12 November, 2025

Blog

The Other Exodus In The North That Needs Resolution

By Jehan Perera

Jehan Perera

This past October 30 marked the 35th anniversary of a mass crime that has all but faded from public memory. The British High Commission, in collaboration with Collective for Historical Dialogue & Memory hosted a documentary screening and panel discussion to mark 35 years since the expulsion of Northern Muslims. On that day in 1990 the entire Muslim population of the Northern Province was ordered by the LTTE to leave their homes within hours. In Jaffna, the cultural capital of the Tamil people, families were given only two hours to leave. In other parts of the North the time ranged from one to two days. They were told they could take only their clothes and a few belongings. The LTTE justified the expulsion of the Muslims by claiming it was a security measure against collaboration with the government. At checkpoints, LTTE cadres seized money, jewellery, and deeds to property. Some women had their wedding necklaces pulled from their necks. Those who attempted to reason or plead were told that everything earned in Tamil Eelam belonged to Tamil Eelam.

The number of people expelled is estimated at over 75,000. Many walked or were taken in overcrowded boats to Puttalam and other parts of the country. They slept in schools, temples, and under trees, and lived for years as displaced people. Their tragedy was overshadowed by the larger war in which hundreds of thousands of Tamils and Sinhalese also suffered death, injury, and loss of homes. The Muslim expulsion became one more episode in a conflict that had already become too vast to be given any special priority. In the immediate aftermath the attention of the government and international agencies was on the massive displacement of Tamils whose numbers ran into a million or more. When resources were scarce, priorities had to be made. The Muslims of the North, who had lost their lands and property but not their lives, were placed lower on the list for assistance.

The problems faced by the displaced Muslims have continued to receive less attention even after the war ended in 2009. There is no longer an LTTE to prevent their return, yet obstacles continue to remain. In the nearly two decades that had passed since the expulsion, the lands once belonging to the Muslims had changed hands. In areas such as Musali, where the Muslim communities had lived on nearly 500 square kilometres of land, only around 70 square kilometres is available and this needs to be shared with Tamil communities that also endured displacement. The military has occupied land taken from the LTTE at great cost and wished to retain it for strategic purposes. Ironically, the vulnerability that the Muslims feel as a minority in the North leads them to be more accommodative of the military presence.

Equal Treatment

Many of the displaced Muslims have rebuilt their lives elsewhere through personal effort and with support from government and aid agencies. They have acquired land and housing in the areas where they resettled, particularly in Puttalam and the North Western Province. Yet these achievements have been used against them. Officials in the North sometimes treat them as if they possess multiple properties and therefore do not deserve priority assistance when they try to return to their lost homes. This view disregards the cultural and emotional attachment the evicted Muslims have to their ancestral homes. For them, returning to the North is not just about gaining more assets but about reclaiming their identity and sense of security.

The periodic eruptions of anti-Muslim sentiment in the South of the country and amongst the Sinhalese since the end of the war have deepened these anxieties. The government must act firmly to prevent incitement and to enforce the rule of law equally upon all. When injustice is tolerated against one group, it ultimately engulfs others as well. Security lies not in dominance but in the confidence of every citizen that justice will protect them. The NPP government is being true to its promise not to use ethnic nationalism for political advantage. But the unification of the country after the defeat of the LTTE has yet to be translated into unity of the heart and mind. The minority communities, notably the Tamil and Muslim, still feel excluded from decision-making and vulnerable to discrimination or violence.

The government needs to ensure that the grievances of every group will be addressed with fairness. In the context of war-time displacement it needs to declare a policy affirming the right of return of all displaced people, Tamil, Sinhalese, and Muslim alike and establish an administrative mechanism to implement it transparently. The Office for Reparations, established as part of the framework for national reconciliation, can play a key role. Reparations are meant to restore victims, as far as possible, to the position they would have been in had the violations not occurred.

Remembering Injustice

The expulsion of the Muslims of the North remains one of the most painful reminders of what can happen when the bonds of coexistence are broken. The expulsion of the Muslims of the North is a warning of what happens when ethnic nationalism overrides humanity. It is a reminder that suffering does not remain confined to one community. Remembering October 1990 is a call to all Sri Lankans to ensure that no citizen is ever again driven from their home because of their identity. It also invites every community to reflect on its own silences and failures. True reconciliation begins when each group accepts responsibility for the pain it has caused, directly or indirectly, and reaches out to others in acknowledgement.

The war created victims in every community, and reconciliation requires that each of them be heard and treated fairly. When one group’s suffering is overlooked, resentment festers and trust in the government weakens. The expulsion of the Muslims of the North must therefore be acknowledged as a national tragedy, not an internal matter of any single community. Both the government and civil society organisations need to continue to create spaces for dialogue and mutual understanding. Last week an exhibition and mural painting by Tamil and Muslim women from the North and East was held to mark the 35 years since the forced expulsion of Muslims from the North by the LTTE. It was held by the Alliance for Minorities and the Chelvanayaham Memorial Trust, in Mannar, Jaffna and Kilinochchi. The Forcibly Evicted Association-1990 also organized a peaceful “Black October 2025” remembrance gathering in Puttalam.

The proposed Truth and Reconciliation Commission that this government and the ones that preceded it have been promising to establish should record the stories of the expelled Muslims so that they become part of the nation’s shared history. Only by acknowledging every wound, without hierarchy of suffering, can Sri Lanka become a truly reconciled nation. Every community has suffered due to the war, and every community needs to be healed if the Sri Lankan nation is to be whole and healthy to take on the challenge of national development with success. The strength of this country will be realised when its different communities live together in mutual respect and trust. Reconciliation is not the task of the government alone.

Latest comments

  • 8
    5

    … The LTTE justified the expulsion of the Muslims claiming it was a security measure against collaboration with the government.
    Jehan, Was the claim accurate?

