8 February, 2026

Blog

India’s Next Move: Strategy In Action

By Visvalingam Muralithas

Visvalingam Muralithas

India, the world’s fastest-growing major economy, is navigating a crucial period of economic recalibration. With global trade tensions escalating, commodity prices fluctuating, and domestic structural transformations underway, the nation’s economic trajectory is tightly linked to the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) strategy. In 2025, the RBI’s priorities—price stability, financial resilience, and growth support—form the triad guiding India through this complex landscape.

As the global economy grapples with slowing demand, trade conflicts, and financial volatility, India continues to stand out as a story of resilience. Retail inflation has fallen to historic lows, economic growth remains robust despite external headwinds, and monetary policy is carefully calibrated to support both stability and expansion.

U.S. tariffs on Indian goods, uneven global growth, and domestic structural pressures demand a nuanced response. At the same time, India’s diverse economy, strong domestic demand, and growing integration with global markets provide multiple levers to sustain growth.

Global Growth

The global economy in 2025 faces a mixed scenario. According to the IMF’s July 2025 World Economic Outlook, global GDP is projected to expand 3.0% in 2025, slightly rising to 3.1% in 2026. This moderate growth is supported by easing financial conditions and selective fiscal interventions. However, escalating tariffs, geopolitical tensions, and uneven demand growth remain key downside risks.

The World Bank’s June 2025 Global Economic Prospects presents a more conservative view, projecting 2.7% global growth in 2025–26, highlighting the transition toward a “low-growth equilibrium” driven by structural policy uncertainty and subdued trade activity.

Emerging Economies

Emerging markets like India are affected differently from advanced economies. While U.S. and European demand moderates, strong domestic consumption, digital adoption, and targeted policy interventions provide emerging markets with buffers against global volatility. For India, this environment necessitates proactive trade diversification and strategic engagement with multiple markets.

India’s Growth

India’s economic growth remains resilient. The RBI has retained its baseline GDP growth forecast at 6.5% for FY2025–26, with quarterly projections as follows: Q1: 6.5%, Q2: 6.7%, Q3: 6.6%, Q4: 6.3%. This reflects a steady, evenly balanced expansion trajectory.

For FY2024–25, growth was also around 6.5%, driven by strong domestic demand, private consumption, and investment flows. Key drivers include:

* Rising middle-class demand across retail, housing, and services.

* Benefiting from a normal monsoon, agricultural reforms, and digital finance penetration.

* Infrastructure investment in highways, railways, logistics, and renewable energy.

India’s external environment faces pressures: heightened tariff barriers (notably from the U.S.), higher-for-longer global interest rates, and geopolitical uncertainty threaten trade and investment flows.

Domestically, export-oriented sectors such as textiles, gems, and chemicals are particularly vulnerable. Yet, positive factors—stable monsoon forecasts, contained inflation, and sustained public expenditure—help mitigate downside risks.

Even in a subdued global environment, India’s 6.5% growth positions it among the fastest-growing large economies, with domestic demand acting as a critical shock absorber.

The U.S. Tariff Shock

On August 27, 2025, the United States doubled tariffs on a broad range of Indian exports to 50%, impacting key sectors such as textiles, gems and jewelry, shrimp, leather, chemicals, and machinery. The shock sent immediate ripples through India’s export economy and retail sectors.

Estimates suggest the tariff could result in:

* Trade losses of $25–55 billion annually

* GDP reduction of 0.2–0.5 percentage points

* Margin pressures for MSMEs, particularly in labor-intensive export industries

Sectoral Impact

Textiles: India’s textile sector, valued at $179 billion in 2024–25 ($142B domestic, $37B exports), faces a 30–31% cost disadvantage relative to competitors such as Bangladesh, Vietnam, and Sri Lanka. Globally, India accounts for just 4.1% of the $800.77 billion textile market, highlighting untapped export potential.

Gems & Jewelry: Contributing nearly 10% of India’s total exports, the sector is now pressured by higher tariffs and the need to renegotiate existing contracts.

Seafood: Exporters, especially in Kerala and Andhra Pradesh, report canceled contracts and pricing pressures, risking employment in coastal communities.

India’s Response

Rather than a defensive retreat, India’s government has opted for proactive market diversification. A 40-market outreach strategy targets advanced economies (UK, Japan, Germany, France, South Korea, Italy, Australia) and emerging markets (Mexico, Russia, Turkiye, UAE), collectively representing $590 billion in textile and apparel imports annually. India currently accounts for only 5–6% of this trade, indicating significant growth potential.

