14 July, 2024


Chasing The Mirage Of National Reconciliation

By Austin I Pullé

Austin I Pullé

The proposed “National Reconciliation” project is foolhardy and ill-advised for many compelling reasons. First, the current social and economic crisis requires attending to the needs of the population in terms of cost of living, hunger and malnutrition alleviation and revenue generation as the topmost priorities displacing all other matters to the back burners. Second, there were and are a few persons who could pull off the major changes demanded by a comprehensive national reconciliation project. The President is manifestly not one of them. Third, hostility to some key components of the project would ensure its defeat. Fourth, the project assumes that throwing more politicians at a problem is the method of solving it. The fatuity of this uncovered assumption speaks for itself. A more productive alternative is a general overhaul of the system that presently unsettles ethnic and religious minorities and which also contain some features designed to prevent repeats of outrages that prompt political systemic changes. 

Millions go hungry and the country is so poor that not a day goes by without a news item about some foreign agency, government, or foreign charity making a donation of some sort or another to the country. Beggars cannot be choosers least of all choose a project that diverts much needed resources into a Mickey Mouse adventure.  An analogy would be a family whose house is on fire planning a vacation at a 7 star resort in the Maldives instead of dousing the fire and saving their dwelling. A less propitious moment for healing the wounds inflicted on the national psyche by the Battle of Vijithapura, BCE 161, can hardly be imagined.

In every society, only a leader who is trusted by key segments not to sell out the country can effect the necessary outreach that others cannot. The breakthrough relations with China from the US could not have been done by an LBJ or a Jimmy Carter. But Richard Nixon could and did with Kissinger at his side. In Sri Lanka, an ambitious restructuring that reconciliation supporters desire could have been done only by the husband and wife prime ministers and the first President Rajapaksa. The Oxford educated husband caved into the demands of a set of protesting monks outside his residence. He tore up a pact, the BC pact, showing how much worth was the promise of a Prime Minister who instituted Sinhala Only but could not dissuade a group of monks from demanding that he break his promise. He could have applied his oratorical skills in a bully pulpit address to the nation to explain his deal but failed to do so. His wife, as prime minister, flanked by the sinister NQ Dias and the meritocracy – phobic Badi-ud-din Mahmud were more interested in destroying Catholic schools, imposing standardization, and marginalizing Christians and Tamils. During her tenure, the embers of the brutal civil war began to ignite. The first President Rajapaksa, on the other hand, did make the right conciliatory statements but perhaps believed he had to be faithful to his core constituency addicted to hating the minorities, even going to the foolish extent of ignoring the praiseworthy recommendations of his own Lessons Learned Reconciliation Committee. The current President, who in earlier roles downplayed the barbarity of 1983 by saying it was not as harmful as the damage done to the Sinhala industrial class and who has opposition leader tore up a draft constitution that involved devolution proposals, is still unlikely to be trusted by the majority community to not give away the country. After having been spurned by his electorate, his legitimacy for the position is as brittle as a dried twig. Absent a credible sponsor of an ambitious national reconciliation project, it will be a reckless waste of energy and resources that will likely inflame anti-minority embers. Moreover, the Northern politicians will be justly blamed for putting their interests ahead of national interests by extracting concessions during a time of societal collapse. The South will see them as some type of Dravidian Shylocks and racial strife rather than national reconciliation will be the result. 

A fractured society where a sizable number writhe in anguish if a few stanzas of the national anthem are sung in Tamil  during National Day celebrations and have a contingent march in the major Colombo perahera, attended by the President, bearing aloft the national flag with the two strips signifying the minorities removed, does not possess the essential conditions for the inauguration of far reaching political reforms inherent in the present national reconciliation agenda. Add to that the incandescent fury of youth who see their leaders detained by the manifestly abusive use of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, and the combined opposition  by these groups to the project is well-nigh insurmountable.

The first steps to national reconciliation must be baby steps. They certainly don’t include throwing in more politicians at the problem. America has a total land area of 3,717,792 square miles, a population of over 300 million, and is represented by 435 congresspersons with the right to vote. Sri Lanka has a land area of 25,332 square miles, a population of over 23 million, and 225 MPs. This outlandish disproportionate representation could only be justified if it can be shown that these representatives on a cost-benefit analysis have yielded good outcomes to the people. But time and time again, these representatives show that their concern is with their own perks and privileges rather than the interests of the community that elected them. Duty free cars, security detail, housing with not pushback for non-payment of utility bills, pensions, and the power to recommend persons to be in charge of police stations are but a few of the outlandish perks and incentives. Take the case of the Eastern Province MPs, who should have been confined to their day jobs in an abattoir. They rushed to support the draconian 20th Amendment vesting vast powers in a President who appointed a rabid Muslim basher as the head of a One Country One Law reform commission, decreed that Muslim dead could not be buried but must be cremated, and was the patron saint of the BBS. They also reinforced the stereotype of the community held by others that members of their community lack all ethical and moral standards and would sup with the devil to harm the country if they personally benefit.