    • 7
      4

      N you could say the same thing about the Government’s attempt to get all Tamils in Colombo to register at Police stations. Did the security situation justify it? Was it not an alienating, stupid and wicked thing to try?

    • 3
      6

      YES
      It was true.
      LTTE supporters justifying the expulsion accuses=d Muslims of using their mobile phones to pass on information.
      N, have you ever bothered to find out the LTTE’s real reason?

  • 12
    1

    Weekly milking time again ……… I’ll have some Kal Kiri please.

  • 14
    2

    “Reparations are meant to restore victims, as far as possible, to the position they would have been in had the violations not occurred.” Does these reparations include the properties and lives lost due to UNP government sponsored riots/violences in 1983. My property in Mt.Lavinia was destroyed. So was TILLY’S Hotel opposite to my house. This Hotel is STILL STANDING as witness to the GoSL SPONSORED STATE TERRORISM which is the Mother of all other uprisings in the country.
    Like the foreign countries that ruled Ceylon for 4 to 5 centuries, Sinhala dominated governments adopted the divide and rule to weaken the minorities right to live as EQUALS. Muslims were made used by the Singhalese to cause harm to the Tamils. Who created BBS/ Grease Yakkas/ White vans? White flag incident was a War Crime that needs to be tackled by NPP Government.

  • 6
    5

    Thank you Jehan for reminding us of the need for reconciliation and restitution.
    I fondly remember and miss our tailor brothers Rahim and Shaheed who tailored my grandfather’s cassocks, then my father’s and finlly our school uniforms. And indeed Master Stores where we shopped.

    • 4
      7

      JM,
      It goes without saying that the most affected provinces in Sri Lanka are the north, east, and uva: What actions has the current leftist government taken in the past 12 months to improve the lives of those who are suffering in those areas? Why are you, Prof. Hoole and other influential politicians, including former minister Hon. Wignaswaran, unable to bring up the issue repeatedly so that the people can benefit from some kind of advancement, let alone miracles? I believe that those people could live better lives in many places if the wealthy Tamil diaspora could assist those provinces. For some reason, Arjuna or similar newcomers have been given the upper hand in raising the voice, while powerful Wignaswaran and everyone else have been remarkably silent since the last election days.

    • 6
      3

      JM
      Thank you.
      What hurts most is the attitude of those who still justify the evil deed.

  • 8
    0

    “the pot calling the kettle black.”

    It means criticizing someone else for a fault that you yourself are guilty of.

    When the UNP blames the JVP for massacres, while the UNP government itself committed or allowed similar atrocities during the same era — it is truly the pot calling the kettle black.

  • 10
    4

    Most Muslims, largely from Mannar, who were forced to leave, have now been settled, and many others, like many Tamils who were forced to flee during the war, due to the actions of the Sri Lankan state, the armed forces and Muslim homeguards, have now settled in other parts of the world or in Sri Lanka and have started a new life and do not want to return. Only around 72000 Muslims were forced to flee from the north, but over a million ethnic Sri Lankan Tamils were forced to flee from their homes, largely to the west. Around 300000 of them have been killed, around 145000 in May 2009 alone, and this has drastically reduced the island’s Tamil population. What about the thousands of Tamils in the east and many other border areas in the north, who were forced to flee due to the deliberate killing, raping, looting and ethnic cleansing activities of deliberately settled Sinhalese criminal elements in Tamil areas, who were pretending to be innocent civilians, the Sri Lankan armed forces and STF and the Muslim homeguards, especially in the Amparai and Trincomalee districts.

    • 5
      5

      Rohan25

      I cannot say with certainty that our friend nimal fernando was in anyway complicit in the Great Northern robbery.

  • 10
    5

    Many ancient Tamil villages in these districts have now been converted to Sinhalese or Muslim areas. They are now a no-go zone for any Tamil, with all traces of centuries of ancient Tamil habitation deliberately destroyed, and place and village names changed. When are these people going to be settled in their original place of habitation and reparations paid to them, too? The chasing of Muslims in the north, although regrettable, would not have occurred if they had not spied and collaborated with the Sinhalese armed forces to harm the local Tamils, who never did anything to them and also largely due to what happened to the Tamil population in the east and in the south, at the hands of the Muslim homeguards, and criminal elements, their brutal killing, buring and destrying Hindu temples, looting, raping and ethnic cleansing activities aganst innocent Tamil villagers.

    • 4
      5

      Rohan25

      Call It What It Was — Ethnic Cleansing.
      Let’s stop pretending.

      No amount of justification or talk of “strategic reasons” can excuse what happened. Once the IPKF withdrew from Sri Lanka, the LTTE found itself in dire need of funds. The so-called “great leader’s” solution was to target the Muslim community — to rob them and drive them out — expecting Tamils both inside and outside the country to turn a blind eye. And they did, by remaining silent.

    • 1
      4

      “would not have occurred if they had not spied and collaborated with the Sinhalese armed forces”
      A lie that even VP’s sidekicks stopped telling long ago.

  • 9
    6

    Despite these Muslims being ethically Tamil, in the name of their religion and an imagined blanket fake Arab origin, they were colloborating and siding with the Sinhalese to marginalise, kill, ethnically cleanse and commit structural genocide on the island’s Tamils, with the sole aim of greatly benefiting at their expense and steal large parts of their ancient homeland, for their immigrant fake Arab South Indian Tamil origin community, with Sinhalese help. Sorry, it may sound brutal, but this is what they were up to. Start all the problems, collaborate with all Sinhalese-led governments to marginalise the island’s Tamils and greatly benefit at their expense. E.g. Badudin Mahmood and standardisation (one example), but when things go wrong and Tamils retaliate, they play the victim card

    • 4
      6

      Rohan25

      “…..and steal large parts of their ancient homeland, ..”

