28 September, 2020

Blog

Maligned 19th Amendment: Are Critics Aware Of Its Value For Sustained Prosperity?

By W A Wijewardena –

Dr. W.A Wijewardena

Society that has become clueless

It has become fashionable for many to criticise the 19th Amendment to the Constitution after the sweeping victory of Gotabaya Rajapaksa at the last Presidential and his party at the recent Parliamentary elections.

Charging that the 19th Amendment has stood in the way for Sri Lanka to attain prosperity for its people, they want it out as fast as possible. Instead, the system of governance that prevailed in Sri Lanka prior to this amendment is being hailed by them as the way out for it to break the vicious cycle of festering economic stagnation. When repealed fully or amended substantially, it would put a full stop to Sri Lanka’s maiden attempt at establishing good governance, albeit in a very small measure. It appears that those who argue for this case, politicians, academics, religious and civil society leaders and also the ordinary people, are unmindful of the value of good governance for sustained prosperity of a nation.

Good governance is for sustained growth 

The presence of good governance at both the public and private sectors in a country has been viewed as a positive contributor to sustained economic growth. At the private sector level, practising good governance principles will enable the stakeholders of a private venture to get the best out of their deals with such ventures. If not, the deals are unequal and substandard meaning a forced resource transfer from stakeholders to such ventures. The economy-wide presence of such substandard deals will reduce the welfare of a nation, though it may have attained high economic growth for a number of years. A good example is the recent power outage in which the whole country was dragged into darkness due to ‘an unintended mistake by a senior engineer at CEB’, clearly an instance of the non-observance of good governance.

Governance gives confidence to people

Since economic development entails the use of scarce resources of a society to get the maximum out of the least, governmental organisations should practice good governance by observing both the spirit and the letter of the principles of good governance. It gives confidence to investors that the moneys they invest are safe from improper expropriation which is a necessary condition for a society to ensure sustained economic growth. Empirical studies have shown that countries which have established good governance regimes have been able to attain a faster economic growth and sustain it in the long run. Countries with poor governance have not only been laggards in the race but also failures to sustain high economic growth continuously.

Governance is needed because politicians are not angels

Governance means how an individual, an organisation or a government would relate itself to its stakeholders in a responsible manner in delivering its promises to them. In politics, it relates to the manner in which elected politicians would perform their duties toward citizens who have elected them to power. In ancient times, kings and rulers of countries are said to have performed these duties by observing Ten Royal Qualities or Dasaraaja Dharma consisting of the qualities of gifting, sacrifice, virtue, austerity, uprightness, softness, non-harmfulness, having non-ill will, forbearance and non-conflict. These ancient ten principles are so comprehensive that if any political leader follows them today, then, there is no need for enforcing governance on them externally. But, as remarked by James Madison, the fourth President of USA, ‘if men were angels, no government would be necessary’. This quote could be extended to governance as well: ‘since political leaders are not angels, enforcement of governance from outside is necessary’.

Economic actions are a choice among alternatives

Actions taken by a government do not necessarily benefit all. Some in society are made better off by government action, while some others are made worse off. Hence, the practice of governance by political leaders is necessary in order to avoid harms and enhance the benefits to citizens. For instance, in the case of a government, trying to attain the highest growth, while damaging the environment by a nation is not considered a good governance practice. Similarly, in the case of a company, it is not good governance if it seeks to maximise profits, while displeasing employees or cheating customers.

Governance matters to everyone

Governance is, therefore, a matter that is concerned with every area of human relationships, though in most cases, reference is made only to political governance or corporate governance. Within the system of political governance, there are sub-governance aspects concerning economic policy governance, monetary policy governance and so on. The proper observation of all these aspects of governance is necessary for a political cum economic system to function properly.

Matters that give rise to governance issues

Issues relating to governance arise due to two reasons, both connected to each other. The first is the division of labour which we have seen in the modern economies. Accordingly, to do things better, people have to depend on a large number of others whom they engage as servants. For instance, since not everyone is competent to teach his or her own children, he or she has to depend on a profession called teachers. Similarly, since each one of them cannot treat his or her own illnesses, once again he or she has to depend on another profession called physicians. Economists have branded those servants as agents and those who hire them as principals. That is at an individual level. At a company level, owners of a company hire managers to do the job and at the national level, citizens hand over the task of governing to elected politicians.

