
By Vishwamithra –
“If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its freedom, and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money that it values more, it will lose that too.” ~ W. Somerset Maugham

Appapillai Amirthalingam
Many a book, many a sermon and many a demonstration has been written, pontificated and staged by the forces of the two sociopolitical extremes in Ceylon. They claimed to have represented the true meaning of patriotism and devotion to their racial sect. In actual fact, it was a tribal mindset that was released by man’s primordial instincts. Religion and ethnicity, time and time again, played their respective demonic role and turned once-a-cohesive society into one more divided, a country more tortured and a dual mindset more perturbed.
The Southern Appuhamy and Northern Natarajah have continued to suspect each other more than ever before. Each segment has cornered itself into a ‘comfort zone’ from which any exit to the outside world is not even pondered upon. Sinhalese, well entrenched by their religious leaders, Buddhist Monks, and Tamils by their political and militant leaders.
How did this happen? How did such a peaceful people who lived under the colonial powers, Portuguese, Dutch and British, as one single nation, as one single people, resort to the most inhuman and dastardly unimaginable treatment on the other community. Adults were murdered, hacked and burnt to death while children were dashed on the ground and their mothers raped in front of her children’s eyes. All these macabre executions were done in public for any bystander to behold; the perpetrators seemed to have enjoyed every second of their temporary indulgences. Men of both communities were totally intoxicated, not necessarily by alcohol or any other drug but by their own beliefs in a fake superiority over the other community. They cloaked their acts in pseudo nationalism or fake patriotism. Any person who had the courage and bravado to interfere met with the same ferocity and fury of that phony patriotism.
When one attempts to trace the origins of this unfortunate and cruel fissure between the two communities, one would see 1956 for Sinhalese Buddhists and 1976 for Tamils as somewhat decisive and game-changing years.
For Sinhalese Buddhists, specifically the average not-so-privileged class, 1956 was the year in which their ‘place in the sun’ was assured. Albeit Independence was ‘won’ from British colonialism in 1948, thanks to the intense propaganda spearheaded by the left-wing parities such as the Lanka Sama Samaja Party (LSSP) and the Communist Party (CP), that Independence was merely a luxury state of affairs passed on by the British masters to the local rich and super rich class who inherited massive wealth from their parental bequeaths and consequential education abroad of Oxfordian kind.
Solomon West Ridgeway Dias Bandaranaike was one of them. Born to a wealthy, political family, he studied philosophy, politics, and economics at Christ Church, Oxford, and was called to the bar at the Inner Temple. Returning to Ceylon, he entered local politics by joining the Ceylon National Congress. Having been elected to the Colombo Municipal Council in 1926, he was elected from his family seat in Veyangoda to the State Council of Ceylon for two consecutive terms between 1931 and 1947, while serving in the second term as Minister of Local Administration in the Board of Ministers. Having founded the Sinhala Maha Sabha in 1936 on Sinhalese nationalist lines advocating for self-rule in Ceylon, he joined D S Senanayake by dissolving the Sinhala Maha Sabha and merging it with the United National Party (UNP) at its formation in 1947.
Bandaranaike was known to be a very crafty politician whose leadership was defined in reversible terms. Instead of spearheading a well disciplined crowd of men and women and leading them to a set goal along a prescribed set of national policies based on ideological grounds, he was one who identified where the followers are and led that crowd where the crowd wanted to go. Being a creation of such a mob-oriented local political stream, Bandaranaike introduced one of the most destructive political forces in the country. ‘The common man’ in 1956 was more of a slogan rather than an outcome of an empathetic feel SWRD had for the common man. He was more entrenched in his own reflection for the betterment of his own political aims. The political stream that consisted of ‘the common man‘ and the so-called ‘pancha maha balavegaya’ (five-pronged movement) was introduced which was socially destructive and divisive, economically unsustainable and morally bankrupt.
Yet he managed to draft a pact with the then Federal Party led by SJV Chelvanayakam whose enigmatic charisma continued to grow among Tamils both Northern and Eastern regions in Ceylon. Chelva, as he was fondly called, however, operated within the strict confines of non-violence. The Satyagraha campaigns organized by Chelva’s Federal Party did not bring any comfort to Tamils in the country, especially whose lives were limited to the Northern part beyond Vavuniya.
Successive governments headed by Sinhalese politicians failed to pay any attention to the hardships, both financial and cultural, suffered by Northern people. The gross negligence of Sinhalese politicians was palpable. Having failed to introduce the Bandaranaike-Chelvanayagam pact in 1957 and Dudley-Chelvanayakam pact in 1966, our leaders of yesteryear punted the ball instead of running with it and scoring a touchdown!