      Don’t you think it is a loaded quote?
      May I ask whose homeland it is?
      Please stop making extraordinary claims (like Chamba and Lester) while I am around.

      • 5
        2

        Sorry, I disagree with you. There is an ancient Tamil homeland on the island, just like there is an ancient Welsh homeland, a Scottish homeland, and people trying to deny and state it did not exist are only playing into the Sinhalese racists

        • 2
          6

          Rohan25

          “… people trying to deny and state it did not exist are only playing into the Sinhalese racists”

          I have problem, can you cite whatever that prevailed in the island 500 years ago was known as Tamil Homeland?

          The stupid Sinhalese and the stupid Tamils have an imaginary construct of this island. The only evidence I have seen is both suffer from mass paranoia, and nothing else.

          • 5
            1

            There would have been no issue with a claim of a Tamil homeland, if they had been treated with justice and diginity from the time of independence by all Sinhalese led governments and their ancient history, heritage, language and places of inhabitation safeguarded and preserved so that can live and thrive in their own areas, instead of being treated as third rates in their own lands and their lands, history, heritage and ancient archeological sites all now being stolen from them in the name of Sinhalese Buddhism. In many multi ethnic and mulit lingual states ,like in India, Canada, Belgium, Switzerland and now even Britian a federal form of government, recognising the homeland of different linguistic and ethnic groups are maintained in order to preserve national unity and the prosperity of the nation and to safeguard minority liguistic and ethnic groups. Short and Sweet if you do not like this, this is not my problem but yours

          • 6
            1

            If the foolish and naive, largely Colombo-based elite Tamil leaders had been more business-like, shrewd, worldly wise and insisted and demanded a federal form of government, at the time of independence, the British would have granted this, and all this would not have happened, but they foolishly and naively believed the then Sinhalese leaders and politicians, who asked them not to demand for a federal form of government, that even SWRD Banaranaicke once wanted but a unitary form of government, and to trust them as under this new unitary government, everyone will be treated equally and there will be no discrimination based on language, ethnicity or religion but they had already diabollically planned what they will do to the Tamils and these foolish Tamil leaders trusted these Sinhalese leaders and politicians, who were their family friends and even relatives. We all know what happened soon after the so-called independence, Indian origin Tamils were made stateless, and large-scale colonisation of the east by outside Sinhalese. Tamil Amparai became Sinhalese Ampara. Tamil Pattipolai Aru became Sinhalese Gal Oya, just like Tamil Manal Aru has become Welioya. Tamil Kantalai is now Sinhalese Kantale. The list goes on

        • 3
          6

          Rohan 25

          Here is something young Rohan ought to learn from my cousin who lives far away and better contemplate the idea being put forward:
          White American confronts Native American https://www.youtube.com/shorts/MppfXn4FjOY

    • 1
      2

      “Badudin Mahmood and standardisation”
      It was not his idea. He happened to be the minister.
      It was a government decision precipitated by a freak examination result that suggested systematic favouring of Tamil candidates.
      Protests to the GCE (AL) results were seen island wide.
      Standardisation was a clumsy way to address the issue, but something needed to be done to rectify the imbalance.
      Blaming a Muslim minister was the easy way out for some opportunists.

      • 1
        0

        You have no idea of anything, other than your constant trolling, bullying, and malicious spiteful, venomous, anti-Tamil comments, comments here to aid and abet Sinhala racists and fake Arab Islamic extremists.

  • 11
    2

    “On that day in 1990 the entire Muslim population of the Northern Province was ordered by the LTTE to leave their homes within hours. In Jaffna, the cultural capital of the Tamil people, families were given only two hours to leave. “
    Whether it is right or wrong, the expulsion of Muslims from Jaffna of North should be considered in the reconciliation process. But it is not the start of the expulsion of people of Sri Lanka from various places since 1948 by various institution including governments of Sri Lanka. We should not isolate one component ignoring other components and we should go towards the root problems that lead to all since 1948. President himself accepted that the past 77 years of racism, religious terrorism are the root causes for the state disaster that brought bankruptcy and dependence on external influence.

    • 3
      7

      Here come two Devil’s advocates!
      Shame on them.

    • 5
      8

      Ajith Oh Please
–
“Whether it is right or wrong, the expulsion of Muslims from Jaffna of North should be considered in the reconciliation process.”
–
Call It What It Was — Ethnic Cleansing.
Let’s stop pretending.
–
The expulsion of Muslims from the North in 1990 wasn’t a “protective measure,” a “temporary evacuation,” or a “strategic move.” It was ethnic cleansing — deliberate, targeted, and brutal.
–
Before talking about reconciliation, Tamil society must first own up to this atrocity. Fifty five to seventy thousand Northern Muslims were driven out of their homes overnight, humiliated, robbed, and exiled — not because they were soldiers or spies, but because they were Muslims. That’s the truth.
–
For decades, most Tamil nationalists have refused to face this reality. When former member of parliament M.A. Sumanthiran had the courage (b***s, honesty), to apologize, many branded him a traitor. Instead of confronting their moral failures, Tamils hid behind excuses — blaming “Muslim collaborators,” “home guards,” or even claiming Prabhakaran did it out of kindness.
–
By the way both Umbilical relatives in South India and greatest Prabaharan fan nimal fernando kept a deafening silence. That kind of self-deception is poison to reconciliation.
–
If Tamils demand justice for Mullivaikkal, for displacement, for genocide, then they must also have the integrity, honesty and b***s to confront their own crimes.