Selfish man and the need for governance

The second reason relates to the normal human nature. Man is by nature a selfish creature and, therefore, bent on satisfying his own self-interest over anything else. According to the evolutionary biologist, Richard Dawkins, who wrote the book, The Selfish Gene, the selfish nature is embodied in the very genetic constitution of species. This was noted by the 18th century British economist, Adam Smith, in relation to economic relationships more than two centuries ago when he argued that one should expect his dinner not from the benevolence of brewers, bakers or butchers, but from their regard to their own interest.

Thus, according to economists, the selfish servant or agent does not always act in the best of interest of the master or the principal for whom he works. Since the master has only two eyes and not ‘four eyes’, he cannot effectively control or see what the servant actually does. This has given rise to what is now known as the ‘Principal-Agent Problem’ or PAP in economics and it is this problem that has contributed to the governance issues in society.

Agents cheat principals

PAP is simply the existence of conflicting objectives between the principal and the agent whom he hires. The principal wants to gain the best for himself and that is why he pays the agent to do the job. But the agent, acting in his own interest may do things which are injurious to the principal. Thus, professionals whom an individual hires or the managers whom the shareholders engage or the politicians whom the citizens elect will not satisfy the needs of their respective principals, but try to satisfy their own desires which are different from those of the principals.

Kautilya: Don’t place honey at the tongue of agents

PAP had been known quite for some time and even measures to alleviate its harmful effects have been suggested. Kautilya, the Indian Economist in the 3rd century BCE, wrote in his economic text, The Arthashastra, that just like a person with honey or poison on the tip of his tongue cannot resist tasting some of it, public servants too cannot resist misappropriating the funds entrusted to them. Worse, the king cannot see it just like he cannot say whether a fish in the water is drinking water or not. Kautilya prescribed both the carrot and the stick to minimise its occurrence.

Politicians and bureaucrats want to maximise their benefits

In the modern era, William A. Niskanen, formerly an official of the US Budget Management Office and later an economist attached to the University of California, Los Angeles, in a path breaking publication titled ‘Bureaucracy and Representative Government’ in 1971, talked about PAP between the community represented by the government and its civil servants represented by public bureaus. Drawing on the previous studies on the subject by economists like Ludwig von Mises and Gordon Tullock, Niskanen presented a new theory called ‘Economic Theory of Bureaucracy’ in which the community as the principal tries to maximise welfare of the members through public expenditure programs and the civil servants as agents try to maximise their salaries and perks. Accordingly, government expenditure programs tend to be overestimated and the community has to bear bigger and bigger burdens as taxpayers if tax rates are raised or as victims of inflation if new money is printed to fund such programs.

Good governance in politics leads to improvements in quality of life

The presence of good governance in politics as well as in economic policy making contributes to quality of life of people and sustainable economic growth. In a paper presented to the 5th Economic Panel Meeting at Harvard University in April 2002, under the title ‘Growth without Governance’ World Bank economists Daniel Kaufmann and Aart Kraay have argued that the quality of governance has a very strong positive impact on the per capita income across the countries.

Using a set of Worldwide Governance Indicators or WGIs, a good governance template prepared by them for the World Bank, in 175 countries for the period 2001/2, the two economists have also found two other important relationships. The first is relating to the theme of their paper that good governance contributes immensely to a sustainable high growth in PCI in countries.

The second is that the growth in PCI does not contribute to improve the quality of governance in the same tempo. Their finding was that growth in PCI has either a weak or a negative impact on the improvement of the quality of governance if good governance had been absent in society initially. In other words, good governance certainly leads to economic growth but economic growth does not necessarily bring in quality governance in society.