It was into this disappointing scenario a young lad from Pannakam near Vaddukodai in Northern province of Ceylon entered into Illankai Tamil Arasu Kachchi (Federal Party) in 1949 and became its Youth Front and became its leader. His name was Appapillai Amirthalingam. In the year 1976, exactly after twenty years from the rise of Bandaranaike, Amirthalingam had become the Leader of the opposition and the Federal Party had become the main partner of the Tamil United Liberation Front.
Even though Chelvanayagam was relatively a passive opponent, Amirthalingam had become more assertive and close to be militant in his approach to gaining concessions from any central government led by Sinhalese Buddhists. In 1972 the ITAK, ACTC (All Ceylon Tamil Congress) and others formed the Tamil United Front later renamed Tamil United Liberation Front. Amirthalingam was delivering leaflets along with other leading Tamil politicians such as M. Sivasithamparam, V. N. Navaratnam, K P Ratnam and K. Thurairatnam in 1976 when they were all arrested on government orders. Sivasithamparam was released but the others were taken to Colombo and tried for sedition. All the defendants were acquitted after a famous Trial at bar case in which 72 Tamil lawyers including SJ.V Chelvanayakam and G. G. Ponnambalam appeared for the defense. S.J.V Chelvanayakam, leader of the TULF and ITAK, died in April 1977. Amirthalingam took on the leadership of both organizations.
It was in 1975, one year before the TULF was formed, Alfred Durraiappah, the Mayor of Jaffna, was murdered in broad day light, presumably by a young man named Velupillai Prabhakaran. Amirthalingam’s sympathies were always with the youth in Jaffna and he clandestinely helped the militant organizations and was alleged to have been supplying both moral and financial support to the youth organizations in the peninsula. In other words, he did unleash a hitherto concealed political force in the North. But he did not know that he, himself with Yogeswaran, Jaffna MP, would become victims at the end of these youth’s guns.
In an effort to bring about unity amongst the Tamils, Yogeswaran made contact with the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Elam (LTTE) and met with them several times. He arranged a meeting between the Tamil Tigers and the TULF leaders at their Bullers Road residence. On the evening of 13 July 1989 three men, Peter Aloysius Leon (Vigna), Rasiah Aravindarajah (Visu) and Sivakumar (Arivu), arrived at the residence. Aloysius and Visu went inside the house whilst Sivakumar remained outside. The two men met with Yogeswaran, Amirthalingam and Sivasithamparam in Yogeswaran’s apartment on the first floor. The meeting seemed to be going well when suddenly Visu pulled out a gun and shot Amirthalingam in the head and chest. Yogeswaran stood up but was shot by Aloysius and Visu. At the behest of Prabhakaran, the leadership of the TULF was eliminated.
Amirthalingam, of course, had not learnt a lesson from the Bandaranaike playbook. If one were to play tough man with militant organizations, one had to take immense precaution as to how far one could go with such organizations, terrorist or otherwise. It’s so hard to keep control of what is going to develop along the way. Instead of you controlling the momentum, the very momentum would ultimately control you. That is the sad story one has to learn from such flirtations with terrorist organizations.
Bandaranaike in 1956 never understood the power of the Pancha Maha Balavegaya and ‘the common man’. When the leadership of the Pancha Maha Balavegaya was in the hands of some thugs in saffron whose ideal is not so much consistent with that of the common man, inexperienced and self-centered men, what entails would be far too unpalatable to societal development. Bandaranaike’s pronounced ideals may have had a novel and daring appeal to the common man, but its romanticist journey will unfailingly lead to social stagnation and political instability.
As much as SWRD Bandaranaike did not learn the harder lessons of politics, neither did Amirthalingam. Both were sides of the same coin.
*The writer can be contacted at vishwamithra1984@gmail.com
R Kaz / August 11, 2023
What an absolutely ridiculous comparison. Amirthalingam and the TULF’s nationalist tilt in 1970s was a result of entrenched anti-Tamil racism within the Sinhala political elite, where they were unafraid to use violence against Tamils when required and repeated failures of the Sinhala political elites to keep promises. The TULF had correctly formed the view that the Sinhala political elites could not be trusted to treat Tamils as equal citizens and history shows us, even in 2023 that they were right.