      • 6
        2

        “Ajith Oh Please
–
“Whether it is right or wrong, the expulsion of Muslims from Jaffna of North should be considered in the reconciliation process.”
–
Call It What It Was — Ethnic Cleansing.
Let’s stop pretending.”
        The expulsion of Muslims from Jaffna happened not happened in 1958 or 1983 or in 1987 before the invasion of Indian army or JVP’s second insurgency. The expulsion of Tamils in Colombo in 1958 or expulsion of Indian origin Tamils in 1983 to Kilinochchi along with expulsion of Tamils from the country. For your eyes these expulsions are not expulsions because you are part of the regime involved in the terror of the Sinhalese governments of the past 77 years. After you have done ethnic cleansing of Tamils in North East from 1958 to 1983 by both Sinhala governments and Muslims, you try to create that it is a first issue. It is the same Muslims who become suicide bombers for Sinhalese governments. Did the Tamils kill the Sinhalese in 1958 or in 1983? Who burnt Jaffna library in 1981.What a conclusion or honesty from you that if Tamils demand justice, then Muslims need justice? Why not tell Sinhalese need Justice. This is what you call reconciliation?

        • 2
          4

          “It is the same Muslims who become suicide bombers for Sinhalese governments.”

          This dynamic of suicide bombers is interesting. On the one hand, some people complain about extremism from the Sinhalese side. But there has never been a Sinhalese suicide bomber. With the exception of Japanese Kamikaze pilots, who died for their Emperor (Sun God) and not any religion, almost all suicide bombers in history have been Tamil Hindus and Muslims. Some idiot will try to find an exception (which might exist), but I’m referring here to scale .

          So then, one should dig deeper into the mentality behind suicide bombing. There is nothing in Buddhism to promote either suicide, bombing, or suicide bombing. In Islam, you have the doctrine of “jihad.” In Hinduism, it is not so clear. The LTTE claimed to be Marxist. But there is nothing in Marxism to promote suicide bombing.

          Anyway, the point is that whatever motivated these Tamil Hindu suicide bombers existed long before 1958, 1983, etc. A normal rational person will not strap C4 around their waist and blow up the Indian PM, or a bank, or a train. Even if Sinhalese extremism played a role, it was not the primary component.

          • 1
            5

            Hello Lester,
            Suicide Bombing has actually declined since 2007. I personally have only met 2 Muslims that justified Suicide Bombings. One was a Pakistani in Qatar and the other was a 3rd Generation British Muslim from Luton. There are very few Muslims who support Suicide Bombings.
            If you really want to understand what motivates someone to strap on the explosives, try reading Jeffrey Lewis’ book “The Business of Martyrdom”.
            The first were probably the Russian Anarchists. Many of the Japanese Kamikaze Pilots were not volunteers. Remember Suicide Bombing is only possible/practical with the invention of smaller deadlier explosives.
            You wrote “Anyway, the point is that whatever motivated these Tamil Hindu suicide bombers existed long before 1958, 1983”.
            What is your evidence for this?
            Best regards

            • 1
              3

              “There are very few Muslims who support Suicide Bombings.”

              But the statistics say otherwise. There are Muslim clerics who have issued fatwas in favor of suicide bombing.

              “Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, one of the most influential modern Islamist clerics, issued several fatwas during the Second Intifada declaring Palestinian suicide bombings permissible and even commendable.

              These fatwas became the theological backbone for Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and later Al-Qaeda affiliates.

              ✅ Key points Qaradawi made:

              Suicide bombing is not suicide (intihār)
              He argues intent is different.
              Suicide = despair or escape.
              Martyrdom operation = attack on an enemy with willingness to die.

              The attacker is “selling his soul to God.”

              Killing oneself is acceptable if the purpose is to kill the enemy.

              Civilians are not truly civilians in Israeli society because of military service and reserve duty.

              The operation is an act of jihad, therefore rewarded with martyrdom.”

              Are you claiming to have better knowledge of Islam than this cleric? Obviously most Muslims will denounce suicide bombing in public. But in private, the suicide bombers are considered Shahid e.g. martyrs.

              • 1
                2

                Hello Lester,
                You have a lot of knowledge about Muslim Clerics. You sound a lot like Mosab Hassan Yousef – so much so that this may be another of your Avatars.
                The Koran says there are 7 Heavens and the Hindus say that there are 7 Realms above the Earth and 7 Realms below. Both are wrong.
                As for “Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, one of the most influential modern Islamist clerics” he was in Qatar when I was there and used to be on Al Jazeerah (Arabic) regularly. He tends towards the Muslim Brotherhood outlook, however does not support an Islamic State “I am totally against theocracy. We are not a state for mullahs”. He also condemned the killing of Civilians and also “added that haphazard killing where the rough is taken with the smooth and where innocents are killed along with wrongdoers is totally forbidden in Islam”. – http://www.islam-online.net/English/News/2001-09/13/article25.shtml
                There are many shades of Islamic belief Lester, and his is only one of them.
                Best regards

              • 1
                0

                “Killing oneself is acceptable if the purpose is to kill the enemy.
                Suicide bombing is not suicide (intihār)
                He argues intent is different.
                Suicide = despair or escape.
                Martyrdom operation = attack on an enemy with willingness to die.”
                How come this great fake patriot has never heard of Coporal Gamini Kularatna of Hasalaka?

            • 2
              2

              “What is your evidence for this?”

              As far as I know, all Tamil Hindu suicide bombers in Sri Lanka came from the North and East of the country. The Northern Part of the country was under the dominion of the Vellalars (who owned most of the land) and treated the lower casts as serfs. In other words, just like the Prussian military tradition was able to produce die-hard loyalist generals for Hitler, the rigid authoritarian backdrop of Northern Sri Lanka under the LTTE was able to produce die-hard loyalist suicide bombers for Prabhakaran. Just like North Korea adapted Marxism because deference to authority is highly valued in traditional Korean culture.

              A perfect example on CT is Rohan25. He is obviously fanatical when it comes to his “cause.” Nothing can dissuade him. He is waiting for the next iteration of the LTTE.

