5 June, 2020

Blog

Abolishing Executive Presidency Is Not A Viable Electoral Strategy

By Jehan Perera

Jehan Perera

For the past month the issue of who will be the presidential candidate of the ruling UNP has been dividing the party and diverting attention away from its needs to develop an election manifesto that is owned by the party as a whole, and not by a faction. There are two main factions, one backing the Prime Minister and party leader, Ranil Wickremesinghe, the other backing its deputy leader and Housing Minister Sajith Premadasa. They have different strengths and support bases. Due to the difficulty that the party leadership is having in selecting one over the other there is an attempt being made to seek the abolition of the executive presidency either before or soon after the presidential elections which are due by December this year.

The issue of the executive presidency has been a contentious one since its introduction in the constitution of 1978. The first executive president JR Jayewardene was gracious to invite one of his defeated opponents at the presidential elections of 1982, Dr Colvin R de Silva, to speak on national television after the vote count. Instead of being gracious in defeat, the learned lawyer turned politician and architect of the 1972 constitution sternly warned of dictatorship and hardships to come and urged the abolishing of the executive presidential system.

The abolishing of the executive presidency has been a part of the electoral campaigns of opposition contestants to that position for most of the presidential elections that followed. At the last presidential election of 2015, the abolishing of the executive presidency took centre stage in the election campaign. President Maithripala Sirisena promised to either abolish or reform the presidency. He also promised to be a one term president, a promise he began to visibly retract from within six months of office. Despite the ominous portents associated with the executive presidency, as outlined by the late Colvin R de Silva, it remains the most highly coveted position of politicians. The track record is that those win the executive presidency find themselves unable and unwilling to give it up.

Strong Leader 

The abolition of the executive presidency prior to the presidential election so that holding it becomes unnecessary is one of the more desperate options being considered. This is a most unlikely prospect as it requires the cooperation of the opposition. However, the opposition SLPP has already selected its presidential candidate, former Defense Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa and believes it has a winning candidate in him. Public opinion polls are said to show that he leads the race in terms of his popularity. His party has a head start over the ruling party in terms of getting its campaign embedded in community mobilisers. In this context, when the SLPP is so near to power, there will be no reason for it to support the abolition of the presidency.

In addition, the executive presidency is so important a feature of the present constitutional structure, it will also require a referendum to abolish the presidency. It will be a difficult task to get the majority of people voting to abolish the executive presidency especially in the run-up to a much anticipated presidential election where the stakes are high and hopes are also high. The present state of mind of the people is that the government system needs to be further strengthened and unified and that a strong leader is necessary. This is the case especially after the Easter Sunday bombings in which the different arms of the government failed to act cohesively. The executive presidency is seen as the centerpiece of such a strong government.

Another option that is being put forward by sections of the ruling party is to field a candidate who will be prepared to campaign on the single issue of abolishing the executive presidency and, no sooner than elected, would take steps to abolish the executive presidential system from the pinnacle of power. This trusted candidate is considered to be Speaker of Parliament Karu Jayasuriya. The Speaker rose to national and international prominence on account of his role in defending parliament from the attacks of the opposition when it joined with the President to topple the government during the period of the abortive constitutional coup last year.

Main Themes 

The media has reported that Speaker Karu Jayasuriya is expected to be proposed as a possible “National candidate” following party leader Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe and Deputy Leader and Housing Minister Sajith Premadasa not reaching agreement on who should contest the presidential election. The Speaker, it is argued, will have the backing of the Buddhist monks, the Sinhala Buddhist majority and the minorities together with civil society if he pledges to abolish the Executive Presidency. In addition, the JVP could step out of the presidential race and back the Speaker’s candidature if his platform is the abolition of the Executive Presidency. This would bring in JVP votes to the ruling party candidate as well as the added benefit of the JVP’s seasoned political campaigners which can bring in floating votes.

However, a campaign to negate something is less likely to be politically attractive than a campaign to do many things. The opposition candidate Gotabaya Rajapaksa is already out in the field, carrying out his campaign, and promising to be a strong leader who will stay the course, be a long term leader, and will use his presidential powers to their fullest to safeguard the country and its people and to develop the economy. By way of contrast, a candidate who focuses on abolishing the executive presidency and exiting shortly after he wins the election is likely to be seen as engaging in a negative campaign. Such a political strategy is unlikely to be electorally viable. A successful political strategy will be one that is able to convince the people of its relevance to the needs of the day.