SWRD on the other hand came from a supremacist majoritarian ideology, whether he did it for electoral purposes or he believed in the ideology, the end result was a brutally divided nation. The TULF were just responding to this ideology to safeguard the rights, lives, culture and religions of the Tamil speaking people. Nothing more.
/
srikrish / August 11, 2023
It was an unfair comparison. SWRD was only a political opportunist after power and was not a genuine Sinhala Buddhist nationalist, whereas Amirthalingam was a Tamil nationalist, not after power, but genuinely fought for a cause.
/
RAVI PERERA / August 11, 2023
“Amirthalingam was a Tamil nationalist, not after power, but genuinely fought for a cause.”
This man reaped what he sowed.Still remember the moment i heard the news of his death. Moment of joy.
His wife fought for a bigger cause since she wanted to make slippers out of sinhala skins. She too suffered a lot in the end
/
leelagemalli / August 11, 2023
But why on earth Racists like Rajapakses don’t suffer from anything?
That proves karmic retribution is selelective? 😙😙😙😙
/
SJ / August 11, 2023
RP
“Still remember the moment i heard the news of his death. Moment of joy.”
What a rotten sentiment is this!
/
Native Vedda / August 15, 2023
RAVI PERUMAL PERERA
The Sinhala Speaking Demela
–
“This man reaped what he sowed.Still remember the moment i heard the news of his death. Moment of joy.”
–
Did you feel that way when Sarronistas assassinated the English Speaking Demela S W R D Pandaranayagam?
–
By the way you are beginning to show Gota-Prabaharan syndrome. I suggest you consult a good doctor here if you can or make an appeal to your long lost cousin Stalin. If you don’t get good treatment in good time you might end up like Mahinda’s step brother the rustler Mervyn Silva PhD who recently said he was ready to pluck Tamil people’s head.
–
Do you also hear voices in your head like him?
I am sure many in this forum share your pain
–
Take care
/
SJ / August 11, 2023
“Amirthalingam was a Tamil nationalist, not after power”
Not after power?
Please check with people in the FP in the 1960s and 70s.
NR Rajavarothiam’s memoirs “Panagoda Days” will give one some taste of the man.
He manipulated the TULF to keep both Kumar Ponnambalam and SC Chandrahasan out of parliament. Neelan Thiruchelvam, who was not a political animal then, was made MP for Vaddukoddai in the manoeuvre. He dashed SCC’s hopes by moving from Vaddukkottai to KKS, the seat of SCC’s father SJVC.
One may also check with leading forces of the youth movements of 1970s to 1980s.
/
Agnos / August 12, 2023
SJ,
You find fault with AA contesting KKS. But AA was looking for a comeback win, and the party supporters felt KKS was the right fit. Neither KP nor SCC had any significant support base among Tamils, so your contention is not exactly right. SJV had sort of anointed AA as his successor and didn’t like his son getting into politics. Perhaps Karikalan Navaratnam, the lawyer who was close to SJV and AA, and writes articles on CT from Canada, can shed light here. I recall reading a book or article by him in my teenage years on SJV, where he claimed one of the great qualities of SJV was that he didn’t push his son as his successor.
Regardless, on the main point, I would say that any claim that a politician is not after power is childish.
I had heard K.V. Balakumar of EROS making a similar claim about EROS in newspapers when EROS was referred to as a junior partner to the LTTE. But recently I learned from an article by DBS Jeyaraj that the EROS leadership was behind the killing of TRRO’s Kandasamy. So you get the idea.
/
SJ / August 13, 2023
Are you saying that AA was scared to contest from Vaddukoddai?
Surely, after 1976 “Vaddukkoddai Resolution” would that not have been the ideal seat to win?
None of SJVC’s children but Chandrahasan took an interest in FP politics and the son-in-law was a UNP loyalist–rather interesting for the ‘father of the Tamil nation’.
I am not arguing that the KKS seat is a family trust of SJVC, but as a party activist Chandrahasan had a legitimate claim.
*
Are you saying that AA was no manipulator? Many a blunder by the FP involved AA and his clique that was a party within the party.
Why did AA refuse Vaddukkodai to Kumar Ponnambalam who had a legitimate right as the seat was held by an ACTC member.
Why was Neelan smuggled in?
/
Native Vedda / August 15, 2023
Agnos
–
Many many moons ago EROS at a public meeting in London owned up the killing of Mr Kandasamy and unreservedly apologised causing his death I was told.
–
Are you implying Balakumar went on shooting spree and never took responsibility for 100 of thousands dead bodies?
–
Why didn’t VP kill Balakumar or massacre his comrades?
