2 June, 2023


The Presidency Was Supposed To Save Us From Oblivion, But What Can Save Us From The Presidency?

By Krishantha Prasad Cooray

Krishantha Cooray

In 1978, JR Jayewardene ushered in the executive presidential system in Sri Lanka as a panacea for all the nation’s woes. By 1991, his co-architects in this venture, Gamini Dissanayake and Lalith Athulathmudali, had realized the dangers inherent in the executive presidency. They formed the DUNF not only as an opposition movement aimed at defeating President Premadasa, but also as a national movement to abolish the executive presidential system entirely.

Every president elected since, from Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga and Mahinda Rajapaksa to Maithripala Sirisena campaigned for president promising to abolish the presidency. Though these promises remained unfulfilled, under Kumaratunga and Sirisena two constitutional amendments were enacted limiting the draconian powers of the presidency. The 17th Amendment was never properly implemented while the 19th Amendment was. Although Sirisena’s administration sadly did not go through with calling for a referendum to abolish the presidency entirely, President Sirisena became our first ever head of state to voluntarily prune his own powers.

The 18th Amendment on the other hand strengthened presidential powers while removing the term limit provision, the only democratic safeguard in the system. The purpose of the bill was to enable President Mahinda Rajapaksa to contest for a third term and more. Ironically, this piece of legislation was a significant factor in his defeat in January 2015. The idea of a presidential king in all but name was an anathema to many and helped unite and rally a divided opposition.

The executive presidency was said to have been designed for JR Jayewardene to bring out the best in his ability to govern. In practice, it brought out the worst and led directly to anti-democratic episodes like the 1982 referendum and stripping Srimavo Bandaranaike of her civic rights.

The executive presidency was supposed to usher in an era of stability, peace and prosperity. Instead, the 43 years of its existence had been a time of relentless instability. With or without a civil war, the excesses of presidents, drunk on power, exacerbated existing problems and sparked new ones. President after president was dazzled by the trappings of their office and overwhelmed by the power of this beast. They all ultimately left office with more shame than pride. It has taken barely four decades of executive presidency to bring Sri Lanka to the brink of becoming a failed state.

Once, when Lee Kuan Yew was asked what the secret was to his success, he replied “I didn’t have idiots in my Cabinet.” In Sri Lanka, politics has become the near exclusive preserve of idiots, including such blessed souls as those who wonder why we need oxygen. There have been notable exceptions, but electoral trends clearly favour the unintelligent, the uneducated and the dishonest. The Presidency has encouraged this deterioration. Time and again, executive presidents have used their excessive powers to elevate idiots and crooks whose primary qualification is their eagerness and expertise at worshiping the president.

It is abundantly clear that today’s government has not only failed, it has failed miserably and failed faster than any other in our history. We have a president who tells government officials with a straight face that his mere words are the only circulars they need. What more do you need to prove the danger of placing too much power in the hands of any single individual?

The executive presidential system enthrones a single individual as the sole leader and puts the public, civil service, police, judiciary and all other politicians at their mercy. It elevates the president like a king to be above the people and above the law. The presidency replaces the usual democratic spaces for decision making like cabinets, parliamentary caucuses and autonomous civil servants with what amounts to a royal court, packed with loyal jesters and cronies who usurp the levers of governance into a supporting cast for a one man show.

When such sycophants manage to isolate presidents and shower them with flattery, weak leaders quickly come to rely on them as they make them feel secure. They become gatekeepers, preventing Presidents from hearing alternate views, and requiring Ministers and civil servants to bow to them even to get an audience with their leader. The presidency, especially in the absence of strong and enduring institutional limitations, creates an ideal breeding ground for such sycophants and enables them to sideline professionals and career politicians. Every President finds themselves surrounded by cronies, whether business people, media moguls or obscure bagmen and their sugary charms. Policies become about people, and decisions become centred around profits for a few and not the betterment of the country.

This is why we hear of fewer and fewer successful business people today investing in their employees or infrastructure or in producing a product or service.

Today, the most successful are those who make deals, keep percentages, using political patronage to buy something cheap or sell it at a higher price, exploit suspicious tax loopholes, pump and dump schemes or illicit bond trading to make it to the top. An economy and a polity that rewards having the head of state on speed dial over honest innovation, sweat and business prowess is one that will never be taken seriously in the global marketplace.

This kind of corruption was one of the key drivers for people like Ven Maduluwawe Sobitha Thero to campaign for an end to the executive presidency. Like Lalith and Gamini before him, he saw that to liberate Sri Lanka would take more than regime change. It would take radical system change. There is no point in ousting one President and replacing him or her with another who you hope will not be corrupted by the crown.

