24 June, 2024

Blog

Guilty Verdict In New York & Anniversary Blues In Sri Lanka 

By Rajan Philips

Rajan Philips

Just after 5:00 PM local time on Thursday, a jury of 12 New Yorkers, seven men and five women, found the 45th President of the United States of America, Donald J. Trump, guilty on all 34 counts that he had been charged with for falsifying business records to influence the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. Each one of the 34 counts was about hiding the payment that Trump had authorized to be made to Stormy Daniels, a porn star and adult film actress, to buy her silence about a sexual liaison between them.

Neither the sex nor the silencing of it was illegal, but conspiring and acting to suppress the story from becoming public broke the New York State election law against hiding information from voters to influence an election. Hence the prosecution. And now the verdict.

The liaison had been in 2006 when Trump may not have even thought about running for president. The payment was made ten years later and one month before the November 2016 presidential election to stop the Stormy Daniel story reaching the media. The payment scheme was executed under a plan that Trump had put in place in August 2015, two months after he announced his presidential candidacy in New York.

The plan involved Michael Cohen, Trump’s nefarious personal lawyer taking care of under the table deals, and David Pecker, a tabloid magnate who provided “catch and kill” service to rich clients by buying out and not publishing scandalous stories about them. Pecker would be the “eyes and ears” of the Trump campaign and would look for negative stories from women and “take them off the market place.”

Pecker testified in court that he paid another of Trump’s liaison’s, one Karen McDougal, a former Playboy model, and bought her story, but was not reimbursed by Trump. For Stormy Daniel, the payment was made by Trump’s sidekick lawyer Michael Cohen and Cohen was reimbursed by Trump’s accountant in multiple payments and each payment was recorded as legal fees. Hence the falsification of records.

The jury heard all of this and more, including salacious details about Trump’s one night stand with Stormy, from 22 prosecution witnesses in the month long trial. Trump’s legal defence was largely limited to denouncing Michael Cohen as an inveterate liar and felon and asserting that his testimony should be rejected. The prosecution countered that they did not pick Cohen, but Trump did, and not only Cohen but also everyone else involved in this sordid tale.

New York Judge Juan Merchan who presided over the trial has set sentencing for July 11. That would be four days before the start of the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, where Trump is to be nominated as the Party’s presidential candidate. Although the charges that Trump has been found to be guilty of carry a maximum jail sentence of four years each, the expectations in legal circles are that the Judge may settle for probation rather than imprisonment of a former President. In any event, Trump would certainly be appealing the verdict and the legal basis for his indictment and trial. He will keep grinding the American judicial wheel. And nothing will bar him being a presidential candidate.

Trump’s main defence is also political. He has already indicated that the verdict would be delivered on November 5th, in the presidential election. He is going all out for victory, for he knows that is the only way he has to get out of his legal troubles. President Biden is in agreement with Trump that the real verdict would be on November 5th, because from his standpoint only the American people could ultimately decide to keep Trump out of the White House.

For now, the Republicans are rallying round Trump and denouncing the verdict from New York as a travesty of justice. The Democrats are celebrating the prevalence and the equal application of the rule of law even to a former President. How many Americans would want to have a convicted felon as their president? In most countries, he could not even be a candidate, and rightly so.

Anniversary Blues

In my column two weeks ago (May 19th), I made little more than passing references to two political anniversaries that come and go during the month of May. The older of the two is the anniversary of Sri Lanka becoming a republic and the First Republic Constitution that was adopted on May 22nd, 1972. The junior anniversary falls on May 19th and it marks the end of the war in 2009 – that came after nearly three decades of political violence and thirty seven years after Sri Lanka became a Republic. I also noted in passing that unlike the May 19th anniversary, no one observes the May 22nd anniversary officially or unofficially, and my comment itself may not have been noticed by anyone in particular.

So, it was fitting to see Dr. Nihal Jayawickrama’s fulsome reminder last week of the anniversary of the First Republic. I cannot agree more with his opinion that without Dr. Colvin R de Silva’s ministerial stewardship Sri Lanka would not have become a republic in the way and manner it did – as Dr. Colvin was wont to say, “not merely despite the Queen but in defiance of the Queen.” However, in my view, the reason why the republican anniversary has fallen into official disuse is because of the decision of the United Front Government after 1972 to officially celebrate only the Republic Day on May 22nd, and to stop commemorating the country’s independence day on February 4th, purportedly because it was a reminder of the UNP’s ‘fake independence’. That was unfortunate.