–
Do you know why Karikalan was denied holding the job of secretary to the Opposition Leader’? I was told a most unsuitable old man was given the job. Perhaps nepotism.
–
Just forget SJ who is one of those self hating Demela.
/
srikrish / August 13, 2023
SJ,
May I justify my observation that
“Amirthalingam was a Tamil nationalist, not after power”
Not after power?
Look at the issue in a historical sense,
Lenin, Stalin , Trotsky, Mao, Castro, Nehru and many other historic figures, were all holding to power under heavy opposition to achieve a greater goal than merely holding to power!.
The cause is their primary objective and power was only a secondary objective, without power, you may not achieve anything at all.
/
SJ / August 14, 2023
I know well your craft of drawing red herrings.
I only contested the claim that someone was not after power.
*
So Mr AA was a man of the calibre of Nehru et al?
Brilliantly pathetic!
/
Anpu / August 12, 2023
Even SWRD eldest daughter Sunethra said SWRD is an opportunist and what he did was wrong. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIhUK_1VRms
/
SJ / August 12, 2023
Back to silly tricks again?
The interviewer was trying to put words into her mouth.
She did not say any such thing. She simply said that she couldn’t say why he did it.
Either your hearing is defective or you are lying.
/
Anpu / August 13, 2023
This is what I hear in the clip
Faraz Shauketaly
“What do you feel, miss B? If your father had not bought the Sinhala only issue, the country would have been thriving by now. the very best left. Clever tamils left, and we are left with the others. Want to answer that? “
Sunethra Bandaranaike
“Yes, I would like to answer that. He was my father. But I agree with what he says. I have always said that to you. I may be talking out of turn, but the truth must be so told. Yes. Why he did it is anybody’s guess. Opportunism, to be popular politically, I don’t know. But what this person says is true. And it saddens me deeply. “
Faraz Shauketaly
“Thank you for being honest upfront and open. It’s all part of the news line ethos anyway. “
Sunethra Bandaranaike
“Yeah. Thank you. “
/
SJ / August 14, 2023
“Why he did it is anybody’s guess. Opportunism, to be popular politically, I don’t know.”
Shauketaly suggested something, and Sunetra refused to commit.
You are constructing things.
That is not being honest.
/
Anpu / August 14, 2023
You have deliberately left this bit “But what this person says is true. And it saddens me deeply.”
/
SJ / August 15, 2023
Which bit of yours have I left out deliberately?
Do you want me to repeat your whole text?
There is nowhere in the interview where Sunetra agreed that her father was an opportunist, let alone say it.
Listen to the words in their right sequence and check what she agreed with.
Is not “Why he did it I do not know.” loud and clear to you?
*
What really saddens you is that you have been caught out badly.
/
Rohan25 / August 11, 2023
Yes, are you correct what a load of rubbish trying to compare calculated state-sponsored discrimination, marginalisation, violence, pogroms, and ethnic cleansing against the island’s Tamils, which started from independence by the Sri Lankan state or then Ceylon and got worse and worse, with each government, until it has now reached genocidal or structural genocidal levels, where the planned systematic destruction of the island’s Tamil people’s homeland, their history and monuments in now being carried out very vigorously by the state, the armed forces, the Buddhist clergy and many government departments like Archaeology, Mahaveli, land and forestry, using all sorts of lame excuses and fake concocted history to steal and acquire Tamil people’s lands and destroy ancient Hindu temples, with the justifiable resistance that only started in the late 70s, after all, other peaceful methods to sort this out failed by the Tamil politicians.
/
Rohan25 / August 11, 2023
This is in my opinion deliberately trying to justify what is now happening to the Tamils by equating the just resistance that was put up by the Tamils against state-sponsored Sinhalese racism, marginalisation and war crimes against them. What did they expect the Tamils to sit and passively accept all the violence, discrimination and oppression that the Sinhalese-led state was dishing out to them from independence, by every Sinhalese-led government and is still continuing, on an accelerated scale, after the defeat of the LTTE, proving it was not Tamil politicians, elite, the TULF, or the TNA who are the problem but the Sinhalese people by large, their politicians, elite and religious leaders.
/
Anpu / August 11, 2023
Mr Vishwamithra
Before independence –
“Tamil nationalism was borne on August 1923, the architect being Sir Pon Arunachalam, who was betrayed by the then Sinhalese leaders James Peiris and E. J. Samarawickrema who broke the promise of reserving one Legislator seat for Tamils in the Western Province in the Legislative Council [where a large number of Tamils lived at that time].”