Sobitha Thero knew that the only way to get Sri Lanka on the right track was to rid us of this system altogether and replace it with one where all power is not centered in any single individual. Tragically, the government he ushered into office fell short of his vision. Still, the 19th Amendment took historic strides towards democratisation. Thanks to this landmark piece of legislation, for the first time in over 35 years our judiciary, our parliament and our public service were unshackled like a breath of fresh air. Our senior judges were not unilaterally hand-picked for appointment or promotion by a President at his whim. Instead, through the Constitutional Council, judicial appointments were made by unanimous consensus between the President, Speaker, Prime Minister, Opposition Leader, their nominees and civil society representatives.

Throughout the life of the Constitutional Council from September 2015 to September 2020, not a single judicial nominee or public servant was ever appointed by the council over objections from the opposition. Every judge was deemed suitable by the government and opposition alike. But with the 20th Amendment, once again, the president rules over the parliament, can appoint and promote judges like his chattel, and can treat public officials and career civil servants as if they are his private property.

The experience of 43 years is clear. The presidential system has weakened us as a nation, made us more divided and more unstable. It is a failed experiment. And as the calibre of men and women in politics has deteriorated, the calibre of the president too continues to deteriorate. Individuals who lack the capacity and emotional maturity to manage a kade, let alone a country, can end up wielding the power of life and death over the country and the people.

Unfortunately, all too many of our politicians have fallen under the allure of the executive presidency. They are consumed by the idea of themselves one day becoming President. They believe that they are special, that they can succeed where other presidents have failed, even though history has taught us that every president has left the country worse for wear.

If the majority of MPs feel that a prime minister is no longer performing, they could replace him or her, as so many British, Australian and Indian Prime Ministers have been dismissed from within their own parties. That constant threat gives rise to more stable, disciplined and democratic governance, rather than allowing a failed President to sit as king for years until the next election.

The executive presidency has failed. The time has come to return to our democratic roots, to a more collegiate, responsible, and accountable form of government. Sri Lanka will only thrive when we finally rid ourselves once and for all of our monarchist presidential system and replace it with a true transparent, pluralistic, liberal democracy. The power of the presidency does not flow from the heavens. The powers of the President were vested in him by Parliament and the voice of the people. Per the Constitution, these same powers can be taken away with a parliamentary supermajority of two thirds followed by a referendum. It is not a divine right, but a delegation of power by the people and their elected representatives.

It is time for a new Constitution to be drawn up that retains the unity of Sri Lanka, enshrines the rights of our citizens, and replaces the presidency with a Westminster-style government headed by a Prime Minister, along with other democratic reforms to take politics out of the process of appointing and promoting judges, police officers and civil servants.

Today’s most senior political leaders, whether in government or opposition, are too enamoured with the presidency to take the lead on dismantling it. The path forward is for those outside of politics, those whose lives, legacies and futures have been jeopardised by this system, those ordinary citizens and civil society movements that want real change. They must stand up, be counted and insist that our next leader return us to our democratic roots.

JR Jayewardene may have thought that the executive presidential system would save the country from impending oblivion. Now the need of the hour is for us to develop a system that can save Sri Lanka from the executive presidency itself.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 9

    An appropriate title. I am afraid that time has run out to save this nation from the executive presidency. Every past president who promised to abolish it and never did bears responsibility. When JR introduced it he had in mind people like himself or PM Lee Kuan Yew who would use it wisely and restrain ones self from abusing it. But he was that last politician of that breed who could honor the requirements of an Executive. His two right and men who would have been ideal executive presidents i.e. Lalith and Gamini were cut down. Those that succeeded JR got power hungry and abused the power to the hilt.Nande is not just leading us into oblivion he has made us board a rocket ship headed for oblivion at warp speed by his own actions. Another way of describing the current situation is to compere it to the Titanic with Nande as the captain. He is sailing at full speed into an ice burg which will totally destroy the ship and everybody aboard. Time as they say is no longer on our side for it has run out.

    • 11

      Blame Sirisena and Ranil. Sirisena who came to power with the promise of abolishing of post of president, in fact claiming that he is a one term president. But they never kept their word. Ranil wanted to be president, and he did not want it to be abolished or even have one without power. Sirisena also did not want to spend his term powerless. Both connived in cheating the people who had faith in them, and this is the result.

      • 4

        @Dr.Gnana – 19th Amendment restrict the power of President and make it as a ceremonial post like India. All the good thing brought in 19th amendment lost with the 20th Amendment. That’s why political coup drama doesn’t staged as intended. Even the premier given power and answerable to parliament won’t help. People elected a crook as premier still the same thing happen.