Role of Export Promotion Councils (EPCs)

* Mapping high-demand products in target markets

* Linking production clusters (Surat, Panipat, Tirupur, Bhadohi) with global buyers

* Expanding participation in international trade fairs

* Promoting a unified “Brand India” identity

* Supporting exporters with FTAs, certifications, and sustainability compliance

* Stronger FTAs will enhance Indian goods’ competitiveness, allowing accelerated market penetration and mitigating U.S. tariff shocks.

India’s Inflation

India’s retail inflation cooled to 1.55% in July 2025, an eight-year low and below the RBI’s 2–6% comfort band. This moderation is largely due to falling food prices, particularly vegetables and pulses.

* Core inflation remains 4–4.1%, reflecting resilient underlying demand

* Repo rate maintained at 5.5%

* Full-year inflation forecast revised down from 3.7% to 3.1%

RBI Governor Sanjay Malhotra emphasized, “Price stability is not a hurdle to growth but an enabler,” highlighting the central bank’s dual mandate of inflation control and growth support.

Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka, recovering from its 2022 economic crisis, recorded inflation of 4–5% by mid-2025, down from previous highs exceeding 70%. Tight monetary policy, IMF-supported reforms, and import rationalization stabilized prices, though vulnerability to external shocks remains.

India demonstrates the ability to combine low inflation with strong growth, contrasting with Sri Lanka’s delicate stabilization trajectory.

Engines of Growth

India’s growth is powered by multiple, interlinked sectors, providing resilience against shocks. Consumption accounts for 60% of GDP, fueled by a growing middle class, urbanization, and digital adoption. Platforms like Unified Payments Interface (UPI) have deepened financial inclusion and boosted retail and housing demand.

The services sector contributes over 50% of GDP, led by IT, finance, healthcare, and tourism. IT exports alone generate $250 billion annually, with global demand for cloud computing, AI, and software services strengthening India’s position as a global hub.

Government initiatives such as Gati Shakti, Bharatmala, Make in India, and PLI schemes are expanding highways, ports, logistics networks, and manufacturing capacity, positioning India as an alternative to China in global supply chains.

Agriculture and Rural Economy

Agriculture employs 40% of the workforce. Modernization through digital agriculture, agri-tech startups, and diversified exports is gradually converting rural economies into growth engines beyond subsistence. India aims for 500 GW of renewable energy by 2030, expanding solar, wind, and electric mobility sectors, reducing fossil fuel dependence and enhancing sustainability. With a median age of 28, India’s youth dividend supports productivity gains. Investments in education, skilling, and healthcare underpin growth, complemented by a vibrant startup ecosystem.

Trade

Despite global headwinds, exports in services, pharmaceuticals, textiles, and gems continue to generate foreign exchange. Strategic FTAs and FDI inflows enhance India’s global economic footprint.

The RBI’s three-pronged strategy

1. Monetary Stability – Repo rate maintained at 5.5% to balance growth and inflation

2. Financial Support – Ample liquidity, targeted MSME credit support, and sector-specific relief

3. Communication – Transparent policy decisions to maintain public and investor confidence

Retail Sector Impact

Export-oriented retailers face rising costs, reduced margins, and competitive pressure. Policy measures—GST reforms, Make in India incentives, and credit support—are redirecting growth toward domestic consumption, mitigating external vulnerabilities.

India’s diversified growth model provides stability, while Sri Lanka focuses on gradual recovery under fiscal discipline and structural reforms. Regional cooperation can bolster energy security, trade, and resilience.

Comparative South Asian Outlook

Conclusion

India’s economy in 2025 is a study in contrasts: record-low inflation coexists with trade shocks, resilient growth contrasts with sectoral vulnerabilities, and cautious policymaking mitigates uncertainty.

Key strengths sustaining growth include:

* Robust domestic demand – 1.4 billion consumers providing a buffer against trade shocks

* Diversified exports – Reducing dependence on the U.S. market

* Strong forex reserves – USD 640 billion, ensuring external stability

* Monetary credibility – RBI’s balanced approach supports investor confidence

The U.S. tariff shock, while disruptive, has catalyzed strategic diversification across 40 global markets, creating opportunities for India to strengthen its position in the global textile, apparel, and manufacturing sectors.

India’s multi-engine economy—spanning consumption, services, infrastructure, agriculture, energy, demographics, and trade—offers long-term resilience. With careful RBI stewardship and structural reforms, India is well-positioned to remain the world’s fastest-growing major economy in the coming decade.

*Visvalingam Muralithas is a researcher in the legislative sector, specializing in policy analysis and economic research. He is currently pursuing a PhD in Economics at the University of Colombo, with a research focus on governance, development, and sustainable growth.