/
Anpu / August 11, 2023
It was Sir Arunachalam Ponnambalam who first [1934] exhorted the Tamils that:
“They should work towards promoting the union and solidarity of what we have been proud to Call ‘TAMIL EELAM’ . We desire to preserve our individuality as a people, to make ourselves worthy of inheritance. We are not enamoured about cosmopolitanism which would make us neither fish, fowl nor red-herring.” https://countercurrents.org/2020/11/tamils-of-sri-lanka-betrayals-and-betrayals/
/
SJ / August 11, 2023
Anpu dear,
I guess that it is Sir Ponnambalam Arunachalam who is referred to as Sir Arunachalam Ponnambalam as there can be none other with a knighthood and these two parts to the full name.
The gentleman passed away in January 1924
Interesting to hear from Anpu that in 1934 he first exhorted the Tamils that “They should work towards promoting the union and solidarity of what we have been proud to Call ‘TAMIL EELAM’ . etc. etc.”
*
Congratulations Anpu. This is a new peak for you in clutching at straws. (Counter Currents is a decent website, but not all contributors choose to be truthful or accurate.)
It will help you to seriously read a little about this great man.
/
Anpu / August 12, 2023
SJ,
(1) writing the name was error.
(2) 1934 – It must have been error
Tamill Eelam and Sir Ponnambalm Arunachalam is a FACT.
(a)”He, who agitated for ‘Ceylonese nation’, spoke of ‘unifying and consolidating ‘Tamil Eelam’ on the premise that Tamils ‘had for ages enjoyed separate nationhood and a separate sovereignty’. It was not the TULF or Prabhakaran who wanted to establish ‘Tamil Eelam’, it was Sir Ponnambalam Arunachalam who first thought of the establishment of ‘Tamil Eelam’ as he found that the Sinhalese leaders were adamant in refusing to accommodate the sentiments of the Tamils in any form and the constitutional reforms of Ceylon were made as a policy of appropriating gain for the majority without corresponding benefit to the Tamils. However, the Jaffna Tamils rejected his plea for Tamil Eelam and ‘hooted him in the streets of Jaffna’.” https://www.sundaytimes.lk/030209/columns/cv.html
(b) “This was the birth or conception of the project of and for Tamil Eelam—and it is no accident that the term itself appears, probably for the first time in this founding speech by Sir Ponnambalam Arunachalam.” DR DAYAN JAYATILLEKA
/
SJ / August 13, 2023
Make up your mind before tapping on the keyboard.
“Tamill Eelam and Sir Ponnambalm Arunachalam is a FACT.”
*
The term Tamil Eelam was not part of the Tamil political vocabulary until around 1970. C Suntharalingam used the term Eelam (spelt in some funny way) in 1956, but did not call for secession.
The term ‘Tamil Eelam’ occurs in a citation of Arunachalam in Tamil Nation in an essay whose title itself was mischievous. The term clearly occurs in passing in the context of a pan-Tamil project that Arunachalam was contemplating, and not as a call for a separate state by that name.
The well respected author T Sabaratnam writing in “https://www.sangam.org/2010/12/Tamil_Struggle_18.php” had no reference to Tamil Eelam by Arunachalam, in his text which cited extensively from the speech of Arunachalam.
*
The comment “However, the Jaffna Tamils rejected his plea for Tamil Eelam and ‘hooted him in the streets of Jaffna’” is not supported by any source but claimed by CV Vivekananthan who dubiously claimed that Arunachalam campaigned for a separate state.
Such is the tragedy of Tamil historiography.
/
Anpu / August 13, 2023
I know when to make up my mind. You do not need to tell me.
https://tinyurl.com/52ba8x2j The Rise of Tamil Separatism in Sri Lanka: From Communalism to Secession
By Gnanapala Welhengama, Nirmala Pillay
“A.J.Wilson … Arunachalam’s Ceylon League was to achieve a Tamil Eelam.”
Hellmann-Rajanayagam points out that the word was not in common usage before Arunachalam coined the term, Tamil Ealam”
Are these respectable people – Gnanapala Welhengama, Nirmala Pillay, AJ Wilson and Hellmann Rajanayagam? Are they lying?
/
SJ / August 14, 2023
A, your ability to make up your mind failed to show itself well in
“(1) writing the name was error.
(2) 1934 – It must have been error”
Had you made up your mind intelligently, the errors may have not occurred, unless the purpose was to mislead, in which case I am at fault to accuse you of a lesser offence.