So what have these 225 worthies produce? Let us count the ways. At independence, our colonial master bequeathed to us a society that only  ranked below Japan in terms of wealth, institutions, and education. Today we have a corrupt, politicized, and discredited military and police. The country largely consists of a parasitic class that consumes subsidies but is unable to create and produce. The erosion of meritocracy and competence in the universities has been accompanied by brutal ragging practices that the government cannot stop. A tiny but powerful group of activist monks exercise more leverage and influence than highly educated professionals. Their nonsensical justification that they are just continuing the practice of their forbears advising kings is undercut by the fact that at present there is a democracy and there is no need for an intermediary class to communicate the needs of the ruled to the ruler. Their incompetence, arrogance and ignorance have led to the catastrophic overnight switch to organic fertilizer, the appropriation of public spaces to erect statues, and their hysterical opposition to any demands by minorities for equal treatment. 

So an ambitious national reconciliation program is the last thing that the comatose nation needs. What is needed is a set of reforms, which as the Chinese saying goes, will be a rising tide that lifts all boats and will benefit all communities. Specific reforms that address minority grievances must be rooted in fairness. Reforms built around the following will garner more support than all the grandstanding of a vanity project committees initiated by a publicity hungry president. 

First, the rampaging white elephants known as provincial councils must be abolished. Several immediate benefits will be realized. These councils are a waste of precious funds, add another level of opportunity for corruption and extortion, as demonstrated by the conviction of a cabinet minister for his extortion when he was a chief minister, and absorbs unqualified persons into positions based on patronage. In the North, these unqualified persons will most likely not be Christians or those of the so-called lower castes. More importantly, elimination of these provincial councils will assuage the concerns of the paranoid South who believe that these are nothing but Trojan horses for eventual separation. This is a good trade-off.

Second, it is beyond cavil that discriminatory and arbitrary action in the North East has advanced a Sinhala supremacist agenda that has discriminated and harmed people who have lived in the area for generations. European company law has a two tier system of governance and the higher tier, the Supervisory Board, plays an important role in corporate governance. Borrowing this concept, Sri Lanka could do well with a specialist oversight board consisting of distinguished professionals representing the various communities who will be charged with various important functions. This will be an ombudsman type outfit but with powers to stop and rectify wrongdoing. The most important of these will be mandating the return of unnecessary acquisitions of land by the military to their original owners, the prevention of unauthorized structures such as temples, kovils, and mosques, and the interdiction of government sponsored re-settlement schemes. Everyone must be free to live anywhere in Sri Lanka but if persons move to the North and East they must show that they are bona fide purchasers who actually own their funds. 

Third, as an important step in the reconciliation process, there must be established a reparations board that will compensate the victims of the state sponsored Aluthgama and Digana riots and the 1983 pogrom. No compensation should be given to owners of property destroyed this year because the damage was not caused by state sponsored agents. Insurance companies and/or individual’s personal finances should be used for re-building such destroyed properties.

Finally, there must be established an office of special counsel, independent, properly funded, and comprising a reputable lawyer heading a cadre of qualified lawyers. The office of the special counsel must be charged with the job of bringing actions which the craven Attorney General has declined. The remit of the office would be to challenge human rights violations, suing law enforcement, like the police, for damages when they trample upon rights guaranteed by the constitution, challenge abusive detentions under the Prevention of Terrorism Act, and engage in public interest litigation. 

A combination of reforms that benefit all of Sri Lankan society as well as address the legitimate grievances of minorities that would be recognized by reasonable persons  are steps that would win widespread support. Rome was not built in a day. Festina Lente!

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 4

    Austin I Pullé is right and wrong. Right in a way and wrong in many ways.

  • 7

    Austin, given our current situation, politicians to stay in power will like to reignite the racial flame. One way to do this, is to bring up SHAM reconciliation, so that rabid SB lead by the yellow robed can go rampaging. Haven’t we heard and seen it all. Pathetic.

  • 4

    I thought the ‘aragalaya’ protest was a new beginning with people of all ethnicity & religions grouping together as citizens of one nation, rising up against corruption, mismanagement & racism but it was as if a dream, only to be woken up in the morning to see that nothing has changed. The same yobs & thugs govern the country, so, if there is any thing to learn, it would be that nothing changes in SL but gets worse by the day unless the original aragalaya continues until there is a change in governance. The current political club has high entry barriers with a corrupt military & police, & even judiciary, as gatekeepers.