              • 1
                1

                Hello Lester,
                My question was on your assertion “Whatever motivated these Tamil Hindu suicide bombers existed long before 1958, 1983”.
                Now your answer is “the rigid authoritarian backdrop of Northern Sri Lanka under the LTTE was able to produce die-hard loyalist suicide bombers for Prabhakaran”.
                So the LTTE was in charge long before 1958?
                As far as I know the LTTE was formed in 1976 from the remnants of the Tamil New Tigers founded in 1972.
                You haven’t explained what evidence there is for a pre 1958 motivation to become a Suicide Bomber.
                Best regards

          • 3
            1

            “some people complain about extremism from the Sinhalese side. But there has never been a Sinhalese suicide bomber”
            Cowards run away from imagined suicide bombers, all the way to USA.

          • 5
            1

            “But there has never been a Sinhalese suicide bomber.:
            But they had given a state approval for its military for killing Tamil people individually or mass level.

            • 2
              2

              Regardless of whether or not there was state approval, it does not contradict my original point: you cannot take a Sinhalese person and turn them into a suicide bomber. It speaks well to the culture . Similarly, the Irish fought the English for 700 odd years, which makes the Sri Lankan Tamil “struggle” (assuming there even is one) pale in comparison. In more modern times, the IRA used bombs, but not suicide bombs. It speaks well to the culture as well. So the only logical conclusion: there is a fatal flaw in Tamil Hindu culture that you cannot attribute to Sinhalese racism.

              • 1
                0

                I suppose, ethnic cleansing, marginalisation, genocide. raping, looting, large-scale war crimes, denying land, jobs and higher education to the island’s Tamils and using the state resources like the Archaeology, land forestry, etc, to steal Tamil people’s lands, their history and heritage. destroy them or create fake stories to claim all these for Sinhalese Buddhism are not fatal flaws, to you and most Sinhalese, but brave and admiring traits. You can see this oozing out from many comments. Tamils deserve everything they get and all that was dished out to them, just like the way blacks deserved everything that was dished out to them; however, if they retaliate, beware. The fatal flaw is state-sponsored Sinhalese racism and fake Arab Islamic fanaticism, the root cause all based on lies and myths, yet you people do not see this and support this

            • 2
              1

              *not suicide bombers

            • 1
              0

              There is no need for that as the Sinhalese state was using its armed forces, the Sinhalese police, Sinhalese/Muslim criminals and thugs. Muslim home guards in the east and now fake Arab Islamic Wahhabi and Salafists, are being used to bomb Tamil churches and Hindu temples—lots of resources, even government departments like Archaeology, Mahaveli, Forestry and land.

        • 1
          1

          The Red Herring artist is back at the job.

        • 1
          0

          All these people have a different set of standards, one for the Tamils and for the others. This is the reason they come here and howl and cry about everyone else, their plight, Eg, like the Palestinians, but keep quiet about the Tamils, condoning what happened to them or is still happening and many times even openly supporting the discrimination, marginalisation and war crimes that were committed on them and justifying what happened. Further, remember the Sinhalese and Muslims vastly benefitted from what happened to the Tamils at the hands of the Sri Lankan state, and most of them overtly and covertly supported these actions. However,r things like Palestine etc do not affect them and they look good supporting these causes and

        • 1
          0

          It also makes them feel good and reduces their guilt feelings over what they did to the Tamils, making them think they are, after all, good people and support justice, only not in their own land. To most Sinhalese, even the so-called liberal ones, and these fake Arab Tamil Muslims from South India, have been taught from small by their parents and peers, that discriminating, marginalising, ill-treating, killing, raping and committing war crimes/genocide on the island’s Tamils is fine, this is what they are born for and deserve no better. Just like the way many whites were brainwashed by their parents and peers about non white people. This is why they do not think it is a big deal when Tamils are killed, raped, looted, and their lands are ethnically cleansed and war crimes are committed on them by the Sri Lankan state, armed forces, Muslim homeguards urged by the politician and elite, Sinhalese and Muslim criminal elements.

        • 1
          0

          They think this is what Tamils are born for, and they deserve no better and should not retaliate, complain or fight back and get very angry, confused, and surprised as to why the Tamils are fighting, complaining or retaliating in kind, as they are born for this sort of treatment and this is what they deserve. However, they have a different set of standards as to how Sinhalese and Muslims should be treated and will jump and down if any form of violence or slight insult is committed or perpetrated against them. The newspapers in all languages will be full of this outrage, condemning this, Sinhalese, Muslim politicians, leaders, clergy, will be everywhere demanding apologies, redress and punishment for the perpetrators and justice. Even Tamil leaders and politcians. In contrast, see the dead silence when large-scale atrocities and war crimes are committed on the island’s Tamils. Other than a few Tamil newspapers and news channels, no reporting, no demand for justice, from anyone.

        • 1
          0

          Other than a few Tamil politicians. You can see how the cross-dressing Sinhalese Cardinal kept quiet about what happened in May 2009 and called the Tamils traitors for demanding international justice, for the war crimes that were committed against them. Even when many of the victims were his fellow Tamil Catholics. In contrast, see how he was jumping up and down and demanding international and UN intervention when around 126 Sinhalese Catholics were accidentally killed by local Islamic extremists in April 2019. When even religious leaders behave like this, then what can you expect from others, even self-hating Tamil quislings and snakes, who encourage these thoughts for their own personal benefit?