*
They are all relying on a sentence which was not written by Arunachalam but a reported interview. How precise the reporting was is another matter.
None of them offer further evidence, but use that single reported utterance.
How is that none of his contemporaries pulled him up for that phrase?
Besides, how is that the term ‘Tamil Eelam’ took half a century to re-enter Tamil politics? (Suntharalingam stopped at a mis-spelt Eelam in 1957. Other separatists and crypto-separatists stopped at Eelam– including the composer of the ‘Eelam anthem’ of the early-mid 1960’s starting “eelath thirunaade”.)
*
I will not ask you to think about these matters for I may be asking for the impossible and thus offend your fine sentiments.
/
SJ / August 15, 2023
Anpu dear
I had access to the collection: Speeches and Writings of Sir Ponnambalam Arunachalam [http://constitutionalreforms.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/PA_book-full.pdf]
“…The League was brought into existence by political necessity, but politics is not its raison-d’etre. It has far higher aims in view, namely, to keep alive and propagate those Tamil ideals which have through the ages made the Tamils what they are, to keep alive and propagate these precious ideals throughout Ceylon, Southern India and the Tamil Colonies, to promote the union and solidarity of Tamilakam, the Tamil Land. We desire to preserve our individuality as a people, make ourselves worthy of our inheritance and worthy members of the British Empire. We are not enamoured of that Cosmopolitanism which would make of us “neither fish, flesh, fowl, nor red-herring.” ” (pp 423–424)
*
Contrast it with what you cited :
““They should work towards promoting the union and solidarity of what we have been proud to Call ‘TAMIL EELAM’ . We desire to preserve our individuality as a people, to make ourselves worthy of inheritance. We are not enamoured about cosmopolitanism which would make us neither fish, fowl nor red-herring.”
*
There is something fishy about the following sentence reproduced by you but missing in the above book:
“They should work towards promoting the union and solidarity of what we have been proud to Call ‘TAMIL EELAM’”
It appears as “We should keep alive and propagate these ideals throughout Ceylon and promote the union and solidarity of what we have been proud to call Tamil Eelam…..” in Tamil Nation.
*
Frankly the style of this sentence (in both versions) is rather unlike the style of the rest of the text.
Whom do we believe?
/
SJ / August 15, 2023
Also
When was the term “Tamil Eelam” first used in Ceylon political discussions.
‘Eelam’ was the commonly used term as an alternative to ‘Ilankai’. It referred to the whole island in Sir PA’s time and long after until the 1970s, when some separatists used it to refer to the Tamil speaking areas. Later the qualifier Tamil was added.
Can someone clarify which entity could have been called “Tamil Eelam” by Sir PA, if he ever did use the term? That has to match the rest of Sir PA’s thoughts of the time.
/
Naman / August 12, 2023
What is the point in talking about the past? Are the Singhalese especially ready to rectify the past errors and move forwards. In Australia, the current rulers had sincerely apologised to the Aborigines. Will the current rulers do so for badly treating the minorities? In the past only the Tamils were deprived of Justice. Now, every law abiding citizen of any race or religion is deprived of Justice
/
P.Rajeswaran / August 12, 2023
Mr.Ravi Perera
You have sadly mistaken or should i say, because of your charecteristic attribute, you are frivolously blaming the wife of làte Mr.Amirthalingam as having made deplorable statements like making slippers out of human skin. Actually it was K.M.P.Rajaratna who made such demoralizing utterances on election platforms in the 60s and i was able to listen to his such speeches wĥen i worked as a govt officer in that area. He was referring to the upcountry Tamils and wanted to make slippers out of their skin.
It is very sad that because of people like RP the country is unable to progress economically, politically, socially and mired in corruption and racism.
/
SJ / August 14, 2023
PR
“The wife of the late Mr.Amirthalingam” did make equally bad racist utterances in the 1970s.
The couple were an inspiration to young Tamil militants.
Her venom ceased after Mr A accepted the post of Leader of the Opposition.
*
Much later, years after the horrible assassination of Mr A, she openly regretted much of her political past.
/
Nathan / August 12, 2023
Is Vishwamithra short of ideas. What a wastage.
If at all there is anything to compare both SWRD and Amirthalingam were shortsighted. To contrast, SWRD is aristocratic; without SJV, Amirthalingam is a nobody.
At a time when a united front was paramount, Tamils were weakened by the infighting Amirthalingam was responsible for.
/
SJ / August 13, 2023
So being aristocratic is very important in politics?
The feudalism that invaded some minds is still clinging on well.
/