Ideally, the UF government could and should have celebrated both February 4th and May 22nd, and that would have established the same healthy tradition as in India where the independence day is celebrated on August 15th and the Republic Day on January 26th.   Instead, the UF’s decision to ignore February 4th played straight into the tit-for-tat hands of JR Jayewardene. JRJ dropped all recognition of May 22nd and enshrined February 4th and other state paraphernalia such as the national flag and the national anthem in a Schedule to the 1978 Constitution and rendered them unalterable except through a referendum.

As well in my view, the very institution of the referendum was intended by JRJ to stop future negations of the state paraphernalia and to provide a mechanism for postponing elections. Judicial exuberance would later carry this further, interpretively imagine an underlying “basic structure” of the 1978 constitution (that was, in fact, no more than an offspring of the mind of President Jayewardene and the Parliamentary Committee that he presided over) and elevate the institution of the referendum as a requirement to amend any aspect of the basic structure. Dr. Jayawickrama, and Dr. Colvin R de Silva before him, have persuasively argued otherwise, and asserted that there is no need to use the referendum except for the specific purposes stipulated in the 1978 Constitution.

Additionally, I noted that the exceptionally flexible 1972 Constitution carried in its womb the seeds of its own undoing and was totally repudiated and wholly replaced by an exceptionally rigid constitution in 1978. Even though the anniversary of the 1972 Constitution may have fallen into disuse, the political legacy of 1972 has not died and continues to provide the parliamentary antithesis to the presidential usurpation of the 1978 constitution. Operationally, no political leader or party has been able to muster the same skill, strength and purpose of a Colvin R de Silva or a JR Jayewradene that is necessary to constitutionally resolve this political tension. But the tension is there, and it commemorates 1972.

If May 22nd is a formally forgotten anniversary, May 19th is a much remembered one. The end of the war anniversary is remembered officially and unofficially, in the north and in the south, and in places east and west where many Sri Lankans have now migrated. As I noted earlier, the war anniversary has become the continuation of the war by peaceful means. And I expressed the hope that they would remain peaceful forever and are not influenced or infected by the raw shenanigans such as allegedly involving the current Indian government and Khalistan Sikhs.

This year there has been more than the usual spate of commentaries on the end of the war commemorations. Of all the writeups, I was most struck by Meera Srinivasan’s account in The Hindu, dated May 25th, and entitled “A Poverty of Hope Among Sri Lankan Tamils.” Ms. Srinivasan’s columns are available on line and are often republished in Colombo. She is a well informed and objective writer, but what sets this particular piece apart from her other writings and the writings of others on the end of the war anniversary is, in my view, the exclusive focus on people – the survivors and victims of war. Many of them are double victims of the 2004 tsunami and the 2009 devastations.

The people and their plights are always forgotten in misallocating scarce resources to benefit road contractors, haggling over devolution of powers and grand debates over political abstractions. Not to mention the political nonsense about the age of Tamil. Even the ever elusive reconciliation attempts are all top-down and far removed from the needs of the people. Addressing the basic needs of the people on the ground is the most basic obligation of the state and those who aspire to be its leaders.

It should not be difficult for the Sri Lankan state to return to people their land to rebuild their lives, give fishers free access to the sea and the means to transport their haul, provide basic water and sanitary services, rebuild schools and hospitals, and most of all provide conclusive information on dear ones who have gone missing after surrendering. Who will commit to making a start on this basic agenda before the next anniversary? Shouldn’t that be a question for the upcoming presidential election?   

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 4
    16

    why only targeting trump for such a trivial issue.There must be thousnds in new york who would have done much worse and not been charged.clearly a witch hunt which will back fire on biden.

    • 20
      3

      ‘why only targeting trump for such a trivial issue.’
      .
      Because he is a public figure and must be held to very high standards. I hope the Rajapakse family end up the same way.

      • 13
        0

        Hello Paul,
        By hiring rogue Sinhala Buddhist monks aka “head shaved bastards (Elle Gunawansa, Medagoda Abeypussa, Ittakanda, Galkanda, Kollupitiya Ananda, Murutthettuwa Nakia and others) and by hiring cheap illiterates like Wimal Weerawansa, Rohitha Abeygunawardena, the Rajapaksas brainwashed the country.
        The silence and indifference of experts such as historians and other scholars and the unacceptance given to them in Media whore houses were instrumental to allow fake public perception of the brainwashed victims.
        Private TV channels are to blame more than any OTHER entities. People just get guided by what they hear, most of them dont rely on NEWs papers as of today.

