve must be to ensure that every individual has access to a well-deserved livelihood, quality education, healthcare, employment, and development opportunities that offer real hope for future generations. Economic empowerment is indeed a powerful catalyst for harmony, but it must go hand in hand with a steadfast commitment by the government to uphold the fundamental rights and freedoms enshrined in our constitution.
      3) Every citizen must remain entirely free to practice their religious beliefs and faith according to their own conscience as equal members of society. By prioritizing both practical human needs and constitutional safeguards, we can move away from resentment and collectively usher in a future of lasting peace, unity, and prosperity within a united Sri Lanka.
      4. Thanks and regards,

  • 3
    2

    The issue we are commenting about is ‘Why I am a Buddhist’. Buddhists are less than 4% of the world’s population. There is no real Buddhism in SL at present time. It is only a part of the culture, period. In addition, since Walpola Rahula wrote ‘Bhikkuwakage Urumaya’ , it has developed in to a political force. The Sangha are sponging off the common man and calling for political power behind the scene or in the open. The common man is expecting a better ‘Athma’ next time around and following the rituals including financing the Sangha. This according to what I have learnt, is not Buddhism.

    So, could anyone commenting or reading, including the author, can you answer my question?

    • 2
      4

      1/2

      Nancytwins

      I appreciate you taking the time to share your perspective, though I must question the precise premise and evidence upon which you base such a preemptive, sweeping conclusion. To assert blankly that “there is no real Buddhism in Sri Lanka at present” is not only a profound mischaracterization /generalization , but it also reduces a complex, living philosophical lineage to a hollowed narrative of absolute absence.

      Your commentary appears to flow from a deeply preconceived and prejudiced mindset rather than a rational assessment of the status quo. By conflating the broad institutionalized or political challenges facing the country with the total non-existence of authentic practice, you rely on a logical fallacy. While structural anomalies, the commercialization of rituals, and political forces—such as the historical trajectory following Bhikkuwakage Urumaya—are valid subjects for critique, they do not erase the silent, enduring practice of true Dhamma that thrives beyond the headlines.

      (TBC)

    • 1
      3

      2/2

      Nancytwins, (Contd from 1/2)
      The very essence of my article, “Why I Am Buddhist,” is to establish a rational and pragmatic critique precisely to decouple the pure, mind-centric framework of the Buddha from the cultural externalized rituals you describe. The core of the Dhamma touches upon nothing but the cultivation of pragna (wisdom), absolute mindfulness, and deep insight into the impermanent nature of existence.

      True Buddhism is defined by an experiential commitment to examining one’s own mind, practicing self-inquiry, and cultivating compassion. To claim that millions of people are collectively incapable of this, simply because they exist within a specific geographical or cultural landscape, is an exercise in blind reductionism. On what objective authority or empirical framework do you dismiss the sincere practice of countless laypeople and dedicated monks who continue to protect and live the lineage of the Theravada tradition?

      Instead of engaging in a hollowed harangue that relies on absolute generalizations, I invite you to look past the surface rituals and engage with the foundational, empirical philosophy that remains very much alive for those who choose to practice it sincerely.

      Thanks for your understanding. Regards

      • 3
        0

        Hello Sarath,
        Buddhist Cosmology is කුණු “kunu”.
        Here’s an example (English Translation) from the Aganna Sutta “‘Then some being of a greedy nature said: “I say, what can this be?” and tasted the savory earth on its finger. In so doing, it became taken with the flavor, and craving arose in it. Then other beings, taking their cue from that one, also tasted the stuff with their fingers. They too were taken with the flavor, and craving arose in them. So they set to with their hands, breaking off pieces of the stuff in order to eat it. And the result was that their self luminance disappeared. And as a result of the disappearance of their self luminance the moon and the sun appeared, night and day were distinguished, months and fortnights appeared, and the year and its seasons. To that extent the world re-evolved”.
        Where is your evidence for this piece of “foundational, empirical philosophy”?
        Best regards

        • 1
          2

          LankaScot
          1) You raise a fascinating point, but your critique misinterprets the text.
          2) The Aggañña Sutta is not a literal science textbook. As scholars like Professor Richard Gombrich detail, it is a brilliant piece of social satire and allegory designed to mock the rigid Brahmin creation myths of that era.

