3 March, 2024


Redefining Traitors & Patriots In Relation To Sri Lanka Losing The Shipping Hub Status 

By Harsha Gunasena

Harsha Gunasena

Based on the evidence available, Sri Lanka was a shipping hub in the Indian Ocean even in the era before Christ. The ships sailed in the Indian Ocean between the West and the East have stopped at Sri Lanka. During those days the ships sailing from Persian ports to Guangzhou in China and vice versa could take up a long time and therefore it made sense to have a transshipment port in between. Sri Lanka fulfilled this need and plenty of seaports were located around the island. Sri Lanka was engaged in import and export businesses and in addition to that was engaged in entrepot trade.  

Sri Lanka mainly exported pearls, gems, elephants, and spices and imported mainly horses, ceramics, perfumes, and textiles. Mahavamsa mentioned that Sena and Guttika who ruled Sri Lanka for 22 years in the third century BC were the sons of a Tamil horse trader.  In the third century BC, Megasthenes, the Greek ambassador in Pataliputra at the time of Maurya rule in India mentioned that wooden ships were built to transport elephants from Sri Lanka to Kalinga in India. In the 9th century Chinese scholar LI Zhao wrote that the vessels from Sri Lanka were the largest of those visiting Guangzhou, a port in China, with stairways for loading and unloading.

It could be assumed that Port of Godavaya close to the main sea route, situated between present Hambantota and Ambalantota was used for entrepot trade based on the excavated ruins. In a rock script at Godavaya it was mentioned that the king Gajabahu I in the first century AD ordered that the customs duties of the seaport Gota Pabbata should be donated to a Buddhist temple situated close by.

The Greek writer Cosmas mentioned that in the sixth century AD the goods from Sindu, Male, Kalliana and other ports in India as well as from China, Persia, Adule and Ethiopia were brought to Sri Lanka and then redistributed. This was entrepot trading.

In the twelfth century AD Parakramabahu the Great established a Tamil slab inscription in Nainativu (present Kayts) to the effect that the foreigners who disembark from their ships at the port Uratturai will remain under the security of the state. It further stated that the ships suffer wreckage in transit through the waters of the port will be charged based on the type of cargo. Wrecked vessels which carried elephants and horses will be charged a fourth share of the cargo but the vessels carried ordinary merchandise will have to pay a half share to the state treasury. One of the main reasons that Parakramabahu the Great invaded Burma was a dispute in Sri Lankan trading vessels.

The chronicles did not give emphasis to the commercial activities of the country so that we have to rely on various other sources in examining this aspect.

Later the kings of Kandyan period adopted an open policy in foreign relations. Vimaladharmasuriya I, the first king of the Kandyan era was fluent in Portuguese and his queen consort was Kusumasana Devi also known as Dona Catherina, a Roman Catholic. During the Kandyan period persons of various nationalities and religions lived together in harmony.  

In early twentieth century Anagarika Dharmapala insisted the importance of upliftment of industries and trade in Sri Lanka. He said that the revenue of the government should be utilized to the building of steamships, upliftment of agriculture and establishment of industries.

Sri Lanka which was a trading and shipping hub during the time of Sinhala kings is now moving away from that position due to the protectionist policies adopted by its rulers with the blessing of the public.

Sirimavo Bandaranaike nationalized the oil industry in 1962. At that time Singapore was emerging as a nation which became independent in 1965. Oil companies which were forced to leave Sri Lanka were welcomed by Singapore. They contributed to the development of Singapore seaport by establishing oil refineries there. Government introduced a law that the majority ownership of the shipping companies in Sri Lanka should be held by the Sri Lankans. As a result, foreign shipping companies do not come to Sri Lanka and they are represented by the agents here. Shipping Agents are against of changing this law to allow the shipping companies to come here due to their own business interests which is detrimental to the growth of the shipping industry in Sri Lanka.  As a result, global shipping companies supported the ports of Dubai in the Middle East and the port of Singapore in the Far East.

I have heard from a reliable source that a Head of State was bribed by a Chairman of a large conglomerate which was having a logistics sector with number of shipping agencies, in order to prevent the liberalization allowing majority foreign ownership of shipping companies.  

In the year 2020 Singapore Port handled 36.6 Mn TEUs and Jebel Ali port which is the largest port in Dubai handled 13.5 Mn TEUs. Colombo port which is in the middle of the Indian Ocean handled only 6.85 Mn TEUs.

Two terminals of the Colombo Port were privatized, and the Port was expanded. This action facilitated the reexport of the goods coming from the Indian ports which were away from the main sea route.  The position of the trade center of the Indian Ocean enjoyed by Sri Lanka in the history was degraded to a mere transshipment port of Indian goods. We are benefitted by the growth of the Indian economy.