Latest comments

  • 2
    1

    Still, India needs the US—just look at how many Indians are living and thriving there, compared to how few Americans choose to live in India, China, or Russia. This interdependence highlights that, while India is well-positioned to remain the world’s fastest-growing major economy in the coming decade, its global partnerships, especially with the US, will continue to play a vital role in shaping that growth.

  • 0
    3

    At the current era, there is practically nothing to compare between Langkang and India. From Sri Ma O time, there has been no friendship between the two countries. Mrs Gandhi sent Indian troops to save Siri Ma O from JVP. Then Siri Ma O turned around and gave space on the Airport to Pakistan military planes to land. Only recently AKD avoided confrontations with India but has a no-go policy on trade and political friendship. Beyond that, Langkang’s foreign policy for the past 30-40 years was about securing China’s veto vote at UNSC. That means, even if China has a better trading partnership India Langkang will remain confrontational with India only to please China for the Veto vote. China doesn’t like others to have friendship with India, but it wants exclusive trade deals with India. (In the videos coming out, Putin was walking hand in hand with Mr. Modi then extended his hand to XI, but Xi did not take Putin’s hand. So, Putin just patted somebody else’s back with that hand back. Ha, ha ha). Too long Veto vote Aappa Diplomacy foreign policy has left Langkang as a vine that has no tree to creep. It is unbelievable for such a long time, practically from 1948, Langkang has not made any friendship with any country in the mode of give and take.

  • 0
    3

    Every time when one country punishes Langkang for one issue, the Aappa Diplomacy politicians run around like the red ant walking on cinder. This started with deporting estate workers and nationalizing UK’s FDI investment. So, Ceylon was isolated in London tea auction, which was very crucial for marketing the tea lie commodities. Kanangra did barter for rice for rubber because China was unable to pay for rubber by dollar. This hurt the American relationship. Russia punished by returning the tea cargo falsely blaming rice bucks were in tea consignments, because Langkang stopped importing Russia’s asbestos. Langkang thought Russian fertilizer was causing kidney problems to North Central province farmers, so stopped it. China brought down (2013) 50 essential government computers because Old Rowdy attempted to hand over Nuraicholai repair works to India. When Golden Brain NM bankrupted the country, Siri Ma O went to America for help. They laughed at her and sent back. But in contrast all this, after Manmohan Singh Refused to meet in his last visit at UNGA, where Old Rowdy was throwing extremely lavish party, the Demulo Pariah, Dr. Jaishankar gave $4.5 B loan, when China broke Langkang’s back for People’s Bank refusing to pay for poop import. It is not just Gothapayal, or Evil Emperor, even AKD yet to start a constructive trade initiation with India.

  • 0
    3

    The essay implies that India is attempting to emerge as an alternative for massive, Chinese build contracts for IC. Now all the Langkang’s roadways are on 99 years lease with China because of the nature of the White Elephant element in them. But then, even AKD is calling China back to restart the road work. Some time back, one of the biggest stories in the media was the Japanese Monorail project going to Bangladesh because China did not like Japan doing that kind of project in Langkang, so Gothapayal had no other option but to give it up. These BRI, SCO are about only throwing a pawn and catching a shark. Langkang recently cancelled the renewable power projects contracts with India. India has been struggling to get at least one contract from Langkang from the time Langkang gave the $250M Nuraicholai project for $450M to China. The Sampoor Coal project was rejected because of its pollution (a fake reason). But, after that, India had offered many alternatives, to no avail. There was talk that Gothapayal worked with WHO to have China’s low-quality Covid-19 vaccine approved in competition to India’s better quality one by bribing UN officials. Then he bought a vial for $15, while Bangladesh was buying for $5 .

  • 0
    3

    The panic driven reaction of every member of the opposition (even the Sadampi, in CT) to Evil Emperor’s arrest is telling that the country is not yet ready for forward moving and Lankaweyan has to wait for decades to implement any construction measures on any dimension of the country’s features.
    President Trump started his 2nd term with “peace for Eastern Europe and peace for the Middle East”. But in these two East side countries, no Sun is shining yet, for Trump. Rather, America has isolated it from the IC, though there are no war entanglements itself. America took the baby to give it a bath, but now, the baby refuses to take a bath, but America has come back with dirt spread all over it. America has tainted its friendship between North America, South America, EU, Eastern countries, and the Middle East. India had a normal relationship until now; but it is turning into retaliating. In Sonia time, there were three big economists, Chidambaram, Manmohan Singh and Mukherjee. They laid the foundation for the current high-flying growth. If India wants to gears it exports to its next level of growth, it is in the West its market is sitting. In Africa and the Middle East, China offers big competition.