Africa eternally suffers due to poor quality of governance

In a Working Paper released by the Department of Economics and Finance of the Middle Tennessee State University in USA in December 2010, Bichaka Fayissa and Christian Nsiah have found that in African countries the gaps in economic growth between the richer and the poorer countries have been mainly due to the differences in the quality of governance in the respective countries. For their empirical study covering 28 African countries, the two economists have used the same WGIs relating to the relevant countries between 1995 and 2005.

Good governance is a pre-requisite

Thus, the general consensus among economists is that good governance is a pre-requisite for sustaining economic growth and improving the quality of life of people. However, there are a few economists like Columbia University’s Jeffrey Sachs who believe that emphasis on good governance for sustaining economic growth has been a misguided policy drive. In an article written to the magazine Foreign Affairs in October, 2012 Sachs has countered the argument by Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson in their book ‘Why Nations Fail’ that superior political institutions protect property rights and through such protections, incentivise the process of invention and the diffusion – distribution of such knowledge among prospective entrepreneurs – helping the countries to sustain economic growth.

Sachs has argued that what is more important is diffusion and therefore, without getting involved in inventions, if a country can cause diffusion to happen, that country can ensure continued economic growth as has been shown by many authoritarian countries in East Asia. His reference was to countries like South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore. Yet, in all these countries, people dissatisfied with the quality of life delivered by the authoritarian governments have agitated for democratic institutions which the authorities have delivered to them eventually. Thus, these countries were able to sustain economic growth. However, the other authoritarian countries were not so fortunate and had to go through bloody revolutions which have taken them back for many centuries.

Good governance contributes to economic growth

How does governance promote economic growth or in a different way, mis-governance impede growth? The six governance dimensions which the World Bank has included in its WGIs provide the answer to this question. The six are the following:

1. Voice and Accountability: capturing perceptions of the extent to which a country’s citizens are able to participate in selecting their government, as well as freedom of expression, freedom of association, and a free media.

2. Political Stability and Absence of Violence and Terrorism: capturing perceptions of the likelihood that the government will be destabilised or overthrown by unconstitutional or violent means, including politically-motivated violence and terrorism.

3. Government Effectiveness: capturing perceptions of the quality of public services, the quality of the civil service and the degree of its independence from political pressures, the quality of policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of the government’s commitment to such policies.

4. Regulatory Quality: capturing perceptions of the ability of the government to formulate and implement sound policies and regulations that permit and promote private sector development.

5. Rule of law: capturing perceptions of the extent to which agents have confidence in and abide by the rules of society, and in particular the quality of contract enforcement, property rights, the police, and the courts, as well as the likelihood of crime and violence.

6. Control of corruption: capturing perceptions of the extent to which public power is exercised for private gain, including both petty and grand forms of corruption, as well as “capture” of the state by elites and private interests.

Governance therefore makes people feel that they are included in the running of the affairs of society. This inclusiveness is an important policy goal of modern societies so that people will become the designers, executers and judges of their own destinies. They collectively ensure the property rights – right to life, physical and financial wealth and human intellect. When the above-mentioned dimensions, at least as a minimum, are present in society, people have the ability to benefit from their own labour and efforts. It gives incentives for them to develop their human and physical capital, invent new things and use such inventions in market-based productions. The continued market production ensures sustainable growth.

Mis-governance reduces the quality of life of people in society. For instance, suppose that the government is ineffective, public service is inefficient and corrupt and the system works under the pressure of politicians, elite power groups and extreme ethnic, religious or racialist social sects. Then, the law enforcement agencies, namely, the police and courts of law, will become dead ducks. As a result, people have no mechanism to get redress when they have been harmed simply by other members of society. They have to live in eternal fear for their life, property and wealth.

In society, per capita income may have increased to record levels. But what use of that income if it can be robbed by those who can claim impunity from the system? Property can be robbed by other fellow citizens, those supported by politicians in power or governments themselves. This last type of robbery had been a common situation even in the past. That was why the Buddha had to advise his lay followers, according to Pattakamma Sutra canonised in Anguttara Nikaya, to protect the wealth earned through one’s labour from, among others, the greedy kings.

