2 October, 2020

Blog

What Is A Bar Association For?

By Basil Fernando

Basil Fernando

Last week, two troubling events took place for the Sri Lankan legal profession: First, the Minister of Justice threatened a lawyer who made a comment in a television discussion regarding some attacks on churches. The Minister said he will take steps to remove the lawyer from practice. Subsequently, the lawyer was mentioned by name by one of the members of the Asgiriya Karaka Sabahawa in a televised interview. These incidents raise questions about the role of the Bar Association.

Professional associations are there primarily to protect the interests of its members. Such interests include the defence of professional integrity and the protection of the capacity to practice one’s profession without fear or favour.

Professional associations are not meant to be driven by ideological considerations or by political affiliations. A professional association must decide its actions on the basis of well-entrenched principles. Each profession has its own requirements so that members of each profession can do their work only on the basis of those professional norms and standards.

Therefore, on this particular occasion, the only consideration should be the defence of a particular lawyer who has been unjustly attacked. Like in other professions, members of the legal profession also, in their own personal and private capacities, may belong to whatever political groups they wish to belong to. They can also have their own personal idiosyncrasies.

An essential aspect of professional conduct is to be able to separate those matters that are of a personal nature and those matters that are relevant to the practice of the profession.

Therefore, in this particular instance, it should be considered a matter of honour that every elected member of the Bar Association will act in unison to defend what is fundamental to their profession.

In the past, we have seen lawyers being murdered for no other reason except the practice of their profession on behalf of their clients. After these things happen, the Bar Association usually makes statements of condolences and subsequently keeps on referring to those victims of violence.

However, what is needed is to act before foreseeable wrongs are done, thereby preventing the consequences of such actions.

A member of the Bar Association should be able to have an expectation that the professional association that he belongs to will stand by him when he faces dangers and threats, and that he will not be betrayed by the Association and its leaders.

Incidents like this particular case are tests of strength or weakness, and the nature of the professional association itself. If the association fails on such occasions, it damages itself, although a few people may win some personal favours as a result of their betrayals. It is to be hoped that the honour of the Association will be upheld and that there will be no room for treachery. 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 3
    1

    They say “Those who think alike, act alike”. History is full of these – the Nazis are obvious examples. The Lankan Minister of Justice saying what he said came from his (or is it its?) heart in an unguarded moment. Compare this with the former Lankan Defense Secretary. Remember him suing a newspaper for defamation? The paper retained a team of lawyers. The Defense Ministry website called the lawyers “traitors in black robes”. International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute was alarmed and expressed concerns with the then GoSL.
    So here we are “Shallow minds never disagree”

  • 3
    6

    Dollar-eating-NGO-crooked-lawyer was lying on the TV. If Bar association defends crook lawyer, then, they will lose their credibility among the public. Bar association must wash their hands of these type of crooked lawyers.

  • 2
    1

    A valid argument. If BASL wishes to stand for justice, then they should stand against such calculated uncalled sentiments from WR. He is appearing to be suffering from superiority complex thinking of no end to himself. If WR expects all the lawyers to regard him as a thero just because he got a bogus doctorate in Buddhism, he is sadly mistaken. BASL must stand firmly on its foot to defend what is just, whether the opposition is spiritual or not.

  • 0
    0

    This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn’t abide by our Comment policy.For more detail see our Comment policy https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/comments-policy-2/

  • 0
    0

    This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn’t abide by our Comment policy.For more detail see our Comment policy https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/comments-policy-2/

  • 0
    0

    Well.. Well.. Well…. Let this Bas(terd)il to prove that he is clean before talking against injustice in Sri Lanka. This is a bloody criminal who even false deeds against poor people.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.