        Tbc

      • 3
        8

        paul

        americans don’t want their presidents to be saints.Bill clinton could have got a third term if the constitution permitted it. Bill did far worse than donald with women.

        The mistake that donald did was to not tell stormy daniels to go ahead and tell it all.It would not have affected his chances of becoming president.He had to only deny it.

        Thre was a woman who accused biden also.he denied it and it just faded away.

    • 4
      1

      Hey Shankar,

      First, it was the NY State Government prosecutor (called a District Attorney, DA) who decided to prosecute. Biden and the Federal Gov had nothing to do with it.

      Second, the thousands who do similar things aren’t contesting an election, particularly one that is for the highest office in the land.

      Sounds like you need to read more about the U.S.

      • 1
        2

        agnos

        i am always reading about the US because what happens there always affects the world financial markets.Did you not see that the DA was a black man.Also quite a co incidence it comes at a time of election year. Won’t stop trump from becoming pres.

  • 9
    2

    “ Who will commit to making a start on this basic agenda before the next anniversary?”
    None of the Sinhala Political Parties will tell the Sinhala Buddhist voters will that they will undertake the things mentioned in your last paragraph as it will RESULT in their DEFEAT in Presidential Election/Parliamentary election.
    Tamils should be happy if the NPP promises that LAW & Order will be re-established from the very first day they become the RULING party.

  • 14
    1

    Trump is complaining bitterly because over the years he has cheated lots of people by not paying them what he owed them, and been getting away with it, but the only time he actually paid someone he has got convicted.
    😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • 9
    3

    “Shouldn’t that be a question for the upcoming presidential election? “
    It should be but it is not. None of the Presidential candidates are prepared to disagree with JRJ.
    “I am not worried about the opinion of the Jaffna people… now we cannot think of them, not about their lives or their opinion… the more you put pressure in the north, the happier the Sinhala people will be here… Really if I starve the Tamils out, the Sinhala people will be happy.” – President J.R. Jayewardene, Daily Telegraph, July 1983

  • 6
    2

    Ranil.W can become the President legally if he is to implement all the things mentioned in Rajan .P ‘s last paragraph of his article. What’s happening in USA is irrelevant for us it is not east to catch the Rajapaksas and his cronies including RW

  • 1
    1

    So disappointed that the Democrats had to go after Trump in this undemocratic way. It only pulls down their reputation and integrity. They should put out a better message if they want to win.

    I wouldn’t vote for Trump in any case because of his stance towards the war in Gaza. That he wants Israel to end it quickly so he can develop American-type real estate on Gaza for Israel, is shockingly crass and callous, and totally indifferent towards the historical sanctity of the area. Disappointed at the way he handled the Covid situation as well (could have taken it well in hand without fighting against it in a personal way). I had such hopes for him, thinking that he was the systems change the globe direly needed against America’s never-ending wars. But he will in the end create only short-term solutions for America’s prosperity in the face of encroaching global autocracies and dictatorships. His ideas are easy ways out, in a world full of complexities.

    • 1
      1

      But he might still have worthiness if he can negotiate a peace deal for the Ukraine war….if he can give a quarter of Ukraine to Russia and then end it there and then. And build up and secure Gaza and the West Bank for the suffering Palestinians who are of the ancient blood of Christ. It will be far cheaper than sending rockets and WMD to Israel for their continuous onslaught on a helpless people. But Baden too can take up these calls.

    • 0
      0

      ramona therese fernando,
      … that the Democrats had to go after Trump in this undemocratic way. It only pulls down their reputation and integrity.
      Courts are there to intervene, if there is anything undemocratic.
      In politics there is nothing to lose, neither reputation nor integrity.
      Everything is about gaining.

  • 1
    1

    A mention of the national flag draws my attention. It is one of my pet peeves.
    What do national flags generally reflect world over … .
    Can the same be said of our Flag.

  • 1
    3

    … Not to mention the political nonsense about the age of Tamil.
    Frankly, would someone care to tell me what Rajan Philips is referring to.
    (I am clueless.)

  • 0
    0

    In SL ……. a genuine patriot has finally emerged that everyone can rally around ……….. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvFHHzfNfQs

    And in the USA …….. how the topmost …… set the stage and space for …… N ……. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtTJ_HR7Gag

  • 2
    0

    “Who will commit to making a start on this basic agenda before the next anniversary? Shouldn’t that be a question for the upcoming presidential election? “

    It seems none of the major contendants for the presidency is talking about it. And that is the tragedy of Sri Lanka.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.