  • 0
    3

    India’s supply chain companies are in China. But there are not many customers for India. India wants to hold on to low-cost Russian oil and is ready to sacrifice the export market growth in technical, agricultural, Industrial and pharmaceutical side. Before its fateful end, China is where Langkang was engaged in commission-based trades. To depend on Shanghai cooperation, it is not an alternative, like non-aligned nations. China is just looking for a circle where it will have full dominance. The BRICS have yet to show some difference, because the members are not aligned within themselves for an organization. They are all only looking for a hangman partner to kill their enemy. India also has a couple of partnerships in South Asia. India and Pakistan coming into an organization means Russia ending up in NATO. SCO is nothing at this time, but a group put together by the theorist who proposes that “my enemy’s enemies are my friends”. There is no sticking together objective. Russia will let down India once it gets back its oil market. The EU (Specially Germany) took too long to understand that it was very dangerous to exclusively depend on Russian Oil and gas. India did show it by its own eye. So, it looks like India is going to take even longer than that to find the truth.

  • 2
    2

    Watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtodEAWm6lY
    Tensions have arisen in the Indian subcontinent as a result of the AKD’s provocative visit to Kachchathiw and its infantile actions. Disanayaka is more pro-china, they say plainly. Sooner rather than later, this will halt Indian development projects in the nation. To be able to balance the relationship between China and India, we need leaders with experience.

    • 3
      0

      India acts in its own interests, not ours or Trump’s. Trump’s stupidity has provoked Modi to patch up with China. Does that mean that Indian and Chinese spheres of influence will be agreed upon in the near future? No prizes for guessing in which sphere we will belong.

      • 0
        0

        Hello OC,
        Remember when Churchill, Stalin and Roosevelt carved up Europe, Yalta Conference in February 1945 and the subsequent Potsdam Conference in August 1945. Many Countries had their futures decided with no regard to what their Citizens wanted.
        Are Putin, Modi and Xi Jinping the 21st Century equivalents? I wonder where Sri Lanka’s Iron Curtain will fall?
        Trinco to the Indians and Colombo to the Chinese could be a sensible division.
        As for Trump he probably thinks that Biden was responsible for re-writing the outcome of the Civil War and that the Confederates actually won. This may be a joke, but Trump is actively trying to change what Museums (especially Smithsonian) are teaching politically – https://www.museumsassociation.org/museums-journal/news/2025/08/trump-interference-could-have-chilling-effect-across-entire-museum-sector/
        Best regards

        • 1
          0

          LS
          After WWII Germany was ‘carved up’ one may say, but again the Soviet Union had control over what would be E Germany and it was Berlin about which a deal was necessary.
          Socialists/communists were a powerful force in East Europe even before the countries formed the socialist bloc. In Greece, however, a very strong left was cheated out of power. The US invested heavily in much of W Europe to prevent the rise of communists.
          Yalta and Potsdam aimed to stop escalation into a new European War and were unlike the colonial carve up of Africa and later the Middle East..
          As for Putin-Modi-Xi deal, it is least about carving up zones of control. The Sino-Indian border itself remains unresolved.
          *
          Taking control of a harbour in another country for geopolitical control is not in China’s interest as it is business first for China for some time to come. (A project to protect Indian Ocean sea lanes from US blockade transformed under Xi into the maritime silk road. Taking over Colombo will frighten many B&R partners.)
          As for China-India rivalry as global powers, the two are in different leagues, playing to different rules.
          Trincomalee if at all was a bone of contention between the US and India for two decades in the 20th Century.
          *
          Non-alignment is the best policy for this little island.

          • 1
            0

            Hello SJ,
            One of my relations was in Greece towards the end of the War. According to him it was much worse than “cheating”. The British Army were fighting against the Resistance Groups that they were assisting not long before.
            As for “Non-alignment is the best policy for this little island.”, they might not have much choice.
            Best regards

        • 1
          0

          LS,
          I don’t think a real “iron curtain” is likely. More like “You keep SL, we keep Maldives. Internal spheres of influence are messy.
          You’re right, what the citizens think doesn’t matter to the powerful.

  • 0
    2

    India seems to be doing a good job. However, I’m not sure if the numbers reflect the totality of their society, as there are scheduled and untouchables castes that do not come into the economic picture. Sri Lanka on the other hand, being more inclusive, will show more difficult numbers. This was also due to the lingering terrorist war that will take many decades to recover from. Still it is a good idea to work with India (minus land-bridge). For India, buying more US oil and products will ease off the tariffs. Their billionaires will have to also pay their fair share of taxes. It is risky for them to diversify into alternate global alliances.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.