        • 1
          0

          This feeling that this is what the Tamil deserve is deeply embedded and entrenched in the Sinhalese, and these fake Arab South Indian Sri Lankan Moors, even from the so-called liberals. At the beginning, they were careful not to reveal this, but with the encouragement of a self-hating Tamil snake, they are becoming braver and revealing what they really think. Tamil Quislings, the selfish Tamil upper class and elite, largely Colombo-based based and so-called foolish Tamil liberals and so-called intellectuals have also largely contributed to this. They will condemn every little atrocitiy committed against the Sinhalese and Muslims by the Tamils or others, mostly in retaliation for the atrocities they had committed against the Tamils and demand justice but never or hardly demand justice for the large scale atrocities and war crimes that was committed against the Tamils, at the hands of the Sinhalese state, the armed forces and the Muslims, especially the Muslim homeguards in the east who were openly being aided and elite. Sumanthiran was magnanimous and, being a good practising Christian, apologised on behalf of all Tamils to the Muslims for what happened to them in the north at the hands of LLTE. However, has a single Muslim leader or politician or Sinhalese leader of politcian or a religious leader, Buddhist, Christian or Muslim has ever condemned or apologised to the war

    • 3
      1

      “President himself accepted that the past 77 years of racism, religious terrorism are the root causes for the state disaster that brought bankruptcy and dependence on external influence.”

      What kind of low IQ level is required to agree with anything the incumbent president has said. He is nothing more than a curse who was born into the country’s poorest community. Can he ever be an example of a successful individual? He lied for power and lost power in less than a year, making him the shortest-serving leader since independence.
      As of today, all of his claims have been proven to be exaggerations. Unfortunately, the kind of mindset exists in this country; there can only be power-change, but no tangible changes in any of the fields. It’s like the stinky Baira Lake in Colombo.
      Btw, I believe Ajith is related to POLRAJ (a Matara minister), who recently spread a big lie about how Tamils were not treated equally until Burampi’s government came into power. However, lies, according to Germans, have a short lifespan. The same president and his powerful ministers are now behaving like cats that have defecated on the rock surface. No attempt can be made to cover. Lies are enough for the same stupid people who thought a man from KADALA-KALRAYA (peanut seller) could make a real difference in a society; malice is in their blood.

  • 3
    6

    The phrase “imagined blanket fake Arab origin” really hurts me. It is insulting of a whole community. It is racist

    From the features of some Muslims I can see and say they have Arab admixture. I do not wish to name names, but look especilly at the Muslim leaders. Look for colour of eyes, the hooked nose, etc. which are not seen in Tamils unless we too have Arab ancestry and wish to hide it.

    Perhaps the mixture in Muslims is a little, perhaps a lot. But even if their ancestry involves one Arab Ancestor, even if long ago, such persons are entitled to claim Arab origin.

    That should not bother us. But unfortunately it does. Why? Sad!

    • 8
      0

      JM,
      The Muslims, like the rest of us, are a very mixed lot. Pre-independence there were places in Colombo called Java Lane, Arab Street and Afgan Passage.
      There were Bengalis, Afghans, Punjabis, Arabs, Sindhis, Malayalees, and many others, all Muslims but with their own languages, who melded into the current community. There are still lots of Muslims whose mother tongue is not Tamil.

      • 4
        3

        Yes, and these non-Tamil speaking Muslims correctly identify themselves by their ethnicity and actual predominant ethnic origin, like Malay, Bohra ( Shia Gujarati Muslims), etc., not by their religion and some imagined blanket Arab origin that only a few of these Tamil speaking Muslims partially have. I have no problem if they wish to have a different identity, but this should be based on truth and reflect their true and predominant origin. I am around 16-20% English, a far higher percentage of English ancestry than the distant minute Arab origin that around 5% of these islands’ Tamil speaking Muslims have; however,I cannot claim to be English as I am still 80-84% Tamil, speak Tamil follow the Tamil culture, Saivaism and my wife is 100% Jaffna Tamil. Even the Slavic Muslims of Bosnia, the Turks and other Indian Muslims have Arab in them, especially the Mappila Malayali Muslims from central and North Kerala, but they do not claim to be Arab, as they are not, as the Arab element is them is minor and it’s very little or negligible amongst these South Indian origin Tamil Sri Lankan Moors. Their parent population in Tamil Nadu do not claim to be Arab or Moor, even the ones with some Arab but proudly claim to be Tamil. So once you cross the sea from India to Sri Lanka your identity and ethnicity changes from Tamil to Arab

    • 3
      1

      Jaffna Man

      “That should not bother us. But unfortunately it does. Why? Sad!”

      The only solution is to send/deport all of them back to South India.
      Their ancestors came on Kallathonies, converted to various imported religions, murdered, massacred, robed, raped, ethnically cleansed, …… innocent people, now they think they have some right to this land.

      National unity is extremely important, which is why I want all 22 millions of them
      sent back.

    • 4
      5

      JM
      You are learning. He is not only a racist but also a caste conscious bigot.
      The Muslims for reasons good or bad assert separate identity and these racists who constantly insult them want them to be part of their community.
      The Tamils of South India treat Muslims with respect so that the Muslims proudly call themselves ‘Muslim Tamils’.
      What a contrast do we see here!

      • 4
        0

        SJ,
        I met a Tamil Pakistani many years ago. A rare breed.

        • 2
          2

          Perhaps a Muslim.
          I wonder if he was a descendant of those who moved to Pakistan when India took over Hyderabad.

          • 4
            0

            SJ,
            Yes, a Muslim, but from Madras. But since he was dressed in the usual Pakistani style but looked different, he explained when I asked him.

        • 4
          2

          They largely migrated to Pakistan from South India soon after partition, thinking that they would be better off; however, many now regret this move, as they are not treated very well by the Punjabis. Pathans and Sindhis. They are considered outsiders, largely dark South Indians and refugees. This story of a pan-Islamic brotherhood is a myth and a fallacy; race, ethnicity, origins and even skin colour in these areas take precedence. Many have now learnt it the hard way, but now too late to return, and many South Asian Muslims, who are in many ways more conservative/traditional than the Western Asian and Arab Muslims, also learn the hard way when they go there to work, that there is no pan-Islamic identity or brotherhood, and the Arabs largely look down on them

          • 1
            2

            Get things right.
            The migrants were predominantly of Urdu speakers of Hydrabad.
            Pakistan was not about pan-Islamic brotherhood.
            It was a result of Hindu hostility to Muslims in the North whipped up by the likes of Savarkar.
            Even the Congress could not handle its Hindu extremists.
            Violence during secession was worst in Punjab.
            Hindu and Muslim lunatics went on a killing spree.