This is similar to the expropriation of private property by modern governments whatever the justification attributed to such expropriations. It is the observance of the rule of law, control of corruption, independent and impartial law enforcement agencies and effective government that will protect the property rights of people.

*To be continued…

*The writer, a former Deputy Governor of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka, can be reached at waw1949@gmail.com

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 7
    0

    Good Governance (GG) is what every responsible citizen yearns for. The author has used all his scholarship to drive the point in his lengthy article with extensive references and to be continued. Leave alone economic development, a Nation without GG is either a failed state or is reaching towards it. It is not the 19A, 20A, 21A and all the A’s in the world that matter but GOOD GOVERNANCE. Were the proponents of this theme attaching a brand “Yahapalanaya” ever practice the noble principle? NO. A bond scam could have taken place in Sri Lanka with the best possible constitution there can be. So is the recent failure in commercial power. How many abuses took place in the under the façade of the 19th Amendment? In UK is there a written constitution in the first place? (So is New Zealand) If the author could give thought to this in his article, I would much appreciate. To put a long story short the intention of a large majority of people and as well as the persons to whom authority is vested must believe and do what is right. That is the foundation of GG.

    • 5
      5

      Presidential Election 2020

      They cheated the people as no times also introducing -NAGAYA brought Relics and anything and everything manipulating the gullible mind set of the people for their political gains. People as if they are born headless, just ignored the numerous crime investigations of the Rajakshes and their court stays etc out o ftheir harddiscs. This is common in so called democracies where innocient people are taken as human shields for fake perceptions being made in such societies.
      .
      2020 General Election

      They through their biased media made the perception as if they succeeded COVID crisis as no other states. SCP or the like subhumans compare it with the numbers of america and countries in Europe to show that srilankens are owning the better systems. Truth is if international community would not support, hunger states of our nature would not continue any more.

      Promotions of delusions- going by falsehoods, untruths, to mislead the nation this is divinely punishable acts as if the poor people are raped and murdered for their political gains

      https://www.healthline.com/health/mental-health/delusions-of-grandeur

      • 2
        2

        This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn’t abide by our Comment policy.

        For more detail see our Comment policy https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/comments-policy-2

        • 3
          4

          Mr. leela ge …..,
          .
          Thank you for keeping it short……….

  • 6
    3

    W A Wijewardena –Maligned 19th Amendment: Are Critics Aware Of Its Value For Sustained Prosperity?

    why didn’t you write about this before the election?

    The Rajapakses were openly asking for 2/3rd majority to abolish the 19th amendment. and they got it.

    all you did was to write about interest rates!

    now you are trying to sound clever?

    or like the Rajapskes fool the people?

  • 4
    3

    Too late dr.Wijewardana.
    What paved the way for retraction of 19A is your own inaction to continue your arguments to its logical end that is total removal of Executive Presidency.
    To this day I remain absolutely puzzled as to why the so called Civil Society remained totally silent on this most critical issue at the last presidential election.
    You wanted to make Sajith Premadasa president.
    We preferred Gotabaya Rajapaksha instead.
    A President either way.

    Soma

  • 2
    2

    19th Amendment must stay.

    But “sustained prosperity”? Is it a joke? Sri Lanka did not see any prosperity since 19th Amendment (though not its fault). 19 Amendment has nothing to do with prosperity.

  • 3
    5

    this reties ex financial consultant .. should take a pill

  • 1
    0

    This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn’t abide by our Comment policy.

    For more detail see our Comment policy https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/comments-policy-2

  • 5
    3

    Only the raje modaya’s will be petty enough to get rid of the 19th amendment which has clipped the wings off the creator of the 18th amendment who in his usual greedy self assumed that the innocent people of this much suffering starving poor citizens will give him a 3rd term which he would have loved to continue till death do him part.
    \
    He then had plans to be succeeded by his dubious another greedy dubious artificial bogus lawyer who was privileged enough to have the ever conniving and willing principal of the Law College who answered the examination on his behalf.
    \
    If developed countries like America, France and a few other true lovers of democracy are living with a two-term why on earth does this Rajapuka pol-pot beggar’s colony need to allow one individual to be the kingmaker for life.?
    \
    By the SLPP winning the 2 hora boru elections the developed true freedom-loving nations have already begun treating this sad sorry shitty nation with tons of indifference.
    Who will suffer.?