          3) The true “foundational, empirical philosophy” of Buddhism lies in its core principles: cause and effect (Karma), impermanence (Anicca), and the mechanics of the mind. The Buddha’s approach was strictly empirical because he asked us to observe immediate reality—how attachment and craving lead directly to psychological suffering (Dukkha).

          4) When the Buddha said Ehipassiko, he invited us to “come and see” and test our own minds. Confusing a historical parody with literal dogma overlooks the true philosophical sanctity of the Dhamma.

          5) Trust the above makes sense and clarifies.
          Best regards,

    • 3
      0

      nancytwins17,
      It is impossible to answer when there is no question!
      Why I am a Buddhist is NOT a question. If you are one, it was your choice.

      • 1
        0

        Nathan,
        Saying that people choose their religion is often misleading, as many inherit it from birth. Those born and raised in Middle Eastern countries are generally brought up in Islam, while those in India and South Asia follow religious traditions deeply rooted in their families and ancestry. In Europe, religious affiliation may increasingly reflect personal choice. Similarly, many Chinese today do not practise Buddhism despite their ancestors’ historical associations with it. Such patterns vary across countries. Therefore, commenting without understanding these realities, or making evasive generalisations, is no longer meaningful. Thank you.

    • 1
      1

      NancyT says There is no real Buddhism in SL at present time. Is there “real christianity in SL or anywhere? Real Islam?, Real Hinduism, or Real Marxism? Each of these faiths has split into in-fighting groups. May be Theravadins and Mahayanists dont fight but they have had their book burings during the time of King Mahsena. But in the other religions there have been real wars between factions, and even today, the wars of the Middle East go back to the hostility of the two Islamic factions, and Jewish Abrahamics regarding others as infidels. Which of them is “Real”?
      Among Marxist true believers, the hateching of Trotsky as well as various dissidents of Marxism by Stalin is well known. Such inter-faith fighting began even before the Bolshevik Revolution with Rosa Luxemberg killed off by the other “socialists”. In China, Laos, Cambodia etc., splinter groups of Marxist believers fought each other just like the various factions of medieval churches.
      The Buddha said “Ehipassiko” – so you try it out and practice it; if it works for you, then it is the true Buddhism — nothing more complicated than that.

      • 1
        2

        SSR,
        Thanks. You couldn’t have said it better. Thank you for bringing such an objective, global perspective to the discussion and highlighting that institutional fractures exist across almost every major ideology and faith in history.

        Your reminder of the Buddha’s true definition of Ehipassiko perfectly cuts through the noise: the Dhamma is not an abstract cultural label to be debated, but a practical philosophy to be personally tested and lived. If it works in transforming the mind, it is true Buddhism—nothing more complicated than that.

        After all, clarity of thought brings us to the same page.
        Best regards,

  • 4
    0

    Religion is undefined. If you choose to be religious, you already have your definition!

    • 0
      2

      Nathan
      You hit the nail on the head. Thank you for bringing clear logic into the discussion and highlighting that one’s philosophical path is ultimately a matter of personal, conscious choice rather than an issue of global percentages or institutional baggage.

      As explored in my article, “Why I Am Buddhist: A Rational and Objective Perspective,” the Dhamma is Ehipassiko—an open invitation to “come and see” and evaluate the path for oneself. When we strip away the external cultural and political noise, true Buddhism remains a highly individual, rational philosophy centered on the cultivation of the mind. Your focus on individual choice perfectly aligns with that core essence.

      Thanks and regards.
      After all, Great Minds Think Alike.

  • 1
    1

    LTTE was a viable mission until Prabhakaran screwed it up!

    • 0
      1

      Nathan,

      1) Thanks. While your comment offers a retrospective analysis of the past, what has happened has happened, and we have long since moved past that dark era.
      2) Debating historical hypotheses does not change the reality of where we stand today.
      If we are genuinely serious about our collective will to usher in an era of lasting peace, stability, and harmony, we cannot afford to miss the opportunities of the present moment.
      3) Rather than remaining bogged down in the divisions of the past, our focus must remain on the well-being of all people within a united Sri Lanka—one that is acceptable to all communities and transcends the religious, ethnic, and cultural differences that have kept us apart since independence in 1948.
      4) Let us channel our collective energy into making that shared harmony a reality during our lifetime.
      5) Thank you for your understanding. Regards

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.