Irrespective of this background which is the dependency of Indian cargo by the Colombo Port, the  attempt of the Gotabaya Rajapaksa government to privatize the East Container Terminal (ECT) with 49% ownership to Indian Adani Group was foiled due to the pressure of the Trade Unions which was the visible reason. There could be invisible reasons as well.  However, the West Container Terminal (WCT) which was situated bit away was given to the same Indian company with 85% stake. From the national point of view this was an idiotic action. In case if the ECT was privatized the work would have been over by now. Since the government does not have money, Port Authority did not do any development there. The reason for the behaviour of the Trade Unions of Colombo Port was to secure their jobs to which much effort was not given. 

The politicians of the country do not in favour of privatization of the loss making or inefficient government business entities since they want to fill those entities with their henchmen who support their elections, from top to bottom. This helps them to be in power.

As explained, the Shipping Agents, the Trade Unions and the politicians of this country are traitors to the Nation. This traitorous act is perceived by the people of the country as a patriotic act since they are blinded with protectionism.

This myth which is against the Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) was promoted by the Sri Lankan governments especially by the Bandaranaike governments which initiated nationalization of private entities and by the false adaptation of the Marxist thinking in the country. China which is ruled by a communist party achieved such a growth within few decades and uplifted the status of millions of the poor due to the opening the country to  FDIs and privatization of the government entities.

Sri Lanka, which is a democratic country, cannot do what China has done without the consent of the people. Until such time the people do away with this backward thinking of protectionism the Shipping Agents, the Trade Unions and the politicians will continue in the path they have hitherto taken. 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 3

    Apart from Colonialism, what ever happened there after was self created by our retards. The end result of which is now obvious to all. It’s our corrupt politicians, who invited foreign powers, with intentions of playing “one against other” for their own survival. Now the bankrupt failed nation is humiliated to go back to the same with begging bowls. Traitors presenting as PSEUDO PATRIOTS.

  • 3

    Privatizing strategic assets is a National Security threat in the context of Sri Lanka and the Indian Ocean becoming a theater of Cold War, Big power competition. Sri Lanka is in a US dollar debt Colonialism Trap and the US is targetting Energy and Transport infrastructure take over.
    The Economic Hit men, at the CBSL with President Ranil Rajapakse (who American Donald Lu recently said was backed by ‘the Force’), are deliberately sabotarging the economy the causing the foreign currency liquidity crisis ahead of more IMF Paris Club Debt Colonialism talks by isolating Sri Lanka from the Asian Region, now by withdrawing from the Asian Clearing Union or the payment system in the Asian Region on the instructions of their foreign handlers to deepen the crisis.
    Bangladesh banks have been asked not to do any trade related transactions with SL since October 18. Earlier the CBSL had said that it would not allow the Russian MIR card payment system, which would however facilitate more Russian Tourism to the island!

  • 3

    Forgive me for this light intervention:
    “Mahavamsa mentioned that Sena and Guttika who ruled Sri Lanka for 22 years in the third century BC were the sons of a Tamil horse trader.”
    Does our ‘horse trading tradition in politics start from there?

    • 1

      There are convenient scapegoats like trade unions to blame

      • 0

        “Sirimavo Bandaranaike nationalized the oil industry in 1962. At that time Singapore was emerging as a nation which became independent in 1965. Oil companies which were forced to leave Sri Lanka were welcomed by Singapore. “
        Sorry, there was no oil industry at the time, but only import business.
        The decision by Shell not to go ahead with a refinery here preceded the natinalization.
        As for China, there are strikes that are not reported much in our media. They have disrupted production and have been resolved by negotiation.
        China has returned to become more of a welfare state in the past decade.
        It is the US that should emulate China to revive its industry and economy.
        We belong to a different category in scale and structure. Perhaps it should be Cuba that could be our model for managing amid crises (although externally imposed unlike ours).

  • 2

    SL political leaders have always been selfish, & at least in hindsight, it is obvious to everybody that SWRD sowed the seeds of ethnic & religious hatred leading to a civil war but let bygones be bygone, it is the Rajapakse clan who are responsible for making SL a beggar country, which is nothing short of absolute treachery. 5 decades of political racism has made the majority SL citizens racist, so much so, that large scale corruption & even acts of treason, were overlooked in denial. The same punks & yobs continue, nobody is held accountable despite the revelations. Naming & shaming doesn’t work in SL because our politicians have no shame & for many, money talks & like to suck up to the rich & the powerful. A disgraceful trait but we talk of our proud heritage as ‘chronicled’ with unsubstantiated facts by a monk.

    The ‘aragalaya’ seemed to have united the people

  • 2


    …. but The Rajapakses have the last laugh. The apparent bitter enemy in the political arena became the saviour. If not for Ranil’s entry to the top office through the back door, maybe there would have been a change. Ranil has a history of protecting friends, even those opposed in politics, so nobody is held responsible. We are back at square 1. Traitors or Patriots, does it matter?

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.