At the last presidential election the main themes were corruption, abuse of power and human rights violations. By way of contrast, today, in the aftermath of the restriction of power of the executive presidency by the 19th Amendment, the problems in the country are seen as being more a part of the entire system of government and not just limited to the excessive powers of the presidency. A successful election campaign today would be one that leads the people on issues that are current now, such as national security, economic development and minority rights. The main themes of politics must be the main concerns of the people at this time. The abolition of the executive presidency does not fit into the priorities of the people, which include the need for a strong government.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 6
    5

    if karu is put forward as a candidate who will abolish the presidncy,nobody will believe him because since chandrika all the presidents have said the same and once they taste power want it more and more.so nobody is going to vote for karu.Gota will become the president.

  • 7
    2

    Can SL afford a ceremonial President? The current regime is a good example of the dysfunction created by a an uneducated & unsuitable candidate put forward to please the village vote base & satisfy the Buddhist influence but once in power, the worm turned, creating chaos by inability to work with the PM & the party that put him in that position in the first place. A visionary, strong & respected leader, internationally accepted, is fine but a constitution that hands over the power to the PM, makes such a President redundant.

    We have currently a yob President, blatantly corrupt with relatives & cronies enjoying privileges at state expense, considered a joke at best internationally, dithering & passing the buck during his entire period in office. Do we need another? This was JR’s folly & time it is is corrected,

  • 6
    4

    dont waste your time talking about things that are never going to happen

    • 1
      1

      I agree. Even at the 2015 presidential election, people apparently considered a host of issues, not the single issue of the abolition of the presidential system. It was dear to some elite groups and theoreticians. At an election, people want a change and consider the living conditions. A winning campaign should be positive, not negative. Even if the abolition issue was a positive slogan in 2015, it is no longer the case today. Under the present circumstances, defeating the opposition candidate is difficult given the poor performances of the government. Only possibility might be to effect a change within the existing, with a new dynamic face and with a positive program: (1) To eliminate inefficiency and waste and revamp the economy (2) To deliver public services to the poor and needy (3) To encourage the private sector and promise not to nationalize (4) To ensure peace in the country both through security and national harmony. (5) To change the electoral system and give people a responsible MP for an electorate (6) To encourage youth and women for gainful employment and enterprises irrespective of ethnicity and religion or other distinctions.
      A new winning candidate also could ask: (a) Do you need a family rule again? (b) Do you really need a military man for security? (c) Do you need to risk democracy and freedoms (speech and media) in the country? (d) Do you need nationalizations and takeover of property and land by the state? (e) Do you need control of your professions and serve a ruler?

    • 2
      0

      nalmen:- It is up to You and me to Talk about Abolishing the Presidency AND Making it Happen!
      Why should We Help to Create a Situation where Corruption and Nepotism can Take Place?
      It is not a Waste of our Time!

  • 1
    0

    hamlet
    tell us how you hope to do it?
    not pie in the sky but in practical terms

  • 0
    0

    I do agreed with writer on the question of executive Presidency of Ours that Republic of Sri Lanka that an urgently requires STRONG STATE..
    Well I do not believed that Theory of Many Center an advocated and undermined by Sovereignty State of Its has Representative by vested interest of USA and Western consensus.
    Those deliberations are leads to be that political disintegration of nations by hegemonic interest of globe domination by Criminal system USA monopolies-Imperialism .
    Because of that Hard core leadership of UNP’s are behind that dissolution of Executive Presidency system of governance and its STATE .
    On the question of State UNP preached by Weak one ,but we have to work for more strong State in coming years. in political terrorism will be key factor of contesting against fundamental principles of Democracy by LTTE +TNA, JVP of New movement of so-called Janatah(people) Front and Islam terrorist of extremism back by Muslim Political parties in mainstream in members of current system Parliamentary system of governance. In broad sense Democracy having NO ROOMS have been permitted political extremism of Terrorism .
    The late Dr, Dr NM of LSSP’s and their political theories of so-called that London School of Thoughts of LSSP’s are by mobilization of social forces are NOT that reflected ground reality of Sovereignty of People of Sri Lanka?
    It has no nexus to democracy of Third World country like us. Therefor that politics of LSSP’s of Trostkism and JVP of an anarchist

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.