            • 1
              0

              The migrants were predominantly Urdu speakers from the Hindi belt. Delhi and Muslim Punjabis from eastern Punjab. Very few from other parts of India. As usual, clueless and trying to troll and bully me, these people, other than the Muslim Punjabis from East Punjab, were all derogatively called Muhajir

      • 4
        2

        Ho really! Tamils in Sri Lanka have always have treated the Muslims here with respect it is the other way around, it is they who have back stabbed and colluded with the Sinhalese to marginlise the island’s Tamils. They arrived on this first that too to the Tamil areas, in the island, that was part of the Jaffna kingdom ,Chilaw, Negombo, Mannar, Puttalam, around the 13Th century from their original Tamil homeland in South India in wooden boats called Marrakallams, as they faced immense persecution, from the Hindu Tamils after the fall of the Madurai Delhi Sultanate, Later to flee Portuguese killings and persecution and along the north west coast and Sinhalese persecution in the central highlands, where they fled, they took refuge and claimed asylum in the Tamil East claiming to be ethnic Tamil Muslims. Now denying all this history and their Tamil origin and heritage, using a itsy bitsy Arab ancestry, that a few of them have, creating chaos and all these wan-ers supporting these fake claims. Of course you know all this.

        • 1
          2

          “Tamils in Sri Lanka have always have treated the Muslims here with respect “
          *
          Let us read what this bigot and his now relatively silent guru had written again and again about them.

          • 1
            0

            Yes, they had, and you know it. Liar, it is from the word go that the Muslims on the island have betrayed the Tamils, colluded with the Sinhalese to destroy them, denied their actual South Indian origin Tamil ancestry and only claim it when it’s advantageous to a self-hating Tamil quisling; their betrayal and denial is respect. Just like the way you defend Baududeen Mahmaud’s standardisation and regional basis that was deliberately introduced to deny deserving Tamil students higher education, especially to prestigious science courses, in favour of far less deserving Sinhalese and Muslim students. You are indeed a teat. A nasty piece of work.

      • 4
        1

        Oh yes, he is your friend now, and you both are buddy buddies, but under his Hoole identity, you both fight with each other, trade insults, and call each other names, even quoting me to justify the insult and name-calling. A real comedy, both of you. Calling me casteist! For pointing out the actual origins of many Sinhalese and Muslim bloggers who come here and make racist, derogatory remarks about all Tamils and their lowly origins, which you gleefully agree and condone, but when I point out to their own actual predominantly lowly origin from South India, that they are poking fun of I am racist and casteist but not them to biased you. As for the Jaffna Man Aka Hoole, just read many of his articles, it is full of anti-Hindu, Christian fundamentalist and pro-high caste Christian Vellalar bias. He seems to have a very in-depth knowledge of the caste and even sub castes of all the people he does not like. Even I was not aware of all these subcastes amongst the Vellalars until he mentioned them. Indeed, now you have to make strange bedfellows. Just because a Muslim tailor made cassocks for his grandfather or father and gave him sweets as a child, he seems to be blind to the rest of the atrociticies and betrayals they did to the Tamils in the name of Islam and an imagined Arab origin that they hardly have. As for you, snake, the less said the better.

        • 1
          2

          You cannot accept that two people need not be pals to agree on issues.
          You personalise everything and get abusive when cornered.
          You are pathetic, as always.

          • 1
            0

            Yes, I read all the personalised abusive comments between you and him under his other identity. You are the one who keeps on trolling me and being abusive and also being a bully. You usually bring a pack of your supportive Hyenas, also to attack me, but they seem to have deserted you recently, most probably because they saw through your nasty agenda.

      • 3
        2

        An identity is based on something actual and not imaginary, or what you wish to or want to be for perceived benefits, economic or political or for prestige. A religious identity on your actual religion, a linguistic identity on your mother tongue. An ethnic or racial identity based on your actual origin, race/ethnicity or on the predominant overwhelming racial or ethnic origin. Tamil Brahmins and many other Tamil upper castes are still Tamil, although they have a large amount of North Indian Steppe ancestry. Just because 5% of the island’s Sri Lankan Moors have a distant Arab or other male ancestor, does not make them Arab, Afghan or whatever they want to call themselves. They are still Tamils with a dash of Arab; it’s absurd when they have less than 1% Arab to claim a blanket Arab origin for the entire community, even for the 95% who are Tamil and ignore their 99% Tamil ancestry. They can have a different identity, but it should be based on truth and reflect their actual origin and ancestry, not something that makes them feel important or superior in their minds. Only people with some sort of inferiority complex do this to hide their actual, largely lowly origin.

    • 3
      2

      Yes around 5% of them have some mixed origins, like Arab, Afghan, Iranian and others and this too distant, but even these people are of predoniminantly Dravidian Tamil ancestry, especially their maternal ancestry. The rest of the 95% do not. A distanct male Arab, Afghan, Persian, North Indian, Camel or any other male ancestry amongst 5% of them does not make them Arabs or anything else or to claim a blanket Arab origin for the entire community, especially for their masses who are Tamil Dravidians. This 5% are also still Tamils with a slight Arab or other western Asian or North Indian mixture. Lots of Sinhalese and Tamils also have this admixture of European and even Arab , other western Asian and north Indian but they do not use not use this little bit of admixture to claim a European or other identities. It should not bother us true but this fake blanket claim, first aided and abetted by the British and then by all Sinhalese led governments to divide and rule,has affected Tamils and created an artificial division

    • 3
      2

      They can be Tamil Muslims or Muslim Tamils with a dash of Arab, or the 5% who have less than 10% Arab and 90% Tamil can call themselves Arabs and make a laughing stock of themselves. Selective intermarrying and breeding can bring out certain features. Lots of Tamils also have sharp noses and sharp features. Maybe not in your family, but lots in mine, even from my mother’s side, who are not mixed. This is like someone ignoring and not acknowledging their parents, siblings, uncles, aunts, cousins and other close relatives but claiming ties and a close relationship and identifying with some very distant foreign cousin, as they are now rich and powerful, as they share a very distant male ancestor who came from this person’s land. In real life, if someone did this, they would be laughed at, derided and ridiculed and told to get a life and not to be ridiculous.

