By Colombo Telegraph –
“Samaraweera had no faith in the Rajapaksas to address meaningfully the questions of national reconciliation and accountability, despite their great importance for the health and future of Sri Lanka. Mahinda Rajapaksa was ‘not so bad,’ but his family ( that is, brothers Gorabhaya and Basil) had made him a prisoner of the worst racist and chauvinist elements in society.” the US Embassy Colombo Informed Washington.
The Colombo Telegraph found the leaked cable from the WikiLeak database. The cable classified as “CONFIDENTIAL” recounts details of a meeting Ambassador Patricia A. Butenis has had with General Sarath Fonseka’s chief campaign strategist Mangala Samaraweera on January 6, 2010.
Ambassador Butenis wrote “ Samaraweera said that in the event of a Fonseka victory, the general would not be content to assume a figure-head role after the abolition of the executive presidency in line with opposition campaign promises. He had made it clear that he wanted to remain chairman of the security council and wanted to oversee the re-organization of the armed forces. Samaraweera said he was not concerned, however, about the general reneging on his promises about abolition of the executive presidency and establishing a military dictatorship once in office.”
“He also expressed concern about Fonseka’s personal safety, noting that he knew Mahinda Rajapaksa intimately and would not put it past him to facilitate an assassination attempt on Fonseka if the campaign increasingly went in the general’s favour. Given Rajapaksa’s penchant for high drama and theatrics, he also thought the president was not above shooting himself then publishing photos of his wounds and blood to gain sympathy as a victim of alleged opposition violence. If these or other such scenarios led the opposition to believe the election as stolen, Samaraweera said they would strongly object and the JVP would likely take to the streets. But he did not believe this reaction push Sri Lanka to its own Orange Revolution, as Ukraine. Sri Lankans were ‘too laid-back,’ and the Buddhist belief in karma would make them accept even a stolen election as what was ‘meant to be.’” the ambassador further wrote.
Below we give a part of the confidential cable;
VZCZCXRO3099 OO RUEHAG RUEHROV RUEHSL RUEHSR DE RUEHLM #0008/01 0061154 ZNY CCCCC ZZH O 061154Z JAN 10 ZDK FM AMEMBASSY COLOMBO TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1075 INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY RUEHKA/AMEMBASSY DHAKA PRIORITY 2233 RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD PRIORITY 9255 RUEHKT/AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU PRIORITY 7510 RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 5350 RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI PRIORITY 3666 RUEHNY/AMEMBASSY OSLO PRIORITY 5275 RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 0136 RUEHSM/AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM PRIORITY 0808 RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 4397 RUEHCG/AMCONSUL CHENNAI PRIORITY 9817 RUEHBI/AMCONSUL MUMBAI PRIORITY 7106 RUEHON/AMCONSUL TORONTO PRIORITY 0131 RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY 3973 RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITY RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY RHEHAAA/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 COLOMBO 000008 SIPDIS DEPARTMENT FOR SCA/INSB E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/06/2020 TAGS: PGOV PREL PREF PHUM PTER EAID MOPS CE SUBJECT: CAMPAIGN STRATEGIST SAYS FONSEKA WANTS TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION COLOMBO 00000008 001.8 OF 003 Classified By: AMBASSADOR PATRICIA A. BUTENIS. REASONS: 1.4 (B, D) ¶1. (C) SUMMARY: In a meeting with Ambassador, chief opposition campaign strategist and one-time Rajapaksa confidante Mangala Samaraweera said he was "pleasantly surprised" that General Fonseka believed accountability was important for Sri Lanka, that he agreed with Samaraweera that the country needed a truth and reconciliation process, and that he had ordered the campaign to start working out the logistics of a truth and reconciliation commission. Samaraweera was "increasingly optimistic" about the Fonseka campaign, noting opposition polls showing the general's numbers increasing from 43 percent just after nomination in mid-December to 52 percent now. But Samaraweera was worried about rising violence of pro-government thugs and suggested the president was not above ordering Fonseka's assassination or even wounding himself to gain public sympathy. If Fonseka won, the general had made clear he wanted to remain chairman of the security council and wanted to oversee the re-organization of the armed forces. Samaraweera was not concerned about the general reneging on his promises about abolition of the executive presidency and establishing a military dictatorship. Indeed, Samaraweera argued it was the Fonseka campaign that had brought questions of democracy and minority rights to the center of the presidential race, supplanting the war triumphalism and budding "national socialism" of the Rajapaksas. END SUMMARY. RAJAPAKSA'S BRAIN ABANDONS HIM ------------------------------ ¶2. (C) If General Fonseka was the heart of the Sri Lankan war effort that "betrayed" the president, Mangala Samaraweera was the Rajapaksa campaign brain that also deserted him. Having a long history with the president's SLFP, Samaraweera was a close confidante of President Chandrika Kumaratunga, the architect of Rajapaksa's successful 2005 presidential campaign, and the GSL foreign minister during the first year and a half of the Rajapaksa government. He lost his position as FM to Bogollagama when the latter crossed over from the UNP, and Samaraweera soon broke with the Rajapaksas to form his own party, the SLFP (Mahajana Wing). Samaraweera is now the strategic architect of the campaign of joint opposition candidate Fonseka. CAMPAIGN VIOLENCE, FONSEKA SECURITY BIGGEST WORRIES --------------------------------------------- ------ ¶3. (C) Samaraweera said he was "increasingly optimistic" about the