        We elected one to proof majority in control and do systematic mad political move to create tension and demographic changes. Fighting for land ownership (after all whoever it is a Sri Lankan own it) but in the process we are leasing out land to foreigners at free will who has political and military interest.. What a joke? Now all the strategic locations up country tea estates, north islands, colombo and hambanthota in control of chinese. Next time we both can fight among us in Chinese for sure.

      • 2

        What load of Rubbish. First of all Sirisena was a one term president and also the only president who consented to reducing his power via the 19th amendment. As for Ranil’s invovelment how on earth could they have connived when they fell out and Sirisena actively worked to over throw his own prime minister and very nearly succeeded. It strikes me that you belong to the group of so called professionals with their heads stuck very frimly up your own back sides. Also, have you forgotten that R Premadasa brutally put down the JVP rebellion, armed the LTTE, engaged in killing his political oponnents including Richard De Soyza. CBK promised to abolish the presidency then got advice from uncle JR who told her not to do so and she went along with it. During the CBK era the Rawatte sons ran berserk, murdered muslim youth, the popular singers Chandraleka and Rukantha were intimidated harassed and assoulted for performing on UNP stages. This couple fled to the USA where they claimed and were granted political assylum.

  • 7

    “But What Can Save Us From The Presidency?”
    Natural causes, I hope. The Great Redeemer is obviously tottering. The Efficient Leader’s next apoplectic outburst could finish him. I hope natural causes will allow me to die happily after I witness these events .

    • 2

      Do not be so pessimistic.
      Did Pinochet ever dream that he will have to go and that the US which put him there will not protect him?
      The masses, more than God, can work in mysterious ways.

  • 7

    While the article has dealt with the subject well, I find one reservation.
    Your assertion :
    …….”his co-architects in this venture, Gamini Dissanayake and Lalith Athulathmudali, had realized the dangers inherent in the executive presidency.”…….
    That is somewhat debateable. If either of them succeeded JR, they may have relished the EP.
    But when Premadasa became the President, they may have had other ideas.
    We never really know.

    • 6

      There is no way to disprove what was famously said; “Power Corrupts. Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely.”

  • 1

    Certainly, Lee Kuan Yew would not have succeeded if if he had idiots in his cabinet. We have a cabinet full of idiots so that the President & the PM don’t look too bad in that light. When we have ministers who think food is more important than air & others who believe in divine intervention & holy water to cure a pandemic, we should seriously ask ourselves if these Ministers ever went to school. Without going into environmental & economic issues, the other important issue is the rampant pandemic but now with the vaccinations, even that can’t dished out properly without inconveniencing, particularly, the old, by having to wait in long queues. In UK, the vaccination was given systematically, according to age & a few weeks ago, I received a letter stating that I was eligible & for me to book an appointment on line at a convenient time in a centre of my choice. Accordingly, I had my vaccination on a Sunday morning, I only had to confirm my details which were already documented & I was out under 10 minutes with no waiting in a queue. In contrast, my old aunt living in Col. 5 had to return after waiting in the qu

  • 1

    Certainly, Lee Kuan Yew would not have succeeded on his own. We have a Parliament full of idiots so that the President & the PM doesn’t look too bad. When we have ministers who think food is more important than oxygen & others who believe in divine intervention & holy water to cure a pandemic, we should seriously ask ourselves if these Ministers ever went to school. Without going into environmental & economic issues, the other most important other concern is the rampant pandemic but now with the vaccinations being available, even that is not dished out properly without inconveniencing the public.


  • 1

    In UK, the vaccination was organised systematically according to age. A few weeks ago, I received a letter stating that I was eligible & to book an appointment at a centre of my choice. Accordingly, I had my vaccination on a Sunday morning, I only had to confirm my details, which were already documented & I was out under 10 minutes with no waiting in a queue. In contrast, my old aunt living in Col. 5 had to return home after waiting in the queue when stocks ran out, another friend who has mobility problems, gave up after 45 minutes as the progress of the queue was slow, while another just didn’t bother because of long queues. However, 2 of my friends had the vaccine after about 45 minutes in the queue. They were fortunate because there had been a token system.

    Social distancing is impossible with queues, therefore, UK authorities do not allow gatherings. The inefficacy in SL, if happened in UK, would have resulted in the Minister being forced to step down .

  • 0

    A very good dispassionate comment. All actions and comments (individuals, governments, organisations) need to be judged by the simple statement “Is it the truth?”. Other considerations such as “damage the image, destroy the community” all fall before “The Truth”.

    A country blessed by a fertile land, an “educated” population has never screwed it up so mightily.

    The Checks and Balances which were maintained until 1977 got so dismantled by JR the Master Manipulator – if he had only been the Master Ruler.

    The current one thinks that the people get everything through his beneficence. As mentioned by another commentator our hope is the Grim Reaper. What a state when the population invokes the Grim Reaper.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.