    • 3
      2

      However, in Sri Lanka, for identity politics and to divide and rule the Tamils, this stupid and ridiculous claim by the island’s Tamil Muslims of an Arab origin and ancestry and their now pathetic and comic attempt to imitate the Gulf Arabs in everyway to justify this claim is entertained and suuprted, even by so called educated people who should no better and if anyone questions this absurdity, they are ridiculed scorned and called racist casteist, and these fake Arab South Indian origin Tamil Muslims should be free to choose whatever identity they want to be even if that ancestry or irigin is itsy bitsy and they should ignore their 99% Tamil origin and ancestry.

    • 3
      2

      This is what is causing all the problems, and these people cannot see it. OK, if they want to be Aabs, why always run to the Tamils when they are in trouble, or claim to be a Tamil and not an Arab when they claim asylum in the West? Why claim a homeland only from the Tamil? Why not from the Arabs after all, they are not Tamils but Arabs? Tamil, when it’s advantageous and when it suits them, all other times, Tamil-hating fake Arabs. Just see if any Arab entertains their Arab identity and origin? The answer will be no.

      • 2
        2

        If they had wanted to be Arab and claimed to be Arab Muslims and not South Indian origin Tamil Muslims, they really are, but kept quiet about it and minded their own business; no one would have bothered, but they did not. They did the oppostie, to justify this extremely minimal Arab origin and ancestry that only around 5% of partially have from a distant male Arab or other western, central Asian or North Indian ancestor, they started to pathetically and comically behave like the Gulf Arabs, imitate them in every way, change their dress, food habits, looks, cuture and behaviour. Make their women wear very uncomfortable clothes not suited to the island’s climate or culture, and cover themselves from head to toe, and then connive, collude and become the junior partners of all Sinhalese-led governments from the time of independence, to marginalise, discriminate, dispossess, and ethnically cleanse the island’s Tamil population and commit structural genocide on them. You can see the result now: the Tamil population within 75 years of independence has been almost halved from around 27% to 15.8%. The Sinhalese from around 66% to 75% and their population has almost doubled from around 6% to 10%.

      • 2
        2

        All in the name of Islam and a largely imagined fake Arab blanket ancestry, that every scientific study has proven that they have far, far below average or not worth talking about. Yet they crow about this, when even the Arabs say they are not Arabs but South Asian converts and in the name of Islam, and this fake Arab origin has caused immense damage and harm to their non Muslim Tamil brothers and sisters. Not only here but in the Muslim world and in the UN, they went there and openly lied about what happened. Yet no one is bothered about all this and the immense damage they did under this fake identity, as the victims are Tamils. The Tamils have suffered far more and been wronged far more at their hands, and the Sinhalese continue to do so. If they had been Sri Lankan Moors or as Tamil Muslims had stood side by side with their fellow Tamils and fought against state-sponsored Sinhalese Buddhist racism, the Sinhalese would have backed away, or it would not have come to this level, with a war and eventual bankruptcy.

      • 2
        2

        But they did not, they did the opposite in the name of Islam and fake Arab origin for petty political and economic benefits, just for themselves and to steal as much as possible of the Tamil homeland, especially in the east, for themselves. Some people may not like this, but this is the truth, and you can hear recordings of their politicians in the east openly stating this and extorting their people to have lots of children to take over the Tamil population in the east and become the second largest minority, especially after almost half the Tamil population has fled the north and east and the country.

  • 4
    4

    Vishwamitra
    Did you say “The British High Commission, in collaboration with blah blah blah……”
    It may be news to you that the LTTE headquarters was located in London until it was proscribed as a terrorist organization by the British government in 2001.
    Approximately 90% of LTTE terrorist budget was funded by its foreign offices, mainly in Britain and Canada, and also in many other European and Asian countries. These countries that shed crocodile tears over the plight of Tamils and Muslims under the LTTE terror era are also the same countries that were complicit in LTTE atrocities. A notable omission is the LTTE atrocities against the Sinhalese and the destruction and desecration of Buddhist temples and ancient Buddhist archaeological sites in the same areas. Thousands of small, ancient village tanks in the North and East prove the ancient irrigation legacy of the Sinhalese Buddhists in the area. The expulsion of the Sinhalese Buddhists from North and East of Sri Lanka was started by the Dutch, and then continued by the British and then, the LTTE. While Tamils and Muslims live all over Sri Lanka, Sinhalese Buddhists are geographically restricted in 1/3 of their own country!

    • 3
      1

      Readers,
      Unfortunately, we need an explanation from our unawatuna NPP promoter. NPP is now exposed for not being as clean as they previously claimed.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_0ar41qieQ&t=8s

      According to reports, the female NPP MP who has been linked to drug use is not new; she is from Eppawala rather than Paliyagoda. This implies that our THAMBUTHTHEGAMA deyyo ought to be aware of her past. In addition, one of her sons was arrested by the police a month ago after being found in possession of drugs. But the minister of police and everyone else had previously said nothing about this. They solely blamed Rajapakshess and SLPP for the drug problem. In front of the same audience, the president, provocative ministers, and all NPP members act like nude men.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.