    Justice minded lawyers appeared for those protestors at the receiving end of state sponsored brutality & I hope such civic minded people will continue to fight for a change of regime. Even then, unless the generous perks & privileges of politicians are abolished, the entry barriers will remain high to prevent outsiders coming in. As long as racial & religious disharmony prevails, we will have yobs & thugs sucking the lifeblood of the country.

  • 4

    The most powerful Presidents in the world are Presidents of Sri lanka. His Minister, His military, His Police and and Buddhist Monks are involved in destroying a Hindu Temple and Building a Buddhist Temple illegally ignoring the court orders is a wll known fact. Did our President say anything or took any action against those culprits? No. This happened in 2021 or 22. Similarly, 1983, Jaffna library was burnt to ashes when the Sri Lankan Ministers were in present and military and police are in prresent. then Prersident did anything? No.
    Why, the Presidents are powerful then and now but their power is to destroy the law and justice and protect Criminals and Majoritarian Buddhist Fundamentalism.

    • 2

      Ajith, The fundamentalism you mention has been a dismal failure and has no future. The reality of absolute truth is that all men are created equal and legally have equal protection of the law whether president or prisoner like Vasantha Mudalige. It is even more important to be within spiritual law affecting the eternal state, specially when people doubt that it even exists.

  • 3

    Austin Pillai, like Nathan, stated you are right in some ways but wrong in many. As per the 1987 Indo/Sri Lanka international agreement, there were only going to be only two units on the island. One the ancient recognised homeland of the native indigenous Eelam Tamils, where the native Tamil and other Tamil-speaking populations are the majority in all districts, the joint northern and eastern provincial council, and then the rest of the country. It was to be a federal or semi-federal form of government, where the north and east have land and police powers and also powers to open industries and obtain foreign aid to develop the infrastructure for the North East council. However crafty JR deliberately scuttled this agreement and made it unworkable by creating eight provincial councils, which were not needed for the other seven Sinhalese majority provinces and gradually each successive government made them unworkable by making them huge corrupt white elephants. JR and all the rest of the Sinhalese leaders deliberately also made the linked NR provincial council unworkable by not providing the police land and other powers, that should have been granted to this council to work and thrive and to keep the predominantly Tamil character and the Tamil Hindu, Christian and Muslim people in these regions safe from further Sinhalese encroachment and domination in their lands.

    • 3

      The Rajapkases further weakened this NE provincial council with the help of a corrupt racist Sinhalese judiciary, racist Sinhalese politicians and eastern Islamic hardliners and extremists by decoupling the Tamil north and the east, which only served the agenda of the Sinhalese racists and Islamic hardliners in the east. The current economic crisis is largely due to these racist Sinhalese Buddhist-only fundamentalist policies, that have been followed by every Sinhalese-led Sri Lankan government from the time of independence. In order to achieve these human rights, justice and meritocracy were squashed and became non-existence. The Rajapakses were the worst, they took this to a higher level. The aim was and still is to create a Sinhalese Buddhist-only land, where the island’s Tamil and Tamil speakers are marginalised and destroyed. Either forced to flee to the west like a million have already done or get forcibly assimilated into the Sinhalese identity, like what happened to the Tamil population living along the Negombo -Puttlam northwest coast, or to smaller Tamil communities like the Colombo Chetty. A generation ago Tamil Hindus or Catholics are now ardent Sinhalese Buddhists/ Catholics. Lots of the Sinhalese population are also not that innocent, they fully approved and voted for these racist and supported these racist policies until the economic consequences of these racist policies started to affect them.

      • 3

        This is the reason for the Aragalaya, not because of any human rights or concern for the Tamils. If these economic problems have to be sorted so should the just federal rights of the Tamils be granted, human rights and meritocracy respected.

        The Tamil people from the north and east have an ancient history on the island and their homeland, which is still largely intact. They have the same rights to their language, history, culture and lands as the Sinhalese, and a federal form of government for their lands. This should be enshrined in the constitution and law of the country, just like the Sinhalese rights, and not left to the mercy, will and whim of largely racist Sinhalese majority, politicians, clergy or Islamic extremist. Sinhalese rights are not dependent on Tamil whims or Scottish rights or French rights in the UK or Canada are not dependent on the English majority. Noone’s human rights and basic fundamental rights should be dependent on anyone or any group of people. What is this rubbish always stating that cannot give Tamil just rights or federalism as the majority of the Sinhalese, Buddhist clergy and politicians do not want this?

  • 2

    The Provincial councils are not the need for us. The Muslims should identify either Tamil speaking or Sinhala speaking SL citizens. SL needs to be secular country like India. Tamils in the North and East should be entitled to at least a Federal state or status similar to the Indian states. It will be great if the Singhalese come to an agreement with the Tamils at the earliest in order for ALL of us to get the country moving FORWARDS!

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.