Fonseka campaign, noting opposition polls showing the general's numbers increasing from 43 percent just after nomination in mid-December to 52 percent now. He claimed that polls by GSL domestic intelligence were similarly showing a 51-Fonseka/49 Rajapaksa breakdown. This was most surprising in the north and east, where the opposition had not expected to do so well. At the same time, however, Samaraweera said he was worried about campaign violence and intimidation -- that is, attacks by pro-government thugs on opposition rallies and offices -- which were quickly escalating, including in his home district of Mahara in the south. He expected the situation to get worse as election day approached, though he thought the violence was back-firing on the Rajapaksas by turning people against them. ¶4. (C) He also expressed concern about Fonseka's personal safety, noting that he knew Mahinda Rajapaksa intimately and would not put it past him to facilitate an assassination attempt on Fonseka if the campaign increasingly went in the general's favor. Given Rajapaksa's penchant for high drama COLOMBO 00000008 002.4 OF 003 and theatrics, he also thought the president was not above shooting himself then publishing photos of his wounds and blood to gain sympathy as a victim of alleged opposition violence. If these or other such scenarios led the opposition to believe the election was stolen, Samaraweera said they would object strongly and the JVP would likely take to the streets. But he did not believe this reaction would push Sri Lanka to its own Orange Revolution, as in Ukraine. Sri Lankans were "too laid-back," and the Buddhist belief in karma would make them accept even a stolen election as what was "meant to be." IF FONSEKA WON -------------- ¶5. (C) Samaraweera said that in the event of a Fonseka victory, the general would not be content to assume a figure-head role after the abolition of the executive presidency in line with opposition campaign promises. He had made clear that he wanted to remain chairman of the security council and wanted to oversee the re-organization of the armed forces. Samaraweera said he was not concerned, however, about the general reneging on his promises about abolition of the executive presidency and establishing a military dictatorship once in office. The UNP and JVP already had been working hard against the Rajapaksa dictatorship, and the whole thrust of the Fonseka campaign was against the "national socialism" that raised its ugly head at the end of the war. Samaraweera claimed that Fonseka was chosen by the opposition as one of the original war icons purposefully to arrest this development and, indeed, the campaign had brought questions of democracy and minority rights to the center of the presidential race, supplanting the war triumphalism the Rajapaksas preferred. RECONCILIATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY --------------------------------- ¶6. (C) Samaraweera had no faith in the Rajapaksas to address meaningfully the questions of national reconciliation and accountability, despite their great importance for the health and future of Sri Lanka. Mahinda Rajapaksa was "not so bad," but his family (that is, brothers Gotabhaya and Basil) had made him a prisoner of the worst racist and chauvinist elements in society. Mahinda himself also was firmly opposed to any devolution of power and had argued in closed government meetings that he wanted Sri Lanka to be a "unitary" not just a "united" country. ¶7. (C) Fonseka, on the other hand, had made reconciliation and accountability centerpieces of his campaign. Samaraweera noted the 10-point plan the general had just signed with the TNA leader Sampanthan on political rights and economic re-development of the war-affected areas. He also said Fonseka had been "surprising me with his liberalism" and noted that the general himself had come up with the idea of ensuring freedom of religious belief under a new regime. On the very sensitive issue of accountability, Samaraweera again said he was "pleasantly surprised" that Fonseka believed accountability was important for Sri Lanka, agreed with Samaraweera that the country needed a truth and reconciliation process, like the South Africans, and had ordered the campaign to start working out the logistics of a truth and reconciliation commission. Samaraweera thought that if Fonseka won, the Rajapaksas would be marginalized in the SLFP and the SLFP mainstream would want to work with the new government on reconciliation and accountability.
suren / December 2, 2011
” Sri Lankans were ‘too laid-back,’ and the Buddhist belief in karma would make them accept even a stolen election as what was ‘meant to be.’”
Mangala belongs to the generation of Protestant Buddhists. He wishes that Buddhism helped the Sinhalas like Calvinism helped the West. This is a misunderstanding of both Sinhala Buddhism as well as protestantism.
/
Sam / December 2, 2011
Mongala ia an uneducated, unclutured person…he is responsible for SFs fate.
/
mohamed wadood / December 2, 2011
Mangala another oppourtunist like the rest of the greedy politicians. Artichect of unprincipled opposition alliance to defeat President Rajapaksha cos he lost the trust of Our great patriotic president Rajapaksha. Mangala a traitor who betrayed srilanka to join hands with Pro tamil terrorist diaspora along with ranil ,JJ and wickremabahu on srilanka bashing on foreign media network. before the demise of brutal terrorists tamil tigers from the soil of srilanka.
SF election campaigns got financial backing from tiran alles / Pro LTTE diaspora to avenge the defeat of tamil tiger ealam terrorists to creat chaos and internal rifts among srilankans and mangala knows President Rajapaksha” the great president” better than alchoholic Chandrika or SF.
God saved srilanka from such a disaster .
/
Lankan / December 3, 2011
Very soon he will change his shirt colour.
/
Pingback: WikiLeaks: Americans didn’t believe Managala’s version of Fonseka « Colombo Telegraph / December 3, 2011
/
Pingback: WikiLeaks: Americans didn’t believe Mangala’s version of Fonseka « Colombo Telegraph / December 3, 2011
/