  • 7
    4

    Dear Dr Wijewardhana,

    thanks for the article.

    But nothing will change so long people’s heads are brainwashed. You may know this much better, even if any good steps being introduced, if RAJAKASHE RASCALS would see it through their manner, and make them as no good, people just nod their heads to the manner MERCY cows would do.
    So what is the purpose of making any further efforts to make aware them. They are stupdier than appeared to be.
    .
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpm-GPlKCNQ

  • 7
    0

    Good governance is a delusion in Sri Lanka.

    Voting in an election is a skill, not a random intuition, and like any skill, it needs to be taught systematically to people. Letting them vote without knowledge is as irresponsible as putting them in charge of a trireme sailing to the Caribbean in a storm.

    The psyche of most Sri Lankan voters is to elect Politicians who claim race superiority and let them make a selfish quick buck.

    Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything.

  • 3
    1

    WAW says “It appears that those who argue for this case, politicians, academics, religious and civil society leaders and also the ordinary people, are unmindful of the value of good governance for sustained prosperity of a nation.” wrong! They are mindful of the well-being of the Rajapakses only.

  • 4
    0

    What are the requirements to have a good constitution for a country to have? We need to accept that the CONSTITUTION of the Country needs to accomodate and protect the ethnic and religious minorities. Any move to suppress them is to be resisted. It is important to see them to promote their language and culture. The constitution should prevent Government’s security forces getting in to businesses and thereby preventing it’s citizens of livelihoods especially in the North and east of the country as well as the rest of the country. The Judiciary needs to be independent and beyond political threats.
    Freedom of speech and thoughts should be guaranteed in the NEW constitution. Fear to confront injustices by state should not prevail in a government of Good Governance.

  • 2
    1

    Mr, or Dr Wijewardana,
    /
    If 19 A is bee’s knees, why did our economy keep collapsing since its introduction in 2015 until the fll of the yamapalana conspiracy?
    /
    Is that because the bankers and economists advising the CB robbers knew nothing about development, but the jargon they were taught by Jewish neoconservatives?

  • 1
    2

    Dear Prof

    What we have as GOSL does not matter to a Jaffna man as we have not been governed by anything from GOSL since 1970.

    “Ratha Pottu Mafia FP/ITAK/TULF/TNA/Tamil Nadu Killing Fields in Jaffna” run the show up North now the GOSL/India removed the LTTE and given the same people who created the LTTE there kingdom back/reward. East got separated and got their respective kingdoms too as per the earlier LTTE split and agreements.

    We the people of Jaffna are still waiting for Justice for the above crimes by the Mafia and a free life away from these thugs.

    Anything else you say I respect regards to what is good for the South..Good Governance will be good after JVP you do not kill each other but we do still commit thuggery politically as we please in a democracy as we have always done unnoticed by the world for the past 70 years in Tamil politics.

  • 2
    0

    I thought the main objective of 19A was depoliticization.

    .If at all there are elements of good governance, they are marginal not mainstream.

    Except the right to Information in 19A which undoubtedly leads to good governance , all other provisions are mainly concerned about freeing public sector from political interference and maintaining independent institutions.

    On the other hand the author should make every efforts in his next installments to relate 19A to good governance and that in turn leads to prosperity.

    I wait eagerly wait for next installments

  • 2
    1

    Gota was adamant on not amending 19A but eliminating it wholesale – the hidden reason being is to cover
    up the provision of non-life-time immunity to Presidents. This is a priority to him personally, as he
    wishes to be in USA without any harassment. Does this columnist not read him better?

  • 0
    0

    The independent commissions in the 19th amendment contributes to good governance. Depriving a President elected by the People the responsibility of being the Minister of Defence and the Commander in Chief, is a negative feature. Depriving Dual Citizens the right to contest an election is another negative aspect. I hope the positive features of the 19th Amendment will be incorporated in the 20th Amendment.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.